Is the Death of DEI Imminent?

Let's hope so...

dei.png



Companies scored on the Alliance Defending Freedom’s Viewpoint Diversity index, along with Fortune 1000 companies not scored, received letters from the investor advisor coalition.

ADF’s 2024 Viewpoint Diversity index revealed that 91 percent of companies scored use critical race theory in their training materials for employees. The index measured the 85 biggest technology and finance companies on their respect for free speech and religious freedom.

Jeremy Tedesco, senior vice president of corporate engagement for Alliance Defending Freedom, told the Daily Caller News Foundation it’s clear that diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) is already “on its way out.”

“What the Trump administration does could really speed up that process, which will ultimately be good for those corporations, for their workforce, for the broader society, because DEI is a toxic ideology that harms everybody it comes into contact with,” he said.

Some companies have already changed DEI policies as a result of pressure from consumers and shareholders, ending their participation in the left-wing Human Rights Campaign’s Corporate Equality Index and abandoning diversity initiatives, Tedesco noted. Under pressure from conservative activist Robby Starbuck, companies like Lowe’s and Tractor Supply Co backtracked on DEI policies, including sponsoring LGBTQ pride parades.

Companies began rolling back their DEI programs after the Supreme Court ruled against affirmative action in higher education in 2023 and conservatives increased their focus on specifically targeting corporations with legal challenges.

“While we urge you to distance yourself from DEI and highly divisive groups like the Human Rights Campaign—which bullies companies into adopting radical, wrong-headed, and reputationally disastrous policies—we also want to caution you against retracting your goal of protecting the civil liberties and dignity of all employees,” the letter continues. “As fiduciaries of your companies, we manage over $16 billion in assets, and we represent working Americans who depend on us to safeguard their financial future, retirement planning, and more. You owe these investors transparency and, when necessary, proactive changes that are in their best financial interests to serve and foster a healthy civil society.”

Inspire Investing director of corporate engagement Tim Schwarzenberger, whose company signed onto the letters, said shareholders “expect those in the c-suite to deliver positive financial results that meet customer demand and contribute to a healthy, civil society.”

“That’s not too much to ask,” Schwarzenberger said in a statement to the DCNF. “For too long, however, corporate leaders have been bullied into taking increasingly extreme positions on hot-button cultural issues and implementing harmful DEI policies that divide up the workforce and society itself.”

 
Last edited:
It is the exact same thing, man. Born from the exact same type of people. There's a reason they can move so fast: because there was thirty years of media propaganda and rebranding gays as the sassy best friends of liberal women. Those exact same handmaidens are leading the charge.

Fight this shit at the root.View attachment 6672700
yeah thats pretty much facts,
They did teach us about homosexuality in school, But it was nothing more than a line during orientation about some people being gay and acceptance, ONE sentence and thats it,
This cult of acceptance and neo sexual identities rub even normie liberals wrong
 
A lot of people are under the impression that somehow this kind of stuff is simply going to be renamed and somehow still persist, but this is a death knell for corporate DEI in the near future. This is how ESG investing became a thing in the first place - reports like this coming from the top down saying that not complying with those standards is a signal of increased regulatory risk was a major factor of why that garbage was everywhere seemingly overnight. Incidentally, it's also why they've slowly been decoupling the "environmental" part from the "social and governance" part as of late, because actual environmental regulatory concerns came about, particularly in the EU.
What's being said here is more than just "please rename the DEI department because there could be potential PR backlash and some minor risk involve", this is "you need to root that shit out, it will be included in risk assessments because we don't want to be left high and dry if the government steps in". I don't think this is a nothingburger that's going to just be sidestepped with a rename.
Megacorps don't invest in DEI because they think 0.05% of the population will buy out their stores, they do so to get a ROI on the neoliberal politicians they paid to be placed into office. The left must never become the economic pro labor left, it can only move further and further left on social issues.
 
Woke and trannyism will become the new Radio or TV. It's there in the background, sometimes people talk about it, but nobody really cares about its existence one way or another, with the exception of a few die-hards.
 
Nope. Even religions with barely any following like the Cult of Reason during the French Revolution didn't die that quickly.

DEI, Multiculturalism, Tranny Worship, "Everything is colonialist" is so deeply embedded it will take a couple of generations to thin out and even then it will still probably lurk as another widespread cultural/ethnic identifier.

Maybe in four generations or so we might see Uni Grads whining about Grandma insisting they hold a Gender Identity Reveal and Mom and Dad will asking they say they're anything but cisgender "To keep her happy".

"Just wear the trans colours when Gransxir is around, you can be straight later".
It won’t die overnight but it took a major L. One from which even some of its most ardent believers think is a generational loss and near irreparable damage. Diversity is going to be a millstone around the Democrats neck. It will still persist and if anything an injured cornered animal is more dangerous than a healthy one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FlappyBat
I don't buy that at all. These people stand for nothing and worship nothing. They have no morals or principles and the moment something like Transgenderism becomes a widespread icky topic, they'll drop it like a hot potato. We've seen the Left do this dozens of times. Look how they talk about Latinos the moment they realized they aren't on their side. The moment transgenderism becomes unpopular, they'll abandon it in droves and claim it never happened. They'll all say they never supported it, and they'll deny every article you show them as proof of the left's endorsement of it. That's how this game works. That's how it's always worked. These people are evil garbage.
They would say the same thing when people who where adults during WW2 were asks by the grandchildren in the ,90s (back when people of that generation was still alive) Why did you support segregation? The would answer something like "everybody supported back then." "or it was a different time".
 
They would say the same thing when people who where adults during WW2 were asks by the grandchildren in the ,90s (back when people of that generation was still alive) Why did you support segregation? The would answer something like "everybody supported back then." "or it was a different time".
That would be owning up to it and taking accountability. These people have no accountability. The reason I always hated people who place high value in "being a good person" is because those people usually place that idea above concepts like accountability. People who place high value in being a good person NEVER take accountability. When someone says they want to "just be a good person", what they aren't saying is they "just want to be a good person in the eyes of others". They would sooner lie than admit they were wrong because you might think they're not a good person. This is an idea the left constantly screams from the top of their lungs.

So to your anecdote, no. They won't say that. They'll say "Only crazy people who very bad did that." and when their grandchildren say "Well my teacher said leftists did that. And didn't you just say you were a leftist in your day last Thanksgiving?", they'll reply with "No. Your teacher is wrong and the left never believed those things. They never forced anyone to castrate their children. The left was the inherent party of good. They would never do something sinister like sell bathtub hormones to kids." They don't have morals. They'll happily lie and spit in the faces of their children and grandchildren to keep up that narcissistic perception of being a good person.
 
Most people I know who are really into woke/queer shit are at or near middle age and desperate to still be "down with the youth" and not old foggies like their parents were. They see progressivism as linear and assume that they have to jump on each new woke trend or they'll be left behind, on the wrong side of history.

They are in shock now that the youth are turning more conservative. A portion of my work is with teens and I've been seeing signs of this for a while, even with the younger girls, but even so, all the media about the huge lines of college students waiting to vote made me anxious on the 5th. Because it was all so sure that younger voters meant liberals. So it's going to take all the woke people in their 30s to 50s a while to fully accept that it's not an anomaly and that the youth culture is a rejection of woke shit. I think somewhere around year 3 of Vance's first term they'll start to quietly let go and pretend they never believed stupid shit like sex being a spectrum.
I do feel like it’s more prominent with 30-40 year olds, but there’s unfortunately a very large segment of gen z that are being brainwashed. The millennials in turn were infected by crazy boomers. But overall I’m optimistic about the trends.
That would be owning up to it and taking accountability. These people have no accountability. The reason I always hated people who place high value in "being a good person" is because those people usually place that idea above concepts like accountability. People who place high value in being a good person NEVER take accountability. When someone says they want to "just be a good person", what they aren't saying is they "just want to be a good person in the eyes of others". They would sooner lie than admit they were wrong because you might think they're not a good person. This is an idea the left constantly screams from the top of their lungs.

So to your anecdote, no. They won't say that. They'll say "Only crazy people who very bad did that." and when their grandchildren say "Well my teacher said leftists did that. And didn't you just say you were a leftist in your day last Thanksgiving?", they'll reply with "No. Your teacher is wrong and the left never believed those things. They never forced anyone to castrate their children. The left was the inherent party of good. They would never do something sinister like sell bathtub hormones to kids." They don't have morals. They'll happily lie and spit in the faces of their children and grandchildren to keep up that narcissistic perception of being a good person.
This happened already with the Democrat party and what they did in the 1800s-1940s.
 
You can't end DEI until you end the middle management wastes of space in the HR spaces of companies. Zealots don't care about money or pragmatism. They will die before they admit they are wrong, so removing some lines from corporate handbooks won't do anything unless you remove the class of people in those corporations that are ideologically possessed by DEI.
 
This is why DEI is DIE.

Quoth:
Our Federal civil service system is based on merit principles. These principles, codified at 5 U.S.C. 2301, call for all employees to “receive fair and equitable treatment in all aspects of personnel management without regard to” race or sex “and with proper regard for their . . . constitutional rights.” Instructing Federal employees that treating individuals on the basis of individual merit is racist or sexist directly undermines our Merit System Principles and impairs the efficiency of the Federal service. Similarly, our Uniformed Services should not teach our heroic men and women in uniform the lie that the country for which they are willing to die is fundamentally racist. Such teachings could directly threaten the cohesion and effectiveness of our Uniformed Services.

Such activities also promote division and inefficiency when carried out by Federal contractors. The Federal Government has long prohibited Federal contractors from engaging in race or sex discrimination and required contractors to take affirmative action to ensure that such discrimination does not occur. The participation of contractors’ employees in training that promotes race or sex stereotyping or scapegoating similarly undermines efficiency in Federal contracting. Such requirements promote divisiveness in the workplace and distract from the pursuit of excellence and collaborative achievements in public administration.

Therefore, it shall be the policy of the United States not to promote race or sex stereotyping or scapegoating in the Federal workforce or in the Uniformed Services, and not to allow grant funds to be used for these purposes. In addition, Federal contractors will not be permitted to inculcate such views in their employees.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Fagnacious D
Quite a few fans of DEI/ESG/Wokeism on here apparently.

It would be absolutely awful if someone addresses them with the wrong pronoun...
And they can all fuck themselves.
Go back to their mud huts.
Eat their bug burgers
And obey their overlords.

Here is a video by a based gay guy whom I have some respect for because he reports the news.

And that's all I care about.

 
It might be worth to bump this thread with that article.

December 9, 2024

The Beginning of the End of DEI – In the Private Sector and Our Universities​

By Janet Levy


Ferraris are priced between $250,000 and $600,000, but it’s not enough to have the money to buy these pricey Italian sports cars. The company’s Diversity and Inclusion Charter demands that buyers and their families pass “social status” background checks to “ensure they fit the mold of the brand and its desired image.”

Talk about cultivating “inclusivity!”

In a similar charade of ‘woke’ virtue signaling, luxury car maker Jaguar unleashed a futuristic ad in a pinkish palette featuring men posing as women. There are no cars in it, so it's no surprise that it landed like a lead balloon and joined the pantheon of duds like the Bud Light ad featuring trans activist Dylan Mulvaney in a bubble bath.

The Bud Light ad sparked a consumer backlash on social media, including calls for boycotting the beer brand.
In Go Woke, Go Broke: The Inside Story of the Radicalization of Corporate America, Charles Gasparino called the Bud Light fiasco the “desecration of a great American brand.” The book—which opens with an account of an incredibly farcical discussion at Goldman Sachs over whether ordering Chick-fil-A sandwiches is sufficiently woke—exposes many such woke/DEI debacles and the brand destruction they wreaked.

Fortunately, the efforts of people like Gasparino (a seasoned business reporter who knows what makes companies succeed or fail) and anti-DEI campaigner Robby Starbuck are paying off. Moreover, the resounding victory of President-elect Donald Trump—who made a campaign pledge to dismantle “divisive,” “un-American” DEI programs—has catalyzed a corporate retreat from leftist “wokeness.”
 
Back