Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

Have the police ever taken the Metokur approach with fatrick where they just call him to make sure he's not committing murder or some other random shit a swatter calls in? Or do they got him in handcuffs every time?
According to Rick, every time they get a call they blast his head off with a shotgun then nuke his house. He survives through sheer refusal to let the idiots win.
 
Sorry if this is a long and autistic post but it helps me a bit to get it all written down to help understand and digest things like this, corrections from wonderful people like @Useful_Mistake aside.
Remember that this early on the court is looking for batshit arguments to dismiss - and so it is assuming much and saying “could this be something for trial” and the question, on its face, isn’t directly answered in existing law or court precedent.
 
Dismissed without prejudice against the officers themselves.
Incorrect. It is dismissed against the city, as count one was solely levied against the city.
s for all counts (1 included if they raise it again) against the cops they're going off of Pat's word that they were being real mean motherfuckers and threatened to kick his door down and ushered them out at gunpoint every time and didn't change how they responded and are thus allowing them to proceed.
Also incorrect. They are going off the complaint and from police reports.
Continuing, they came to a 3 strikes rule for some reason in regards to the city. The first swatting, count 1, was the first real time they responded that way, so they can't reasonably say they didn't act appropriately or that the city's policies failed since they lacked info. It's the same for the 2nd and 3rd incidents, but now for some reason at 4+ the court thinks that's when policy change could reasonably happen and they're (potentially) culpable? I'm retarded so maybe I don't get it.
Also incorrect. The 1st count was dismissed because Patrick didn't allege that the officers knew that the call was false, and therefore "because no constitutional violation was sufficiently pled, there can be no Monell claim"

As to counts 2 and 3, Patrick failed to properly plead "the showing of an unconstitutional policy or procedure". Nor did he plead well a unconstitutional pattern of behavior, which even viewing favorably to him cannot be established by two bad acts. They also failed to plead facts under the "failure to supervise theory"

As to the other counts, by that point the court plausibly see a pattern, and a year long deliberate indifference to constitutional violations.

Interestingly, the court mentioned that it will allow the defense to argue qualified immunity at a latter juncture.
 
My my pig man, whatever are you trying to say here?
1730490459287.png

I mentioned this a while back on a different thread but his kind of social media "updoot me for supporting currentgood and hating currentbad" liberal all have an inevitable "YEAH WELL....WELL....WELL YOUR A FUCKING FAGGOT!" moment they are steadily ticking down towards by virtue of the fact they are such shameless asspat chasers they likely spent years if not decades of their lives before 2012/2013 hit being the most insufferable Gen X/wannabe Gen X edgetards, and thus have long been repressing their desire to scream whatever slur comes to mind at people they hate, and the angrier they get the closer they come to making that fateful slipup
 
Interestingly, the court mentioned that it will allow the defense to argue qualified immunity at a latter juncture.
This actually was another question I had so good to know. It was difficult for me to parse this as you could tell, thanks for the clarification.
 
Thank you for your autism. No wonder his brain is broken. Repeating the same phrase, over and over, is bound to do bad things to his already warped psychology.
as a much more intelligent and much less fat man once stated: if you repeat a lie often enough, it will eventually become the truth
 
475 pages deep from the beginning - Elon Musk has just been appointed to Twitter's board and three things I'm looking forward to:
  1. When the court audio and transcript of Pat's loss to BDA makes an appearance.
  2. The first time Pat says 'Enjoy prison, stalker'
  3. When @Judge Holden forays into the thread
I suspect all three are coming very soon and I can't wait! I'm pretty sure Bossmanjack will give me enough time to completely deep dive this guy before he comes back.
It's been a wild ride.
 
I don’t understand the Leftwing conspiracy theory on the Trump assassination. The right wing one is more plausible (it was allowed to happen to trigger a war with Iran, like John McCain always wanted and kill Trump to demoralize the MAGA Republicans).

The one Pat subscribes to is that Trump either planned it, he didn’t get hit, he did get hit (not by a bullet, by shrapnel), the shooter was a Republican incel, or something far more retarded. It’s very fat cope.
 
Jesus I just caught up.
With the most recent MPD and City decisions being 'well yes, but actually no, but kind of' be some sort of ploy to let Patrick have just enough r hope to continue with his case to let his lawyers bleed him dry?

I could see them knowing him so well that they will let him go until he bleeds out every penny he has, just because he is who he is. Suffer Pig.

I am probably completely wrong, but I could see it.
 
@Useful_Mistake with discovery pending, what kind of juicy details would the city be able to access about Patrick? Would it include location data or telegram data, texts/emails not directed towards the city? 16, know dick about the law, etc I’m sure we probably won’t see most of it since they’re being so weird about the evidence they’ve submitted so far.
 
For the actual lawyers out there: does this mean Rick will have to spend a whole lotta money, or juuust a little bit more?
He's gonna need a loooooooooot of money if he plans to take it to trial
, but kind of' be some sort of ploy to let Patrick have just enough r hope to continue with his case to let his lawyers bleed him dry?

I could see them knowing him so well that they will let him go until he bleeds out every penny he has, just because he is who he is. Suffer Pig.
Motion to dismiss is viewed favorably to the non-moving party. In this case, that'd be Patrick.
@Useful_Mistake with discovery pending, what kind of juicy details would the city be able to access about Patrick?
While I can't say for certain, they did file their preliminary discovery plan:
Screenshot 2024-11-01 232923.png
 
Back