Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.7%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 53 15.4%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 132 38.4%

  • Total voters
    344
1729563587679.png
 
What kind of asinine unhinged faggot response was that? What attention, the kind that involves calling a literal 10-year-old a loose whore that should do OnlyFans at 15? The kind that says he'd like chasing defensive little boys in coal mines to presumably rape?
Yes.

Nick finds the paricular "attention" Melton wants to give Aaron's daughter hilarious.

Because he's a piece of shit, and a sorry excuse for a father.
 
Skelly's view on children:
>Kiwi Farms is a den of paedophiles who want bodycam footage so they can see mah keedz
>Da goobermint is using mah keeedz to persecute me
>Pays a disgusting fat creep in excess of $100 because he does 5 hours streams on Aaron all day
>Goes on Mexico economic refugee piggy's stream even though he shared the names of all of his children. The pig who didn't even bother to read the document beforehand to make redactions like I do with those community posts
>Shares excruciating detail about Aaron's children on fat creepy Vegas piggy's dumb show
>Now he states he doesn't care about those comments which is fine, but a stark contrast to his previous "nonces face the wall" comments

What happened? Which is it? I didn't even mention how he cosied up with Vaedophile despite previous statements.
Time to catapult him into the fucking sun. It's clear that he doesn't give a shit about any child involved in this fiasco which was 100% directly due to him. Between the Qover and Aaron's side are 8 children. 8 of them. One tested positive for cocaine at ten times the cutoff and the other is being paraded around by Fatrick Meltonne as a loose whore who should do OnlyFans when she turns 15.

How grim and grimey. I hope skelly chokes to death on the next Jamaican penis he downs.
 
Did they know he allowed his 8-year-old child to test positive for cocaine metabolites at >5000pg/mg with a cutoff at just 500, ie ten times higher?
This this and this.

I got my head around Nick not serving time a long time ago but what the actual fuck is wrong with the judicial system if he's not forced to answer for the coke-positive kid?

And WHY wasn't there another charge added after the result?

WORSE, if that charge, the most egregious one in my book, is dropped in a plea deal - and it probably will be - what what and what???

.... Nick gets Internet cover for just being a party boi. He'll invent some stupid story about how she accidently bathed in the coke and he dindu nuffin. Arghhhhhhhh!!!
 
Larry couldn't have saved his ass anyways.

That's not a dig against Larry, BTW. I've seen Larry's work. He's pretty good at criminal defense.

Nick has a big mouth, to be sure, but he's also just open and shut guilty. Lawyers aren't wizards. Larry dodged a ding to his W:L ratio.
It was only because Nick kept making videos on YouTube? Not:
  • Nick's 8 yo daughter testing positive for cocaine
  • Nick neglecting his 5 children
  • Nick doing drugs/tweaking in church
  • Nick's comments about the judge and her "pussy"
  • Nick accusing state advocates for his neglected children of perjury
  • Nick lying to officers about April "visiting"
  • Nick befriending Melton, a (not yet convicted) pedophile
  • Nick ridiculing the state for making him "go to rehab"
  • Nick mocking his drug charges by drinking "coke"
  • Nick accusing small town police officers of planting hard drugs in his house
  • Nick failing court mandated alcohol tests
  • Nick using biblical references to normalize having both a wife and live-in girlfriend
  • Nick yelling at officers during multiple traffic violations
It was only because Nick kept making YouTube videos? Lawyers really are good at lying.
He's not a very reliable client, he's also an addict.
Dude, he's a lawyer. They'd defend people for anything people did if they think they can win. Morals are never in the equation. That's how they got the rep for being scum in the first place. :story:
What was he lying about? Nick isn't just a shitty person, lawyers deal with that all the time. He's a shitty CLIENT. He's the kind of jerkoff who would ignore your advice and do dumb shit that could get you in trouble for just defending him, because he doesn't even understand what he's doing.

He could make you look like a moron just for defending him, and not in a way that would get you more clients.
Larry is a careered criminal defense attorney. He's probably seen worst. But yeah Nick's actions are reprehensible but they also make him a shitty client to defend because every time he opened his mouth he hurt his case and if I was a attorney I too would have been like nah fuck this guy.

Larry is also a recovering addict and has posted about his sobriety journey and milestones on Twitter. He probably did not want to invite that kind of addict mentality closer into this life--especially when he has a new relationship with a woman after a long search.
 
He should have done more what? More cocaine? More bad things? More. . .something so incredibly bad we have a separate thread for speculating about it? I'm not understanding what he's getting at here.
More Jamaican dick? More ugly tattoos? More naked Twister? As regards the latter, I think he misses ol’ Toe. I feel like Aaron might be right about one thing, I think Nick is genuinely heartbroken over him. He acts like SUCH a passive aggressive BPD ex-girlfriend.

BPD is making more and more sense with him.
 
It was only because Nick kept making videos on YouTube? Not:
  • Nick's 8 yo daughter testing positive for cocaine
  • Nick neglecting his 5 children
  • Nick doing drugs/tweaking in church
  • Nick's comments about the judge and her "pussy"
  • Nick accusing state advocates for his neglected children of perjury
  • Nick lying to officers about April "visiting"
  • Nick befriending Melton, a (not yet convicted) pedophile
  • Nick ridiculing the state for making him "go to rehab"
  • Nick mocking his drug charges by drinking "coke"
  • Nick accusing small town police officers of planting hard drugs in his house
  • Nick failing court mandated alcohol tests
  • Nick using biblical references to normalize having both a wife and live-in girlfriend
  • Nick yelling at officers during multiple traffic violations
It was only because Nick kept making YouTube videos? Lawyers really are good at lying.
He's not a very reliable client, he's also an addict
Harsh.

Duiguy is a former alcoholic. Many former addicts try to help others.

Lawyers literally defend guilty people all the time. Guilty of horror stuff. It's their job.

Imagine. Former addict, trying to do a good thing for a former associate and all you see is total denial and lies on stream. Pretty much everything that happened after showed he was right, as Balldo was obviously calling the shots re his case
 
I know youre reading this rekieta, you faggot, wheres my god damn 5k locals gift.
:really: 5k pg/mg?

He's the kind of jerkoff who would ignore your advice and do dumb shit that could get you in trouble for just defending him, because he doesn't even understand what he's doing.
Why would you say that?
It's not like he ever intervened a hearing by shouting ":really:OBJECTION YOUR HONOUR" instead of allowing his lawyer to object.
It's not like the judge told him to go fuck himself after he did that, because the lawyer knew it wasn't the right place and time to object. He didn't then hire a retarded fat lolyer that holds his exact delusional faggot lolbert worldview.
. . . ?

I think it's likely that Nick enjoys the company of other reprobates because it makes him feel slightly better in comparison. Doesn't hurt that losers and creeps will circle the wagon in order to allow their continued evil.
He's like that insecure girl who befriends "ugly" ones to make herself feel better.
Skelly is a fucking teenager.
Did he ever self-diagnose with ODD, a diagnosis given to children? :really:
 
Lawyers literally defend guilty people all the time. Guilty of horror stuff. It's their job.
Yeah, but lawyers also like to win.

Especially Larry. If you've seen his channel, his big thing is posting his kill shots against corrupt or incompetent government officials.

Contrary to Nick's propaganda, that was never going to happen in Nick's case. Nick's case, much like Nick, is a loser.

Larry made the smart move in retracting his offer.

Or, to quote Pippa Pipkin concerning Nick, from long ago, "Bullet dodged."
 
More Rekieta comments on Melton's behavior towards Aaron's kids:

View attachment 6547045
(Archive)
I am SHOCKED that Nick thinks a pedophile lusting over a child and obsessively talking about how much they want to rape them actually just cares more about them than their father does. I can't believe this is the same guy who has a 9 year old "favorite" daughter that has night terrors and violent outbursts. It's incredible that he has induced a drug dependency in this same daughter for unknown purposes. So fucking weird. Funny even.
 
And WHY wasn't there another charge added after the result?
IANAL, but: My understanding is that prosecutors tend to go for the charges they think they can win without a lot of effort or time rather than every single instance of criminal activity. I suspect being unable to prove how the child came to ingest cocaine played some part in the decision not to prosecute for it.
 
I am SHOCKED that Nick thinks a pedophile lusting over a child and obsessively talking about how much they want to rape them actually just cares more about them than their father does. I can't believe this is the same guy who has a 9 year old "favorite" daughter that has night terrors and violent outbursts. It's incredible that he has induced a drug dependency in this same daughter for unknown purposes. So fucking weird. Funny even.

You should also consider what Nick said about Monty. Mocked the guy relentlessly. I'd even say he defamed him (IANAL).

But with Melton, who's said some very concerning things about kids Rekieta personally knows, Nick jokes that Melton paid more attention to the kids than their own father.

Pretty appalling, huh?
 
He should have done more what? More cocaine? More bad things? More. . .something so incredibly bad we have a separate thread for speculating about it? I'm not understanding what he's getting at here.
That's the problem with performative introspection, he knows he's supposed to look like hes learning valuable life lessons. He probably does wish he did things differently. Like eject his used up wife and stupid fucking liability kids, really committed to the hedonistic lifestyle without all those pesky obligations like showing up for church, acting interested in your kids.
He was so fucking close to the easy life->fame->drugs->downfall->IP2 streaming pipeline but his kids robbed him.
 
"It's God's money. I don't need it bc I'll always be fine. I learned how to take care of my family long ago."

Three sentences: three entirely independent ways Nick is a liar, both to others and to himself.

Efficient Delusion Award of the day.


Classic narc.
The first part closely echoes something Louis once said in an interview (except all indications are that Louis actually believed it) and it makes me suspect that it's being said at the prompting of Celeste, possibly to rebut the assertions that she is bailing Nick out (not that it's a believable rebuttal).
 
IANAL, but: My understanding is that prosecutors tend to go for the charges they think they can win without a lot of effort or time rather than every single instance of criminal activity. I suspect being unable to prove how the child came to ingest cocaine played some part in the decision not to prosecute for it.
For sure they do, and I'm just venting here... but it's still insanity to me.

Buying and snorting coke is generally victimless in isolation.

So, criminally, there was only one real victim in Nick's crimes. A little girl. (The hunger, etc is a CPS issue.)

To the degree that our laws are meant to reflect our morals and values, it's this crime that should not be ignored and have some kind of mandatory 3 months in prison or something equivalent.

As for proving it, we may never know the real story but this thread did a pretty bang-up job proving that the testing lab is state-of-the-art, that multiple hair follicles are tested, that a false positive is almost impossible, and that she could have died. Meanwhile, Nick kept doing booze (and probably coke) for a week after being released from jail - by his own admission.

Just... JFC. (Venting over. Sorry.)
 
While I wouldn't be surprised by a plea acceptance at this point, as he could still keep the lie going saying that he "HAD to do it" as others have said already, but I'm a little surprised by the actual admission that the coke did in fact go up his large nose.
Nick's ticked off attending a substance abuse programme. He can admit past cocaine use with impunity now and still maintain that he's not an addict.

My guess is that he feels free to do so because plea bargains for both him and Kayla have already been arranged under terms he can live with and it's likely those terms include any charges related to child neglect being dropped.

Nick is arrogant enough to believe that he's too smart to get caught again.
 
Back