Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 21.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 28.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 42 14.4%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 100 34.2%

  • Total voters
    292
If they're doing it that way, they're the stupidest sons of bitches ever. Your ass is attached to everything that has your signature, you're literally speaking the words that are on the pages.

To appease Nick by looking like incompetent fucks is a weird way to protect your brand.
Well, when we know that some lawyers, like your colleague Joe Nierman, sign various legal documents without apparently knowing what's inside, it's not surprising to me that some lawyers will just sign off on whatever a fellow lawyer writes when they're their client.

Joe looking like an incompetent fuck is a weird way to protect his brand.
 
Last edited:
A normal, fully healthy child that popped positive for cocaine. And with the kid being completely ignorant on the subject of drugs it must have been done by someone she trusted. I'll say this, maybe the prosecution is waiting and documenting to bring more charges to the table, just because you were charged once it doesn't make you immune to additional charges.
If she didn't recall ingesting it, how did it get into her?
Almost like CBD quack oil chiropractor believing retards also thought microdosing cocaine can fix ADHD. Huh.
 
No, it was at court. The children over 12 attended. As far as I know, the oldest son, parents and Sweeps were never present together at the Crackden. He wasn't there during the warrant and they were removed from crackden that day. They were all present at the custody/removal hearings.
Went on a goosechase for this because I remembered it differently too, but the above is correct: Sweep testified that she observed this conversation between Kayla and Christian at another hearing.

sweepstimony.png
 
If she didn't recall ingesting it, how did it get into her?
Almost like CBD quack oil chiropractor believing retards also thought microdosing cocaine can fix ADHD. Huh.
I remember when his first excuse was that it must have fell into his pans. Which makes no fucking sense btw. It went from that to fucking cop contaminated my daughter's hair with cocaine and the lab did TOO to secondary source of exposure. The story keeps fucking changing. He did it. 200% he fucking did it. Why can't he get his story straight and tries to explain everything away ? Also who is that secondary source of exposure. He is VERY ADAMANT about that. He either is lying or he knows who did it.
 
Last edited:
If they're doing it that way, they're the stupidest sons of bitches ever. Your ass is attached to everything that has your signature, you're literally speaking the words that are on the pages.

To appease Nick by looking like incompetent fucks is a weird way to protect your brand.

When Nick first hired the Barneswalker, I took a look at his appeals in Minnesota. Many of them were not what I would consider good legal work. His "brand", such as it is, is IMO encouraging stupid clients to waste time and money on actions that are extremely unlikely to be successful. In some ways, Nick is the perfect client for him. His clients generally seem to be more interested in being given false hope than competence.
 
Just took a look at the Kayla thread and All those early pics of Nick are the first time I've ever seen him in his 20s.

This is the faggot ass nerd calling people nerds and dorks? I am now 100000% certain Nick has some child sexual abuse skeletons in his personal closet. Every insult out of this retard's mouth is projection. That and he just really hates himself. Seems to me like his most recurring insults are all just things he loathes about himself.

Lord help us if that includes Pedophilia.
 
I am now 100000% certain Nick has some child sexual abuse skeletons in his personal closet. Every insult out of this retard's mouth is projection. That and he just really hates himself. Seems to me like his most recurring insults are all just things he loathes about himself.
If this turns out to be the case and is revealed to the public, it's the only situation in which I wouldn't be surprised if he killed himself.
But at this point I wouldn't throw pedo accusations without any substantial evidence. First, it waters it down. Second, we're better than Nick who likes to throw this accusation against everybody he doesn't like.
 
View attachment 6663963
machine generated

Feltsgiving is qoming.
What are you using to put these together? I'd like to dabble at a few nick ones myself.


All the allegations people are throwing around that we have seen zero proof of besides some other lolcow claiming it. Are garbage and definitely watering drown anything we say. Keep it factual keep it whats on the docket.
If things change? Sure.
But for now hes a druggie, hes a weird sex hedonist who sucks cock, a chronic liar, hypocrite, and his eight year old got exposed to his coke. That's plenty to work with.
 
The Barneswalker isn't out of state, just about as far away as he could be without being out of state.

Also Randazza would be worth the money if you needed him. The thing is there was no good reason to take an incredibly expensive interlocutory appeal making arcane arguments instead of just treating this case as what it is, a garden variety defamation case, and settling it because it clearly has merit.

Even if Monty loses, which is always possible for someone who is at least a limited purpose public figure, it would still be substantially cheaper to settle than fight a case where you're obviously a gigantic asshole to the bitter end. A real man would have manned up and apologized for lying.

My opinion is the general strategy is Nick's idea but the poor execution is because the Barneswalker simply sucks.

I think the speculation is the filings are so bad no practicing lawyer would file them.
To this day Nick still defends the stupid watermark on the video argument. He also has stated he thinks that Aaron tipped off the cops, but can't prove it. This also mirrors the "concerned citizen" argument.

If Nick isn't writing them, even though he previously stated he spends all day researching legal theory of his case, he is heavily involved in the theme.

What's strange is just how shit the arguments are. Like say if you wanted a Frank's hearing, how can you completely ignore the mandatory reporter? There was some reporting that Kayla's sister used to live in the spare house but was kicked out around the time April left Aaron. That's a pretty good motive to lie and it could be said the cop acted in wreckless disregard by omitting it. Or how about the former nanny recently leaving her employment and holding a grudge?

Or Balldo being on ADHD and narcolepsy medication and why the cop omitted it. It's something Nick talked on his videos about.

I get they are still losing arguments, but at least make it a believable story if it is also meant for public consumption. Instead its "muh watermark" "not my video and the cop lied saying it was"

Or how about challenging the probable cause as well. Somehow Balldo mamages to always just make the biggest mess of it every time.

You just know he leaked that Aaron history under the influence of something, as he has been more sheepish than usual this week. He was definitely under the influence on Melton's show call in.

Arguing with randos on twitter. Its like he seeks out the worst possible outcome every time.
 
It just occurred to me.. Nick is cool with streaming from his kitchen which looks like an episode of hoarders and he seems to think it's totally fine. How much worse must the footage of the house on the bodycam be if he doesn't want anyone seeing it? Yuck.
As i wrote above, if there is a bad decision to make, Nick will make it.

He argued with people saying the mess was clothes related, piles of washing, etc. Mentioned it in CPS documents. Refuses to release bodycam as it obviously shows a drug den BUT THEN voluntarily streams from his kitchen he can't be botheted to tidy and has a door hanging off he is still in mourning over. Wtf.

If you pick my kitchen at a bad hour or bad morning sometime after a party it will be messy. It doesn't stay that way and always clean for a guest. Is Nick trying to show us he can cook a basic snack worth showing us his messed up kitchen? If so, why not clean? If you wanna cry, go to your studio. Ahh!!
 
To this day Nick still defends the stupid watermark on the video argument.
It's an idiotic argument not only because it's just idiotic on its face, but let's just subtract out the deranged cokestream entirely and pretend it wasn't even mentioned in the warrant affidavit.

There's still probable cause there. That's the fatal weakness in anything based on that. The probable cause was already there, and the video was just lagniappe. It wasn't necessary. From the fact the warrant was executed mere days after the video even happened, it's obvious they felt they had enough to move ahead and just added that at the last minute.

That makes Balldo's weird obsession with it all the more ridiculous.
 
Nick's lawyers suck so fucking bad.
so like, "doctors make the worst patients" and all that shit notwithstanding, what should they be doing? how should they handle the situation?
suppose you have a client who is a (non-practicing) attorney who knows just enough about the law to have very strong opinions about how to handle the case but not enough to actually make competent arguments. you can:
  1. file whatever the fuck the client asks you to file, no matter how dogshit, because the client believes its in their best interest, and you just carry out their wishes.
  2. refuse to file whatever the fuck your retard client asks you to file and risk getting fired/replaced in order to save yourself the embarrassment of filing dogshit
  3. file whatever the fuck you want because you think it is in the best interest of your client, regardless of what they think.
they obviously haven't gone option 2, since they're not fired and they're still filing dogshit. so it's a choice between filing dogshit at nick's behest, or filing dogshit on their own and nick so happens to approve of it.

i guess i'm just trying to think of the upside to filing dogshit like this. is "my client made me do it" a good defense? like, suppose nick sues them for malpractice with whatever pennies he has left for failing to zealously or competently represent him, the lawyer can say, "but your honor, our client, a licensed attorney, approved of and condoned each and every one of our filings and approved of our legal strategy and we all, as a team, firmly believed it was in our client's best interest to pursue this approach." does that work?

i just find it hard to believe that nick's attorneys, presumably adults, are so retarded as to not have any plausible deniability for filing dogshit. then again, i don't put it past nick to find a literal retard to represent him. i could go either way.

edit avoid doublepost:

He's back at it again (archive)

View attachment 6663941
No matter what he does for the rest of his life, he will forever be known as the man whose nine-year-old daughter tested positive for cocaine. If only somebody, a friend perhaps, had warned him to pull up from his nosedive while there was still time.
test resultS, plural. is that a big reveal or did i miss something?
 
What are you using to put these together? I'd like to dabble at a few nick ones myself.


All the allegations people are throwing around that we have seen zero proof of besides some other lolcow claiming it. Are garbage and definitely watering drown anything we say. Keep it factual keep it whats on the docket.
If things change? Sure.
But for now hes a druggie, hes a weird sex hedonist who sucks cock, a chronic liar, hypocrite, and his eight year old got exposed to his coke. That's plenty to work with.

feltsgiving.jpg



I trained my own flux models of the qover, locally. This can be done on sites like Civitai, but I don't think it's free? Then I take the image I generated to https://hailuoai.video/. You can use any image there, and prompt a video. As you can see it wrecks the likeness of my models but it's still fun. Free alternatives to Hailuoai like Mochi are getting lots better, though it's going to be a while until they're on par.


If Aaron's to be believed (regarding something they did to the kids), things are going to change, and probably soon? But yeah.
 
If she didn't recall ingesting it, how did it get into her?
Almost like CBD quack oil chiropractor believing retards also thought microdosing cocaine can fix ADHD. Huh.
I personally think it was incidental and related to the uncleanliness. They don't do dishes in the Rekieta household. That means Nick lines up coke on a cookie plate. The 9 year old spends a lot of time in the master bedroom according Nick. Nick/Kayla gives her the coke plate to get cookies/snacks because she does get normal meals, just snacks. Someone with more knowledge of cocaine can comment on how it metabolizes by weight or blood volume and how much less cocaine it would take a child to show up as a regular user.
 
Back