- Joined
- Jan 17, 2014
Hey @Jaimas, looks like Cheong has an archive of the Steam false-flag from Wu's account! https://archive.is/t1Oxl
'If Trump can do it, so can I!'
Brianna Wu / John Walker Flynt - "Biggest Victim of Gamergate," Failed Game Developer, Failed Congressional Candidate
- Thread starter Jaimas
- Start date
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2015
This is a Twitter exchange between a horsefaced tranny and a horsefucking tranny. The voice of reason is the horsefucking tranny. Sad!
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2015
So wait, 'backchannel' means to Wu 'not screaming you bullshit out into the world via twitter' ?
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2016
"They already have VK." not that Wu knows what that is
>that header image
:horrifying:
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
"I'm going to err on the side of kindness and support" sounds suspiciously like the passive-aggressive "I'll pray for you."
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2016
How can your feel bad about making things when you don't actually make anything?
- Joined
- May 25, 2013
So in other words, she has found a convenient excuse to not work on games or patches to broken games for four years, and instead plans to pontificate on Twitter about how great of a person she is, while pulling in money not only from Patreon, but also from potential donors to her vaporware political campaign.
I see someone has been studying from the Big Book of Jill Stein...
Quasar
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2015
I wonder if Wu has done her homework...
It's gonna be real easy for her to mess this one up
The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), as amended in 2002 by BCRA, provides that a contribution or donation accepted by a candidate or the holder of a federal office may not be “converted by any person to any personal use.” 2 U.S.C. § 439a(b)(1). Congress codified for the most part the FEC’s previously issued regulations on personal use and retained the ban on personal use of campaign funds. Since BCRA’s passage, the FEC has published new regulations that, like their predecessor regulations, both (1) provide a general definition of the term “personal use” and (2) determine that certain uses of campaign funds constitute personal use and hence are prohibited.
The general definition in the regulations provides that an impermissible “personal use” of campaign funds is use to pay an expense of any person that would be incurred even in the absence of the candidacy for office:
Personal use means any use of funds in a campaign account of a present or former candidate to fulfill a commitment, obligation or expense of any person that would exist irrespective of the candidate’s campaign . . . . [11 C.F.R. § 113.1(g).]
Among the particular uses of campaign funds that are specified in the FEC regulations as constituting an impermissible personal use are payments for the following:
Source: https://ethics.house.gov/campaign-a...funds-and-resources#campaign_FEC_personal_use
The general definition in the regulations provides that an impermissible “personal use” of campaign funds is use to pay an expense of any person that would be incurred even in the absence of the candidacy for office:
Personal use means any use of funds in a campaign account of a present or former candidate to fulfill a commitment, obligation or expense of any person that would exist irrespective of the candidate’s campaign . . . . [11 C.F.R. § 113.1(g).]
Among the particular uses of campaign funds that are specified in the FEC regulations as constituting an impermissible personal use are payments for the following:
- Household food items or supplies, or clothing;
- Mortgage, rent or utility payments for any part of any personal residence of the candidate or a family member;
- Admission to a sporting event, concert, theater or other form of entertainment, unless part of a specific campaign activity;
- Dues, fees or gratuities at a country club, health club, recreational facility or other non-political organization, unless part of the costs of a specific fundraising event; and
- Tuition payments, other than for the training of campaign staff.
Source: https://ethics.house.gov/campaign-a...funds-and-resources#campaign_FEC_personal_use
It's gonna be real easy for her to mess this one up
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2013
And the House is already a grab bag of shysters, yuppies, and quasi-lolcows anyway.
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2013
But there's no way she can keep this up for two years, she's already spergin and sprinting towards the finish line, slandering her opponent, shilling for press, trying to put advisors together. The Wu we've come to know will get bored in months.
Mike Hunt
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2016
I just want her campaign to progress enough for her many lies to come out in the open, have legitimate news outlets question her on it, and she'd be forced to admit her lies on public record. She's been able to control her narratives on Twitter, I would absolutely love to see her defend herself in a forum where she can't selectively block people who don't want to believe her lies from the get-go.
Is that too optimistic? I'm not from the US, so I don't know how much media scrutiny a candidate for a representative attracts.
Is that too optimistic? I'm not from the US, so I don't know how much media scrutiny a candidate for a representative attracts.
The best part is his inner male already can't help himself. He's blown his metaphorical load way too early and laid out his "campaign" is going to be lazy as hell, based on the lowest of hanging fruit, and based on a combination of hubris and buzzwords.
Any serious candidate he tries to run against will make short work of him, because even politics requires more effort than he's gonna put into this.
If he fucks up and puts himself in a position where he has to tell the truth or look like a liar for dodging the question, he is so screwed, and any halfway decent politician could easily sandbag him with a pointed question in any public forum and put him on the spot.
I'd love to have him have to say in public all the shit about his past. There is so much contradictory information out there, released by his own hand no less, he's screwed no matter what lie he tells, especially if the truth is an even worse alternative.
And if he's forced to admit being a tranny, stick a fork in him, he's done.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
John would never admit to lying about anything. Instead, he'd start shrieking insane accusations at the questioner and completely melt down. He is completely incapable of dealing with situations where he isn't allowed to control everything. Think Pakman but much, much worse.
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2016
Remember when journalists did their job and called people out when they lied? All John ever does are soft interviews where no one questions his narrative.
I can't wait until he's really grilled and has to answer for his lies. That is if he manages to continue this farce of a campaign. I don't believe for a minute he's going to go all the way.
I can't wait until he's really grilled and has to answer for his lies. That is if he manages to continue this farce of a campaign. I don't believe for a minute he's going to go all the way.
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2016
As much as I am looking forward to all of that, I'm also sure that Wu will either make up some lame excuse to bow out from any public appearances ("gamergate will have snipers posted everywhere!"). If somehow Wu does actually re-grow the balls to show up, he'll loudly screech "misogyny!" and "gamergater!" the minute the conversation doesn't go his way. If Bri-bri's opponent brings up any of his shady past, Johnny will have already bolted out the door before his opponent can finish his sentence.
Either way, there is a fuckton of LOLs to be had.
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2014
I'm counting on the latter. It would essentially be the same thing as admitting the accusations are true, so no matter what he does, he's damned.
It's the Kiwi Xanatos Gambit, to quote @Jaimas, and he'll have no one to blame but himself.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2015
Same reasons why Chris thought Sonichu was good enough to be published by Nintendo/Marvel: greed, narcissism, mental re.tardation.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014