Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[3MMA]

Chrissie released a 20 min "premier" vid (so, previously recorded - possibly a clip from a recent stream).
View attachment 6663201
Link.It's not worth watching. The only thing notable:

• Keanu goes farther about Nick not being sober (with guarded words)
• Keanu says she has more she could have shared
• Nick and April are most upset with Keanu because April living in the second house was not "public knowledge" (uhhhh, what? who didn't know that?)

Took a glance at the description of this clip. It shows Mayr’s new angle which is worth a brief note. Seems like her Balldoguarding badge is currently expired. She’s now saying she hopes Nick comes to terms with his wild mess of a life, then wishes him, Kayla, & even (lmao) April find peace & move forward from addiction’s dark hold:

“…he calls people specters & other flowery language that would often be found in a fantasy novel.”
Lmfao.

The children were almost certainly given a drug screening rapid test prior to any lab tests being run and it's most likely the lab test results the GAL was waiting on so it's entirely possible Nick did know, whether he admits it or not, that one of his children had tested hot (although he may not have been told at the time which one).

Almost certainly could be. Knowing this or not makes a huge difference in Nicks comments on May 28th, the first court appearance, versus the hair follicle discussion in court on June 6th. Nick would have had to be told or overheard rapid test results from someone, which at first glance seems unlikely. Without knowing, it’s 50/50 either way. It would be nice to know, though I’m leaning towards what @Not Who You Think posted details of, that it was strange for Nick to jump the gun with his comments on “if the children test positive,” in court on the 28th of May.

I appreciate & can see the logic in what you’re saying, that he may have had prior knowledge via someone telling him about likely, on scene, rapid test results, which were hot for one kid, but as that info isn’t known, it’s as likely to not be true. If Nick had prior knowledge of that, it makes his comments on May 28th, the first court appearance, make a little more sense. And if not, it’s still just as dark & disgusting as has been discussed if he introduced that idea before knowing of any hot test. The more I think about it, it could be either way, I’m unsure about the exact details. What has been seen looks bad, either way.

 

[Mr E. Grifter]

I think he's complaining about the children being 'coached' in a interview (which he has recordings of) to say they were exposed to drugs. Nick's pickled brain thought that was brought up in one of the transcripts that we have, it wasn't.
So now we know at least one of the kids (the 6 year old that 'wouldn't talk like that') said there was some exposure to drugs.

On the subject of coaching of Children in interviews - due to their age a specialist interviewer usually has to speak to them in a certain way to extract relevant information.

A six year old is unlikely to know what cocaine is, and is unlikely to talk about a specific issue at request. Instead, they have to be drawn into conversations about these things. The difficulty from an evidentiary perspective is ensure that you don't lead the child towards a pre-determined conclusion. This is why specialists are used, these things are easy to fuck up.

If Nick isn't just babbling utter shite, entirely possible, he could just be objecting to how people normally interview children.

 

[Grayback]

Was he pretending then, is he pretending now or did he genuinely change?

I think that this old 4chan post captures what Nick was like for most of his life—up until very recently, when he became successful on YouTube.

Even after his streams had started taking off and becoming successful, Nick was still pretty cautious about the positions that he took relative to what other people would think of them—whereas now those concerns basically don't even enter his mind. And he would always make these self-deprecating jokes about how skinny his shoulders were, or how unathletic he was, or any other random thing that he could use.
Self-deprecating humor is someone begging to be liked by offering their own vulnerability. It comes from a position of weakness, where you don't believe in yourself (at least to some extent) because you feel that, deep down, you're really not some charismatic "alpha" or whatever.

I think that this weak, gay shit is what Nick is (or was) really like—before hundreds of thousands of viewers, and tons of praise from his audience, and millions of dollars in earnings, and a leading spot the global superchat list told him that, you know what, actually, he was an alpha!
All of that success gave Nick the social permission to start being more assertive, less obsequious to progressive (or any) social norms (like he had been in that old post), and to make decisions for himself.

Unfortunately, those decisions were shit like "start swinging," "go fuck some hookers," and "do cocaine," none of which turned out to be good decisions. But they were finally his decisions.

 

[Folgers Can]

Meanwhile, Nick says that the children were coached because it doesn't sound like what children say:

True, it doesn't sound like something a child would say. This is because it is something Nick conspicuously said himself at an Emergency Protective Care hearing prior to the test results being made known.

The biggest problem for me wasn't just that it doesn't sound like something a child would say, but that it doesn't sound like something a cop or CPS agent would either say or elicit in the first place. In all the awkwardness of introducing oneself to the kids on the morning of the raid while trying to mitigate the traumatic experience of being ripped away from their parents by terrifying strangers, any cop or CPS agent with any experience wouldn't conduct an interview with the sort of cold mechanistic language Nick used and instead would have adopted a soothing, folksy, friendly tone throughout. For that reason alone I'm still sticking to the headcanon that the interview that morning went more along these lines:

Nick always did like to remind everyone that they're "all straight-A students" after all...

 

[Red flaming panda]

Mother fucker is so retarded and delusional, he thinks he can brute force an god damn appeal out of the judge.
Sorry to break it to yeah, Balldo pope, but judges dosen't give appeals to NERDS!

 

[repentance]

No idea if he mentioned it directly, but there's multiple attestations from friends that he did it to the point of infamously making a scene on it, which adds to the explanations of his brain being as fried as we see now:

Hmmm. That makes me wonder whether Kayla was tripping balls when she had to be talked down from the roof at Anime Matsuri.

 

[Obnoxious Asshole]

Hmmm. That makes me wonder whether Kayla was tripping balls when she had to be talked down from the roof at Anime Matsuri.

Wait, what? This is new lore to me.

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

Hope Nick goes down swinging with a long speech about how one man’s cuck is another man’s husband

Is a man not entitled to snort cocaine off of his bull's cock?
"No" says the Pastor at church, "It belongs in his pants"
"No" says the superchatters, "I wanted you to toast my grandma"
"No" says the social worker "Think of your children"

I rejected those answers; instead I chose something different. I chose the Balldoreich where the coomer would not fear the prude, where the cool would not be harassed by nerds. Where the adult isn't constrained by caring for his child.........And with a snort of cocaine, the Balldoreich can become your home as well.

 

[hesaback]

Thread goes fast and I dunno if anyone has pointed this out yet but ...

Why's the pillock whining on about the six year old? It was the nine year old as tested hot. What did she say?

She said she doesn't like what coke does but it smells amazing.

 

[Gee Willows Wilson!]

Must bite knowing nobody will ever take his word on anything, let alone legal stuff, seriously.

I re-watched a film/show critique podcast called EFAP not too long ago about She-Hulk.
Nick was on it, and even with the little legal analysis on that show, I still have to wonder if he even knew what he was talking about in light of his recent fuck ups.


Also hello to me on page 7202. I'll see you at some point.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Anything that comes out of the mouth of this retarded faggot should be taken with a mountain of salt. Not a grain but a mountain. Need i remind everyone that this disgusting faggot is stolen valor. As much as i hate balldo and maybe this makes sense, maybe it doesn't, i don't believe Spec tree, because he spec'd all his point into gay niggeraids.

They are both mythomaniacs (or, if you prefer, liars) who shouldn't be believed if they don't support their claims with solid evidence.

 

[Stiffy]

She's very desperate and delusional. Her own personal Love Quest.

Quite simply she's emotionally trauma bonded to Nick. Borderlines can easily become irrationally fixated, and fall for the manipulative narc's future faking/love bombing shared fantasy bullshit. It's like limerence on steroids. I'm sure Nick made her many promises he never intended to keep.
Fun fact, women with BPD always fuck on the first date, but once you become their "Favorite Person" it's only a matter of time before you really regret not heeding the wise old idiom "Don't stick your dick in crazy"
Let that be a lesson kids.

 

[Oxous]

On the subject of coaching of Children in interviews - due to their age a specialist interviewer usually has to speak to them in a certain way to extract relevant information.

A six year old is unlikely to know what cocaine is, and is unlikely to talk about a specific issue at request. Instead, they have to be drawn into conversations about these things. The difficulty from an evidentiary perspective is ensure that you don't lead the child towards a pre-determined conclusion. This is why specialists are used, these things are easy to fuck up.

If Nick isn't just babbling utter shite, entirely possible, he could just be objecting to how people normally interview children.

People who interview children, from what I've seen, do take a distinctive approach to asking questions that is both extremely specific and extremely redundant. They'll ask all sorts of things that would seem obvious but they have to ask to make sure the kid isn't confused about anything, or to rule out any remote possibilities, that sort of thing. It would make total sense to me if Nick learned about what sort of questions his kids were asked somehow and his wetbrain concluded it must be "coaching" because the phrasing of the questions didn't make sense to him. It's not like he has much courtroom experience after all.

 

[Not Who You Think]

And here is the other issue here at hand. It's a prepubescent girl, so "secondary exposure from some other source", it's very limited the amount of sources that a little 8 yo girl can get cocaine from. It's not like she can go to her friends and ask for it, it's not like she can go to school or her church and get some. Like what would that "secondary source of exposure" even be ?

Yes, the "other sources" seem to be very limited.

In the supplemental report one of the anonymous parties advised that they didn't believe that the two eldest daughters were being homeschooled at the time. This would include the daughter who tested positive for cocaine.

Since they are part of a homeschool co-op, this would indicate that the daughters were missing classes or otherwise noticeably absent.



If the Rekietas were just making do with iPads for their homeschooling needs then that further restricts "exposure" from others.

 

[dustnight]

Nick was DENIED again.
lmao

[EDIT] I accidentally posted in the Montegraph lawsuit thread, so here is everything again.
The biggest burn in that entire document: "The state has not filed a response."

View attachment 6662809View attachment 6662808View attachment 6662807View attachment 6662806

If only he could have seen the warning signs...

Nick's lawyers suck so fucking bad.

They're trying their best OKAY?

 

[Potentially Criminal]

Nick was DENIED again.
lmao

[EDIT] I accidentally posted in the Montegraph lawsuit thread, so here is everything again.
The biggest burn in that entire document: "The state has not filed a response."

View attachment 6662809View attachment 6662808View attachment 6662807View attachment 6662806

Nick's lawyers suck so fucking bad.

 

[Grayback]

Nick's lawyers suck so fucking bad.

In the line that says,

"Petitioner does not explain why the district court's pretrial ruling denying his motions to suppress evidence and for a Franks evidentiary hearing requires this court's immediate review."

could the court just be saying that the motion did not make an adequate argument that satisfies some standard? Or would you take this line to mean that Nick's lawyers really made no argument at all as to why the court should grant them a review?

 

[Mouse Cop]

He's back at it again (archive)


No matter what he does for the rest of his life, he will forever be known as the man whose nine-year-old daughter tested positive for cocaine. If only somebody, a friend perhaps, had warned him to pull up from his nosedive while there was still time.

 

[FiggerNaggot1488]

Hey Nick, if you're reading this, you're a gay faggot with aids.

 

[Grayback]

He's back at it again (archive)

Nick, no one in that fucking house is normal. Not after living with you.