Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.4%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.7%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.4%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 113 24.4%

  • Total voters
    464
Also, magistrate has an interesting background. He's an environmental law guy of some distinction:
image (2).jpeg
He reminds me of Governor Cox, the current governor of Utah. Must be the hairline. No offense.
 
I couldn't help but notice the "this meeting is now being recorded" notification banner popping up. No idea if it was the court or some idiot, so TBD.
It was Magistrate Judge Barrett. You can see who's recording it by an icon next to their name in the participant list. Him also being the only licensed user on that domain, I dont believe anyone else would have been allowed. It was using zoomgov not zoom, so it has some slightly different features.
If you dial in to a Zoom call, does it tell you how many people are participating/observing? I'm just wondering because I was really looking forward to hearing Russell complaining about all of the people who definitely were stalking him from Kiwi Farms.

It said 50, IIRC
50 was where I saw it peak. I am not sure if that was Barrett's licensed limit, or we just hit a nice round number. With it being zoomgov I dont know if their licenses are different thank the corporate ones where the lowest is 100 participants.
I was also scanning the participant list for crazy names...it looks like everyone was well behaved. Good job kiwis (not sure if others were blocked with outlandish shit like "Greer's Favorite Brothel").
 
I worry that as jury trial will not be the best outcome.

Far too easy for mushmouth to plead being a retard and get a sympathy verdict from some dumbass wine moms on the jury.

A bench trial would be best as I think Jersh has the facts on his side. Not that it matters much when the judge treats Rustard with kid gloves.
 
I worry that as jury trial will not be the best outcome.

Far too easy for mushmouth to plead being a retard and get a sympathy verdict from some dumbass wine moms on the jury.

A bench trial would be best as I think Jersh has the facts on his side. Not that it matters much when the judge treats Rustard with kid gloves.
I think Russell Greer voire dire antics would be hilarious. All I can picture is him trying to get an all woman jury and then trying to filter out the ones that would charge him $$$$ instead of $$$ for sex.
 
I worry that as jury trial will not be the best outcome.

Far too easy for mushmouth to plead being a retard and get a sympathy verdict from some dumbass wine moms on the jury.

A bench trial would be best as I think Jersh has the facts on his side. Not that it matters much when the judge treats Rustard with kid gloves.
Hopefully if it actually comes to that Hardin would be able to present to the Jury the numerous times that Greer has destroyed his own reputation with such classic works as "Why I'm Making It Legal for Your 18 Year Old Daughter to Get In Bed with a Complete Stranger for Only 500 Bucks: A Short Essay from a Pro Se Litigant who is Challenging the Utah Brothel Bans". That should play well with a Utah jury.
 
I worry that as jury trial will not be the best outcome.

Far too easy for mushmouth to plead being a retard and get a sympathy verdict from some dumbass wine moms on the jury.

A bench trial would be best as I think Jersh has the facts on his side. Not that it matters much when the judge treats Rustard with kid gloves.
I don't think the Judge said anything that would imply that Russ is entitled to a Jury trial. As far as the case is, he is destined for Bench trial.
 
50 was where I saw it peak. I am not sure if that was Barrett's licensed limit, or we just hit a nice round number. With it being zoomgov I dont know if their licenses are different thank the corporate ones where the lowest is 100 participants.
I was also scanning the participant list for crazy names...it looks like everyone was well behaved. Good job kiwis (not sure if others were blocked with outlandish shit like "Greer's Favorite Brothel").
Farmers who went to one of the Nick Rekeita hearings as observers:

163612.png

I didn't expect less than impeccable behaviour from my fellow Farmers, so of course it went smoothly.
 
Greetings everyone. I'm magistrate Judge Jared Bennet and let's talk about rule 34 done right.
Thank God someone's talking about it. I'm sick of seeing Rule 34 done wrong. Everywhere I look it's just bad Rule 34 after bad Rule 34 and sometimes I have to wonder if it's even worth having the rule anymore.

...Why are you looking at me like that? Clearly I'm talking about the law.

I'm submitting this as random.txt material either way
 
Scheduling order is attached.

Three things I did not see upthread: The initial deadline for Rule 26 disclosures is set to 2 December:
Rule-26-Deadline.png

Someone (presumably Hardin) anticipates filing confidential material (Godbear if you are listening I have been very good this year and would like to see Russtard held in contempt for breaching the confidentiality order):
Confidentiality.png

And the number of depositions for each side has been limited to ten, including Russ:
RulesOfEngagement.png
I assume the December 2025 deadline for motions to amend was a typo.

ETA FUCKING NINJA'D.

ETA x2: Not a lawyer here, can interrogatories or requests for admissions be filed on third parties? Russ claims that as-of-yet unidentified producers have rejected him and he has previously mentioned using his father as a witness, and they're such non-issues from a practical sense that an interrogatory or request for admission would accomplish the same result (prove they have nothing relevant) as a deposition for less time and effort.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Someone (presumably Hardin) anticipates filing confidential material (Godbear if you are listening I have been very good this year and would like to see Russtard held in contempt for breaching the confidentiality order)
What we'd get would be a convoluted destruction of all legal precedent explaining how Russ can't be held in contempt for breaching confidentiality.

How good/bad is this?
The case is trundling towards a conclusion, which we might actually see within our lifetimes. In the hearing today, Russ got the retard pass yet again, which isn't good.
 
Hopefully if it actually comes to that Hardin would be able to present to the Jury the numerous times that Greer has destroyed his own reputation with such classic works as "Why I'm Making It Legal for Your 18 Year Old Daughter to Get In Bed with a Complete Stranger for Only 500 Bucks: A Short Essay from a Pro Se Litigant who is Challenging the Utah Brothel Bans". That should play well with a Utah jury.
Bro if this happened in Utah, even in Salt Lake, the liberal part, and Hardin showed this shit...
 
Thank God someone's talking about it. I'm sick of seeing Rule 34 done wrong. Everywhere I look it's just bad Rule 34 after bad Rule 34 and sometimes I have to wonder if it's even worth having the rule anymore.

...Why are you looking at me like that? Clearly I'm talking about the law.

I'm submitting this as random.txt material either way
How much of the case's Rule 34 material do you think will be AI-generated?
 
can interrogatories or requests for admissions be filed on third parties? Russ claims that as-of-yet unidentified producers have rejected him
I’m retarded and not qualified to answer, but I think Russ would have to answer an interrogatory describing all efforts he went to have his songs produced, then he’d probably have a request for production asking for all communications between himself and producers about the songs he mentioned.
 
Back