Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 21.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 28.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 42 14.4%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 100 34.2%

  • Total voters
    292
  1. file whatever the fuck the client asks you to file, no matter how dogshit, because the client believes its in their best interest, and you just carry out their wishes.
  2. refuse to file whatever the fuck your retard client asks you to file and risk getting fired/replaced in order to save yourself the embarrassment of filing dogshit
  3. file whatever the fuck you want because you think it is in the best interest of your client, regardless of what they think.
I'm pretty sure #3 is a bad idea unless your client is demonstrably incompetent, but #2 is obviously the best option for any lawyer Cackets gets. #1 seems kind of awkward if your client is insisting on you filing things that are obviously awful and will make you look like a moron in court. The Barneswalker has chosen #1, possibly to gain clout with Barnes's club and possibly because he may be a shit lawyer anyway. #3 can have implications outside that specific court case that are very much not in the client's interest, and is a recipe for a malpractice lawsuit.
To an extent, but I am not going to look like a tool for your ego. I still have to work in the court after you're long gone and my obligations to the Professional Rules are paramount.
That's not a good idea, IMO. While the client doesn't have control over the tactical decisions, it's only going to cause issues for you woth the court or bar if you ignore your client.
My understanding of this is that the client has a surprisingly large amount of control over strategic decisions, but once you get to a level of tactics (especially the content of motions), it's all up to the lawyer. If your client comes in and says "I want you to try Franks to get this dismissed" and your client is a lawyer and you have explained all the options and insisted that this is a stupid course of action, it's not clear to me that you can do anything but file the most professional Franks motion you can muster (however unlikely it is to win) or fire your client.

I suppose you could argue that this still means "I want the warrant tossed" despite your client's request specifically for a Franks motion and that interpretation would give you a bit more latitude. Or you could try to argue that it means "I want the evidence from the search tossed" and you get even more latitude. Of course, you might have to have an awkward conversation when your motion doesn't cite Franks.
 
@I Will Be Us

Alternative archive
https://ghostarchive.org/

X alternatives
https://nitter.poast.org/
https://xcancel.com/

Link and archive of your post
View attachment 6666561
Link / Archive

Edit
Sorry @Vibralldo didn't see that you had already linked ghostarchive.
So ? Is it a secondary source ? Is it the test that's wrong ? Was it the corrupt cop that dusted his daughter's hair with metabolites while taking a sample ? Was it the frying pans ? This nigger can't get his story straight. "Well uuuh the test is totally wrong and the cop was also totally corrupt but in case it was accurate it wasn't me it was some secondary source OR THE FRYING PAN! MY KID IS TOTALLY HEALTHY NERDS!"
 
Listen, I'm not doubting your google-fu, but I will say that the number of cases of modafinil abuse are very, very small in number, and the side effects of taking a shit ton of moda are significantly worse than whatever euphoria you'll experience. Without getting too much into it, I've been in positions where I was essentially required to be awake for 24-48 hours at a time, and over those time periods I took upwards of 1600mg of modafinil, which is 8 pills. I got nothing more than a bitching headache.

As for Balldo, Modafinil has been shown in clinical settings to blunt the effects of cocaine, so I cannot imagine that he's into taking megadoses of it.
Just what I found at multiple sources. I didn't search hard for it.
1. There were multiple tests performed.

2. If subsequent testing came back negative for cocaine, Nick would certainly have told us.

Ergo, the very safe bet is that Nick Rekieta’s eight year old child tested positive for cocaine multiple times.

It’s not complicated at all, despite Nick’s attempts to make it appear so.

The idea what you get a reading like that and nobody can insist on a retest sounds so utterly retarded. Hey, happened after it got sealed, we can trust Nick, sure.

View attachment 6666313

Speaking of, Nick is still going pretty hard. Defending his love of his kids and the drugging seem to be all he's done online for the past two days.

(Also, archive.today and archive.ph never load for me and the archival thread isn't giving many alternatives on Tweets. Sorry, I'm trying here).
Uh huh. Everyone knew it was a problem with the test. No Balldo Man, they couldn't prove you intentionally dosed her or she dosed herself. That's all.
 
Nick is back in the livechat of his favourite pedophile Fatty Melt. A classic way to emotionally deal with legal failure for the Balldo.

View attachment 6666580
View attachment 6666581
I think his strategy is every time he fails, he redoubles his effort to destroy Aaron somehow. Like he knows he's cooked, and he wants to drag people into hell with him.

You have to REALLY hate Aaron in order to want to work with Melton.
 
Because it sounds like a ridiculous media scare headline, here's a link to a published article on the NIH website discussing pyrethroids. Highlights include the fact that 1 in 6 drug users in rural Kentucky report using them, and that some people just skip the middle man and coat their drugs with wasp spray. You know, just in case you had any hope left for humanity.

“In one case, the man transitioned to inhaling or smoking crystalized cockroach killer containing pyrethroid when he became unable to afford methamphetamine. The man reported a methamphetamine-like high, olfactory hallucinations, increased heart rate, and suicidal ideation, though the latter may have been due to untreated bipolar disorder.14 The other case involved intravenous use of a pyrethroid-containing compound, but details of his transition to wasp dope use and its reported effects were lacking”

So… wasp meth doesn’t show up on a drug test?

Nick is always one step ahead of the farms so I think it’s fair to assume he already knew about this and has indeed been creating wasp meth in the pug bathroom for months.
 
Last edited:
IMHO if Nick didn't drug her himself, then he left coke right in the open and the kid got into it when daddy and mommy were too busy fucking their respective sidepieces, and they were both pieces of shit who'd risk their kid dying of an heart attack or ischemia just so they could continue using drugs than to rush her to hospital and face legal repercussions later.
Aaron has said that Nick once left a coke bullet on the couch at his (Aaron's) house, where the kids could have gotten to it. It doesn't seem likely that Nick was more cautious about leaving drugs lying around at his own house (and it's obvious from the police statement of facts following the search that he wasn't cautious).
 
Those halcyon days before Ty fucked up bigly and Nick started eulogizing people's second cousin's dead tardigrades, and before Nick made cooming his personality.
That was when I checked out. He'd get $5 to toast someone's grandpa who died 15 years ago, down a glass of whiskey, then another superchat would roll in asking for a toast to their deceased hamster. Rinse and repeat for at least the first hour of the show. Just trash content. That had to be around 2021 or 22 maybe?
 
I won't bother doing a bunch of quoting here, but I agree with the kid testing positive being legit. They will retest an 8 year old. This isn't gonna be some shit where they just do one quick test and wing it. Nick claiming he wouldnt face more serious charges is bullshit, because it would be rolled into endangerment or something else. Why? You can't really prove how the kid got the drugs, but you can prove that it was a result of negligent parenting. Nick has a big fuckin mouth too so if there was another test and anything ever came back anything besides positive, he would be swearing up and down all over the place about it.
 
Scorned ex-gf Nick Rekieta is seeking attention from random Melton fans by teasing he will release logs of Signal chats with Aaron.

2024-11-20 - 20_30_51 - 🔴 November 20, 2024_ Aaron Imholte WINS & Johnny Krutches SPINS! Rumor...png2024-11-20 - 20_30_03 - 🔴 November 20, 2024_ Aaron Imholte WINS & Johnny Krutches SPINS! Rumor...png2024-11-20 - 20_32_37 - 🔴 November 20, 2024_ Aaron Imholte WINS & Johnny Krutches SPINS! Rumor...png2024-11-20 - 20_33_15 - 🔴 November 20, 2024_ Aaron Imholte WINS & Johnny Krutches SPINS! Rumor...png2024-11-20 - 20_39_16 - 🔴 November 20, 2024_ Aaron Imholte WINS & Johnny Krutches SPINS! Rumor...png2024-11-20 - 20_40_36 - 🔴 November 20, 2024_ Aaron Imholte WINS & Johnny Krutches SPINS! Rumor...png2024-11-20 - 20_41_01 - 🔴 November 20, 2024_ Aaron Imholte WINS & Johnny Krutches SPINS! Rumor...png
 
Back