Russian Special Military Operation in the Ukraine - Mark IV: The Partitioning of Discussion

prolapsed_cranium said:
Ryan McRaytheon went to shill for NATO
Click to expand...
A fat, balding faggot youtuber, wearing effeminate problem-glasses even when he's trying to look presentable in a suit.
They're really scraping the bottom of the barrel for shills now.

faggot.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: WENDY DENG 2020, Nigger Cobson, Total Annihilation and 8 others
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: demicolon, Scarface1, Jex and 17 others
Echo_Doge said:
Not an ICBM expert, but don't they usually have an explosive payload?

Unless they're using the "Rods from God" types and relying on kinetic impact damage?
Click to expand...
Maybe they were launched without warheads to send a message? Even without warheads the kinetic energy delivered is probably the same as the missiles they've been launching so far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nigger Cobson, jeff7989, PointOfNoReturnPoint and 5 others
Meh123 said:
I'm no ICBM expert either, but isn't IC stands for InterContinental? Last time I checked, ukraine wasn't continents away from russia..
Click to expand...
I think intercontinental refers to the maximum operational range. As in, the max range could be 10,000 miles, but there's nothing really preventing you from using them on targets 1000 miles away.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Kuritan Deplorable, 90s Military Aesthetics, Bananadana and 7 others
Scipio Neomericanus said:
As in, the max range could be 10,000 miles, but there's nothing really preventing you from using them on targets 1000 miles away.
Click to expand...
Yes but normally you have different weapon systems for that, like the Kinzhals/Zircons/Kalibrs the Russians have been throwing at Ukraine for the past three years. Like a said above, breaking out an ICBM was a message both to Ukraine and it's Western puppet masters and there are probably shart stains on a bunch of chairs at NORAD.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: TwoDollarPeePeePooPoo, Iron Jaguar, Feline Supremacist and 3 others
Scipio Neomericanus said:
I think intercontinental refers to the maximum operational range. As in, the max range could be 10,000 miles, but there's nothing really preventing you from using them on targets 1000 miles away.
Click to expand...
Could have gone around the earth and come back down. Glonass has a big not for civilian use black array that could shepherd it anywhere they would want it to go. Good way to send a message and given it was better part of a day before it dropped from the western declared launch plausible.

The soviets invented the ICBM, and regardless of what retards in say their uncle told them; NATO has never caught up in ICBM tech (excusing the french whom have still tried to narrow it), and the gap has drastically grown over the last decade. Just as with AA where anyone who cares about actual receipts (rather that again what their uncle told them), saw that Patriots Pac3ewhatever turned out to be hot garbage next to old S-300 variants Ukraine had before: Russia can afford to show off and have hundreds in the tank to use as they please, nukes or not.


If I am wrong we will see the USA dump one of their newbie minutemen Sentinel or trident variants on a south pacific sandbar Atoll with he footage to show, because obviously thats how you show you can get warheads to orbit without having to resource guard. Or perhaps I am just plainly wrong and retards blowing big dildos up their ass wanking over their dads Galil and muh iron dome they will never inherit due to gun laws and failure to right of abode are correct.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: The giant penis of doom, The Foxtrot, Broken Cuddles and 6 others
Enoch Emery said:
Ukraine says Dnipropetrovsk was struck by an ICBM.
Click to expand...
Bullshit. For 70 odd years the West has developed an advanced system of ICBM detection. There is no way, with all the nuclear saber raddling Russia has been doing that the West isn't looking at Russia closely. If NATO says it wasn't an ICBM it wasn't one. What is it with Ukraine lying or claiming the most extreme stuff?
 
  • Dumb
  • Disagree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar, Tamerlane, Stained Racecar Bed and 8 others
prolapsed_cranium said:
Did the kike lovers in the other thread acknowledge that the Russians aren't fucking around anymore?
Click to expand...
Unless you cause massive civilian casualties and broadcast the vast undeniable devastation for the world to see, you will never be taken seriously by ZOG or their worshippers. Just showing you can isn't enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charred Dinosaur, Nigger Cobson, Bananadana and 6 others
I initially thought it was just hohols lying.

But the video does show something unusual. Perhaps milspergs know what the weapon is.

It appears to produce no big explosion upon intact and looks like 6-8 long glowing beams of molten metal very rapidly dropping from the sky in groups.

Maybe it is a mirv warhead pscked with tungsten rods to royally fuck up ammo storage bunkers?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: AllieKat
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back