Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 51 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.5%

  • Total voters
    318
1000017456.jpg
Woah Nick, be careful what you say, the cops are watching and might take you seriously. Also I'm stunned that Graf has a nitter instance that works, that must be the only thing he's done right. Nitter Archive

Also yes this is a joke, but would be HILARIOUS if it came up for real.
 
Nick getting out of this thinking he's somehow "WON" will only lead to a worse crash (into a tree on the way back from a drunken bender at the grand reopening and rebranding of the Gay20s) further down the line.

If he "wins", it means he has to look after all 5 of his children again (who he hates), with the government, relatives, and community still breathing down his neck.

He'll keep gloating with increasing hysteria, he'll spend more and more time on twitter and in troglodytes' livestreams trying to get a rise out of people - just to scratch that psychological itch of believing he IS getting wins - but the monotony and chafing of his actual, humdrum rural life will inevitably build.

It'll creep up. And it will be excruciating.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 6547278
Woah Nick, be careful what you say, the cops are watching and might take you seriously. Also I'm stunned that Graf has a nitter instance that works, that must be the only thing he's done right. Nitter Archive

Also yes this is a joke, but would be HILARIOUS if it came up for real.
What do you guys think:

1. He took a plea deal so now he thinks he's invincible

2. He has another "foolproof" legal strat like the Frank's hearing

3. He's mentally broken and doesn't even pretend to care what he says anymore
 
This is the closest we're going to get to an admission isn't it?

The fact that he directly confirmed drug use, something he was explicitly not willing to do before, is the strongest sign yet that he intends to or already has accepted a plea deal.
And so, the spinning of the narrative for the Balldo Comeback Kid arc has begun.
It may go something like this:

"My wife's mental illness took over, and she stopped caring for her children, for herself. She stepped out of the marriage and was unfaithful and began using illegal drugs to self-medicate."
"I, her devoted husband, was too proud to ask for help and ashamed that I could not fix her, so I too turned to drugs to try to do not only my job as a Dad, but I had to do her job too!!!" (tears well up in his eyes)
"I lost my wife and I lost my mind."
BUT!! NOW!!!
"I am REDEEMED!!! I am in recovery and I will stay clean and sober and I have reconnected with my Lord and Saviour!!!"
"Sadly, my marriage is over, but the children's mother is also getting the help she needs and we are in Family Counseling."
Any variation of this is my bet.
Kayla, meet Bus.

TL;DR Yeah, I am guilty, with extenuating circumstances, i.e. evil woman, Have pity on me, pls send superberries
 
View attachment 6547278
Woah Nick, be careful what you say, the cops are watching and might take you seriously. Also I'm stunned that Graf has a nitter instance that works, that must be the only thing he's done right. Nitter Archive

Also yes this is a joke, but would be HILARIOUS if it came up for real.
I never said I did cocaine stalker child.
I said the person who posted that did.
Where did I ever say I did cocaine?
 
What do you guys think:

1. He took a plea deal so now he thinks he's invincible

2. He has another "foolproof" legal strat like the Frank's hearing

3. He's mentally broken and doesn't even pretend to care what he says anymore

All three.

1. Feeling of psychological freedom from somewhere is leading to this social media diarrhoea slash victory lap. And to be brazen enough to post in Aaron's chat directly. Could be pre-emptive yet again.

2a) Either his own goal-posts have shifted so much he's calling a plea deal a win (when he knows and WE all know he would've never have considered it as such, several months ago), or

2b) he thinks he's got some legal / "social hacking" strategy to work against Aaron. Getting April to file DV charges, thinks he can get the felony in Kayla's case to stick, thinks HIS plea deal is better than Aaron's plea deal, is trying to get Melton to file a suit, or for Aaron to file a suit and lose money against Melton, or get in more trouble with his ex-wife because of it, or believes with the shackles off he can finally full-on try to goad Aaron into lashing back and fucking up, yadda yadda yadda. His BPD machinations against Aaron have been brewing for months, and he needs some kind of win against him to look like enough of a man to convince his Qult he's worth facing charges for.

3. *Gestures expressively at the thread* (but he does care, EXCESSIVELY care, about what people think, otherwise he wouldn't be behaving like a histrionic teenage girl)
 
Last edited:
And they're often reluctant to deny some procedural thing for a defendant when it won't change the outcome anyway, because they want the case to be over when it's done, not to linger around in appeals for another year or two. This leads to some "wrong" decisions that are pragmatically correct in the long run.
If I understand correctly, if he pleads, he allocutes and waves appeal on everything. Barring some really exceptional thing.

So I don't think that's gonna be a problem here.

Yeah, he could dig in and keep pushing the Franks bullshit though the appeals process, but I think even he knows now that that's just gonna prolong his agony. He's itching to get back to streaming about degenerate faggot shit (and not law stuff) and his ongoing criminal case is a giant wet blanket.

He's already lost. It's just a question of how bad the loss is gonna be.

And if I'm wrong, and he decides to fight this after all, that's fine. It just means it'll be funnier.
 
Last edited:
I don't know what his game is but I'm fairly sure he does not have a plea deal.
He pissed off the judge by forcing him to watch his cokestream twice and he pissed off the prosecution by calling them and the police liars.
Unless they're too busy to put him on trial, I don't see a plea deal being on the table.
 
I don't know what his game is but I'm fairly sure he does not have a plea deal.
He pissed off the judge by forcing him to watch his cokestream twice and he pissed off the prosecution by calling them and the police liars.
Unless they're too busy to put him on trial, I don't see a plea deal being on the table.
There is a thing called Judicial Economy. It dictates, among other things, they offer him a plea deal to try and save the time and expense of a trial.

Yeah, they got him dead to rights now that the warrant is confirmed good (as if there was any doubt), but if they can still save some time and coin, they will.

I don't particularly like it either. He's such an asshole, I wish they would take him to a jury verdict and ask for the maximum, but it is what it is. What I want to happen doesn't cause me to ignore what's likely gonna happen.

Ultimately, I think @Potentially Criminal is right.
We're likely headed towards a suspended sentence and probation.

Now, where it'll get REALLY interesting is whether this fuckwit can make it through probation without being the fuckup he frequently is.

If Nick were smart, he might wanna give serious thought to NOT streaming.
 
I don't know what his game is but I'm fairly sure he does not have a plea deal.
He pissed off the judge by forcing him to watch his cokestream twice and he pissed off the prosecution by calling them and the police liars.
Unless they're too busy to put him on trial, I don't see a plea deal being on the table.
None of that would affect the prosecution's willingness to give him a plea deal. The judge probably has a dozen other cases just like this one on his desk, and if having to watch the cokestream made him feel anything, it probably just made him want to get this thing over with as quickly as possible. For the prosecution, if they denied plea deals to everyone who ever called them or the police corrupt liars, then there wouldn't be hardly any deals left to give.

It is extremely rare that the prosecution in a case is invested enough in it to forego a plea deal and force through a trial, just to deny the accused any possible mercy from the courts. Florida did this with the Parkland Shooter in order to try for a death penalty, which the jury declined to grant. Rekieta's crimes are not nearly as heinous as Cruz', nor is he really notorious enough to justify that kind of investment.

The system will simply roll over and crush Nick without a second thought, the same as it's done to every other degenerate druggy in his situation.
 
Earlier in the thread and earlier in the tweeting session he already directly confirmed (by replying "He was") to a question asking if he was on coke when writing his pinned NYE tweet. The fact that he directly confirmed drug use, something he was explicitly not willing to do before, is the strongest sign yet that he intends to or already has accepted a plea deal.
Something in the way he wrote the handful of messages posted here sounds mayyyybe like someone packed him off to inpatient rehab. (...Except that it also reads as reckless enough to be drunk posting). But the absence from view, the quasi-ruefulness and quasi-honesty (don't buy it), the piety resurgence, and the continuing defiance and mystery-shrouding says "30 days in isn't enough."

Any deal he may have isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on until he goes into court, the deal is presented to the Judge for his approval, and the Judge approves it.
It would be highly unusual for a judge to nope a plea.
 
I don't know what his game is but I'm fairly sure he does not have a plea deal.
He pissed off the judge by forcing him to watch his cokestream twice and he pissed off the prosecution by calling them and the police liars.
Unless they're too busy to put him on trial, I don't see a plea deal being on the table.
if you had to interact with him in real life, would you drag it out or get him away from you as soon as possible?
 
Back