Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[uhoh spaghettios]

More...


Quite the expression in the final pic. Link and link for the posts.
Edit to Add: Her comments:

So this is why Nick hasn't been streaming, he's got a 6th kid to schlep around town and take pictures of.

 

[AnOminous]

Is there a specific word for a woman like her? I mean in regards to the family thing.

Well, the general term is whore. But a more specific one would be homewrecker.

 

[Accidental Protege]

The way she talks is bizarre. She sounds like a qult member.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

Today I learned that the "Nicolaitans" in Revelations were specifically condemned by God.

Yet this is to your credit [the church of Ephesus]: you hate the works of the Nicolaitans, which I [Jesus] also hate.

— Revelation 2:6 NRSV

But I have a few things against you [the church of Pergamos]: you have some there who hold to the teaching of Balaam, who taught Balak to put a stumbling block before the people of Israel, so that they would eat food sacrificed to idols and practice fornication. So you also have some who hold to the teaching of the Nicolaitans. Repent then. If not, I will come to you soon and make war against them with the sword of my mouth.

— Revelation 2:14–16 NRSV

The teachings of "Balaam" are a reference to immoral sexual acts within a religious context (pagan orgies) and Nicolas, the presumed founder of the Nicolaitans, was potentially an advocate of polygamy and was specifically accused of allowing other men to marry his wife.

This, combined with the fact that Nick's cursed Popehat is some kind of sexual roleplay prop has blown my mind.



Apologies if someone has already documented this serendipity, I missed it if so.

 

[Mike Stoklasas Spock Ears]

She really is like a tourist of other people's families. She tossed the last three kids aside like they were nothing, she'll do the same with these five when she finds someone new to move on to.

She did the same thing when she posted about someone else’s dead baby on Instagram for pity points after she got re-charged (discussed in the Steel Toe thread a while back). It’s a disturbing pattern of behavior.

 

[Mandatory User Name]

At the very least it should be the border for future BalldoHam segments.
View attachment 6529516
What no sunscreen, too much coke, and not enough @Fapcop lovin' does to a gal.

Sad.

First thing to comes to mind here is "Lot Lizard", she looks like the type of woman who hangs around at Truck Stops.

 

[Law]

Is there a specific word for a woman like her? I mean in regards to the family thing.

Loose Husband Snatcher

It’s a disturbing pattern of behavior.

Good thing Nick the lawyer and insightful political commentator can't recognize patterns of behavior.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Guys, can we just be totally honest here... and this is coming from a guy who posts here regularly... the Farms isn't exactly the type of place you want to "involve" yourself in if you are a person tangentially involved with a "subject" of the Farms.

People (correctly) complain that many streamers ripping off material from threads without credit and trying to hide the fact that they visit the site, why shouldn't Sean be on the forum?

Should he be lurking to get information to use on his streams without saying where it came from instead?

The way she talks is bizarre. She sounds like a qult member.

The captions are starting to sound like the same kind of vapid faux-intellectual slop as Rekieta's writings. I assume it's due to his influence rather than writing them himself, but still. If you go back the old ones don't read like this.

 

[datura_binge]

People (correctly) complain that many streamers ripping off material from threads without credit and trying to hide the fact that they visit the site, why shouldn't Sean be on the forum?

Should he be lurking to get information to use on his streams without saying where it came from instead?


The captions are starting to sound like the same kind of vapid faux-intellectual slop as Rekieta's writings. I assume it's due to his influence rather than writing them himself, but still. If you go back the old ones don't read like this.

I never said he shouldn't be here. I was just offering an explanation to the people posting before me asking "if it was really him" and/or "why he took so long to make an account" etc. if he took a long time to make an account maybe it's because he actually put some thought into it. To be clear I never said he shouldn't be here or even that he shouldn't steal content from her for his shows, I really don't care either way. Maybe my post came across wrong or I was misunderstood.

Personally though I don't see why anyone would give a shit that people take content from here and use it for themselves without "giving credit" but there's also a difference in "giving credit" so people know you are reading the forum and actually identifying your account on the forum and posting etc.

But again, who really cares either way. I was just offering a possible explanation. I know if I was a professional I would probably think twice before identifying myself on here because why not be more safe than sorry? Once the cats out of the bag it's not like you can ever put it back in.

 

[Major]

She did the same thing when she posted about someone else’s dead baby on Instagram for pity points after she got re-charged (discussed in the Steel Toe thread a while back). It’s a disturbing pattern of behavior.

Shes just looking for good times for the lowest price. After that something more permanent if she can afford it. If you think about it, she has no real friends and little family. It's quite depressing really.

 

[Sharpeteer]

I never said he shouldn't be here. I was just offering an explanation to the people posting before me asking "if it was really him" and/or "why he took so long to make an account" etc. if he took a long time to make an account maybe it's because he actually put some thought into it. To be clear I never said he shouldn't be here or even that he shouldn't steal content from her for his shows, I really don't care either way. Maybe my post came across wrong or I was misunderstood.

I'm writing this under the assumption that this newly created Potentially Criminal account is actually him - if that's the case, then I don't think it's a matter of him taking a long time to make an account, but rather a second one. I say this because he's mentioned quite a few times in past streams that he doesn't want to share his screen with the Farms up at that particular moment because it would give away his account. So assuming again that he was being honest during those instances, then he would now have two accounts: this new one, and an already existing one. If that's the case, then I would think this new one solely exists to participate, or have a place to directly reply to people in the place where the actual information gets out, whereas an older one exists for actual shitposting and stuff.

While I get that some people want him to get his account verified, and I get why it would be good to ensure it's not some gayop from Locals, or Xitter or wine moms or something, I don't think it would necessarily be a good idea for him because it wouldn't do anything good for him. As already said by tons of people already, there are people who look for any opportunity to get people here in trouble if they can find out who you really are because this is the "alt right nazi" site on the internet. If he were to verify his account to be actually Sean Martin, then I could see that possibly bringing trouble to his actual law work and business in real life. Whereas this way, he has plausible deniability, and there's no actual verification to anyone reading that it's truly the guy, and if anyone doesn't believe it's him, he can simply say "I understand, and that's your opinion" and carry on.

I see both arguments, but I lean towards it probably being the smarter idea to keep it unverified, and leave it up to you whether to believe it's him or not.

 

[not william stenchever]

The teachings of "Balaam" are a reference to immoral sexual acts within a religious context (pagan orgies) and Nicolas, the presumed founder of the Nicolaitans, was potentially an advocate of polygamy and was specifically accused of allowing other men to marry his wife.

Oh god time really is a flat circle.

Yet this is to your credit [the church of Ephesus]: you hate the works of the Nicolaitans, which I [Jesus] also hate.

For denying the divinity of Jesus, Nick is in turn DENIED by the son of God.

 

[LovisXVI]

As already said by tons of people already, there are people who look for any opportunity to get people here in trouble if they can find out who you really are because this is the "alt right nazi" site on the internet. If he were to verify his account to be actually Sean Martin, then I could see that possibly bringing trouble to his actual law work and business in real life. Whereas this way, he has plausible deniability, and there's no actual verification to anyone reading that it's truly the guy, and if anyone doesn't believe it's him, he can simply say "I understand, and that's your opinion" and carry on.

I don't think that the people who would tar him would actually care if it were actually him or not, especially since he has been open about associating with the Farms. Hell he's said some really edgy things on stream with his face and everything. As long as the public account is just for "correcting the record" I'm sure it wouldn't be worse than it actually is.

 

[3MMA]

As for credit, it’s important to cite your source. In the case of the forum, I appreciate when people who use the research found here take a moment to give a general (& genuine) shout out to Kiwi Farms. If it starts focusing on specific users as a rule, rather than the exception, that treads into clout whore BS. Being anon is major part of this site. Most everything (in any thread) piggybacks off of other posts, so it’s more of a collective repository than an individual one, & that’s a good thing. There are other sites to publish under a specific name, there is much strength in anon posting. Not getting dragged down in minutiae about ethics in blah blah blah or specific usernames or whatever, citing where information was found by a simple shout out to Kiwi Farms is always welcome in my book.

 

[Burt Macklin]

Also didn't realize her jaw was that masculine.

I’ve thought this for a while, and bet I’m not the only one: Nick’s into dudes. He says he loves super skinny girls, borderline anorexic looking. April—if you saw her in that bikini stream—she’s built like a 12-year-old boy, no tits, no curves. Now, with that jawline, my hypothesis could be proven as fact.

if it's the Delta Equine Center; Assisted Therapy (5 miles NE of Willmar) and they're there FOR one of his kids' horse therapy, I might blow a gasket.

Yeah, I’m late on this, but what’s the deal? Is one of their kids Forrest Gump in braces learning to walk, or is Nick dragging his coke-haired little girl to as many pony riding lessons as he can before she takes the stand, hoping she’ll vouch for him being a good dad?

Well, the general term is whore. But a more specific one would be homewrecker.

Yo! Do you even locals? Nick’s back to Bible thumping. It’s concubine, harlot, adulteress, woman of ill repute, or my personal favorite, jezebel.

 

[Poop Shoot]

As fun as these names are, there is an actual term for it - “Mate Poaching”. Instead of finding a partner and building something with them, you find a person who already has a life built with someone else, then aim to replace their partner with yourself. It’s a strategy to find a mate who has already proven themselves capable of providing for a family. It’s just, you know, fucking shitty.

 

[Captain Manning]

So assuming again that he was being honest during those instances, then he would now have two accounts: this new one, and an already existing one. If that's the case, then I would think this new one solely exists to participate, or have a place to directly reply to people in the place where the actual information gets out, whereas an older one exists for actual shitposting and stuff.

Here's a thought...

Maybe it's because the other Sean account, if it exists, posts some really spicy (read: funny as shit) stuff about Nick here and, as we've clearly seen, Nick is prone to retaliate against people who do that and that he knows personally and/or has had prior friendly dealings with.

Bear in mind, Rekieta's immediate response to Sean merely discussing denied denied denied, as a lawyer, on his law show, in a purely legal context, was to send Sean screencaps of conversations concerning Montegraph, as some sort of gay intimidation/blackmail tactic.

It was a sad futile attempt by a brain damaged, coked-up, temper-tantrum throwing manbaby, to get Sean to not discuss Nick's latest irrefutable and devastating legal defeat. Sean is a not like the cowed Balldoids like TUG, Megan Fox, Joe, and others, who have obediently refrained from discussing what's actually going on now out of either fear, a misplaced sense of loyalty, or both, and that is a big problem for Nick's fragile ego.

And that was done to "nice Sean." The same Sean that still claims he wants Nick to get better.

Nick is barely better than Ethan Ralph at this point. Same energy. Same scummy tactics.

EDIT: Typo.

 

[Oxyjen]

Maybe @MNPublicRecords was Sean too and he got bored.

 

[LovisXVI]

Worst of all, he could be any one of us... He could be in this very thread! He could be @Oxyjen ! He could be me! He could even be @Balldo's Gate!

 

[datura_binge]

Maybe it's because the other Sean account, if it exists, posts some really spicy (read: funny as shit) stuff about Nick here and, as we've clearly seen, Nick is prone to retaliate against people who do that and that he knows personally and/or has had prior friendly dealings with.

I may be off base, but I don't think Sean actually knew Nick well enough to get anything spicy. I thought they had only met 1 or 2 times IRL if ever and honestly I don't even recall them collaborating online that much. But again, I could be wrong because I quit watching Nick like 2 years ago when he became a fiend.