Megathread SRS and GRS surgeons and associated horrors - the medical community of experimental surgeons, the secret community of home butchers

This is the Director of the Trans Health Clinic at Cincinatti Childrens. She treats patients as young as four. She’s transing 4-year olds!

IMG_1820.jpegIMG_1821.jpeg
 
I've seen advertisements suggesting black women should be looking into PrEP specifically for this reason. It was very disturbing to see.

It's why, even though I think the gays do need to grow up and quit banging everything that moves, aggressive homophobia still does cause problems in its own ways.
I adopted a policy of rifling through my date's medicine cabinet before going to bed for this reason. If he's doing something shifty enough to need PrEP he has to wrap it up. I hate that the medical establishment thinks it's easier to make a bunch of black women take unnecessary PrEP rather than instruct black men to stop looking for nsa gay hookups.
Do they do regular testing of every donation in the US?

I was under the impression that the scale involved for blood donations was simply too immense to actually do affirmative testing on every sample, and in practice they just rely heavily on people's word in those questionnaires they give you.
Like @Otterly said they do batch testing and then if any of the samples in the batch test positive, they'll individually test units to figure out which unit(s) are unusable. It's been a little while since I donated blood, but I remember that when they took a unit of blood they also take like 5-6 15mL sample tubes that are all labeled with donor PII and attached to the big bag with a rubber band. Those sample tubes are presumably for testing people for bloodborne disease, but it is probably true that they test for common shit, not whether or not you had a dura mater graft or are positive for babesiosis.
 
They test batches I think and if a batch shows positive all are tested BUT the problem is that HIV doesn’t always show up u til months after infection.
Maybe in the US, but in Australia they are all tested. Every single sample.
If you have a recent infection it may not come up positive. Plus there’s always a danger of simple error. That’s why pre s preening and keeping potential danger out is so important. Or was
Prescreening takes longer these days than the actual donation. I understand the need for it, but it drives me crazy.
It's been a little while since I donated blood, but I remember that when they took a unit of blood they also take like 5-6 15mL sample tubes that are all labeled with donor PII and attached to the big bag with a rubber band.
My last donation was 4 days ago. They still do a small first draw followed by the pint. Every sample is tested for infection or viruses. I was explicitly told this by staff at the blood draw I did three months ago.
 
I hate that the medical establishment thinks it's easier to make a bunch of black women take unnecessary PrEP rather than instruct black men to stop looking for nsa gay hookups
Doctors can tell them all they want, but I don’t think a bunch of black gay guys are going to be very amenable to those kill joys.
 
They test batches I think
I hope it's not done that way in the UK, but it is definitely not done that way in the USA. Each donation is tested and stored individually and every donation is tested without exception. I don't know why the myth persists that there are big gallons of mixed Type A+ sitting down in the blood bank when we know of so many other type issues (Kell being an enormously consequential one for childbearing women, for instance) that may be relevant to some recipients and must be singled out for crossmatch, not to mention other needs like CMV neg and so forth.

Now plasma used for pharma is definitely kept in the proverbial big mixed tanks, but that's for things like immune globulin products.
 
I don't know why the myth persists that there are big gallons of mixed Type A+ sitting down in the blood bank
I suspect the myth comes from those that don’t actually donate blood. I’m not sure what it’s like in other countries, but technology is so good now, and so easy to access, that within a couple more days I’ll even know the exact hospital my blood was sent to. After the testing of the smaller sample, the actual unit of blood is tracked in it’s original, still sealed, sterile collection bag all the way to its final destination. Only the small sample is opened for testing. The bag my blood was collected in is the bag that will be hung on the hospital IV poll when it’s being transfused into a patient.
 
Last edited:
I got a zero depth vaginoplasty about seven months ago in Thailand. I think the results are sort of ok but not great yet whenever anyone else sees it (including my wife and my female doctor back in Australia) I always get told it looks fine. I'm wondering about revision surgery, I'd love to get some feedback - does it look okay the way it turned out or is it worth revision surgery? The photo was at seven months post op, I appreciate it might still change a bit as the healing process might not be complete. The dark mark at the top was a tattoo

Screenshot 2024-11-22 at 08.27.07.png

In case anyone is wondering what that green discolouration is - he had his wife's name tattooed on his dick. All the troons in the comments are gassing him up that this thing which looks nothing like a vagina, looks normal.
 

In case anyone is wondering what that green discolouration is - he had his wife's name tattooed on his dick. All the troons in the comments are gassing him up that this thing which looks nothing like a vagina, looks normal.
They're always sited so fucking high up. I have never in my life been with a woman that looked like that. Apart from the fact it doesn't even look human, they always start so high and the actual 'ditch is always under the ballsack labia.

Who the fuck would get a tattoo on there dick ffs?
Ok they don't really hurt when you're used to them but I wouldn't want a fucking tattoo gun blasting my dick JfC.
They're freaks.
 
Its the tranny version of giving birth. I would imagine the pain is insane and the chance of something getting stuck is high.
Just imagine a kidney stone getting caught in a fistula, or trapped in a pooner's labyrinthine urinary tract. It's a bloody disaster waiting to happen, and yet somehow they convince these fools that complications are vanishingly rare and totes won't happen to them.
 
Its the tranny version of giving birth. I would imagine the pain is insane and the chance of something getting stuck is high.
Just imagine a kidney stone getting caught in a fistula, or trapped in a pooner's labyrinthine urinary tract. It's a bloody disaster waiting to happen, and yet somehow they convince these fools that complications are vanishingly rare and totes won't happen to them.

The thing is their rotdogs are normally completely numb from nerve damage, so the first they would know if a stone for instance got lodged in their 'dog is when it caused their urinary system to back up and started affecting their organs. This is the sort of shit that ended up contributing to killing Gruffin, her problems started with organ damage from constant urinary infections and the antibiotics and other things used to treat them end up nuking other organs, and this shit has resulted in a lot of these Pooners getting kidney and other various organs damaged.
Normally a stone would be painful, but if it managed to reach the Pooners 'dog before getting lodged, they might not even feel it at first until its too late.
 
This is why there was all that drama about whether gay men (or rather, MSMs) can give blood. If they were actually testing every sample, then it really wouldn't be a serious problem to let the gays donate, other than the small issue of wasted resources.

It's more about the tests never being able to detect the virus 100% of the time. Even at 99,9%, if testing a population with a high percentage of the disease running around you'll have an unacceptable amount of false negatives, since each case is another human tragedy that goes undetected (cause you don't actually know if the blood was infected till one of the two infected people show symptoms)

1000007192.png


The negative predictive value of your test depends on the prevalence of the disease on the population being screened, the higher the number of people that actually have the disease, the more probable it becomes that the negative test was a fluke.

It was the same deal with the COVID tests - while they gave a small amount of false negatives, it was always very possible that the test was wrong, due to the sheer size of the population screened, and the prevalence of the disease on the screened population. But admitting that would mean that faggots aren't acktchuallly at an increased risk of AIDS, and you're the bigot for even suggesting that maybe sucking every available dick in a 10km radius may be harmful to public health.

On a semi related note, the more I learn about that niggerfaggot Fauci, the more I despise him. Can someone do an early life check on him? I have a feeling
 
the dolls wouldnt be dolling if the balls werent balling

but all kiwis do is hate. they wish they could go down on this beautiful little flower xoxo


source: https://old.reddit.com/r/Transgende...plasty_3_weeks_post_op_piv_method_dr_delchet/
Anyone interested in seeing the progression of this one? The pic above is 3 weeks post-op.

Day 4

Looks_cyzz1.jpg

Day 7

Looks_cyzz2.jpg

Day 11. The "newly eviscerated Christmas turkey" look is starting to appear...

Looks_cyzz3.jpg

The troon's Reddit account is u/EmilyRetcherNSFW
 
I hope it's not done that way in the UK, but it is definitely not done that way in the USA. Each donation is tested and stored individually and every donation is tested without exception.
The American Red Cross Blood Services page on infectious disease testing (you need to expand the section on Hepatitis B virus) says this:
The assay detects HBV DNA, HIV RNA, and HCV RNA. Testing is performed in mini-pools (MPs) of 16 samples; components of reactive MPs are tested individually to identify the reactive donations, followed by virus-specific testing to determine the virus responsible for the sample's reactivity.
It does seem for at least some diseases that they take small samples of each donation, mix it into a pool, and test the pool first in lieu of wasting 16 tests unnecessarily.

If the statistical approach checks out, personally I don't have a problem with this. I honestly thought they were doing something much more sketchy, like just doing random tests on individual samples combined with the pre-screening questionnaires.
 
BA question
Hi everyone,

I had my breast augmentation surgery just recently, and I'm super happy with how everything went! I wanted to ask for advice on scar management. My goal is to have my scars heal as invisibly as possible.

What worked for you in terms of treatments, creams, tapes, or other methods? Also, how soon did you start scar care, and what was the most effective?

I’m including a picture (taken just a day after my operation) so you can see where I’m at now. Thanks so much for sharing your experiences and tips
Tldr: “I'm super happy with how everything went! I wanted to ask for advice on scar management.”
IMG_1196.jpeg



White/yellow creamy liquid came out of canal after dilation. What is this? Have you had the same experience? It was always clear or blood stained liquid before.

Warning! It’s a closeup of his wide open canal.
IMG_1195.jpeg
 
Back