Is the Death of DEI Imminent?

Let's hope so...

dei.png



Companies scored on the Alliance Defending Freedom’s Viewpoint Diversity index, along with Fortune 1000 companies not scored, received letters from the investor advisor coalition.

ADF’s 2024 Viewpoint Diversity index revealed that 91 percent of companies scored use critical race theory in their training materials for employees. The index measured the 85 biggest technology and finance companies on their respect for free speech and religious freedom.

Jeremy Tedesco, senior vice president of corporate engagement for Alliance Defending Freedom, told the Daily Caller News Foundation it’s clear that diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) is already “on its way out.”

“What the Trump administration does could really speed up that process, which will ultimately be good for those corporations, for their workforce, for the broader society, because DEI is a toxic ideology that harms everybody it comes into contact with,” he said.

Some companies have already changed DEI policies as a result of pressure from consumers and shareholders, ending their participation in the left-wing Human Rights Campaign’s Corporate Equality Index and abandoning diversity initiatives, Tedesco noted. Under pressure from conservative activist Robby Starbuck, companies like Lowe’s and Tractor Supply Co backtracked on DEI policies, including sponsoring LGBTQ pride parades.

Companies began rolling back their DEI programs after the Supreme Court ruled against affirmative action in higher education in 2023 and conservatives increased their focus on specifically targeting corporations with legal challenges.

“While we urge you to distance yourself from DEI and highly divisive groups like the Human Rights Campaign—which bullies companies into adopting radical, wrong-headed, and reputationally disastrous policies—we also want to caution you against retracting your goal of protecting the civil liberties and dignity of all employees,” the letter continues. “As fiduciaries of your companies, we manage over $16 billion in assets, and we represent working Americans who depend on us to safeguard their financial future, retirement planning, and more. You owe these investors transparency and, when necessary, proactive changes that are in their best financial interests to serve and foster a healthy civil society.”

Inspire Investing director of corporate engagement Tim Schwarzenberger, whose company signed onto the letters, said shareholders “expect those in the c-suite to deliver positive financial results that meet customer demand and contribute to a healthy, civil society.”

“That’s not too much to ask,” Schwarzenberger said in a statement to the DCNF. “For too long, however, corporate leaders have been bullied into taking increasingly extreme positions on hot-button cultural issues and implementing harmful DEI policies that divide up the workforce and society itself.”

 
Last edited:
I think shareholders are freaking out about it due to how decisively Trump won and how magnified DEI has become in the past year. With Boeing in particular being so publicized as following it and then having their company driven to ruin because of it. This might force companies to pivot away from it at least publicly.
 
Nope. Even religions with barely any following like the Cult of Reason during the French Revolution didn't die that quickly.

DEI, Multiculturalism, Tranny Worship, "Everything is colonialist" is so deeply embedded it will take a couple of generations to thin out and even then it will still probably lurk as another widespread cultural/ethnic identifier.

Maybe in four generations or so we might see Uni Grads whining about Grandma insisting they hold a Gender Identity Reveal and Mom and Dad will asking they say they're anything but cisgender "To keep her happy".

"Just wear the trans colours when Gransxir is around, you can be straight later".
 
Nope. Even religions with barely any following like the Cult of Reason during the French Revolution didn't die that quickly.

DEI, Multiculturalism, Tranny Worship, "Everything is colonialist" is so deeply embedded it will take a couple of generations to thin out and even then it will still probably lurk as another widespread cultural/ethnic identifier.

Maybe in four generations or so we might see Uni Grads whining about Grandma insisting they hold a Gender Identity Reveal and Mom and Dad will asking they say they're anything but cisgender "To keep her happy".

"Just wear the trans colours when Gransxir is around, you can be straight later".
i don't know i think at least the tranny shit isn't long for this world. im 28 and it wasn't taught in highschool when i attended. so its all very contemporary and doesn't have the roots that civil rights or gay liberation has. the people pushing tranny shit (not the trannies them selfs they really had nothing to do with it at all really) went too far and too fast,
consider it took gay people 60 years of constant bitching to be able to get married and are now kind of accepted by most people, IF they keep to them selfs.
now imagine being a tranny who wants to groom your children into being castrates with education starting asap, grifting plastic surgery on the tax payers dime.
all of this happening within 5-7 years of being a thing that most people would be aware of.
 
Nope. Even religions with barely any following like the Cult of Reason during the French Revolution didn't die that quickly.

DEI, Multiculturalism, Tranny Worship, "Everything is colonialist" is so deeply embedded it will take a couple of generations to thin out and even then it will still probably lurk as another widespread cultural/ethnic identifier.

Maybe in four generations or so we might see Uni Grads whining about Grandma insisting they hold a Gender Identity Reveal and Mom and Dad will asking they say they're anything but cisgender "To keep her happy".

"Just wear the trans colours when Gransxir is around, you can be straight later".

We will always have DEI or something like that as long as Blank Slate Theory is our guiding ethos. You will always need some reason to explain why blacks underperform whites and women underperform men in the various ways that they always have, and since that reason isn't allowed to be heredity, it will be some variation of "the System," and thus there will always be a moral mandate to fix "the System" so that the equality we know is lurking under the surface is finally achieved.
 
"Death" ?

It never lived in the first place.

It was an artificial construct loosed by the elite upon the general populace and only survived as long as it did through naked favoritism from the political and cultural elite classes who were willing to trade their constituency, country and institution's collective wellbeing for ego and money.

This homunculus of a social movement never had a single genuine breath of life in it, as it was a giant and obnoxious contradiction to everything that came before it.


Wasn't BRIDGE the new label for DEI that they're trying to push? DEI might die, but they're just going to relabel and try again. Never thinking why it never works.
The TRUE AND HONEST believers will try again, but they'll fail.

They've lost the element of surprise.

People, like those who voted for Trump in 24, despite being sure he was a dictator in 16, have seen it all before, the exact same arguments you used the first time will fail to impress the second time.

Sequels never earn as much as the original.

Repackaged DEI will be the Joker sequel that earned fifty cents to the billion dollar version.


It's as silly as saying "Well, the Klu Klux Klan failed to prevent Civil Rights from passing, so, they'll just change their name and try again and do it anyways"

Yeah, they became neo nazis and were even LESS popular and less able to affect their desired change.

The Klan at it's height was something an elected official could admit to membership of and suffer no consequence, even before current day insanity and cancel culture, that was never afforded to "white power" movements in the 80's and 90's

DEI was something you were expected to openly endorse in the 2010's, in the 2020's and beyond? Doing so will be an express ticket to Kamala Harris levels of popularity.
 
Last edited:
DEI, Multiculturalism, Tranny Worship, "Everything is colonialist" is so deeply embedded it will take a couple of generations to thin out and even then it will still probably lurk as another widespread cultural/ethnic identifier.

Maybe in four generations or so we might see Uni Grads whining about Grandma insisting they hold a Gender Identity Reveal and Mom and Dad will asking they say they're anything but cisgender "To keep her happy".
I don't buy that at all. These people stand for nothing and worship nothing. They have no morals or principles and the moment something like Transgenderism becomes a widespread icky topic, they'll drop it like a hot potato. We've seen the Left do this dozens of times. Look how they talk about Latinos the moment they realized they aren't on their side. The moment transgenderism becomes unpopular, they'll abandon it in droves and claim it never happened. They'll all say they never supported it, and they'll deny every article you show them as proof of the left's endorsement of it. That's how this game works. That's how it's always worked. These people are evil garbage.
 
I'd say for a lot of companies now reversing DEI would be like trying to turn a ship around in the Panana Canel, due to the amount of dedicated activist hires in key departments such as HR.

The same goes for companies that have hired too many Pajeets. The few White people left have realized that all recent hires are of a certain group and by a certain group, but wouldn't be able to do anything (legally) that would undo things.
 
I don't buy that at all. These people stand for nothing and worship nothing.
Except themselves.

And gay rights were pitched as a "we just want to be left alone" initiative.

DEI has always been "you're gonna start living THIS way from now on, unless you want to go hungry an possibly to jail"
 
Just push back this DEI bullshit whenever someone forces it on you. In my workplace, when a potential young employee focuses more on their socio-political BS than their achievements during their interviews, we just reject their sorry ass, we don't care if you're a nigger, a wetback or a chink who pulls their race card just for a BS diversity hire.
 
A lot of people are under the impression that somehow this kind of stuff is simply going to be renamed and somehow still persist, but this is a death knell for corporate DEI in the near future. This is how ESG investing became a thing in the first place - reports like this coming from the top down saying that not complying with those standards is a signal of increased regulatory risk was a major factor of why that garbage was everywhere seemingly overnight. Incidentally, it's also why they've slowly been decoupling the "environmental" part from the "social and governance" part as of late, because actual environmental regulatory concerns came about, particularly in the EU.
What's being said here is more than just "please rename the DEI department because there could be potential PR backlash and some minor risk involve", this is "you need to root that shit out, it will be included in risk assessments because we don't want to be left high and dry if the government steps in". I don't think this is a nothingburger that's going to just be sidestepped with a rename.
 
We will always have DEI or something like that as long as Blank Slate Theory is our guiding ethos. You will always need some reason to explain why blacks underperform whites and women underperform men in the various ways that they always have, and since that reason isn't allowed to be heredity, it will be some variation of "the System," and thus there will always be a moral mandate to fix "the System" so that the equality we know is lurking under the surface is finally achieved.
Agree, the "post-war consensus" really did a number on the Boomers and subsequent generations. Not just Leftists, but Centrists and Conservatives stuck in their framework and unable to effectively argue that differing abilities and the resulting hierarchies are inevitable and not something to be explained around.

Another way of looking at this is that there is power in promising to give low performing people high status in your system. To the degree they resent the fact that no healthy society would give them power, they'll loyal to anyone who offers it to them, and will help burn down civilization in the process. And the more degenerate & dysfunctional, the more loyal, which is why troons & retarded somalis are elevated.

This has been called BioLeninism, Spiteful Mutants, Coalition of the Fringes, or just "why are these antifags so unbelievably ugly?"
 
Back