An article on bike lanes in cities published by CBC (
original source/
archive) over the whole Doug Ford/bike lanes thing.
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
Naturally, some idiots only read the headline and republished it to urbanist/leftist rags like Planetizen, with the headline of "Over and Over, Studies Show New Bike Lanes Don't Cause Congestion" but that's not what the article says.
In addition to suggesting induced demand for bicycle lanes (please point to a city where people are cramming up bicycle lanes built in the last 10-15 years), three cherry-picked cities are brought up as brought up as examples.
New York, where a 35% decrease in travel times was reported on one major throughfare with new bike lanes...and even then, a left-hand turn lane was added in the process. It's not like Toronto where bike lanes were just hastily added in old traffic lanes. (Remember, urbanists forget you can do a lot with roads without adding capacity--something Road Guy Rob is well aware of).
Copenhagen, where they don't actually discuss any impact to traffic with bike lanes (or even if bike lanes were at the expense of traffic lanes).
Paris, where they cite that bike use went up from 2018 to 2019 while car use went down between 2010 and 2018. Why the stats discrepancy? The French article (which I couldn't translate directly) mentions that there was a 25% drop in motorcycles and scooters as well during that time.
Then Toronto, where in 2022 the traffic times almost doubled for the segment...