Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Or even an outright deferred adjudication. Frankly if he doesn't get one of those it's because he fucked himself out of one, so if he has to suck up a conviction, even with no time, he's still lost and will have to answer to the bar association on top of that.

A deferred adjudication would annoy me to no end. And I'm skeptical of any serious disciplinary action even if convicted.

On the first:
Nick is 40 damn years old, already a lolyer, literally sworn in and bound by ethical and professional standards, and chose to possess a large (very large) quantity of a serious and illegal drug (and a handful of others) with 5 children in his home, keep an unsecured gun within reach of children, and be sufficiently negligent of his children over a long enough period of time that multiple people were concerned enough to escalate their observations. I've known people terrified that their young adult offenses would preclude bar admission, and what they did was nothing compared to what Nick did.

On the second:
Even the ABA, which generally rejects the notion of moral turpitude as the correct qualifier for lawyer discipline, and vs personal misconduct as an element, rather advocating that the crime bore some relation to/ reflecting on the practice of law, provides in its Model Rules for interim suspension on conviction of a "serious crime."

Rule 19:
C. Definition of "Serious Crime. A "serious crime" is any felony or any lesser crime that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, or any crime a necessary element of which, as determined by the statutory or common law definition of the crime, involves interference with the administration of justice, false swearing, misrepresentation, fraud, deceit, bribery, extortion, misappropriation, theft, or an attempt, conspiracy or solicitation of another to commit a "serious crime."

But for final discipline - even in states that retain a broad "moral turpitude" standard as a potential bar to admission or for discipline, the personal use of drugs is not necessarily considered a crime of moral turpitude [note: see Note in link] (and in some places it's defined/ refined to include an element of deception or similar.

The ABA is also against a broad range of disciplinable offenses:

"Many kinds of illegal conduct reflect adversely on fitness to practice law, such as offenses involving fraud and the offense of willful failure to file an income tax return. However, some kinds of offenses carry no such implication. Traditionally, the distinction was drawn in terms of offenses involving "moral turpitude." That concept can be construed to include offenses concerning some matters of personal morality, such as adultery and comparable offenses, that have no specific connection to fitness for the practice of law. Although a lawyer is personally answerable to the entire criminal law, a lawyer should be professionally answerable only for offenses that indicate lack of those characteristics relevant to law practice. Offenses involving violence, dishonesty, breach of trust, or serious interference with the administration of justice are in that category. A pattern of repeated offenses, even ones of minor significance when considered separately, can indicate indifference to legal obligation."

However, states take different tacks. He should be glad he's not in CA. Or FL or DC.

MN, on the other hand, is very flex-y about it, especially if the action did not actually revolve around harming or taking advantage of clients. And in MN, even if disbarred, lawyers have a potentially friendly return.

I know a lot of lawyers have substance abuse problems. Will this really suspend him?

Being a substance abuser will not likely hurt him...especially if he does the treatment thing. See link above of one person's analysis of reinstatement. If they are somewhat charitable about an actual disbarred lawyer, they'll have it for people who aren't yet. And MN is the land of rehab.

 

[Swole McPole]

I was watching one of those YouTube videos where they show the cops body cam today. Couple of crazy nigs involved in some tawdry domestic. Young buck had just had a baby with his heiffer. While she was in hospital, he was shacked up with another bitch and had marched off with the TV, so his baby mama had called the cops.

While they're trying to get the shit sorted out our young negro shows the detective his phone to try and make some point or other and the detective notices that he'd sent out a photograph of his paramour's gaping butthole when she was naked and sucking his cock to all of his friends.

Lil Nigra tells the cop he was perfectly justified in doing this because his cuntish baby mama had posted a picture of his shitty drawers to her followers -- pointing out that his underwear contained more shit than her new born baby's diapers did, so he was just retaliating by showing what a nasty ass slapper she was. So he gets charged. I thought the charges and bail conditions were very illuminating when compared with Aaron's charges.

Cause electronic transmission or posting of sexually explicit material
Nolle prosequi restrict non criminal justice
Special condition bond amount: $1,500
Special conditions of bond: stay away from the person, home, job and school of the victim
Do not have harassing, intimidating, threatening, provoking or violent contact with victim.

The pics he sent out were seen by multiple people. Kayla's nudes were seen by just one, but the courts appear to be taking it much more seriously. Clearly this is an example of a two tier legal system in which white wammen get more stringent protection from revenge porn than your typical section 8 dwelling welfare mama. Aaron needs to get NAACP or BLM on the case.

Here's the video. The meat of the story starts at 22:25

 

[Captain Manning]

Larry Forman (The DUI Guy) explains on Twitter why he rescinded his offer to assist Rekieta.

View attachment 6548428
Link | Nitter | Nitter Archive

Larry couldn't have saved his ass anyways.

That's not a dig against Larry, BTW. I've seen Larry's work. He's pretty good at criminal defense.

Nick has a big mouth, to be sure, but he's also just open and shut guilty. Lawyers aren't wizards. Larry dodged a ding to his W:L ratio.

 

[Pippa's Greasy KB]

Trials are expensive and time-consuming.

For who? The state wouldnt give a shit, would they? Each person still gets paid regardless of how fast they go AND they get accolades to use for promotion when they take heads (like nick's) no?

And so, the spinning of the narrative for the Balldo Comeback Kid arc has begun.
It may go something like this:

"My wife's mental illness took over, and she stopped caring for her children, for herself. She stepped out of the marriage and was unfaithful and began using illegal drugs to self-medicate."
"I, her devoted husband, was too proud to ask for help and ashamed that I could not fix her, so I too turned to drugs to try to do not only my job as a Dad, but I had to do her job too!!!" (tears well up in his eyes)
"I lost my wife and I lost my mind."
BUT!! NOW!!!
"I am REDEEMED!!! I am in recovery and I will stay clean and sober and I have reconnected with my Lord and Saviour!!!"
"Sadly, my marriage is over, but the children's mother is also getting the help she needs and we are in Family Counseling."
Any variation of this is my bet.
Kayla, meet Bus.

TL;DR Yeah, I am guilty, with extenuating circumstances, i.e. evil woman, Have pity on me, pls send superberries

So first he threw her into the bangbus and now he throws her under the bangbus?

 

[Martin Cooter King Jr]

Larry Forman (The DUI Guy) explains on Twitter why he rescinded his offer to assist Rekieta.


Link | Nitter | Nitter Archive

It was only because Nick kept making videos on YouTube? Not:

• Nick's 8 yo daughter testing positive for cocaine
• Nick neglecting his 5 children
• Nick doing drugs/tweaking in church
• Nick's comments about the judge and her "pussy"
• Nick accusing state advocates for his neglected children of perjury
• Nick lying to officers about April "visiting"
• Nick befriending Melton, a (not yet convicted) pedophile
• Nick ridiculing the state for making him "go to rehab"
• Nick mocking his drug charges by drinking "coke"
• Nick accusing small town police officers of planting hard drugs in his house
• Nick failing court mandated alcohol tests
• Nick using biblical references to normalize having both a wife and live-in girlfriend
• Nick yelling at officers during multiple traffic violations

It was only because Nick kept making YouTube videos? Lawyers really are good at lying.
He's not a very reliable client, he's also an addict.

 

[Pippa's Greasy KB]

It was only because Nick kept making videos on YouTube? Not:

• Nick's 8 yo daughter testing positive for cocaine
• Nick neglecting his 5 children
• Nick doing drugs/tweaking in church
• Nick's comments about the judge and her "pussy"
• Nick accusing state advocates for his neglected children of perjury
• Nick lying to officers about April "visiting"
• Nick befriending Melton, a (not yet convicted) pedophile
• Nick ridiculing the state for making him "go to rehab"
• Nick mocking his drug charges by drinking "coke"
• Nick accusing small town police officers of planting hard drugs in his house
• Nick failing court mandated alcohol tests
• Nick using biblical references to normalize having both a wife and live-in girlfriend
• Nick yelling at officers during multiple traffic violations

It was only because Nick kept making YouTube videos? Lawyers really are good at lying.
He's not a very reliable client, he's also an addict.

Dude, he's a lawyer. They'd defend people for anything people did if they think they can win. Morals are never in the equation. That's how they got the rep for being scum in the first place.

 

[Captain Manning]

It was only because Nick kept making videos on YouTube? Not:

• Nick's 8 yo daughter testing positive for cocaine

Yeah, I always suspected it was that that did him in with Larry. Given that Larry walked back his offer right after that revelation.

However, TBH, it could also be that Larry freaked out when Nick shower called Null and confirmed those CHIPs documents were authentic.

That was a real smooth move BTW, Nick. We'd still be debating whether @MNPublicRecords was bullshitting us if you hadn't have done that.

Good job. Dumbass.

 

[Dimension Sniper]

For who? The state wouldnt give a shit, would they? Each person still gets paid regardless of how fast they go AND they get accolades to use for promotion when they take heads (like nick's) no?

For the state it’s probably more a matter of the time investment that’s required for a trial - there are many many cases and only so many judges, prosecutors, and court staff to go around. If they can lighten the overall caseload via people pleading out, it’s a win for everyone.

Nick’s case really isn’t anything remarkable, either. I know it is to us, but as has been said in this thread many times before, it’s a pretty standard possession case - there’s not really much of a fact question to even put before a jury. Niggers get busted for drugs and get their kids taken all the time and nobody bats an eye. Nobody’s getting a promotion because they put Nick Rekieta on probation and made him do community service (the most likely outcome.)

 

[repentance]

You have to keep in mind that the people who are still in Nick's Locals (who aren't a-logging) are in denial. As far as they're concerned, the positive coke test is just a misunderstanding, because there's no way their e-daddy is that much of a fuck up and a degenerate (despite all the evidence staring them in the face). It's just another one of the countless examples of the Sunk Cost Fallacy in action.

"Resolved" doesn't mean a particular outcome, Nick just knows that people will assume there's been a favourable outcome when he uses that word.

Locals has always been the home of Nick's most degenerate fans. Anyone who didn't bail early has known for a long time that Nick is a degenerate and sees nothing wrong with it.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Nick shower called Null and confirmed those CHIPs documents were authentic.

That was a real smooth move BTW, Nick. We'd still be debating whether @MNPublicRecords was bullshitting us if you hadn't have done that.

That remains one of the most astonishing fuckups I’ve seen a person make. Nick is the ultimate cautionary tale for every human being. Just so fucking stupid and lacking humility.

 

[Pippa's Greasy KB]

For the state it’s probably more a matter of the time investment that’s required for a trial - there are many many cases and only so many judges, prosecutors, and court staff to go around. If they can lighten the overall caseload via people pleading out, it’s a win for everyone.

Nick’s case really isn’t anything remarkable, either. I know it is to us, but as has been said in this thread many times before, it’s a pretty standard possession case - there’s not really much of a fact question to even put before a jury. Niggers get busted for drugs and get their kids taken all the time and nobody bats an eye. Nobody’s getting a promotion because they put Nick Rekieta on probation and made him do community service (the most likely outcome.)

Yeah ok but it's just time they spend waiting for nick to dig himself deeper. They can do something else in the meanwhile. Wouldn't be surprised if the prosecution relishes it at this point considering how much nick has attacked them. I imagine it would make a good water cooler talk for them.

"Youre not gonna believe what my guy just did!"
"What?"
"He filed a franks motion on a reupload of his stream! The exact same copy!"

 

[Martin Cooter King Jr]

Niggers get busted for drugs and get their kids taken all the time and nobody bats an eye.

Most also get sentenced to some amount of prison time, many never get their kids back. Nick getting the white glove treatment should make him grateful but his behaviour gives pause to think he might want to do some time.

CURVEBALL: He secretly enjoyed jail. He could live out being prison gay, cause it's not full gay.

Being a substance abuser will not likely hurt him...especially if he does the treatment thing. See link above of one person's analysis of reinstatement. If they are somewhat charitable about an actual disbarred lawyer, they'll have it for people who aren't yet. And MN is the land of rehab.

Could this be why Nick went to "court mandated rehab?"

 

[AnOminous]

It was only because Nick kept making YouTube videos? Lawyers really are good at lying.
He's not a very reliable client, he's also an addict.

What was he lying about? Nick isn't just a shitty person, lawyers deal with that all the time. He's a shitty CLIENT. He's the kind of jerkoff who would ignore your advice and do dumb shit that could get you in trouble for just defending him, because he doesn't even understand what he's doing.

He could make you look like a moron just for defending him, and not in a way that would get you more clients.

MN, on the other hand, is very flex-y about it, especially if the action did not actually revolve around harming or taking advantage of clients. And in MN, even if disbarred, lawyers have a potentially friendly return.

This is why I really didn't focus on the "moral turpitude" aspect, partly since it's a phrase only legal autists even recognize, much less understand. It's actually one of my areas of specialty, along with ethics in general. Also fun fact: philosophical and legal books on ethics are the most frequently stolen from libraries.

You think I'm making this up:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232934259_Do_ethicists_steal_more_books

Not just that, but the more advanced and esoteric the works are, the more likely they are to be stolen.

 

[dustnight]

A tweet from a guy who is very regretful about his time on drugs:

(Archive)

yes, yes yes... we need more...

 

[Windy Moors]

I think I've found April's inspiration:

Isobel Varley, who held the title of the 'most tattooed senior woman' in the UK. She died in 2015 at the age of 78.

" If it looks like a CUCK, fucks like a CUCK, and drinks like a CUCK, then it probably is a CUCK."

Cuck edit.

 

[AnOminous]

A tweet from a guy who is very regretful about his time on drugs:

He should have done more what? More cocaine? More bad things? More. . .something so incredibly bad we have a separate thread for speculating about it? I'm not understanding what he's getting at here.

 

[DumDum Did Nothing Wrong]

It was only because Nick kept making videos on YouTube? Not:

• Nick's 8 yo daughter testing positive for cocaine
• Nick neglecting his 5 children
• Nick doing drugs/tweaking in church
• Nick's comments about the judge and her "pussy"
• Nick accusing state advocates for his neglected children of perjury
• Nick lying to officers about April "visiting"
• Nick befriending Melton, a (not yet convicted) pedophile
• Nick ridiculing the state for making him "go to rehab"
• Nick mocking his drug charges by drinking "coke"
• Nick accusing small town police officers of planting hard drugs in his house
• Nick failing court mandated alcohol tests
• Nick using biblical references to normalize having both a wife and live-in girlfriend
• Nick yelling at officers during multiple traffic violations

It was only because Nick kept making YouTube videos? Lawyers really are good at lying.
He's not a very reliable client, he's also an addict.

Larry is a careered criminal defense attorney. He's probably seen worst. But yeah Nick's actions are reprehensible but they also make him a shitty client to defend because every time he opened his mouth he hurt his case and if I was a attorney I too would have been like nah fuck this guy.

 

[Get the rope Macaulay!]

crazy how we don't hear about the monty case anymore, what happened with that?

Also Nick straight up doesn't have a streaming career now, so what will he do for money? even if his parents are fine letting him leech off them, he has to do something.

 

[AltisticRight]

More Rekieta comments on Melton's behavior towards Aaron's kids:

View attachment 6547045
(Archive)

What kind of asinine unhinged faggot response was that? What attention, the kind that involves calling a literal 10-year-old a loose whore that should do OnlyFans at 15? The kind that says he'd like chasing defensive little boys in coal mines to presumably rape? How many of Aaron's kids were taken away? I don't know the kind of attention they get from him but it's probably better than yours.

Rekieta implies that @Potentially Criminal and other LawTubers knew that he "was a crackhead" when he was still popular:

Did they know he allowed his 8-year-old child to test positive for cocaine metabolites at >5000pg/mg with a cutoff at just 500, ie ten times higher?
I think the outcome would be different.

 

[Desktop User2]

More Rekieta comments on Melton's behavior towards Aaron's kids:

View attachment 6547045
(Archive)

There is a special thread speculating if Nick indulges on that same kind of attention Melton pays for kids that Aaron lacks...