Devon Del Vecchio / "Dev" / ShortFatOtaku / @sleepy_devo - Degenerate loser, honorary whiteknight for Lilith Lovett, constantly at odds with his own viewers for being a centrist

Every youtuber has that mic because its considered the "best", be it amazon reviews, or just because everyone else has it and they don't want to feel left out.
I would've figured the AT2020 would've been the mob mentality mic. Everyone I see tells people to grab that as their starter microphone.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: FurbusCuckus
I would've figured the AT2020 would've been the mob mentality mic. Everyone I see tells people to grab that as their starter microphone.

Little off topic, what was the old mic James Rolfe used in his old Cinemassacre videos before 2011?, you know, his golden age (early youtube/Spike era)
 
Back on topic

1731720665153.png
1731720748130.png


This was a bad premonition

1731720892922.png
 
There is no fucking way Dev, the coomer-in-chief who openly lusts over tranny cock, stated that he has an issue with the guy doing OnlyFans. I refuse to believe that. If instead what he's says in the video is that rightists shouldn't be that mad because the guy does OnlyFans, then if they did that he'd be able to turn around and accuse them being hypocrites because they're not angry enough at the government for trampling over his rights and privacy because he's a sexual degenerate.

Some life advice for you guys, if someone criticizes you over something, and there's an extremely probable chance they would find something to criticize you over if you had done the exact opposite thing, it's not real criticism and they're just looking for a reason to demean you.
 
There is no fucking way Dev, the coomer-in-chief who openly lusts over tranny cock, stated that he has an issue with the guy doing OnlyFans. I refuse to believe that. If instead what he's says in the video is that rightists shouldn't be that mad because the guy does OnlyFans, then if they did that he'd be able to turn around and accuse them being hypocrites because they're not angry enough at the government for trampling over his rights and privacy because he's a sexual degenerate.

Some life advice for you guys, if someone criticizes you over something, and there's an extremely probable chance they would find something to criticize you over if you had done the exact opposite thing, it's not real criticism and they're just looking for a reason to demean you.
Yeah, Dev wasn't mad at the guy doing "Gay-for-pay" OF stuff. He was more trying to dunk on rightists who're anti-porn as a "oh you hate people doing OF porn, but you're supporting this guy who is doing OF porn! Curious!"

Which, honestly misses the point, i.e. yes, some of the anti-porn right wingers may dislike the guy doing porn. But the govt coming in and doing a 5 hour raid over the squirrel and unregistered animal shelter when they could spend their time on other, more important pursuits is a separate matter, and outside of the moralistic faggots for whom the "pornographer" is more important than the "govt overreact" aspect, most people would support the guy or, at the least, cry out against the wastefulness of govt resources on such a trivial matter.
 
Last edited:
The p'nut situation should have been a uniting event for all Americans against a overreaching government and moral busybodies. There's no "right wing extremist" like Ruby Ridge, no pedo stuff like Waco, no ranchers on "federal land" like Bundy, there's nothing that says the people are in the wrong. Yet liberals and leftists defend this. Dev is a cuck to the "law".
 
There is no fucking way Dev, the coomer-in-chief who openly lusts over tranny cock, stated that he has an issue with the guy doing OnlyFans. I refuse to believe that. If instead what he's says in the video is that rightists shouldn't be that mad because the guy does OnlyFans, then if they did that he'd be able to turn around and accuse them being hypocrites because they're not angry enough at the government for trampling over his rights and privacy because he's a sexual degenerate.

Some life advice for you guys, if someone criticizes you over something, and there's an extremely probable chance they would find something to criticize you over if you had done the exact opposite thing, it's not real criticism and they're just looking for a reason to demean you.
This is just wild speculation from me, but what are the chances Dev has a sex tape of him and Naomi? Or has a hidden fursona or vtuber personality he uses with a voice changer? His rising level of crazy and public degeneracy has me thinking.
 
"Listen guys, it was OK for Germany to euthanize all those kids and later gas the kikes because THEY HAD SOME SHIT WRITTEN ON OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT PAPER SAYING IT WAS THE LAW! Gosh don't you right wingers love to talk about law and order? Why are you suddenly against law?"

t. Dev

This fucking leaf nigger cannot understand the issues people have. He of course does not understand how a shitload of people being mad about Pnut are mad that a government that lets illegals in and ignores crime has the time to euthanize a harmless animal over arcane bureaucracy. Look at this:

View attachment 6649903

This fucking faggot cannot understand the concept of allocation of resources. You don't have a single national money pool for "raids on law breakers" Dev, the government CAN and SHOULD act according to what is needed. Fucking Animal Control should not be having the luxury of conducting raids like this when illegals are everywhere and simply allowed to stay. How the fuck can they afford to raid on this nigga's house for a squirrel and not on fucking NYC hotels for illegals? I will tell you why Dev, because they are evil and petty.

Seriously MATI.
This comment is just a perfect encapsulation of why I can't watch anything with Dev in it anymore. Every response he seems to make seems both underthought, and overthought. He says things in such a way that makes him seem simultaneously like a dipshit retard, and the most up-his-own-ass bad faith style actor. Maybe I'm only noticing it now, or he's really just gotten worse with it, but sheesh.
 
i'm not romantically interested in lilith, we're just friends.

the reason i posted that specific priest headline, is because a year ago, lilith posted that same headline saying something like "nobody's been molested at drag queen story time, and yet the same people who bitch about it, are silent when priests do it", which at the time, was a true statement. I worded my own post the way that I did to show no bias toward either story, knowing that only people who were slanted one way or another would be pissed about it. there's literally nothing objectionable about what I said.

as for the concept of drag queen story time itself? i wouldn't send my kids there but tbh i don't give a shit if others want to do it. the problem with the pedos in this case is not that they are drag queens, it's that they are pedos.
You'll never have kids dev. The Stop the Steal protest was not a coup. You idiot.
 
Yeah, Dev wasn't mad at the guy doing "Gay-for-pay" OF stuff. He was more trying to dunk on rightists who're anti-porn as a "oh you hate people doing OF porn, but you're supporting this guy who is doing OF porn! Curious!"
I'm starting to wonder if Dev is literally incapable of realizing that people can be outraged over injustice even if the person suffering it is someone who does something they disagree with. Or if he's once again just being a bad faith bitch.
 
I'm starting to wonder if Dev isn literally incapable of realizing that people can be outraged over injustice even if the person suffering it is someone who does something they disagree with. Or if he's once again just being a bad faith bitch.
Kinda doubt it. It seems in Dev's own little world, the right being outraged over someone who is strongly leftist getting hurt by leftist government policy is hypocritical of the right. Doesn't matter that part of the issue is the fact that innocent animals were killed (whose deaths were planned by the state a week in advance), which was completely unnecessary when there are other means of testing for rabies (10-day quarantine, just for example). Maybe Dev doesn't realize that conservatives can be compassionate toward animals, too. It's cheaper to 10-day-quarantine a squirrel and a raccoon than it is to euthanize them for a rabies test, so even in the most pragmatic and economic conservative argument, euthanasia is utterly pointless.

I think Dev's view of the situation isn't just that he's bad faith. He's incapable of seeing anyone else as being good faith. He doesn't seem to even believe there's such a thing as good faith, when you really look at the implications of everything he says. I'm not sure if he realizes it, either.
 
Back