Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Procrastinhater]

I get animated at this shit because no scenario is good and this is extremely generous. You don't really play around with 8 yos and illicit substances like that without having some kind of alternate motive. And i don't know, it sounds like a cover, it just doesn't connect with me on why he would even believe that, let alone put it into action. Back in the 80s-90s there were housewives that were using bleach enema on their kids cause they thought it was a cure for autism. But that was something widespread and it was done as some sort of twisted blind leading the blind kinda deal of misinformation. HOWEVER, how does that man come to the conclusion that cocaine is something helpful for ADD. Personally this is the first time i am hearing that, i googled it too, only to find out articles that actually say that people with ADD and ADHD are more prone to become cocaine addicts due to this euphoric energetic feeling it gives them that makes them feel more sharp. To me it looks like total absolute bullshit and a cover story, AND NOT A GOOD COVER STORY EVEN.

I feel ya bro, fucking around with kids is one thing that sets my fucking rage off too.

No. It was not accidental. The kid’s cocaine level was as high as a regular user. Drop this “accidental” crap, it’s weak.

Yeah that's the thing, if it was just over or around the cut off, I could maybe buy "accidental" exposure, but ten fucking times the cut off??
How the fuck do you pop a 10 times the cut off dose, a level that indicates regular or habitual use by accident?
This is a hair test, not a piss test, so that level is accumulated over a period of time, it's not just one large dose, what she "accidentally" managed to get into his stuff multiple times?
You can't piss on me and tell me its raining, I'm not subbed to Nicks Locals, it doesn't fucking compute.
Just doesn't square.
A hot test at or just over the cut off, sure, accidental, he's a fucking drunk, careless faggot could have left his "bullet" out again, but not ten times over.
That ain't a fucking accident.
I don't buy it.
It's fucking cope.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

Just search the MN court leaks thread, it was argued over and over.

Arguing with zero evidence to support your position. Otherwise you would have popped out the post link.

 

[Confetti Meringue]

HOWEVER, how does that man come to the conclusion that cocaine is something helpful for ADD. Personally this is the first time i am hearing that, i googled it too, only to find out articles that actually say that people with ADD and ADHD are more prone to become cocaine addicts due to this euphoric energetic feeling it gives them that makes them feel more sharp.

Nick is twisting reports to validate his own preconceptions. Nick has ADHD > Nick feels sharper while on cocaine > cocaine treats ADHD
Stimulants are used to treat ADHD > cocaine is a stimulant > cocaine treats ADHD
He is equivalent to conspiracy theorists in this way. It does not matter how faulty the logic or how loosely he uses words as long as he is able to convince himself or others that his beliefs must be correct. This includes his belief that cocaine has medicinal uses in treating ADHD.

 

[Desktop User2]

How the fuck do you pop a 10 times the cut off dose, a level that indicates regular or habitual use by accident?

Just search Dyn posts on that thread and you will read a bunch of us arguing on the same pages. There are over 100 pages discussing the issue already, there is no need to reopen it here but @AltisticRight could also elucidate it as well.

 

[Vibralldo]

how does that man come to the conclusion that cocaine is something helpful for ADD

Coomalot mentioned in a video that Nick saw a bunch of YouTube videos about self medicating yourself with cocaine to treat ADHD and started doing it himself. When you use cocaine you feel great, so he must have concluded it worked, and since his daughter was troubled with mental issues Nick might have thought cocaine would work better for her than anything those nerd psychiatrists could prescribe and started dosing her regularly.

 

[All becomes gunt]

Dosing your kid with a schedule II substance is an extremely generous assumption? The self medication hypothesis is the marijuana paranoia theory, the dosing for abuse is the krokodyl transe and the most generous and by far more likely is accidental ingestion.

The generous assumption is that he did it, not accidentally, but because he had a false belief that cocaine is a cure for ADD. This is the GENEROUS asssumption as crazy as this sounds. Yes the generous assumption to repeat here is that he was so insanely retarded that he was medicating his kid with a schedule II substance REGULARLY in order to cure her ADD. And actually i am not even buying it, it sounds like a cover story he came up with. I don't believe, i am not gonna be generous, i believe there is some kind of fucked up shit going on in there.

 

[Procrastinhater]

Just search Dyn posts on that thread and you will read a bunch of us arguing on the same pages. There are over 100 pages discussing the issue already, there is no need to reopen it here but @AltisticRight could also elucidate it as well.

I know bro, I remember. They're good arguments, I just don't buy it personally.
You're right though, it's already been gone over, and it's probably better not to redo it on this thread, it's already starting to feel like the Library of Balldoxandria with the size of Nicks fuck ups.

 

[Desktop User2]

Arguing with zero evidence to support your position. Otherwise you would have popped out the post link.

I´m no specialist, I just asked a bunch of questions and researched a little, there is no need to polute this thread when there is a full thread discussing it already. You can believe whatever you want but your assumption that is impossible to happen was denied by people that knew what they were talking about.

I know bro, I remember. They're good arguments, I just don't buy it personally.
You're right though, it's already been gone over, and it's probably better not to redo it on this thread, it's already starting to feel like the Library of Balldoxandria with the size of Nicks fuck ups.

We started that argument because Nick´s first defense was saying it was impossible to have an accidental exposure on that level so the test could only be faulty.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

Yeah that's the thing, if it was just over or around the cut off, I could maybe buy "accidental" exposure, but ten fucking times the cut off??
How the fuck do you pop a 10 times the cut off dose, a level that indicates regular or habitual use by accident?
This is a hair test, not a piss test, so that level is accumulated over a period of time, it's not just one large dose, what she "accidentally" managed to get into his stuff multiple times?

When I searched on PubMed, most papers analyzing the hair follicle test for cocaine affirmed that the test is good for determining if exposure to the drug happened in children. However, it isn't a very reliable test for confirming the dose the child was exposed to or for how long.

I know that 10x the reference value seems very high, but it really depends on the tests. Some tests consider 10x the reference value as nothing, while others see 2x as a huge difference. So, I think it’s better to leave this kind of analysis to people who really understand the interpretation well.

I would trust @AltisticRight opinion on this.

 

[Captain Manning]

Now he’s confirmed so many of Aaron’s stories that people here doubted (not me, Aaron truther since he showed the snow angel picture) and even forgot about because they seemed too out there e.g. Baseball bat confrontation.

Also, before that, naked Twister. That was pretty out there too.

And, I agree.

I simply don't understand the people that think Aaron is this gigantic liar who is completely dishonest at all times. Especially relative to Nick.

Do I think Aaron probably omits some details that might be embarrassing to him? Sure.

But he's generally been spot on when it comes to Nick.

Nobody here has to like the guy, but that's a separate issue. You'd think people in this thread would know how to spot an actual habitual liar by now.

Just search Dyn posts on that thread and you will read a bunch of us arguing on the same pages. There are over 100 pages discussing the issue already, there is no need to reopen it here but @AltisticRight could also elucidate it as well.

I don't know for sure if it was an accidental or intentional exposure that the kid had with coke, but I know 100% it wasn't caused by a cop patting her hair. That's not how the test works, or what it's designed to find out.

I pray we can all agree on that much.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

When I searched on PubMed, most papers analyzing the hair follicle test for cocaine affirmed that the test is good for determining if exposure to the drug happened in children. However, it isn't a very reliable test for confirming the dose the child was exposed to or for how long.

I know that 10x the reference value seems very high, but it really depends on the tests. Some tests consider 10x the reference value as nothing, while others see 2x as a huge difference. So, I think it’s better to leave this kind of analysis to people who really understand the interpretation well.

I would trust @AltisticRight opinion on this.

Also, children are small, <shocked gasp>, and small amounts of drugs can have a much bigger impact on test results than they would have in adults.
Every single possibility for how the kid was exposed to the drugs, doing as mommy does and snorting some from a little spoon, eating the candy, being dosed by daddy, being dosed multiple times, accidentally giving the kid something laced with cocaine. They are all entirely possible scenarios and the test result does not tell us ANYTHING that indicates which is true.

EDIT: I excluded the "the cop touched my kid's hair" cope Nick keeps repeating because its scientifically impossible.

 

[All becomes gunt]

Coomalot mentioned in a video that Nick saw a bunch of YouTube videos about self medicating yourself with cocaine to treat ADHD and started doing it himself. When you use cocaine you feel great, so he must have concluded it worked, and since his daughter was troubled with mental issues Nick might have thought cocaine would work better for her than anything those nerd psychiatrists could prescribe and started dosing her regularly.

I call bullshit to that too. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY 0 AND I CAN KEEP SCROLLING BUT ABSOLUTELY 0 VIDEOS THAT SAY THAT COCAINE CURES ADD. THEN HE LIED TO COOMALOT. I also tried Cocaine cures ADD/ADHD. Where are these "youtube videos".

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

I´m no specialist, I just asked a bunch of questions and researched a little, there is no need to polute this thread when there is a full thread discussing it already. You can believe whatever you want but your assumption that is impossible to happen was denied by people that knew what they were talking about.

We started that argument because Nick´s first defense was saying it was impossible to have an accidental exposure on that level so the test could only be faulty.

By the numbers, yes. There is room for interpretation on what the number means. I also do not have a need to give the man any benefit of the doubt given the totality of the circumstances. Another point against Nick is for all his bluster about a second test, it never happened. So we’ll agree to disagree and I won’t be such a dick next time I express a difference in opinion.

 

[DemsBNutz]

Nick is pity farming for attention. Something happened and he's compensating. Just wait for the news to break.

View attachment 6652191

Good lord this makes me miss 128 char limit on Xitter. Diatribe of barffy proportions...

 

[Desktop User2]

I pray we can all agree on that much.

Him flip-flopping between the tests are inaccurate and the cop contaminated her hair is proof enough he is full of shit.

 

[HackerX]

It would be fucking hilarious watching Ralph trying to ride a horse

Do not manifest this into existence.

What I keep coming back to as well is his court ordered drug tests ending, mighty funny how he's at least seemed fairly sober (no complete drunken mess streams at least) for a while, but then within days of the testing ending, he's right back to embarrassing himself again, calling into the pedocast, slurring and obviously wasted, to whine and seeth in his nasal fag drawl.
He really is completely incapable of any form of self control over his vices unless he has the court hanging over him like a nanny.
He's a fucking subhuman faggot. Controlled by his urges like an animal. The second it was down to him to do the right thing he goes back to showing why he shouldn't be allowed anywhere near anyone's kids.

There's a few ways to look at it. The recent whiny stream where he implicated himself for computer fraud, so he could obsess over Aaron jerking off, definitely felt like alcohol was involved. Probably more, but booze is a safe minimum assumption. But, his overall behavior doesn't feel like someone that's started hitting the crack pipe again after a few months, it feels like someone that's at their limit. By limit, I mean crossing between functional (relatively) to crackhead. There was no honeymoon phase that you'd expect if his tolerance was low. He just went from relative silence to crackhead behavior instantly.

 

[Harm]

Yeah that's the thing, if it was just over or around the cut off, I could maybe buy "accidental" exposure, but ten fucking times the cut off??

Not to mention the defenses he gave, particularly while on stream with Dick Masterson, were insanely unconvincing. I believe Dick Masterson at one point described it as a margin of error equal to a butterfly gently gracing its wings on a surface. What are people supposed to think when they hear such unrepentant bullshit?

View attachment 6653496View attachment 6653497View attachment 6653498View attachment 6653499

I call bullshit to that too. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY 0 AND I CAN KEEP SCROLLING BUT ABSOLUTELY 0 VIDEOS THAT SAY THAT COCAINE CURES ADD. THEN HE LIED TO COOMALOT. I also tried Cocaine cures ADD/ADHD. Where are these "youtube videos".

I checked out some of these and you're right, none of them are talking about the supposed medicinal benefits of cocaine. Either Camelot lied or they were videos on another platform like TikTok instead of Youtube specifically.

 

[Omega Bruh Moment]

Nick is pity farming for attention. Something happened and he's compensating. Just wait for the news to break.

View attachment 6652191

Holy shit has he developed such a victim mentality. I wonder if he lies to himself in his actual, private diary entries as well. I guess it's most efficient for peddling lies if you con yourself into believing them as well. I wonder just how much longer before he goes family annihilation mode, probably after the court case is finished and before his ass gets sent to jail, escorted by Officer Felt.

 

[repentance]

And why is he lying about June 5 in particular? Is there some legal event I forget?

I mean I understand why he's lying, it's because he's the walking pile of bullshit known as Nick Rekieta, but why June 5?

It's probably the earliest date he had a clean test and there was either a time-frame or a specific number of tests required for him to be free of monitoring. He wants to be free from restraint ASAP so the earliest date he can claim sobriety matters to him.

 

[All becomes gunt]

A hot test at or just over the cut off, sure, accidental, he's a fucking drunk, careless faggot could have left his "bullet" out again, but not ten times over.
That ain't a fucking accident.
I don't buy it.
It's fucking cope.

A cocaine test in hair folicles and how its conducted even as a field test, first there is a very good wash of the area that the test is done in order to remove contaminants. The problem in the equation so to speak is that after this washing procedure occured, then the sample was collected and field tested AND THEN IT POPPED 10x the amount. This eliminates the "cop touched my daughter's hair with cocaine" story completely. It was found in the root, it wasn't found in the end of her hair but the root. That's the issue here balldo doesn't understand. For it to pop like this we are talking a regular use of perhaps 40-90 days even, ,maybe even more and it was way over 10 times for it to pop 10 times. It was regular usage like once a week or even twice a week kind of deal for a long time.