Laura Loomer / @looms93 - The Conservative Brianna Wu

209255746-Complaint-images-0.jpg209255746-Complaint-images-1.jpg209255746-Complaint-images-2.jpg

209255746-Complaint-images-3.jpg209255746-Complaint-images-4.jpg209255746-Complaint-images-5.jpg

209255746-Complaint-images-6.jpg209255746-Complaint-images-7.jpg209255746-Complaint-images-8.jpg

209255746-Complaint-images-9.jpg209255746-Complaint-images-10.jpg209255746-Complaint-images-11.jpg

209255746-Complaint-images-11.jpg209255746-Complaint-images-12.jpg209255746-Complaint-images-13.jpg

209255746-Complaint-images-14.jpg209255746-Complaint-images-15.jpg209255746-Complaint-images-16.jpg

PDF attached
source: https://www.larryklayman.com/pdf/209255746-Complaint.pdf
 

Attachments

Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Trombonista and Freshly Baked Socks
Autistic Integrity said:
Not sure if how i can link/insert/whatever to the pdf but i uploaded it too
source: https://www.larryklayman.com/pdf/209255746-Complaint.pdf
Click to expand...
IMO Maher should probably try to remove to federal court under diversity jurisdiction, then argue Florida's anti-SLAPP statute applies under the Erie doctrine in the Eleventh Circuit, something that is currently unclear. Maybe that wouldn't be the best strategy for him but it would be fun to watch.

Or he might just make an anti-SLAPP motion right in the Florida court.

Also this complaint is just fucking idiotic. She's claiming things like "maybe" and "might" and "may" are objective statements of fact. That's pure nonsense. I hope the dumb cunt paid a lot for this pile of trash.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Trombonista, Dean Pentel, L_I_F_T_E_D and 3 others
NAL but trying to wrap my head around this.
So $50k in legal fees and another $149,950,000 in reputational damage that prevents her from being an investigative journalist, getting her feelings hurt, and people thinking shes essentially an adulterous slur?
A simple internet search of her already makes her look so insane that nobody would hire her for any serious journalism. There's a drunk video of her already acting like an Aryan loving jew slut. Not to mention her wet bread pussy that she has blackmailed a young man into licking. How could this crazy bitch have any standing over $150 mil in lost potential monetary gains?
Surprised she didn't put "And now I'm not even allowed to continue my dream of flying in Trump's plane any more because of Maher."

Also looking at her oh so professional news website this crazy bitch didn't even replace the stock images in her WordPress theme.
Screenshot_20241023-103526-070.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Vecr
Autistic Integrity said:
So $50k in legal fees and another $149,950,000 in reputational damage that prevents her from being an investigative journalist, getting her feelings hurt, and people thinking shes essentially an adulterous slur?
Click to expand...
She's a public figure and has to allege actual malice. Claiming a public figure had an adulterous affair is literally what New York Times v. Sullivan was about. It also has to be a statement of fact. Loomer cites one thing, and pastes it into every cause of action claimed.

Maher sperging said:
I think maybe Laura Loomer’s in an arranged relationship to affect the election because she’s very close to Trump. She's 31, looks like his type. We did an editorial here a few years ago ... it was basically, who's Trump fucking? Because I said, you know, it's not nobody. He’s been a dog for too long, and it’s not Melania. I think we may have our answer this week. I think it might be Laura Loomer.
Click to expand...

MAYBE. MAY. MIGHT.

Good luck with that.

I think she'd have dropped her panties given the slightest opportunity but I also think Trump can do a lot better than that insane skank.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Trombonista, Dean Pentel, Norman B. Normal and 4 others
AnOminous said:
She's a public figure and has to allege actual malice. Claiming a public figure had an adulterous affair is literally what New York Times v. Sullivan was about. It also has to be a statement of fact. Loomer cites one thing, and pastes it into every cause of action claimed.
Click to expand...
Does "I think" and "maybe" keep it from being a statement of fact?
this is the full Maher quote for anyone else looking
Bill Maher said:
I think maybe Laura Loomer’s in an arranged relationship to affect the election because she’s very close to Trump. She’s 31, looks like his type. We did an editorial here a few years ago…it was basically, who’s Trump fucking? Because I said, you know, it’s not nobody. He’s been a dog for too long, and it’s not Melania. I think we may have our answer this week. I think it might be Laura Loomer.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trombonista
Autistic Integrity said:
Does "I think" and "maybe" keep it from being a statement of fact?
this is the full Maher quote for anyone else looking
Click to expand...
I quoted exactly that in the very post you quoted. And no, there aren't any magic words that automatically immunize your speech, but in context, it's clear he's speculating. It's idle gossip. No reasonable person would view that as a statement of fact.
mailfrawd said:
She’s looking to pull a low 6 figure settlement out of this. She might even get 7, who knows.
Click to expand...
Maher isn't going to settle shit. Neither is HBO unless they want to advertise themselves as a free pile of cash for any lunatic one of their people insults.

If anything they'll pursue sanctions because it's patently frivolous and Florida has a very nice anti-SLAPP statute.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Trombonista, Dean Pentel, BlueArmedDevil and 2 others
what about "i heard a rumor that.." "anonymous source said..." seem to hear those a lot..sorry to derail
 
Autistic Integrity said:
what about "i heard a rumor that.." "anonymous source said..." seem to hear those a lot..sorry to derail
Click to expand...
It is all in the context and what a reasonable person would believe hearing those words. There's a reason people use these words. "I heard a rumor" isn't going to do you much good if there's proof you were the one who made up that rumor. "Anonymous source said" isn't going to do you much good if you're the anonymous source. "Allegedly" isn't going to be some magical invocation of sphere of protection when you knew for a fact the person alleging it was an institutionalized schizophrenic you also knew was notorious for bizarre hallucinations.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Trombonista, beets4borshenko, Dean Pentel and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back