Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

Tony always doubles down on his wrong headed ideas.

Screenshot 2024-11-14 075115.jpg

Helen Joyce (big Terf) and Banana Wu took the bait.
wu.jpg
 
People are starting to realise events like the US Olympics and World Cup are going to be hosted under Trump.
We’ve got the best opening ceremony ever haven’t we folks? It’s UGE.
I want this. I want blonde perky healthy cheerleaders, I want munition grade fireworks firing everywhere. Only star and stripe flags. I want an eagle, screaming down from the sky with a lit torch in its talons to light the Olympic flame. I want trump gurning his best gurn as troons, back in the men’s events, seethe and America wipes the board. Do it. Do it for the rest of us still under the yoke of woke.
Drag bans with bounty provisions?? Saddle up, ladies! We goin hunting
 
Helen Joyce (big Terf) and Banana Wu took the bait.
View attachment 6647976
I've been away from this thread for a few months and I see Tony is still spending all his time DEBOONKING and acting like the spokesman for the trans community despite the fact that he has zero credibility and no one, not even other troons, take him seriously.
 
We’ve got the best opening ceremony ever haven’t we folks? It’s UGE.
I want this. I want blonde perky healthy cheerleaders, I want munition grade fireworks firing everywhere. Only star and stripe flags. I want an eagle, screaming down from the sky with a lit torch in its talons to light the Olympic flame. I want trump gurning his best gurn as troons, back in the men’s events, seethe and America wipes the board. Do it. Do it for the rest of us still under the yoke of woke.
Drag bans with bounty provisions?? Saddle up, ladies! We goin hunting

Wonder if securing big name headlining bands and artists is going to be a problem with the inevitable petty boycotts and sissy flouncing. Ted Nugent and Kid Rock aren't going to cut it. Trump needs bands with big dick, alpha energy at the Olympics - but who would perform?
 
I've been away from this thread for a few months and I see Tony is still spending all his time DEBOONKING and acting like the spokesman for the trans community despite the fact that he has zero credibility and no one, not even other troons, take him seriously.
Troon spokespeople seem to have a limited lifespan. There was a time when Greta and Nina were leading lights. There was a time when Zinnia Jones was respected.
 
Code red: Big Mama has landed, repeat Big Mama has landed on the theatre of operations.

1731693287736.png

Nobody’s ‘taking’ except you. You demand that women and girls give up their rights and spaces to you. You insist there are no contexts in which a man shouldn’t be considered a woman if he says he’s one. Your aggression, entitlement and overreach brought pushback. This is on you.
 
Tony’s going to be insufferable now. Senpai noticed him.
He's becoming increasingly grandiose as the most super duper important cherngenger blogger ever.

Screenshot 2024-11-15 114337.jpg

Boomarking for when Tony finds himself at odds with the Great Cheeto admisinistration.

Screenshot 2024-11-15 123150.jpg

Tony still thinks that troonery is a winning political issue.

Capture 1.PNG


Tony has really dug into science denial as he copes and seethes about the election.


Capture.PNG
 
Last edited:
I'm still laughing at how he claimed Trump was going to lose the election badly because he doubled down on "anti trans" ads, etc, and then once Trump won, all of a sudden it wasn't because trans issues aren't popular, it's because dems weren't pro trans enough. He really believes that many people give a shit about trans rights.
 
I'm still laughing at how he claimed Trump was going to lose the election badly because he doubled down on "anti trans" ads, etc, and then once Trump won, all of a sudden it wasn't because trans issues aren't popular, it's because dems weren't pro trans enough. He really believes that many people give a shit about trans rights.

Tony asks a question that answers itself and he is totally oblivious to it.

Screenshot 2024-11-15 153500.jpg
 
The legislators fucked up something fierce by using an undefined, meaningless term like "gender" instead of "sex".

I guess they didn't realize the risk in 2005.

About 60% of the troon movement's success comes from a linguistic quirk in which a large number of English speakers started using "gender" instead of "sex" because "sex" had also came to mean the act of bumping your no-no parts with another person.

The "gender is different than sex!" argument was able to take off much more successfully this way, because the widespread use of the word "gender" meant that they could use the word as a cuckoo's egg, even when it was clearly being used to mean "sex."

(and of course the TRAs then leapfrogged from that argument to "gender and sex are the same thing, but sex is somehow meaningless")
 
About 60% of the troon movement's success comes from a linguistic quirk in which a large number of English speakers started using "gender" instead of "sex" because "sex" had also came to mean the act of bumping your no-no parts with another person.

The "gender is different than sex!" argument was able to take off much more successfully this way, because the widespread use of the word "gender" meant that they could use the word as a cuckoo's egg, even when it was clearly being used to mean "sex."

(and of course the TRAs then leapfrogged from that argument to "gender and sex are the same thing, but sex is somehow meaningless"
Its the classic bait and switch they did.

sexandgendercontradiction.png
 
Regarding Chess, I did a little googling, since Tony seems to think it’s a big gotcha:
- there *may* be male advantages as there are some IQ differences between men and women. For example men are said to be better on average with spatial reasoning.
- girls are usually less likely to be encouraged to play chess or train in chess from a young age, so people who experienced a male childhood may have been given more advantages in chess.
- Women’s chess is to encourage more women and girls to participate in a historically male dominated sport.
- Chess is gender separated in some places because of cultural issues.

These are some of the possible reasons there are female spaces held for chess. There are also mixed gender tournaments that exist, and these allow anyone to participate regardless of sex/ gender.
 
there *may* be male advantages as there are some IQ differences between men and women. For example men are said to be better on average with spatial reasoning.
There absolutely is a male advantage, it's undeniable. Whether that advantage is because of male genetics, upbringing, puberty, or the culture of competitive chess is up for debate, but either way it would not be fair for a male master to join a female competition.
 
He also assumes a "but for" type of causation where he suggests that but for that one vote on that single issue, the incumbent would have won. But where is the evidence for that supposition?
I find it's funnier and more effective to grant as many favorable premises as possible to show just how fucking stupid Tony and his audience is. You can look at his replies and see they don't even notice the contradictions in his narratives let alone demand he answer why all those anti-trans ads didn't sink Trump and the GOP. I'm not sure Tony can see them himself. Reddit "debaters" like Tony will focus neurotically on any tiny morsel and squeeze it into dust to try and snatch a "win" over an irrelevant point tangentially related to the disputed one so they can declare victory. Grant them the premises and they can't distract the audience with this "technique" to make everyone tune out. Then you can circle back around and note "plus it's not true."

He's becoming increasingly grandiose as the most super duper important cherngenger blogger ever.

View attachment 6649394

Boomarking for when Tony finds himself at odds with the Great Cheeto admisinistration.

View attachment 6649545

Tony still thinks that troonery is a winning political issue.

View attachment 6650000

Tony has really dug into science denial as he copes and seethes about the election.


View attachment 6650004
Here Tony's just producing a false choice, that the only two stances are "give Tony everything he wants" and "complete eradication" otherwise he would notice that what these Democrats are doing is not saying "find compromise with the eradicators" they're saying "find the actual views of the populace." Tony chastises Mouton for ignoring his constituents by Mouton saying that Democrats should find out what their constituents actually think and support. Tony would have Mouton ignore 99.8% of his constituents for 0.2%, he can pull this "slight-of-hand" over 500 tweets by framing it as eradication or Tony, when Mouton accurately perceives the dominant majority would be something like "don't kill them, don't fire them for being trans, but not in girls sports and probably not in women's bathrooms, definitely not in girl's bathrooms in school." This is unacceptable to Tony and so becomes deliberate state-backed eradication of all trans people.

About 60% of the troon movement's success comes from a linguistic quirk in which a large number of English speakers started using "gender" instead of "sex" because "sex" had also came to mean the act of bumping your no-no parts with another person.

The "gender is different than sex!" argument was able to take off much more successfully this way, because the widespread use of the word "gender" meant that they could use the word as a cuckoo's egg, even when it was clearly being used to mean "sex."

(and of course the TRAs then leapfrogged from that argument to "gender and sex are the same thing, but sex is somehow meaningless")

Its the classic bait and switch they did.

View attachment 6650808
It's really more that they're sneaking a more specific definition of gender in, adhering to it tightly and literally and then using that to advance on sex. When most people actually don't accept that definition of gender in the first place. It's only the top level "bailey" of most gender studies definitions of gender that people accept, not the "motte" they construct from it. If you say gender is a performance and talk about like hair and clothing, people understand that and grasp it and agree with it but then this other definition of gender goes an extra step and says there's nothing to gender but performance. Nobody accepts this, not even the gender studies people which is why they run from it when challenged. But all their arguments, all their work is constructed on just that motte or it's worthless. If you're saying things that everybody already "knows" and "means" about gender then you aren't challenging anything, you aren't a radical, you're a handmaiden for the patriarchy upholding the status quo.

The gender/sex distinction is important to feminism and gender studies only if sex is real because "gender" can theoretically be smashed or changed. It's a cultural or social institution, not innate. But innate biology is fixed and therefore puts limitations to the scope of this, but real world limitations are anathema to radicals in the academy or elsewhere. This mandates a march on sex because it's the actual "offense" against what they think they want. Troons are stupid so they miss the nuance but also many of the "experts" deliberately hide the nuance so as to support their ideological project, one they can't actually define in any clear way, which makes it seem like sex is also a cultural and social institution. This is where they start to drift into the rest of the postmodern/"science studies"/etc. bullshit and yet again dance with definitions taken overly literally. Science has to be done with words and words are social constructs therefore science is just a social construct and society can construct science in anyway it chooses.

And here's where we get to "but that's not true." Since they're narcissists, it's natural for them to deny the existence of a reality outside of their control, even though they like the rest of us don't check to see if physics is still operating as known when we wake up.
 
Wait, four out of five were trans? I thought you could never tell.
It's Schrodinger's Clock: You can never tell, except when you have to in order to make a point.
Yawn. YWNBAW Snaggle Tooth.

View attachment 6645968
It's ironic this is a post about sports given all the own-goals Tony''s been scoring recently. I am inclined to agree with him on this though: the core of the issue has always been that men dressed as women don't belong in any woman's space.

Sports just happens to be the best example because the distinction between the sexes is never more obvious than when you're staring at Lia Thomas towering over his female opponents on the winner's podium.
 
It's also as simple as women use these hobbies to get away from men, which is a good reason why males shouldn't be allowed in women's anything.
Women have hobbies to get away from men, and men have hobbies to get away from women. Men want a pick-me girl in their 40k hobby group about as much as women want a hideous troon like Tony barging into their chess club.
 
Back