Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 101 25.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 72 17.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 162 40.2%

  • Total voters
    403
You have to look at his life not through your own thought process, but through that of a midwit narc who achieved his dream and burnt it all down.
His original stated goal was to earn enough from streaming that he no longer had to take legal cases, but I'm not sure that his dream wasn't always to use that as a stepping stone into the broader "entertainment" industry. His streaming schedule was a punishing one and would never have been sustainable long term.
 
to have a private community of fans that buy his bullshit
I think some people have children for this reason. Create their own fan army of mini-me's who are forced to listen to them. Basically never works, since children are people.
Nope mdma if used at normal dosages and not too often does not cause any type of hangover and can have the opposite effect.
At the risk of turning this thread into Trip Report Central, this tracks with my experiences. Never felt any sort of hangover the next day, felt pretty great actually.
Of course I wasn't wearing a balldo at the time, and it was in winter, so no pesky heat allergy flare ups brought on by the tropical Jamaican sun.
He's pity farming.
He's apologizing to his fans by talking about himself.
Guess the ole molly watuh doesn't cure narcissism.
 
I know people here like to see literal words before a thing is considered settled, but in this case, whether he said "I will pay you OK one million dollars to come on my show" or just implied it, or spoke euphemistically, or didn't "promise," or let them think it, or whatever sloppy or slippery thing, he was disingenuous and is now not only wiggling away from it per usual, but he's being a belligerent head-ass about it, also per usual. No honor and no grace

As an autistic person, I am very literal, but even I can understand social cues well enough to learn very quickly when someone has 'promised' something and is merely taking advantage of not outright. When someone plays games like this, you learn to dislike them.

My nieces and nephews do it when asked 'Have you tidied your room?' We have to check because we never said 'Tidy it ALL the way...' and they just picked up a few bits and bobs. This is primary school logic most people leave behind.

you know for a moment i really thought this was him saying that he was cooking for his family. i should've known he meant that he was cooking for himself. what a fag. "how can you know if you're cool?" you know from just that nick never understood what was important. he only understands on the surface level. that 'being cool' as nebulous a concept as it is comes entirely from how others perceive you, but he just doesn't know how to manipulate that perception effectively, and he fools himself into think that if he perceives himself as smart, then others must be perceiving him that way too.

maybe that's why it makes him so angry and unable to stop taking bait when people shit on him for posts similar to this, because he has his cognitive dissonance brought to his attention.
Oh, so you feel "putting parts of me aside" was worse than the decisions you made that led to your kids being removed and testing positive for cocaine? Self-centred asshole.

He's probably in a good mood because he had to pretend he wasn't in contact with April for a few days then she came round and had a sleepover after her omnibus hearing, and they felt they could go right back to their previous behaviour. Nick's gay enough that "things I had set aside and how important they were" and "none as bad as putting parts of me aside" could be cringe but ~sneaky~ public messages / declarations to April.

Nick's focus is always himself. The enabling 'self-love' form of therapy is to blame for this kind of mindset, and the new zeitgeist is about accepting yourself uncritically without any motivation to change. Nicks old audience and many internet denizen who are not brainrotted commies realise this.
 
"COOL guys cook STEAK, EGGS, and MUSHROOM sauce for breakfast, super MANLY and cool! How about you NERDS??"

"I cook breakfast for my loving family."
No nerd, I'm one of those real, actual Christian fathers who will spoon feed you steak and eggs. I never had my kids taken into protective custody, those are merely your delusions. Enjoy mushroom sauce, stalker child.
 
This is a nitpick and Nick probably doesn't actually understand this anyway, but looking at just the money, giving money to charity even with the deduction on your taxable revenues still costs more than not giving to charity.
Yes, but, as you say, that's "looking at just the money." There's also less tangible aspects to making such donations. Such as good PR. Corporations, for example, frequently view charitable donations as a form of advertising, and the charity will often be more than happy to put their corporate logo on crap.

In the case of the paintings, Nick could have paid a lot of money at the charity auction, declared the fair market value of the paintings well below what he paid (for the write-off), and THEN also used such paintings as decorative backdrop in his for-profit show and to brag how well off and "charitable" he is. The last part of that being the less tangible, but still very real, benefit he received from buying them.

Screenshot_20241030-094453~2.png

Alternatively, he could have also claimed them as business expenses. That has been discussed in this thread at some length in the past. He loves claiming business expenses.

My point is this: Nick is all about looking good. I do not believe he gives "charity" without some expectation of getting something in return. Which basically means it's not charity.

The $1,000 to the Jamaican "dancer" might have happened, and I think a lot of people here want it to have happened, because the idea of him being scammed is hilarious.

HOWEVER, it's also possible he made the whole story up out of whole cloth. To make him following the two bulls seem less worthy of mockery. Maybe even get him some asspats for being so charitable to this woman.

A good alternate theory here is he wanted to appeal to Kalea's own sense of charity, and the fact she is female (and would therefore maybe be more naturally sympathetic to a woman who is pregnant and experiencing hardship). So he cooked up this cockamamie story to try and emotionally manipulate her back onto Team Rekieta. He pulled the same shit with Perception Check where he tried to claim (falsely) he was being railroaded like Vic. Knowing full well PC's admiration and support of Vic.

Except it didn't work in either case, and the Jamaica story he's now going with is just causing people to laugh even harder. Nick is a dumbass.
 
Fucking eugenia cooney has better posture than rackets now, which suggests something is REALLY wrong with the guy's health.
Okay so in addition to a non-practicing liver, he be also have a non-practicing musculature and a non-practicing cardiovascular system. Should start taking bets as to what will kill Balldo, because it's looking like it could be anything at this rate.
 
Alternatively, he could have also claimed them as business expenses. That has been discussed in this thread at some length in the past. He loves claiming business expenses.
Another note, the same explanation about charity for the sake of deductions on your taxable revenue applies to Business Expenses as well.

Being able to "write something off for taxes" will likely become an excuse used to justify unwise purchases. Is something you write off on your taxes less costly than that same item if you don't? Yes, but not nearly as much as what most people think.

Unless you're actually doing math to make those calculations when making a purchase for yourself, you run the risk of being needlessly wasteful with your money because you've tricked yourself into thinking the value of the purchase exceeds the cost you paid for it.

You buy a drawing Tablet that costs, say $2,000, and write off 25% in taxes. Congrats, you still spent $1,500 on a toy you will use once to draw exactly one caricature of Anisa Sarkeesian as Muhammad. Think of how much Hookers and Blow you lost out on because of a single shitty jpg.


TLDR: Nick is a white bread ass nigger who likely spent ALL of his money he earned during his productive streaming years and has nothing left beyond what he gets from mom and dad.
 
One of the big signs of it is fucked posture, because those muscles are just gone and they can't hold the body in place any more.

Yeah, I noticed that during the cokestream. He looked so thin and spindly and pathetic. It was not just that he was swaying and wobbly because he was completely fucked up beyond all recognition. He looked at some points like he could barely keep himself from collapsing. There are several times when he slouches down to attempt to read a message and can't keep himself from sinking lower and almost falls off the chair.
 
Settle in for a 10 page discussion about mushroom sauce recipes for steak and if those eggs are pre boiled store bought ones or not

:story:
Please God, no.

Better idea: Appeals court needs to hurry up and come back with DENIED. That way we can have 100 pages calling him a retard faggot again. I like that idea better.

Honestly, it should not take that long at all. Way less than Monty. Way less than the Franks motion. I don't even think they need to write out a reason for denying it as they did in those two examples. It's a discretionary appeal. They can just say "no, we're not hearing it."
 
Back