Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

Reminder that women do not think that their words have to be truthful or that their actions have to be fair.
This is the primary driver for why the definition of “truth” has been obfuscated these last few years. Now everyone has their truths, which always mean their bullshit. It doesn’t matter what is objectively factual. Some whammen’s “truth” matters more than what the facts say. This is a perspective being promoted at almost every institution, major corporation, NGO, etc. This was the foundation of #MeToo and #BelieveAllWomen. Okay, yes, she consented to having sex with this guy but turns out he was actually 5’10”, therefore she was raped. That is her truth and you can’t say shit about it.
Are you retarded?
I think it’s a great idea. First we need to de-nigger society, restore the castle doctrine, ensure every man is well armed, etc. The less “inclusive” of a society, the fewer cops we find we actually need.
 
This is the primary driver for why the definition of “truth” has been obfuscated these last few years. Now everyone has their truths, which always mean their bullshit. It doesn’t matter what is objectively factual. Some whammen’s “truth” matters more than what the facts say. This is a perspective being promoted at almost every institution, major corporation, NGO, etc. This was the foundation of #MeToo and #BelieveAllWomen. Okay, yes, she consented to having sex with this guy but turns out he was actually 5’10”, therefore she was raped. That is her truth and you can’t say shit about it.
"I think that there’s a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right."
-Congress Big Booty Mamasita
 
It's that they don't understand what fighting back even is; the concept of fighting a man, defeating him, and maintaining supremacy is as alien to them as flight is to a fish
This really put into words, and forgive me for bringing this to a spergier topic, why female domination of action media is so annoying. Because on the face of it, the argument that "it's fantasy/unrealistic, who cares?" Would make sense until you realize that women literally do not understand combat the way men do.

Arnold Schwarzenegger or Keanu Reeves gunning down 40 Venezuelans on the way to their goal is unrealistic, but there's something about it that makes it feel like heightened reality, at their core, these men and the men who made their movies understand what it is to do violence to protect what is yours or to avenge what is lost.

But you see a woman in a similar roll and there's something about your brain that rings absurdist. It's like watching a toddler pretend to fly a rocket ship, infantile imitation that -- in a best case scenario -- can be cute, but never transcends beyond the realm of absurdity.

I don't know, maybe I'm talking out of my ass. Give me autism stickers now.
 
This really put into words, and forgive me for bringing this to a spergier topic, why female domination of action media is so annoying. Because on the face of it, the argument that "it's fantasy/unrealistic, who cares?" Would make sense until you realize that women literally do not understand combat the way men do.

Arnold Schwarzenegger or Keanu Reeves gunning down 40 Venezuelans on the way to their goal is unrealistic, but there's something about it that makes it feel like heightened reality, at their core, these men and the men who made their movies understand what it is to do violence to protect what is yours or to avenge what is lost.

But you see a woman in a similar roll and there's something about your brain that rings absurdist. It's like watching a toddler pretend to fly a rocket ship, infantile imitation that -- in a best case scenario -- can be cute, but never transcends beyond the realm of absurdity.

I don't know, maybe I'm talking out of my ass. Give me autism stickers now.

It's also because heroic feats of valor, where a single man really does defeat multiple other men against overwhelming odds, are real. The movies just dial it up to absurdity. A woman taking on the same role is as absurd as a man starring as the protagonist in an "ugly duckling" movie where a makeover and new wardrobe make him the most popular boy in high school.
 
But you see a woman in a similar roll and there's something about your brain that rings absurdist. It's like watching a toddler pretend to fly a rocket ship, infantile imitation that -- in a best case scenario -- can be cute, but never transcends beyond the realm of absurdity.
Wimmin are incapable of creating heros and this is inherently because of foid socialization. Average female reaction to a more successful woman is seething and a strong will to sabotage her. Guys meanwhile have no problem watching a hero beat the shit out of 40 evil guys™ and cheer for him.

We've already had strong female characters who can beat multiple guys in DC/Marvel (pre modern-day), after all it's fiction. The problem with modern-day "stronk female character who needs no man" is because it's written by entitled feminists based on retarded feminist ideals which have no relation to reality. And when the audience who want to feel entertained for an hour and a half feel preached instead and downdoot their movie on imdb, they'll cry "muh soggy knees". Which is bullshit by the way, for every 1 guy that seethes at seeing a good strong fictional female, there are 10 who say "wowie I wish the she-hero would be my femdom gf"
 
That doesn't mean they are finished. Liberals, which women vote for, will stop putting women in jail alltogether, while penalizing any crime commited against women harsher in a move to consolidate their inferiority-complex caused illusions of grandeur into law and destroy any notion of patriarchical ideas like "equality before the law", "justice" and "accountability".
Forget "crime". If women were in charge, they'd throw an ugly, short, bald man in the electric chair and zap him to death for merely existing. You don't need to commit a crime for women to want you dead. You just need to talk to them while being unattractive. Women will happily condemn a man to death because they feel like it or for sympathy points. It's already happened. Men didn't fucking promote cancel culture. Women did. Do you really think Bill Cosby forcibly raped 60 fucking women? If you do, you're an absolute fucking retard. But women will happily commit social genocide on men they feel like would make good targets for nothing more than a smile and sympathy on the internet.

What makes you faggots think women would stop at social genocide? With institutional power, women would happily genocide men they don't find attractive out of existence. They're already doing it at workplaces. They're already doing it in schools and campuses. If women had institutional power, they'd happily do it on a governmental level. We should all 1000% without irony believe all women when they say short men and ugly men should die. Women cannot and should never have complete governmental power.
 
Forget "crime". If women were in charge, they'd throw an ugly, short, bald man in the electric chair and zap him to death for merely existing. You don't need to commit a crime for women to want you dead. You just need to talk to them while being unattractive. Women will happily condemn a man to death because they feel like it or for sympathy points. It's already happened. Men didn't fucking promote cancel culture. Women did. Do you really think Bill Cosby forcibly raped 60 fucking women? If you do, you're an absolute fucking retard. But women will happily commit social genocide on men they feel like would make good targets for nothing more than a smile and sympathy on the internet.

What makes you faggots think women would stop at social genocide? With institutional power, women would happily genocide men they don't find attractive out of existence. They're already doing it at workplaces. They're already doing it in schools and campuses. If women had institutional power, they'd happily do it on a governmental level. We should all 1000% without irony believe all women when they say short men and ugly men should die. Women cannot and should never have complete governmental power.
Women are in charge, and they're not going to that extreme thankfully. Instead they're advocating for killing babies and believing all women no matter the circumstances of their accusation. Keep in mind, you don't need to be ugly to be falsely accused.
 
We've already had strong female characters who can beat multiple guys in DC/Marvel (pre modern-day), after all it's fiction. The problem with modern-day "stronk female character who needs no man" is because it's written by entitled feminists based on retarded feminist ideals which have no relation to reality.

The biggest problem is that the "strong female heroine" is not an end in herself. They didn't write Captain Marvel to be a badass, baddie-punching bitch because they think punching bad guys is intrinsically cool. They wrote her to put men in her place and be better than them. It's fundamentally the same thing as Keffals saying the point of trooning out is to be better than women. The whole point of a "strong woman," as written by a woman is...to be seen by men.
 
You just need to talk to them while being unattractive.
Which makes it twice as ironic since foids love to lie about how they care more about personality than looks. Never underestimate how lookist the average foid is.
We have to be thankful that average foid seethes at other women far more than men, and that's why we don't have manlet extermination camps

They wrote her to put men in her place and be better than them.
Yeah, that's why I said "pre-modern day". All modern day stronk females are written by feminists to push their agenda and when it gets backlash, they'll cry about misogyny and retract further into their own bubbles instead of learning. The fact that foids inherently don't get hero stories is the cherry on the sundae.
 
Foid pisstake of the day
164k likes on twitter
View attachment 6434088
This post reminds me exactly of libtards claiming that nonliberals vote against their interests by voting Republican.
homosexual postmodernist Marxists in academia
Just say Jews. It's not hard.
You can kind of apply this to anything. Women will say they're die hard fans of something, like Queen, to the point they revolve their entire life about it, only to have never heard of any song other than Bohemian Rhapsody. Hell I even overheard a girl once say "OMFG, I LOVE HAZBIN HOTEL THAT'S THE BEST SHOW EVER!!" And I'm like "....You mean the 3 minute trailer...?" I went on to explain how it wasn't even a show yet (thanks KiwiFarms) and they only did a short trailer clip at the time. There wasn't a single full episode out. It wasn't even a fucking show yet. WHY ARE WOMEN LIKE THIS?!??!??
In the past, these people were called posers. They spend more time signaling than consuming the media they claim to be a fan of.

Never stop gatekeeping, friends.
Another one bites the dust.
View attachment 6497081View attachment 6497077
The (Italian) IRS doing well, I see.
The Italian Carabinieri should also investigate the disgusting moids that give her money, and lock them up, then close Only Fans and expropriate its owners.
One can only dream!
Glad to see #ThotAudit is alive and well. I remember when it initially hit, a lot of Onlyfans whores were angry because they thought paying taxes on all those simpbuxx were optional. I suspect that continues to be the case today.
I've seen Mady's collaborations with Tania Bann who mogs her in every way. Mady's face is busted. Tania is an acquired taste facewise, but everything below her neck is just right.
 
Last edited:
In the past, these people were called posers. They spend more time signaling than consuming the media they claim to be a fan of.

Never stop gatekeeping, friends.
This has been amplified thanks to social media where they will spend hours combing through the right selfies to upload but they can’t be assed to spend 30 minutes listening to Queen (to use the example given in the quote). Hell, she can do both at once! But despite being the biggest Queen fan girl in the world, she’ll never seek out their music, preferring to listen to Taylor Swift again.

Think about that when foids get spun up about moids caring about Roman history. If you don’t spend your free time crafting your image and what you conspicuously consume on social media while Friends or The Office is streaming as background noise (they aren’t comfortable with their own thoughts, assuming they even have any) then you are weird and most likely an incel. If women ran the world we’d still be looking for the wheel.
 
The biggest problem is that the "strong female heroine" is not an end in herself. They didn't write Captain Marvel to be a badass, baddie-punching bitch because they think punching bad guys is intrinsically cool. They wrote her to put men in her place and be better than them. It's fundamentally the same thing as Keffals saying the point of trooning out is to be better than women. The whole point of a "strong woman," as written by a woman is...to be seen by men.
They want to anger and disgust men with their female heroines. You know wonder womans original conception? Her primary trait wasn't to be strong, but to fight with kindness. Compassion was her superpower, now she's defined by being a man hater and her big muscles which incite arousal in dykes.

1729349413116.png
 
Wonder Woman was created by a male feminist and BDSM fetishist. She had virtually zero appeal to girls.

1729352937292.png

No female character created by a male writer for the entertainment of men, from Ellen Ripley to Wonder Woman to Lara Croft, is particularly beloved by women or seen by them as any kind of role model.


William Moulton Marston, the American psychologist, lawyer, inventor, and comic book writer, is the creator of Wonder Woman. His personal life was marked by unconventional relationships and interests, which influenced his work on the iconic superheroine. Specifically, Marston was involved in a polyamorous relationship with his wife, Elizabeth Holloway Marston, and their partner, Olive Byrne.

BDSM and Kink​

Marston was known to have explored BDSM (bondage, discipline, dominance, submission, sadism, and masochism) and kink practices. His relationships with Elizabeth and Olive involved elements of BDSM, which he incorporated into his writing, particularly in the early Wonder Woman comics. The character’s use of Lasso of Truth, a magical rope that compels people to tell the truth, can be seen as a metaphor for the power dynamics and control inherent in BDSM relationships.

Polyamory and Non-Traditional Relationships​

Marston’s relationships with Elizabeth and Olive were non-traditional, even by today’s standards. The three lived together, and Olive was the mother of Marston’s children. This arrangement was not publicly acknowledged during Marston’s lifetime, as it was considered taboo. However, it has since been documented and acknowledged as an important aspect of his life and work.
 
Last edited:
There are some archetypes of "strong women."

As written by men:
  1. The kickass sex object. She's gorgeous. She's charming. She's got a great ass. And she can throw a knife through your eye from 50 feet away! Examples: Lara Croft, Black Cat, Alice from the Resident Evil movies.

  2. The male feminist fantasy. She's hot, but not in a way that makes it sexist of me to lust after her, and she totally owns the chuds and would definitely ride my dick because of how much I appreciate her. Examples: Wonder Woman, MCU Black Widow, G.I. Jane, The Bride in Kill Bill.

  3. The woman vs nature heroine. She's not really a sex object at all. Rather, she becomes the protagonist due to the absence of any men to protect her, and must overcome her own physical frailty to survive; typically written to be believable, e.g. the woman is maternal. Examples: Ellen Ripley, Naomi Watts in The Impossible.

  4. The man with tits. Typically written by someone who doesn't understand how (3) worked or what women are, so he writes a male action hero who simply happens to have boobs. Examples: Basically every fucking movie for the last 15 fucking years.
As written (or at least co-written/created) by women:
  1. The bitter, man-hating, butt-kicking bitch. This woman kicks ass primarily to show boys how stupid they are and she totally doesn't need them, or even want them, which is why she's also a massive bitch and not very attractive. There are often scenes of her beating up men as the creator's self-insert. Examples: Captain Marvel, Abby in TLOU2, Rey in Soy Wars, various other block-jawed women in modern media.

  2. The girl who is wonderful and special and better than everyone but also boys like her and she's not a massive bitch. Self-explanatory. May or may not be super hot. Examples: Hermione Granger, the chick from Hunger Games, the chick from Divergent, MCU She-Hulk.

  3. The socially intelligent woman. This is a female character whose power comes from her social graces, her ability to influence, to charm, to offer wisdom, to give emotional support, and so on. The conflicts are social, or internal, and she overcomes external social conflict and internal moral or emotional conflict to influence the world around her. Her goal is often to marry the right man and have a family. Examples: Jo March, Elizabeth Bennett.

You rarely see the socially intelligent woman in modern literature, because being a mentally healthy, socially well-adjusted woman who desires a family is relentlessly pathologized by mass culture today. I think though that what is important is that Ellen Ripley is a male-oriented female character, because women simply do not care what someone would do when under attack by an alien. Men like to imagine we'd be totally badass like Arnold in Predator. We also like to imagine that a woman would find a way to survive like Ripley did. Women do not really care to imagine what happens when bloodthirsty aliens attack.
 
Forget "crime". If women were in charge, they'd throw an ugly, short, bald man in the electric chair and zap him to death for merely existing. You don't need to commit a crime for women to want you dead. You just need to talk to them while being unattractive. Women will happily condemn a man to death because they feel like it or for sympathy points. It's already happened. Men didn't fucking promote cancel culture. Women did. Do you really think Bill Cosby forcibly raped 60 fucking women? If you do, you're an absolute fucking retard. But women will happily commit social genocide on men they feel like would make good targets for nothing more than a smile and sympathy on the internet.

What makes you faggots think women would stop at social genocide? With institutional power, women would happily genocide men they don't find attractive out of existence. They're already doing it at workplaces. They're already doing it in schools and campuses. If women had institutional power, they'd happily do it on a governmental level. We should all 1000% without irony believe all women when they say short men and ugly men should die. Women cannot and should never have complete governmental power.
Don't forget that they'll let actual violent criminals off the hook and insist that they shouldn't be jailed just because they think he's hot. Just look at that "Deadpool" killer that was in the news recently. You had thousands of women simping for him, and many of those women were insisting that he shouldn't be jailed because "he's too hot to go to prison", or that he clearly must've had a good reason since he must be a good guy deep down (ignoring the fact he was in court for murdering two women, and that he had visible swastika tattoos while most of the women simping for him were lefties)
I distinctly remember some chick wrote a full-on poem about how good a person he was, and how he was clearly an innocent man that was just betrayed by the system; I can't find it now for the life of me, but I swear to God it existed, and it was every bit as embarrassing as you'd imagine.
There was also that zoomer who killed a woman and her child because he was doing several times the legal speed-limit while street racing in a residential area. Women got unfathomably upset that he was arrested, started demanding that he be left free for similar reasons to the above guy, and even started sending death threats to the husband of the victim because his wife and child getting manslaughtered got their precious Chad put in prison. Then he got his head shaved after being admitted, the women got the ick because he no longer had his fluffy zoomer hair, and immediately stopped simping for him.

When people talk about how women don't care about the truth, and care about "their truth", they're 100% correct. Women believe that the pretty man who murdered several woman must be innocent, because they WANT him to be innocent so they feel justified in having the hots for him. Likewise, women believe that the schlubby 4/10 manlet must secretly be a rapist or other criminal, because they WANT him to be a bad person so they're justified in hating him and wanting him punished for existing.
 
When people talk about how women don't care about the truth, and care about "their truth", they're 100% correct. Women believe that the pretty man who murdered several woman must be innocent, because they WANT him to be innocent so they feel justified in having the hots for him.
They actually just did a study and found out that even BLIND WOMEN demand 10/10 Chad. It doesn't even fucking matter that they can't see what he looks like. It's purely a social "look at my fancy expensive handbag!" type of thing. Fucking BLIND WOMEN want the handsomest man possible regardless of whether they can see or not.
 
Back