US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: ThisIsGonnaBeGood, The Shredder, ActualCracker and 120 others
Click to expand...
GamerGateSurvivor said:
If you want entertaining, go with Trump. If you want a chaotic shit show, Kamala.
Click to expand...
My biggest problem is whether or not I prefer total human suffering is based on how good I feel about myself any given day. I think Kamala would be better if everything stays on track and I vastly improve my daily feelings. Like, I think about how awesome it would be if I felt good while everyone else around me suffered immeasurably. That might be the best world.
 
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
  • DRINK!
Reactions: UnKillFill, CEO of Gay, boxtail and 7 others
You received a like! said:
It’s surprising to me how, with everything going on, they’re paying any attention to Jill Stein. Did their new Labour hires tell them to do that, not realizing their system works differently from ours?
Click to expand...
Far from knowledgeable on this subject, but in 2016, didn't a Clinton requested recount cause Stein to gain votes(to Clinton's detriment). They seem afraid of any 'nearly Democrat' candidate being on the ballot(see what they did to RFK).
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid and invisibult plus+
Ethereal Eye said:
Harrissisters...we are less capable than an old man with dementia...
Click to expand...
CaddestSlown said:
I can for sure say, without a shadow of a doubt, it has never been more Uh-oh Harrisisters than it is right now at this very moment. It is unbelievably Uh-oh Harrisisters right now. That is, if gossip is to be believed, and I'm inclined to believe it.
Click to expand...
I no longer think the drinking shit is just gossip, and I can rectify what I've said in the dead of night.

With this interview, the momentum from orange man, and the fact the guy she replaced is (probably) outright saying she's more retarded than he is... She is 100% drinking herself into barbaric rages. It has now reached CRITICAL LEVELS of Uh-oh Harrisisters, more than it was before.

I don't even want to joke about it too much, it's just kind of fucking depressing and scary.

But I will joke about it a little bit.

I really hope she nails one of her zoomer staffers in the head with a bottle of bourbon! Honk honk!
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird, YarrBlueballs, CEO of Gay and 11 others
Gehenna said:
in 2020 you had an elderly statesman in the form of Biden and Covid which notoriously killed the elderly. Plus widespread protests against the Trump who was actively in office. There was, in short, enough cover that Biden not going out and about was largely ignored.
Click to expand...
Also consider the Summer of St. Floyd of Fentanyl in 2020.
Local Farmer said:
I think he’s a victim of elder abuse and should be spending his time with his grandkids
Click to expand...
I don't know man, what if he "sniffs" them?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Local Farmer
Tucker's pet pollster says things are not as rosy for Trump as people seem to think. He's not saying Harris is going to have a landslide but that she still stands a very good chance to win 4 of the 7 swing states and thus the Presidency.

It's his opinion that the sheer amount of money the Harris campaign has access to may have a major deciding factor. Harris apparently blew 300 million on TV ads for PA alone and is out spending Trump 10 to 1. This means more local offices, more door knockers and more get out and vote operations. The strange thing is that most of Harris's money comes from small donors and not the big rich democrats according to him.

She's raised almost 500 million from grass roots donors which may suggest a lot more support for her then polls predict. 500 million from average Joe and Jane's is a lot of support that may be unaccounted for by pretty much all the poll models.

Tucker looked slightly perturbed by this, I think he figured this was in the bag for Trump

 
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Getting Tard Comed Jr, Nod Flenders, argostug and 23 others
Pendulous Dong said:
View attachment 6532764
Do you think gamblers:
A. Are more likely to go with the crowd
B. Are more likely to go with high-odds bets
C. Have secret insight into the state of the race

Everyone I talk to says C, and I always feel like a crazy person because I don't think of gambling addicts as people guided by reason. :lossmanjack: What do you guys think?
Click to expand...
I think they're just running off of vibes with excess money for fun, and I dislike how often it gets referenced here as if it's the best analysis on the state of the race. "Who are you voting for?" is a much better metric to rely on than "Who do you think is going to win?" I also suspect that these Polymarket gamblers are mainly Trump voters, likely skewing the odds with wishful thinking.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: m1ddl3m4rch, Coo Coo Bird, spiritofamermaid and 1 other person
TheSockiestSock said:
It‘s gonna be Public Enemy as the surprise musical guest.

View attachment 6533008
Click to expand...
Rage Against the Machine isn't up to much right now, could be them.
Guaranteed it's some group of old-ass Gen Xers cosplaying as revolutionaries while shilling for the establishment.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Dirty Larry, AnitaSarsleezian, CEO of Gay and 9 others
HodgePodgeRogerDodger said:
@Null

Btw this is real:


I @ you for this mainly because it’s another reason to hate the British.
Click to expand...
"A vote for Kamala is a vote for the British Crown."
Perfect slogan
CaddestSlown said:
There's of course multiple instances of it across New York, too.
Click to expand...
On a MATI episode Null played a video of a kid getting arrested by the NYPD. That kid was one of those child gangsters robbing people on trains.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: m1ddl3m4rch, spiritofamermaid and Hey Johnny Bravo
Sweeter and Savoury said:
Tucker's pet pollster says things are not as rosy for Trump as people seem to think. He's not saying Harris is going to have a landslide but that she still stands a very good chance to win 4 of the 7 swing states and thus the Presidency.

It's his opinion that the sheer amount of money the Harris campaign has access to may have a major deciding factor. Harris apparently blew 300 million on TV ads for PA alone and is out spending Trump 10 to 1. The strange thing is that most of Harris's money comes from small donors and not the big rich democrats according to him.

She's raised almost 500 million from grass roots donors which may suggest a lot more support for her then polls predict. 500 million from average Joe and Jane's is a lot of support that may be unaccounted for by pretty much all the poll models.

Tucker looked slightly perturbed by this, I think he figured this was in the bag for Trump

Click to expand...
To be fair it has been shown that historically citizen’s identities have been stolen to filter big donations through in their name, particularly deceased people. I have to look it up but offhand I would want to see who those ‘small donors’ are and if they even know if they donated.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Grug, Post Reply, Coo Coo Bird and 14 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back