Razörfist / The Rageoholic / xRazorfistx / Daniel Paul Harris - Hipster Metalfag. Game Journo-Doesn't Play Games He Reviews. Thief Fanfic Author. COOMER AND GROOMER.

Why the hell does this dipshit have such a problem with the Playstation 1 and 2?
Because Sony at the time was unabashedly Japanese. The PS1 is considered by many as the JRPG machine, the PS2 as well, to a lesser extent. But the biggest advantage of the PS2 was the monstrous library of games it had. And it was widlly successful, hence the seething from Tranny. The guy is in a perpetual state of asspain about consoles, games, comics and so forth, when he believes it's competitors, (e.g. the original Xbox vs PS2, The Shadow vs Batman, Witcher vs Elric, Thief vs MGS, Frech comics vs manga) is more deserving of the recognition and success that they never achieved. This fag is always on the losing team, which explains the seethe.
 
Whatever you feel about the game, Danny was talking about the game's troubled development , and a super-chat came in challenging him to a debate.
He's such a pussy that he won't even debate some random dude about Star Citizen. This is probably a debate that even his retarded ass can come out looking good. Because he's mostly right about Scam Citizen. That game has been in development forever, with an extremely bloated budget that never stops increasing. Best case scenario for fans of that game is being able to play it in their deathbed at the hospital, as they approach their 80's. This is probably one of the easiest debates he could have and he still shrinks away from it. This is a debate where he has a really good chance of owning his opponent. That Kyle debate must have given him severe ptsd, so much so that he won't even debate some random viewer, who probably isn't a seasoned debater, and probably doesn't possess the debate ability that's anywhere close to Kyle.
 
Last edited:
Here's Danny getting called out not finishing the games he reviews.
1731490157893.png

Bro, bro I play games on so many platforms. Bro, I game in Canada bro, fucking Canada, you wouldn't know all the games I even play, bro.
 
And you know what I agree with him on that, but the problem is this faggot melts down when someone challenges his perspective about Star Citizen, a fucking video game, he then proceeds to dilate and goes off on a bitchy asperger's induced rant, telling them to suck his dick, which they're not a 15-year-old Latin chick at Hot Topic Danny, I don't think they are interested.
The problem with the culture wars isn't that it is left vs right.

The problem with the culture wars is that it is the most retarded on either side who are calling the shots. If there is a point, I guarantee Destiny, Vaush, Sargon and Danny all missed it by a mile but are too high from huffing their own farts they completely missed it.

I wish the culture war was retards vs non-retards. Mainly because I miss highschool when I could get away with picking on retards.

Here's Danny getting called out not finishing the games he reviews.

View attachment 6640904
I fucking love this game. And to be perfectly honest if you played either of the Neverwinter Nights games than none of the Owlcat Pathfinder games are that difficult to understand, it is literally just an upgraded version of that. Just kinda hammers home my point of him being a retard.

CRPGs aren't Darksouls, they don't take a hell of a lot of practice to get into and be competent. It does take a lot of time and autism to be gamebreaking by exploiting the systems. But that is a matter of time and autism, and most people can grasp the basic concepts. Anybody who played a d20 game (Neverwinter Night 1 & 2 plus both KOTOR 1 & 2) the game mechanics should be like riding a bicycle for the Owlcat Pathfinder games. It should be even easier as I remember Razor saying he played D&D 3.5 at some stage with friends, which is, I repeat, almost the exact same system as used in Pathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous.
 
He's such a pussy that he won't even debate some random dude about Star Citizen. This is probably a debate that even his retarded ass can come out looking good. Because he's mostly right about Scam Citizen. That game has been in development forever, with an extremely bloated budget that never stops increasing. Best case scenario for fans of that game is being able to play it in their deathbed at the hospital, as they approach their 80's. This is probably one of the easiest debates he could have and he still shrinks away from it. This is a debate where he has a really good chance of owning his opponent. That Kyle debate must have given him severe ptsd, so much so that he won't even debate some random viewer, who probably isn't a seasoned debater, and probably doesn't possess the debate ability that's anywhere close to Kyle.
That should be easy fucking pickings. Star Citizen never went anywhere despite all the celebrity voicework, it's still stuck in limbo. Entire console generations have come and gone while it was still in development. Shitting on it and its defenders should be easy, even for someone of Razorfist's meager talents.

I suppose Kyle gave him such an ass-whooping that he decided to stay away from debates forever, since he figured out that he isn't as good at debates as he'd like.

Dude Danny hasn't even played Baldurs Gate 1 & 2 or any of the Pillars games on account of his Obsidian hate boner, none of the Divinity Original Sin games (he did stream 2 though, and his ass got rocked and sperged out about the games difficulty, which is why the stream is no longer available anywhere, which is a shame because there were a lot of gems of Danny seething in that one), hasn't played Planescape Torment, Icewind Dale, Neverwinter Nights. However he did stream the beginning of the second Pathfinder game, and got ass mad that people were telling him he was bad at CRPGS which I'm gonna clip. He claims to have played Fallout 1 & 2, which press X to doubt on that one.
Which again, makes his DnD-RPG dogmatism look even stupider when he didn't play a lot of the DnD-CRPGs back in the day. And I'm betting his playthrough of Fallouts 1 and 2 never got that far.

Because Sony at the time was unabashedly Japanese. The PS1 is considered by many as the JRPG machine, the PS2 as well, to a lesser extent. But the biggest advantage of the PS2 was the monstrous library of games it had. And it was widlly successful, hence the seething from Tranny. The guy is in a perpetual state of asspain about consoles, games, comics and so forth, when he believes it's competitors, (e.g. the original Xbox vs PS2, The Shadow vs Batman, Witcher vs Elric, Thief vs MGS, Frech comics vs manga) is more deserving of the recognition and success that they never achieved. This fag is always on the losing team, which explains the seethe.
I loved the original Xbox, but I also loved the PS1 and PS2. They gave me and my cousins plenty of good gamer nights. The fact that Danny-boy has to draw a line in the sand and judge one thing as good and another as evil goes to show how insecure he is, when most gamers today celebrate all the good that multiple consoles and companies brought back in the day.

A DnD-RPG zealot like Danny-boy should be happy that JRPGs brought tons of people into the genre. And like I said before, the JRPGs he despised had more DnD DNA than the casual RPGs that came about due to the "westernization of gaming" that he praises from the Xbox 360 era. All those FPS games like Call of Duty and casual RPGs that he wound up hating like Skyrim and Mass Effect 2 came about as a result of said "westernization".

The fact that he's always on the losing team seething that his favorite didn't become massively popular is kind of funny, especially since it's almost as if he does this to himself by always shitting on popular works and trying to promote things that are less popular. Eventually, you'd have to ask; is it just bad luck, or is it his desire to always pick the less popular option then just seething when said less popular option doesn't become popular?

CRPGs aren't Darksouls, they don't take a hell of a lot of practice to get into and be competent. It does take a lot of time and autism to be gamebreaking by exploiting the systems. But that is a matter of time and autism, and most people can grasp the basic concepts. Anybody who played a d20 game (Neverwinter Night 1 & 2 plus both KOTOR 1 & 2) the game mechanics should be like riding a bicycle for the Owlcat Pathfinder games. It should be even easier as I remember Razor saying he played D&D 3.5 at some stage with friends, which is, I repeat, almost the exact same system as used in Pathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous.
It's basically just a game of "how do I break the system". There's the way the game-makers want you to play the game, then there's the way that utterly breaks the game, and it doesn't take that long to figure out how to do it, if you're good with math, stat-building, and memorization.

The problem with the culture wars isn't that it is left vs right.

The problem with the culture wars is that it is the most retarded on either side who are calling the shots. If there is a point, I guarantee Destiny, Vaush, Sargon and Danny all missed it by a mile but are too high from huffing their own farts they completely missed it.

I wish the culture war was retards vs non-retards. Mainly because I miss highschool when I could get away with picking on retards.
The Left went full retard, and the Right figured that they ought to do the same thing to combat it. Basically, that's the culture war in a nutshell.

The only difference is that the Left's SJW talking heads are a bit more professional since they actually went to school and know how to formulate an argument, even if their points are wrong. You look at how someone like Anita Sarkeesian formulated her arguments and it's clear that at the very least, her literary skills are actually up to par.

The Right's talking heads like Sargon and Danny flunked out of school while smelling their own farts, and most of their arguments are entirely reliant on the ideas of smarter people than them whose ideas they leeched off from, like how Sargon mooches off of Locke, and how Danny-boy copied others' arguments about how bad Lincoln was.
 
You look at how someone like Anita Sarkeesian formulated her arguments and it's clear that at the very least, her literary skills are actually up to par.
Only problem is a lot of Anita's arguments were made by her husband, who wrote lots of her scripts. However, when those two got divorced and Anita tried to go on her own, it kinda showed this chick knew jack shit of what she was talking about.
 
Coming back to this thread since Razor's doing that shit where he forgets/flip flops on things he said in the same week:

Oh my science, dup's cabinet could be...le bad!!!?
1731517754226.png


If you whine about his picks, you ain't MAGA!
1731517638411.png


Something I've noticed is that as his notoriety ramped up during Trump's first term, so did his cow status. And I think that it's going happen again during Donald's next one. Seems like when Danny feels like has some ideological victory or high ground, he gets cocky and gets more brazen with his retarded takes on things, and with it, more defensive and bitchy, as if he expects that since his brand overall politics is somewhat more mainstream in retaliation against the far left, so to should his audience agree with everything else he says lest they get a thesaurus-laden sperg out.
 
Last edited:
Danny seething about "detractors stealing" his scary great "jokes".
View attachment 6637253
Double post, but is it me or is Danny seriously taking fucking credit for the WE WUZ KANGS meme here? Nigger, that's a 4chan /pol/ meme that dates back, to my recollection, 2013. A time when you were mostly known for your jerk off phone pics and your retarded defense of the Xbox One being a TV TV TV machine.
 
Coming back to this thread since Razor's doing that shit where he forgets/flip flops on things he said in the same week:

Oh my science, dup's cabinet could be...le bad!!!?
View attachment 6641710

If you whine about his picks, you ain't MAGA!
View attachment 6641701
The fact that Danny-boy is mad that Trump might compromise with his political rivals goes to show that he doesn't understand politics. When you win, it's important to show conciliatory gestures to your rivals to show that you aren't a vindictive cunt and that they can work with you. Danny-boy would rather have Trump burn bridges with everyone but his true believers, which is a guaranteed way to fuck up in politics, because the only people you'll be left with are useless ass-kissers.

No wonder he supported Sargon back when that tool ran for office. They're both political fuck-ups; it makes sense that those two see eye-to-eye.

Something I've noticed is that as his notoriety ramped up during Trump's first term, so did his cow status. And I think that it's going happen again during Donald's next one. Seems like when Danny feels like has some ideological victory or high ground, he gets cocky and gets more brazen with his retarded takes on things, and with it, more defensive and bitchy, as if he expects that since his brand overall politics is somewhat more mainstream in retaliation against the far left, so to should his audience agree with everything else he says lest they get a thesaurus-laden sperg out.
Sounds suspiciously like the Marxists and SJWs. They got bolder and stupider whenever their man was in office. Looks like Danny-boy shares plenty of flaws with his SJW adversaries.

Double post, but is it me or is Danny seriously taking fucking credit for the WE WUZ KANGS meme here? Nigger, that's a 4chan /pol/ meme that dates back, to my recollection, 2013. A time when you were mostly known for your jerk off phone pics and your retarded defense of the Xbox One being a TV TV TV machine.
The fact that Danny-boy tried to defend that console and its retarded policy goes to show how his critical thinking skills are in the dumpster. Friends don't let friends do stupid things. If Danny-boy truly cared about the health of the Xbox brand, he'd have opposed Microsoft's Xbox One policies. It goes to show that he's less of a reasoned critic and more of a sycophant for the things he likes.

Protip, Danny-boy; nobody needs an ass-kisser. They have enough of those in the press.
 
Last edited:
Only problem is a lot of Anita's arguments were made by her husband, who wrote lots of her scripts. However, when those two got divorced and Anita tried to go on her own, it kinda showed this chick knew jack shit of what she was talking about.
You mean Jonathan McIntosh? I don't know they were married, you sure?
 
Danny getting cranky about his autistic parasocial audience that he cultivates.
View attachment 6640302
I've wondered about that, not just with Raz0r but with people who live by superchats in general, it just comes up with him a lot because a lot of the people who superchat him have really odd user names like "Jack's Dino God" or whatever. Whenever Terran reads one out it kind of reminds me of a camgirl on chaturbate having to pretend to be excited when she's tipped five credits equal to 2.5cents and says "Thanks DickDaddy6669!"

The parasocial relationship in a sad way always kind of reminds me of OnlyFans. I mean, I get it, if you're watching a multiple hour stream with someone regularly you'd probably like to hang out with them, they're probably filling a void for you depending on the kind of stream it is, but it gets so awkward for everyone involved when someone sends in a chat and just randomly starts talking about getting a new job or surviving a car accident. Of course they're not going to comment on how weird this is because they want that money, but you could cut that tension with a knife. Why are you chatting this at random youtubers? Don't you have friends or family to talk about this with? Or at least a discord server, anonymous image board of God forbid subreddit? And what are Raz0r and Terran supposed to say back? It's like some random woman trauma dumping to you about her failed marriage at a grocery store, or getting sucked into a schizophrenic's story on the bus. It's always an awkward silence followed by an awkward statement of condolences or congratulation. I'm sure it's exactly the same feeling as being the guy writing the response messages for OF girls having to contend with a pajeet who drops a thousand a month saying "I lub u u my girlfrend i make u wife"
 
I've wondered about that, not just with Raz0r but with people who live by superchats in general, it just comes up with him a lot because a lot of the people who superchat him have really odd user names like "Jack's Dino God" or whatever. Whenever Terran reads one out it kind of reminds me of a camgirl on chaturbate having to pretend to be excited when she's tipped five credits equal to 2.5cents and says "Thanks DickDaddy6669!"

The parasocial relationship in a sad way always kind of reminds me of OnlyFans. I mean, I get it, if you're watching a multiple hour stream with someone regularly you'd probably like to hang out with them, they're probably filling a void for you depending on the kind of stream it is, but it gets so awkward for everyone involved when someone sends in a chat and just randomly starts talking about getting a new job or surviving a car accident. Of course they're not going to comment on how weird this is because they want that money, but you could cut that tension with a knife. Why are you chatting this at random youtubers? Don't you have friends or family to talk about this with? Or at least a discord server, anonymous image board of God forbid subreddit? And what are Raz0r and Terran supposed to say back? It's like some random woman trauma dumping to you about her failed marriage at a grocery store, or getting sucked into a schizophrenic's story on the bus. It's always an awkward silence followed by an awkward statement of condolences or congratulation. I'm sure it's exactly the same feeling as being the guy writing the response messages for OF girls having to contend with a pajeet who drops a thousand a month saying "I lub u u my girlfrend i make u wife"
It just feels like the worst place to get emotional reinforcement, in my opinion. You're totally dependent on reacting with a bunch of total strangers who may have come to like you based on your ramblings, but they're completely anonymous and can totally fuck with you if they wanted to, and the worst you can do is ban them. Danny-boy is obviously trying to use his fanbase to give him some positive reinforcement, but the more his flaws surface in realtime and people call him out on them, the angrier and more impulsive he gets, and we've seen it happen more than once.

And the thing is, he ought to be more careful with his image. Especially with him having built up his image as a classic RPG nerd like Spoony; he slags JRPGs for not being good DnD-RPGs, but when made to play the latter, he sucks at them. That does more damage to his image than the debate performance with Kyle. He's in his turf, playing the games that he tells everyone he loves, and he's screwing up playing them live.

This is especially egregious because in the internet, your image is everything. It's not like real life where people get used to the real you; the positives and the negatives, and they can judge that for themselves. 90% of the people in the internet will judge you based on your image, and either hail you as a hero or mock you as a lolcow. And with Danny-boy being impulsive and vindictive as fuck, that's going to bite him in the ass one day. Especially since he's working to make himself more of a public figure by showing up in other people's podcasts. I'm getting Sargon flashbacks from that.
 
Last edited:
Only problem is a lot of Anita's arguments were made by her husband, who wrote lots of her scripts. However, when those two got divorced and Anita tried to go on her own, it kinda showed this chick knew jack shit of what she was talking about.
Hey. Are you implying forcing a man to do all the work you can't do for the good of the matriarchy isn't a feminazi utopia? I mean. Sure it's weird that the laborous tasks of mank in d are the creative skillsets men have no inherent biological advantage for and not, you know the manual labor and sports men have a distinct inherent advantage in. But what do I know. I only watch and enjoy several books and movies written by women who unlike Anita were actually competent at their jobs.
 
Back