Mega Rad Gun Thread

I'm currently leaning towards an M&P Shield Plus OR, but it doesn't seem to support Trijicon optics.
it'll support whatever optic you're willing to pay to mount to it. out of the box the only Trijicon it can use is the RMR shield adapter plate for the rear sight dovetail and not the optics ready cut which is intended for crimson trace, holosun, et c type optics. leupold delta point also fits.
 
Well, gas port on the 16in BA barrel I got for the Cobb wasn't drilled properly. Gunsmith is opening it up now. Also found a guy who is in the process of machining a long action mag well that feeds from noreen mags for it. Next goal is to find someone to make me either a 6.5x55 swede or 7.5 swiss barrel for it.
 
I would like to get a slimmer gun that I can mount a Trijicon red dot to. I'm currently leaning towards an M&P Shield Plus OR, but it doesn't seem to support Trijicon optics.

I have a gen 3 Glock 26 that I pocket carry. I don't mind the Glock but I prefer the looks of the M&P series and I'm curious about switching platforms. I'm thinking Trijicon because of their reliability compared to Holosun, but maybe I'm missing another option.

What are your thoughts? Am I being retarded and should just get a Glock 43x MOS? Is pocket carry with a red dot a mistaken idea? Should I just buy more ammo instead?
Trijicon is fine, but they're really not that great a choice anymore. Holosun and SIG seem to be where it's at as they're actually making new products, and trijicon is just resting on their laurels.

On a podcast Hop and Brass Facts were on I heard mention of people having to check some sort of contacts under the dot every battery change as apparently they wore out somewhat fast. Idk if that's still a thing, but goes to show that nobody is perfect. Their tint also sucks and of course the price sucks too.

What's wrong with just sending out your slide and having it milled? 43X or 48 is solid too, but I'd also consider having one milled instead of running the MOS model.
 
What's wrong with just sending out your slide and having it milled?
Means I'll be without a conceal carry firearm for the 2-8 weeks the 26's slide is out for milling. Also seems like it'd be nicer to carry a lighter gun for a bit. I agree that milling seems a lot nicer than using an MOS adapter plate. I could always buy a used 43x/48 and immediately send it out for milling, thanks for the idea!

43X or 48
Anything against the Shield Plus instead? I know I can get one of those milled too, but finding one used might be more difficult.
 
Last edited:
Means I'll be without a conceal carry firearm for the 2-8 weeks the 26's slide is out for milling. Also seems like it'd be nicer to carry a lighter gun for a bit. I agree that milling seems a lot nicer than using an MOS adapter plate. I could always buy a used 43x/48 and immediately send it out for milling, thanks for the idea!


Anything against the Shield Plus instead? I know I can get one of those milled too, but finding one used might be more difficult.
They're supposed to be good too, and a used gun + milling fees would be solid as not everybody offers a good footprint, or a footprint at all. Friend of mine got a used G48 for like 300 with a couple mags, so there's def some savings there. The gun had zero wear on the barrel when he got it, so it was basically brand new.
When it comes to handguns, really most of them are good and its easy to overthink shit
 
Saving to finally get my PAL (leaf gun license) not going for restricted yet because I haven't had much experience with semi-autos quite just yet to really know what I want, but currently want a repeating rifle, just curious to see what your opinions are on them, I have always thought they were cool regardless of cowboy material.
 
I understand it's part of the design they copied, but I wish these things didn't have the grip safety. Not a big issue if you actually shoot, but I've seen a few new shooters fail to depress it, enough to avoid recommending it to family/friends I know won't shoot more than a few times a year.
The grip safety is there for a very good reason. The target market of the M&P EZ is firearm novices, one of the biggest issues they have is not holding the gun correctly. The grip safety (which is easy to depress) forces them to hold it properly and learn proper firearm handling technique even in the absence of a training environment. I didn't "get" it until I was at the range with a novice who had an EZ, and I witnessed them holding the gun wrong and it not firing because the grip safety wasn't depressed, then they corrected their grip, fired the gun, and that's when it clicked for me why they did that. They didn't do it because people wanted it, they did it because people needed it. You have to keep in mind the EZ is intended for normies and novices, and every design element is in service of that.
 
Not that I'm aware of, I'm not really sure it'll be going anywhere either......

In my situation it wouldn't be that practical because of mag restrictions as a shield mag in a G43X meets that, and companies only seem to be rechambering older guns. A single or 1.5 stack in 30 super with steel mags would be awesome, but I just don't see that happening in the American market.
People will say stuff like "size of .380 performance of 9", or "11.5 is basically 13.7" but in reality it's not and that's a fake and gay thing to say.
The idea is good but I see no reason to switch over for what it has to offer even in a situation with larger magazines.
I agree. I think it'd be cool if there was a 40 round mag in 30 super carry the size of a 30 round 9mm, but people already have 9mm. Which kinda stinks, but it is what it is.
The grip safety is there for a very good reason. The target market of the M&P EZ is firearm novices, one of the biggest issues they have is not holding the gun correctly. The grip safety (which is easy to depress) forces them to hold it properly and learn proper firearm handling technique even in the absence of a training environment. I didn't "get" it until I was at the range with a novice who had an EZ, and I witnessed them holding the gun wrong and it not firing because the grip safety wasn't depressed, then they corrected their grip, fired the gun, and that's when it clicked for me why they did that. They didn't do it because people wanted it, they did it because people needed it. You have to keep in mind the EZ is intended for normies and novices, and every design element is in service of that.
Held a EZ once. Extremely comfortable gun. I found the grip safety easy to depress too. Like you said it's a good starter gun.

Edit: why aren't there side or top mag feed sub guns/PCCs anymore? They let you get real low to the ground without having your 30 round mag dig into the dirt. The Owen gun comes to mind when thinking of a good design in this category.
CompletedOwenGun1942 (1).png
 
Last edited:
The grip safety is there for a very good reason. The target market of the M&P EZ is firearm novices, one of the biggest issues they have is not holding the gun correctly. The grip safety (which is easy to depress) forces them to hold it properly and learn proper firearm handling technique even in the absence of a training environment. I didn't "get" it until I was at the range with a novice who had an EZ, and I witnessed them holding the gun wrong and it not firing because the grip safety wasn't depressed, then they corrected their grip, fired the gun, and that's when it clicked for me why they did that. They didn't do it because people wanted it, they did it because people needed it. You have to keep in mind the EZ is intended for normies and novices, and every design element is in service of that.
Yes that was the entire point of my posts. It's designed for new shooters or people who hardly shoot and it cannot fire without a good grip, something new shooters often lack especially under stress. As a range rental training aid it's fine, but not the ideal 'old woman' gun people say it is.
 
why aren't there side or top mag feed sub guns/PCCs anymore? They let you get real low to the ground without having your 30 round mag dig into the dirt. The Owen gun comes to mind when thinking of a good design in this category.
I guess SMGs were never thought to be used from a prone position that much, and bringing the magazine on top of the gun makes for funky sight arrangements. Especially nowadays, when optics are the default instead of iron sights.
 
Edit: why aren't there side or top mag feed sub guns/PCCs anymore? They let you get real low to the ground without having your 30 round mag dig into the dirt. The Owen gun comes to mind when thinking of a good design in this category.
The Owen was made by an Aussie. It's upside-down by default.
 
I guess SMGs were never thought to be used from a prone position that much, and bringing the magazine on top of the gun makes for funky sight arrangements. Especially nowadays, when optics are the default instead of iron sights.
The sensible argument
The Owen was made by an Aussie. It's upside-down by default.
The true and honest answer lol
 
Well, just got an email from Tucker Gun Leather that my custom holster and matching magazine carrier is on its way and should be here Friday. I ordered one of their Texas Short Stroke leather holsters and a matching double mag carrier. I'm looking forward to having it. Wait was about three and a half months. I'll post pics when it arrives. I still plan on eventually getting another shoulder rig from Nightingale Leather like I have for my Dan Wesson since that has been my favorite holster I've ever worn, but that's going to have to wait a good while since they're pretty spendy and Kevin's wait time is about half a year, and I've got other projects that need to come first.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 6637754
Has there been any new guns in .30 super carry or is it basically dead? I'll admit I find it cool in terms of ammo, you're able to stack up a lot of it, but it just doesn't seem much is chambered in it

.30 Super carry? Oh yeah, you must mean the French long 7.65. That shit was dead before before it ever got off the ground. The must have found the guy that came up with the .45 GAP cartridge and asked him if he had any more great ideas.

The 100,000 firearms engineers employed over the years at a thousand firearm and ammo companies have spent trillions coming up with the most lethal projectile an auto loading pistol will work with. Considering the market is basically composed of 4 cartridges for full sized pistols, 9mm, 45ACP, .40S&W and the 10mm; 9mm and 45 are over 100 years old, the 40 and 10mm were developed in the mid 80's IIRC. The idea someone can engineer a "better" functional round without some giant leap forward in metallurgy, combustible powders or something we have yet to develop it's still the same cartridges. Just ask a Glock sales rep how well those .45GAP guns sold.



Pocket sand.

RIP Johnny, you taught me to never trust the federal government.
 
.30 Super carry? Oh yeah, you must mean the French long 7.65. That shit was dead before before it ever got off the ground. The must have found the guy that came up with the .45 GAP cartridge and asked him if he had any more great ideas.

The 100,000 firearms engineers employed over the years at a thousand firearm and ammo companies have spent trillions coming up with the most lethal projectile an auto loading pistol will work with. Considering the market is basically composed of 4 cartridges for full sized pistols, 9mm, 45ACP, .40S&W and the 10mm; 9mm and 45 are over 100 years old, the 40 and 10mm were developed in the mid 80's IIRC. The idea someone can engineer a "better" functional round without some giant leap forward in metallurgy, combustible powders or something we have yet to develop it's still the same cartridges. Just ask a Glock sales rep how well those .45GAP guns sold
I mean you're not wrong lol. The market is basically dominated by 4 rounds, not counting revolvers. Those rounds dominate for a reason, they work. If you want balance, go with 9mm. Power while still having high ammo capacity, go 40. And if you just want raw power, 45 and 10mm. All the other calibers are just niche, even if they have pros and cons.

30 super carry really offered nothing new. Even 5.7 offered something new, it's AP ability with the right ammo and the ability to stack a ludicrous amount of ammo, like the 50 round mags in the P90. Kinda sad, competition is good, but it is the way it is.
 
Meh, The 5-7 pistol was marketed as this "pocket AR-15" pistol. If you want to pay out the ass for the blue-tip genuine AP ammo and you can actually find it then yes you can have something with mild AP capability that fits in a holster. So who wears soft body armor? Well mostly law enforcement ergo even when lawfully possessed AP ammo, some LEO's look at it like you are prepping to have a firefight with either the feds or the local PD. The P90 was very innovative but was designed for a Coldwar project for an invasion that never happened, If they made the P90 in 9mm or 10mm I'd consider buying one and starting SBR paperwork. Till then I consider it a gun for the "Patrick Tomlinson's" of the world.

Frankly I don't even know the legality of 5.7 AP factory loads. If you know how to use a lathe and work with basic tools you can make your own AP projectiles rounds and hand load some 5.7 if legal where applicable. My understanding was the old KTW rounds were just tungsten carbide wrapped in polymer so they would actually engage in grooves of rifling. Not that hard to make your own if you know how to hand-load already. Considering how easy it is to obtain and lawfully exempt as AP the current 5.56 AP greentips/blacktips rounds do the job very well out of the AR platform.

As I said before LE finds live AP in your possession, they will take offense to this lawful or otherwise.
 
Meh, The 5-7 pistol was marketed as this "pocket AR-15" pistol. If you want to pay out the ass for the blue-tip genuine AP ammo and you can actually find it then yes you can have something with mild AP capability that fits in a holster. So who wears soft body armor? Well mostly law enforcement ergo even when lawfully possessed AP ammo, some LEO's look at it like you are prepping to have a firefight with either the feds or the local PD. The P90 was very innovative but was designed for a Coldwar project for an invasion that never happened, If they made the P90 in 9mm or 10mm I'd consider buying one and starting SBR paperwork. Till then I consider it a gun for the "Patrick Tomlinson's" of the world.

Frankly I don't even know the legality of 5.7 AP factory loads. If you know how to use a lathe and work with basic tools you can make your own AP projectiles rounds and hand load some 5.7 if legal where applicable. My understanding was the old KTW rounds were just tungsten carbide wrapped in polymer so they would actually engage in grooves of rifling. Not that hard to make your own if you know how to hand-load already. Considering how easy it is to obtain and lawfully exempt as AP the current 5.56 AP greentips/blacktips rounds do the job very well out of the AR platform.

As I said before LE finds live AP in your possession, they will take offense to this lawful or otherwise.
Oh I don't disagree that, especially in civilian hands, it's a meme round. Personally wouldn't try getting AP ammo for it myself, don't know the legality, and 5.56 exists in the civilian market, which is just better.

It was just a comparison really. 30 super carry is light 9mm that I guess you can stack up more of (though really nothing exists taking advantage of that. At LEAST with 5.7 I can find theoretical pros, and why it still exists today.

Personally I'd rather have a 9mm or a .40. Both can be stacked up high and have plenty of aftermarket support. Virtually every modern PCC is chambered in both, meaning your pistol can share ammo with your carbine. And people usually have one or the other, meaning ammo sharing.

Only reason at this point I'd see someone buy a 30 SC is to have a oddball caliber in case of shortages, or just for fun. Unless new guns come out in it, it looks pretty dead.
 
Back