Diseased Open Source Software Community - it's about ethics in Code of Conducts

[i440BX]

Video games have sucked for way longer than years because people make boring shitty games. There's never been a game that could have been good but was ruined because of "the woke."

Half true. There are games from early 2010s with decent gameplay/story without wokism ruined by microtransactions/P2W.
The issue I notice is how pretty good games in the past that are still receiving updates are getting censored/altered. Like Terraria, Minecraft, Remasters (remasters are a scam anyway, even in films/music).

Will trans in a game and pronouns ruin my experience? No, but the people pushing that likely also push other boring shit, like you being forced into Kassandra in ac odyssey's endgame then being forced to have a kid with the dude even though you chose every single "no" option

This is a deal-breaker for and I believe these Tranny/pronoun insertions are not to be taken lightly. If these are accepted, it will degenerate the culture, people or me will accept the new normal, and it will continue the slippery slope of depravity. The media is now used as propaganda tools. That's why I spit on those that force me to comply with pronouns or consume Tranny Aphrodite from Hades 2.

Right wing forks never work because right wingers are lazy grifters. No direct financial gain? No work. The right wing programmers I know don't even learn new shit outside work or college.

Agree that many forks that are only made because of grifting and not legitimate reasons as no CoC, accepting developers banned from the main repository like Vaxry/Lunduke/etc, or putting features not accepted by tyrants in GNOME/Godot. I wish Redot would be less talk and more work.

. I doubt if you openly assign yourself as a right winger like it's your personality or some shit you actually have any passion for programming or whatever you're trying to program

I think you are wrong here. In the ideal world people that are both right/left wing as their personality, taken to the extreme, would be crticized. The issue is that society rewards leftists devs while they punish conservatives. I am lean-right and I dont want to insert politics in my repos because is cringe. A sane leftist would do the same.

 

[01929524f4b9dd11d6c2]

The primary evidence is in the attached screenshots. Looking at the historical A records for the stallman report, we can see that it was temporarily hosted on the exact same IP address as the one currently hosting Drew DeVault's website/blog.

The secondary evidence is that looking at the HTML for both websites reveals that they're both using the Hugo framework. It would make sense that someone would choose a familiar technology, rather than learning a completely new one just to publish this one report.

Drew himself was caught on the orange website pretending to have "read most of the report", implying he wasn't the author. However, given that the same IP and same framework was used for both the report and Drew DeVault's personal website I doubt this is simply a coincidence, specially considering the past hatred Drew has displayed against Stallman.

There's no "anonymous authors" for this report, it's just Drew targeting an autistic 71 year old cancer survivor and trying to hide behind anonymity to avoid backlash.



I thought I posted all screenshots, but just one is showing up so I'll post the other ones again.
Here's the historical A records for the stallman report.



And here's Drew himself, pretending he's not the author of the report.

 

[teriyakiburns]

If you actually read this "report", it becomes very obvious why it exists, and it's not because of anything Stallman actually did or said. That's just the excuse.

 

[306h4Ge5eJUJ]

The primary evidence is in the attached screenshots. Looking at the historical A records for the stallman report, we can see that it was temporarily hosted on the exact same IP address as the one currently hosting Drew DeVault's website/blog.

The secondary evidence is that looking at the HTML for both websites reveals that they're both using the Hugo framework. It would make sense that someone would choose a familiar technology, rather than learning a completely new one just to publish this one report.

Playing devil's advocate for a bit: 46.23.81.157 is a Sourcehut IP, and Sourcehut offers static webhosting with Hugo, so it could just be somebody from Drew's circle of friends. The way the host switches to Cloudflare just before the big publication is super suspect though.

E: I thought this was mentioned here, but it was in Drew's own thread: He showed up to the HN thread not even half an hour after it was made.

 

[vonnegrunt]

Drew removed the website for stallman-report.org from his server, causing it to 404. But he forgot to remove the TLS certificate:

 

[Don Yagon]

: 46.23.81.157 is a Sourcehut IP, and Sourcehut offers static webhosting with Hugo, so it could just be somebody from Drew's circle of friends

The report domain also uses the same registrar (1api.net) as the majority of Drew's domains listed in OP.

 

[The Mass Shooter Ron Soye]

Open-sourcing of WinAmp goes badly as owners delete entire repo (archive)

The owners of WinAmp have just deleted their entire repo one month after uploading the source code to GitHub. Lots of source code, and quite possibly, not all of it theirs.

The deletion happened soon after The Register enquired about the seeming inclusion of Shoutcast DNAS code and some Microsoft and Intel codecs.

Intel & AMD Form An x86 Ecosystem Advisory Group (archive)
Includes Linus Torvalds.

 

[i440BX]

Open-sourcing of WinAmp goes badly as owners delete entire repo (archive)


Intel & AMD Form An x86 Ecosystem Advisory Group (archive)
Includes Linus Torvalds.

I need to get the Winamp repo

 

[dioxide]

Not all the WHOIS information for "stallman-report.org" was redacted.

stallman-report.org
>Registrant State/Province: West Yorkshire
>Registrant Country: GB

sourcehut.org
>Registrant State/Province: West Yorkshire
>Registrant Country: GB

drewdevault.com
>Registrant State/Province: West Yorkshire
>Registrant Country: GB

cmpwn.com
>Registrant State/Province: West Yorkshire
>Registrant Country: GB

 

[seri0us]

Fuck, I hate that stupid fucking phrase ate their lunch. It just pisses me off.

Me too but Stallman is really fat which makes it relevant

 

[Coolio55]

I need to get the Winamp repo

They made sure to include all the private code like Shoutcast internals and Dolby libraries and stuff. It was great.

 

[analrapist]

I need to get the Winamp repo

https://github.com/alexfreud/winamp - while it lasts

 

[ChromaticAberration]

The report domain also uses the same registrar (1api.net) as the majority of Drew's domain listed in OP.

Sourcehut is also Drew's project, it wouldn't be weird that he uses the same providers.

 

[CrunkLord420]

The primary evidence is in the attached screenshots. Looking at the historical A records for the stallman report, we can see that it was temporarily hosted on the exact same IP address as the one currently hosting Drew DeVault's website/blog.

The secondary evidence is that looking at the HTML for both websites reveals that they're both using the Hugo framework. It would make sense that someone would choose a familiar technology, rather than learning a completely new one just to publish this one report.

Drew himself was caught on the orange website pretending to have "read most of the report", implying he wasn't the author. However, given that the same IP and same framework was used for both the report and Drew DeVault's personal website I doubt this is simply a coincidence, specially considering the past hatred Drew has displayed against Stallman.

There's no "anonymous authors" for this report, it's just Drew targeting an autistic 71 year old cancer survivor and trying to hide behind anonymity to avoid backlash.

View attachment 6529214

I thought I posted all screenshots, but just one is showing up so I'll post the other ones again.
Here's the historical A records for the stallman report.

View attachment 6529234

And here's Drew himself, pretending he's not the author of the report.

View attachment 6529235

The "paradox of tolerance" people literally cannot stop their weaselly, bad faith witch hunts for perceived failures of purity (always tranny related). They need to be removed under the paradox of tolerance.

 

[Kola]

Open source grifter Bryan Lunduke is already on the case and reposting whatever he read on 4chan and Kiwi Farms:

 

[GNU Abyss]

I honestly think the dude is only autistic, and a remnant of the big brain debate bro euphoric atheist types that fancied themselves as free thinkers for being able to have objective discussions even about high emotion topics - „what if the dog consents“ type of thought experiments.
Whoever made that call out website (I believe it was only one person) is mentally unwell, but unfortunately not of the autistically productive kind that Stallman is.

He's a contemporary of the "we are the ultimate Rationalists(TM)" wave of academia that gave us Scientism and became a primary vector of infecting all facets of life with tranny and other alphabet people shit. Completely unsurprising that he has retarded and incredibly creepy opinions on subjects outside of software licenses and the FSF.

 

[Old English Roast Beef]

Don't forget that all of this stems from the fact he doesn't like pronouns. That's it.

Quoi? Doesn't Stallman prefer gender-neutral neopronouns?

 

[seri0us]

Open source grifter Bryan Lunduke is already on the case and reposting whatever he read on 4chan and Kiwi Farms:

How is Lunduke a grifter?

 

[Maldavius Figtree]

Don't forget that all of this stems from the fact he doesn't like pronouns.

That makes sense. I was thinking this whole time „defending molestation of both kids AND animals? The trannies must love him!“.
Honestly, I think this whole smear campaign was started by one vindictive guy that got BTFO‘d in some mailing list, had his pull request denied, or something like that.

FWIW I chuckle at Stallman‘s spergy zoophilia arguments whenever they get brought up, because they mirror the early arguments for homosexuality perfectly. They seemed so big brain logical on the surface, if you have no idea how these people work. (Ironically most animal fuckers are homosexual males anyway.)
Spoiler because only tangentially related + maybe disturbing if you didn’t know the full depravity of humans yet.

Spoiler: spergy rant about psychology of sex offenders

Obligatory: I don’t support zoophilia, just in case you’re one of those 80IQ mongrels that doesn’t understand that you can talk about something without supporting it.

Spoiler: spergy rant about psychology of sex offenders

Normal people find the thought of zoophilia naturally revolting, and all arguments like „animal welfare“ are post hoc rationalizations of this hard wired disgust, since we’re taught to be intellectual rational moralists and are afraid to base laws on „feelings“.
-> homosexuality is also triggering hard wired disgust reflexes in healthy males irrespective of political and social convictions - brain mappings show that seeing two men kiss activates the exact same parts of the brain as seeing a bucket of rotten meat with writhing maggots. Yes they did a study about that.

Zoophilia is a paraphilia that - in pure theory - could be lived out without harming another being (see Stallmans peanut butter dog argument). In practice, zoophiles tend to overwhelmingly have a whole bunch of other paraphilias, many of them dangerous to themselves or others.
-> compare to homosexuals and their „hankey codes“, so they can easily know if the stranger they will copulate with is into shit, piss, blood, rape, fisting, farting, smegma or whatever else there is. That’s just the basic variants, there’s more!

If you catch a guy with animal porn, likelihood is like a hundred times bigger that the guy will also have child porn on his HDD.
-> homosexual men make up 1% of the population but are 50% of all known child rapists (male victims of all ages being less likely to report)

Being sexually fixated on animals in adolescence is a good indicator this person will grow up to be disturbed and/or dangerous, with it being an indicator for dangerous sexual sadism, up to a precursor for having urges or committing necrophilia involving killing a human victim.
-> we know that „LGBTQ teens“ have a very high likelihood of having all kind of psychological comorbidities and personality disorders; see also „early life“ section of many sadistic serial killers re crossdressing etc

There is this romanticized idea in parts of the population that these people are just weirdly „wired to love in a different way“ and hurting nobody, and while there probably are some girls out there that might love their dog more than they should… that’s not the main driving factor behind zoophilia.
For most of those perpetrators, it really is about raping and abusing, with the animal taking the place of a human victim they don’t (yet) have access to, or are too afraid to seek out. Perps will often also collect videos of butcheries, and deliberately inflict pain on animals in addition to the sexual abuse. It has nothing to do with a form of maladjusted love for most of these people.
-> This whole idea of „normal people like you and me who just love differently“ was bullshit for the homosexuals as well. Not uncommon for them to have three to four digit body counts, most sex is with strangers, they almost never use protection, the abuse rate is incredibly high, and nearly no homosexual „relationship“ is monogamous.

Zoonosis… weak argument, gets brought up often, I don’t think there is a known zoonosis spawned by human-animal sexual contact. Most of them are caused by human consumption.
-> it’s funny though that homos just can’t stop spreading all kind of hard-to-transmit plagues like HIV, which actually is really not that easy to get infected with, or monkeypox (remember when all those dogs and kids living with homo couples got mpox?)

Biblical arguments… can’t create offspring, but honestly who cares. Still gets the joggin noggin though that the word „sodomy“ used to describe both gay sex and raping animals - not only in the Bible but up until recently also in much of western legislature. Telling that it hadn’t even been necessary to differentiate.

„Consenting beings in the privacy of their bedroom“ - see everything above, while the argument Stallman made for his hypothetical scenario that 1) animals could consent on some level and 2) we do a billion times worse stuff to animals every day - it simply does not apply to reality.
We are not talking about loving consensual relationships here. These are dangerous broken people sinking into deeper levels of depravity, and zoophilic actions are a warning sign for future worse offenses.
-> obviously all those lgbtq and homo types are not normal people and I’m tired of pretending otherwise (but will have to, for now)

Thanks for coming to my TED talk!
PS: I hate faggots.

He's a contemporary of the "we are the ultimate Rationalists(TM)" wave of academia that gave us Scientism and became a primary vector of infecting all facets of life with tranny and other alphabet people shit. Completely unsurprising that he has retarded and incredibly creepy opinions on subjects outside of software licenses and the FSF.

It keeps being the most funny thing that the rigorous rationalist „can you empirically prove it?“ types morphed into „actually women don’t exist“ cultists.

 

[SCV]

If you actually read this "report", it becomes very obvious why it exists, and it's not because of anything Stallman actually did or said. That's just the excuse.

View attachment 6529307

There it is.

Intel & AMD Form An x86 Ecosystem Advisory Group (archive)
Includes Linus Torvalds.

What is the point of this when there are only two companies with x86 licenses (and VIA, I guess). They say "Broadcom, Dell, Google, HPE, HP Inc, Lenovo, Microsoft, Oracle, and Red Hat. Tim Sweeney and Linus Torvalds are also involved." but what are they going to do?