J
JU 199
Guest
kiwifarms.net
"People in these facilities aren't criminals"
lol no
lol no
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Absolutely. Anyone who doesn't kiss the ass of the cult leader must be banished from the tribe lest they influence others. Everyone who questions anything is now a troll. It will discourage questions from the faithful who so desperately want Greta's stamp of approval, but it also means genuine supporters will get purged as well.
It's another indication that Greta cannot, and never will be able to, see the organisations with which she's involved as separate from herself.
lol they make no effort to help? The fuck? They provide detainees with food, clothes, water, a roof over there head, legal access, and visitation rights. Literally the best El Niño could ask for right now.Remember, Greta getting drunk and oversleeping her visitation with about-to-be-exported Child Bride IS THE FAULT OF ICE THOSE FASCIST RACISTS! Greta has a pathological aversion towards personal responsibility.
View attachment 169393
I doubt any of them took a moment to actually look at what was said before deleting the person from their friend lists, too; all it took was Shrek's word that this person was "trolling." All it takes is an accusation, and cult mentality does the rest. None of them will ever bother to wonder why someone might be against the lifeline.The post didn't accuse them of that, though. All it said was that they never have anyone online to help.
![]()
If anything the comment after that is more trollish, but Greta doesn't ask about that person. I tend to agree that it's about Greta purging her own friends list of doubters, but also about getting her followers to purge their lists of people who aren't 100% faithful Greta groupies.
Or the possibility that maybe he's going to start phasing Niraj out of his life and is just using ICE as a convenient excuse?Whats the chance Greta simply forgot when to see Nina? I'm not ruling out ICE getting it wrong but Greta is a notorious liar.
Whats the chance Greta simply forgot when to see Nina? I'm not ruling out ICE getting it wrong but Greta is a notorious liar.
I asked a non-profit consultant for a pagan org i used to be involved with. This is what she had to say:Well legally, doesn't Shrek have to release a report on their spending since they are a non-profit?
Yes. Legally, they have to release an annual report showing where every penny of donation money goes. If they fail to do so within a reasonable amount of time, and then continue to fail to comply when petitioned by the IRS or other enforcement agency (state AND federal) the IRS has grounds to strip them of their Non-profit status. At which point they can regain said status after 3 years so long as they comply with policy. Problem is that when a non-profit is stripped in the first place, it flags the organization so that should they petition for non-profit status again, they will be dealt with under far more scrutiny and with harsher penalties for failure to comply. That's why many non-profit orgs who get stripped change their name, change their board members around, and their executives to get around the harsher policies and such. (Re-structuring/re-branding.)
If you don't have things in order for the first 2 years or so, you get a hefty fine and they may look the other way or try to help you make sure you're ready for the next year's report. By year 3, if reports are not filed (or they are found to be lacking/fraudulent) and public access denied to said reports (especially if you can prove you donated to the organization in question), status is typically stripped if you continue to fail to comply to the rules and regulations.
"People in these facilities aren't criminals"
lol no
I asked a non-profit consultant for a pagan org i used to be involved with. This is what she had to say:
TLL has been in operation what? 1-3 years or so? TAP was recently established near the end of 2016? It's not uncommon for non-profit scams to be in operation for around 2-3 years (to establish themselves and gain a "trustworthy" reputation in order to maximize donations, grants, and other income flows) and then suddenly have branches come off with a separate (but often similar) organization for the scammers to jump to when the IRS comes down on the current one. Wash, rinse, repeat.
I asked a non-profit consultant for a pagan org i used to be involved with. This is what she had to say:
TLL has been in operation what? 1-3 years or so? TAP was recently established near the end of 2016? It's not uncommon for non-profit scams to be in operation for around 2-3 years (to establish themselves and gain a "trustworthy" reputation in order to maximize donations, grants, and other income flows) and then suddenly have branches come off with a separate (but often similar) organization for the scammers to jump to when the IRS comes down on the current one. Wash, rinse, repeat.
One thing I'm unclear about is whether Nina can take two bites at the cherry simultaneously. Can she still try to get a green card via the spousal route while trying to claim asylum at the same time, or does she have to pick one of those options right now (in which case it would make sense to try to go the spousal route and only try to claim asylum if that is ultimately denied)?
View attachment 169388
Okay that's cool that you made it to the Taco Bell on time, what about Niraj though
View attachment 169429
Why am I not surprised that a mere accusation of "trolling' is enough for the faithful to block someone without asking Greta what was said or where?
It's the "listen and believe" mentality so rampant among these types. If you question anything you're shut down and out. If the leader (in this case Greta) says someone is a kf-troll, then their a kf-troll and if you question it then you're in leagues with that person and probably a kf-troll yourself.
Ballin with whom, though? (Well at least he had the time to be ballin at the motel 8.
This is the kind of thing that can backfire badly, though. If you suddenly start declaring lots of previously loyal followers to be trolls, maybe some will believe you, but others will start asking the very questions you don't want being asked. So you unperson them, and that in turn creates more doubters. You wind up with a chain reaction where the only people on your side are yes-men who'll happily let you walk over a cliff as long as it was your idea.If anything the comment after that is more trollish, but Greta doesn't ask about that person. I tend to agree that it's about Greta purging her own friends list of doubters, but also about getting her followers to purge their lists of people who aren't 100% faithful Greta groupies. She doesn't want to risk being asked awkward questions in non-public posts right now.
Well I mean, if you break the law, you are by definition a criminal.Remember, Greta getting drunk and oversleeping her visitation with about-to-be-exported Child Bride IS THE FAULT OF ICE THOSE FASCIST RACISTS! Greta has a pathological aversion towards personal responsibility.
View attachment 169393
I love the way she describes it as "lying," like they were deliberately trying to catch her out or something. Probably they had different hours on New Year's Day and the website had been overlooked - it happens. Or more likely, Greta's lying.Okay that's cool that you made it to the Taco Bell on time, what about Niraj though
View attachment 169429
Heh, someone is asking questions. I love it.An interesting turn.
View attachment 169440
Google tells me that Debra Grace Peri is indeed a trans activist of the full on SJW type - which makes her being critical of TLL interesting.