Last edited:
US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians
- Thread starter SeniorFuckFace
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2018
Not to be outdone by shitting on one of the biggest names in pro wrestling, "art candee" shows how little they value women, at least women that don't agree with them. Danica isn't a huge name outside of racing, but inside racing she's very well known.
After a couple posts by "art candee", i really wish I was able to find out who she is and how much money she's getting from the DNC for her shilling.
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2016
Just like when he lost the 2016 election after the "grab 'em by the pussy" audio leaked?
Sekirodiealot
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2019
At this point, she deserves a thread. She's in her own little world.
Catboy Ranch
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2022
>It wouldn't have mattered. If any judge had declared election interference or rigging, it would have delegitimized the national election. A national election being delegitimized "officially" would have set up one of the two political parties in the US as being someone who rigged the election to win.
>That's the start of a civil war.
You're confusing what happened 1830-1865 when there was constant screaming about unfairness in Congress (including election handling) with what actually led up to that civil war. The electioneering didn't trigger the war, the writing was on the wall that Lincoln was going to win even though several Southern states eliminated him off the ballot entirely. So if you peel that back and go deeper, the complaints about the South's representation in the U.S. Senate was going to be knocked off-kilter for a decade or more while they squabbled over how to carve up land between Texas and California into slave vs. free states.
With Lincoln being an abolitionist, no compromise would likely be signed by the president that spread the "evil franchise" any further. It's not that there was a desire to plant cotton in Phoenix that was at stake, it was that Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, etc. were all likely to not care about the South or its interests, in particular with slavery, and the South would never hold a majority power bloc in the Senate ever again like they had since the founding.
If we're talking actual election process fraud here, which is what you're on to: you're talking about a scenario where a swing state or a surprise "solid" state is flipped. In most of these swing states a 1 point shift in vote requires a large number of local polling jurisdictions to be compromised. Anything larger than 1 point is such a huge fraud in terms of scale, you're likely leaning out of SCOTUS not just weighing in, but Congress as well.
How does Congress get involved? So.. you remember that "ceremony" that was going on inside the Joint Session of Congress during Jan 6?
What seems very ceremonial now, the ratification of the electoral college votes, now has real meaning. Depending on the state that had a compromised election, that state would actually face a real push in Congress, with the backdrop of real criminal investigations, the Supreme Court being directly involved: to not certify the electors.
There's certainly going to be an extreme fear of a civil war and lots of talk about it on every journalistic outlet there is in the lead up to the Joint session of Congress when we get to the state that was compromised and wants to flip the election.
Since that didn't even happen before the Civil War I'm pretty confident the chances of that exact scenario happening next January is precisely zero
>That's the start of a civil war.
You're confusing what happened 1830-1865 when there was constant screaming about unfairness in Congress (including election handling) with what actually led up to that civil war. The electioneering didn't trigger the war, the writing was on the wall that Lincoln was going to win even though several Southern states eliminated him off the ballot entirely. So if you peel that back and go deeper, the complaints about the South's representation in the U.S. Senate was going to be knocked off-kilter for a decade or more while they squabbled over how to carve up land between Texas and California into slave vs. free states.
With Lincoln being an abolitionist, no compromise would likely be signed by the president that spread the "evil franchise" any further. It's not that there was a desire to plant cotton in Phoenix that was at stake, it was that Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, etc. were all likely to not care about the South or its interests, in particular with slavery, and the South would never hold a majority power bloc in the Senate ever again like they had since the founding.
If we're talking actual election process fraud here, which is what you're on to: you're talking about a scenario where a swing state or a surprise "solid" state is flipped. In most of these swing states a 1 point shift in vote requires a large number of local polling jurisdictions to be compromised. Anything larger than 1 point is such a huge fraud in terms of scale, you're likely leaning out of SCOTUS not just weighing in, but Congress as well.
How does Congress get involved? So.. you remember that "ceremony" that was going on inside the Joint Session of Congress during Jan 6?
What seems very ceremonial now, the ratification of the electoral college votes, now has real meaning. Depending on the state that had a compromised election, that state would actually face a real push in Congress, with the backdrop of real criminal investigations, the Supreme Court being directly involved: to not certify the electors.
There's certainly going to be an extreme fear of a civil war and lots of talk about it on every journalistic outlet there is in the lead up to the Joint session of Congress when we get to the state that was compromised and wants to flip the election.
Since that didn't even happen before the Civil War I'm pretty confident the chances of that exact scenario happening next January is precisely zero
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2023
a schizo's ramblings don't count as proof she's lying.
it was one of the worst mid terms for the opposing party and especially for the gop in history. it was like 5th worst depending on how you count senate seats (worth more, or worth the same, or don't count) and for the GOP to get so few seats with biden shows yo they didn't really stop the rigging
no it doesn't, people are too spineless. especially veterans. people said we'd have tons of guys using their 2nd ammendment rights too back during the george floyd summer. lol didn't fucking happen.
some interpretations of the entire movie is that Dfens entire arc would have not lead to a murderous rampage if he wasn't fucked over every step of the way, he was an "old school" type guy in a modern era.
Stuff like the breakfast time or getting change for a phone call or getting shot at by teenagers were all very modern and recent problems that people had to deal with and wouldn't have been an issue back in dfen's day but the days of "rebel without a cause" were demographically replaced with "boyz in the hood" its also why the cop that catches him was a cuck who was equally mocked and belittled by everyone but just put up with it all like a real american. "i'm the bad guy?" doesn't get as much examination by the right wing because they're mostly retarded but the left has been mask off about their hatred for the ham and egger crowd for a hilariously long time. but it took until recently for most people on the right to have enough critical thinking skills to figure it out.
"no goyim, those guys deserved it for not voting dem"You mean like the Jan 6 folks?
except how true is that still? most zoomer's look up to internet weirdos than hollywood fruits now. and if you have indie enough music tastes like a proper human being they won't be forced to endorse kamala.
there's a reason that shit seems not to work on anyone under 30 now.
both shitlibs i'm pretty sure. also mark's looks got fucked up and thats why his career vanished so quickly in the 1980s, and why he went into VA back when it was something struggling actors do for quick cash
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2018
I disagree. I don't even follow NASCAR but she was in those GoDaddy commercials spammed everywhere for years. Even outside of that she was fairly well known solely for being a woman in racing, as sort of a proto-girlboss archetype (minus the "insufferable cunt" part).
That bitch either has been living under a rock the last decade and a half, is intentionally dense, or twelve years old.
Sekirodiealot
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2019
I have to wonder why anyone think they can replicate or even accomplish the cheat this late into the election. I feel another factor that helped in 2020 aside from covid was anti-Trump sentiment was stronger. I can imagine somewhere in the future, history looks back on him in a sympathetic light
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2021
They tried to stop Republicans from ballot-harvesting in CA and insist there was some technicality that meant only they could do it, and a judge told them to fuck off.
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2020
First of all, who or what is an Art Candee?
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2024
Yes, two WWII combat veterans were shitlibs.
At least put some effort into this, buddy.
Can you provide some sources on this? Not that I don't believe you, but I would like to have some sources on that.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
Your arguments are invalid and senseless. Have a nice day.
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2018
Not to sidetrack too badly, but I'm pretty certain "she" is mostly AI, the image she uses for a profile picture goes back to an AI art account on something called "artcandee" so it would make sense it's some sort of fake/AI faggotry. Someone with more skill, or hell any skill could probably run her account through some program and show a lot of her replies are jsut "FACTS!" or "TRUTH!"
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2018
I find the possibility of a successful steal to be much lower because pretty much every advantage they had in 2020 is gone. They have fewer resources, a significantly worse candidate, and need to pull off a much bigger steal with much less cover to win.
Ron Jeremy Stan Account
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2021
Lee Marvin actually was a Democrat and an outspoken progressive, mind you he was famous in the 1960s when our perception of political beliefs was different than what we're familiar with now. He's not an outlier, either. Bear in mind that Norman Lear – a.k.a. far-left activist TV show creator who brought us All In The Family – was a World War II veteran as well.
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2015
Lee Marvin also forced his girlfriend to abort two pregnancies - a shitlib trademark bar none.
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2018
I might be wrong on this, but shitlib is more a modernish term for someone who toes the party line no matter what, right? like patrick tomlinson. Someone like RFK jr is more what i think of when i think of a 60s era liberal, or jimmy dore maybe.
Lee Marvin was pro fag in the 60s, but i think that was more "hey stop beating up these faggots merely because they are faggots" not really pride parade fag stuff. Probably anti war and pro free speech sort of liberal.
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2021
A shitlib is someone whose "liberalism" is just part of him being an all-around shitty human being. He's belligerent, he hates people who aren't like him, he's whiny, he's childish, he's kind of a fag, and he dresses like a retard. He doesn't really think about anything or have any core beliefs; he's just a "liberal" as a way of being a decadent asshole.
Catboy Ranch
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2022
New Black Panthers is very FBA coded, the only black dudes barely interested in it are all FBAs. And Kamala is not an FBA and has a jew husband.
Nobody is going to go to jail for her.
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2021
I'm not Googling it. CA state gov tried to shut down GOP drop boxes in Orange County on some technicality.
MrJokerRager
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2019
CNN is like "Trump says bad word".
MSNBC is like "TRUMP MUST DIE, KILL HIM".
And the second assassin was heavily influenced by MSNBC style talking points.
- Status