Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

[Divine right to rule]

I swear I keep reading those "OH DARN I ACCIDENTALLY DESTROYED MY PHONECHILD! IT SURE IS ENJOYING THE MEXICAN OCEAN RIGHT NOW....DANG ALL THE DATA IS SURE NON RECOVERABLE!!!!" xeets and cracking yet further ribs laughing

Either it is the most obvious fucking retarded ass covering we have ever seen attempted or the pig is just so fucking fat and stupidly unlucky that he made it look that way completely by accident

I found your post funny so I made Pat say it.

 

[Rekeita's Kidneys]

I found your post funny so I made Pat say it.

View attachment 6674837

It's honestly scary how damned near perfect AI Fatrick sounds

 

[LobsterBoy669]

It's honestly scary how damned near perfect AI Fatrick sounds

That's because Patrick is basically an AI already. Someone with very basic coding experience could program a Patrick in like 25 minutes.

What you're hearing there? For all intents and purposes, that might as well be the real Patrick.

 

[DickMain]

Like....fucking imagine him fully burning the xitter bridge, and then he gets forever banned from the new fashionable #resistance hub solely for pissing off enough liberals with his cuntass behavior and he winds up exiled back to elon musk's X dungeon

"Actually, child, the strongest resistance movements always operated deep within enemy territory in the heart of the danger, such as the French. I'm back on Elon's hellhole fighting from within the belly of the beast, like many revolutionaries before me. The fight has only merely begun, as you will see. Enjoy prison."

 

[OtherLastTrainHome]

"CRIMINAL ASSOCIATIONS"

what is it when Rick associates with convicted criminals and pedophiles?

 

[Judge Holden]

what is it when Rick associates with convicted criminals and pedophiles?

Tuesday

 

[AntiSchwuletteAktion]

It was. But the thing is, Pat is fantastically retarded and doesn't know what that actually means.

According to Mr. Smith, a mechanical and eletrical engineer who Pat childs on a regular basis:

• An IP8 rating is the actual standard that means underwater resistance.
• An IPX8 is just the metric designed by the companies that create the product as a way to say that "under certain conditions", the product probably could resist immersion. Ie, it is no guarantee.

Here's his video explaining why Pat is full of shit:

Disclaimer: I'm not an engineer in anyway, and I was probably born with a special math retardation and can't count past 5.

Power-level here but the IPX8 thing is not correct. IP (Ingress Protection) certification comes in two categories, dust ingress and water ingress. A combination of dust and water ratings are written together like IP68 which is the best rating you'll see on consumer products, being dust-tight and also water-tight up to a certain depth. Companies that don't care about solid/dust ingress will ignore that number and write the fluid protection rating as IPX8. Replace 8 with whatever the fluid ingress protection rating actually is.

The real trouble is that IP ratings are just claims a company makes. The IP rating standards are set out by the IEC, but there's really no agency going around testing companies devices to see if they actually live up to the claimed IP rating. I guess if you see one fail when they shouldn't, you could try to sue them, but have fun with that. IP rating claims only have a lot of weight if the company has an independent IP testing firm publicly back them up, because then the IP tester's reputation is on the line.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

20 million people on Bluesky are just the village idiots that had the decency to fuck off on their own. It's no "town square", it's a mental ward with a bunch of delusional retards not taking their medication.

 

[OffTopic]

Another item we keep forgetting to mention is there's the Airbnb element in play.

Rick has done a media tour framing himself as the most swatted individual in the history of the internet. What SANE person would decide to rent their home to unsuspecting guests under those circumstances unless they themselves were controlling the swatting events?

I have so many questions.

How is it possible a swatting never occured while guests were there? HOW? What are the odds of that?

And how is it possible Airbnb hasn't terminated Rick's account if they know there's a possibility his guests could be hauled out of his house at gunpoint? The Pests certainly made them aware. So they just didn't care? Surely someone would have contacted Rick about this if he didn't preemptively reach out to them first. In either case, what did he tell them to assure them there was no danger posed to his guests? He was on the NEWS, all you have to do is Google his name and there it is clear as day.

Even if we agree that Rick is a sociopath without morals willing to put his guests at risk, wouldn't he be too scared of a guest getting swatted, Googling him, finding out he knew there was a swatting risk, and suing him? Or God forbid, the police show up and see a stranger in Rick's house and shoot them? Or Airbnb suing him? There's just too much that could go wrong. If Rick ISN'T behind the swattings, then he has to be the biggest fucking asshole on the planet. Like, me and my wife fear for our lives but we'll invite strangers over to sleep in our house for money?

It just doesn't make sense to open your home to guests under his circumstances unless he has control over when the swattings were going to happen. And the fact nothing occured while he had guests on site is miraculous.

I hope this comes up in his trial with the MPD. He's not going to be able to explain this. It's inexplicable.

 

[femoralcanal]

Power-level here but the IPX8 thing is not correct. IP (Ingress Protection) certification comes in two categories, dust ingress and water ingress. A combination of dust and water ratings are written together like IP68 which is the best rating you'll see on consumer products, being dust-tight and also water-tight up to a certain depth. Companies that don't care about solid/dust ingress will ignore that number and write the fluid protection rating as IPX8. Replace 8 with whatever the fluid ingress protection rating actually is.

The real trouble is that IP ratings are just claims a company makes. The IP rating standards are set out by the IEC, but there's really no agency going around testing companies devices to see if they actually live up to the claimed IP rating. I guess if you see one fail when they shouldn't, you could try to sue them, but have fun with that. IP rating claims only have a lot of weight if the company has an independent IP testing firm publicly back them up, because then the IP tester's reputation is on the line.

Oh got it. So was what he said wrong, or did I just got my concepts all mixed-up like a half- marathon cheating pig? It's been a long time since I watched the video.

 

[Markorian]

How is it possible a swatting never occured while guests were there? HOW? What are the odds of that?

I'd have to find it again, but I did some napkin math a few months back, and under the BEST POSSIBLE circumstances for pat, if you were just ordering SWATs by random chance without having knowledge of when the airbnb was booked, there's an estimated 1% chance that absolutely none of them would result in a police visit while booked.

 

[AntiSchwuletteAktion]

Power-level here but the IPX8 thing is not correct. IP (Ingress Protection) certification comes in two categories, dust ingress and water ingress. A combination of dust and water ratings are written together like IP68 which is the best rating you'll see on consumer products, being dust-tight and also water-tight up to a certain depth. Companies that don't care about solid/dust ingress will ignore that number and write the fluid protection rating as IPX8. Replace 8 with whatever the fluid ingress protection rating actually is.

The real trouble is that IP ratings are just claims a company makes. The IP rating standards are set out by the IEC, but there's really no agency going around testing companies devices to see if they actually live up to the claimed IP rating. I guess if you see one fail when they shouldn't, you could try to sue them, but have fun with that. IP rating claims only have a lot of weight if the company has an independent IP testing firm publicly back them up, because then the IP tester's reputation is on the line.

For anyone who cares, Samsung does actually rate their phones for solid ingress protection too, so "IPX8" isn't even what Samsung claimed his phone was rated to.

In any case, I think Samsung's lawyers could successfully argue in court that 10,000 hours of tweeting by fat, greasy thumbs is enough abuse to invalidate any manufacturer IP rating claims.

 

[break these cuffs]

For anyone who cares, Samsung does actually rate their phones for solid ingress protection too, so "IPX8" isn't even what Samsung claimed his phone was rated to.

In any case, I think Samsung's lawyers could successfully argue in court that 10,000 hours of tweeting by fat, greasy thumbs is enough abuse to invalidate any manufacturer IP rating claims.

Rick was talking about one of the folding models, because of course he bought that retarded shit, which is IPX8 as per the website you linked. ALthough I see one model is IP48. Don't remember what he had.

 

[AntiSchwuletteAktion]

Rick was talking about one of the folding models, because of course he bought that retarded shit, which is IPX8 as per the website you linked. ALthough I see one model is IP48. Don't remember what he had.

Yes, my mistake. It's only the newest version that has a dust protection rating. If he had an older model it's only tested for water protection.

 

[DickMain]

Tuesday

I would have said Fat Tuesday, but that's a once-a-year thing.

 

[rusty shackleford 1]

Hey big shot Brad, if you're reading this, maybe look into the claim Pat has been swatting himself, as some of us on here think. The crypto nonsense, the weird timing of SWATs, the conveniently dropping his phone in a cenote on holiday. Something stinks.

Remember that time he announced the swat before the call was made? I don’t remember if it was the hovel or a theater but I believe he DD that post and then made it again after the call. And then there’s the two obvious lies - brewers opening day a bomb threat was made and the stadium wasn’t evacuated and nobody cared according to fat. Same with the hotel- that front desk lady confirmed there was never a bomb threat at the convention but Pat insisted there was. Again no evacuation or panic, con leaders admitted there was no bomb threat also iirc. Plus the vandalism video, the garage writing that matched his, and the canyon Boykin voicemails. He stinks.

 

[AnOminous]

Either it is the most obvious fucking retarded ass covering we have ever seen attempted or the pig is just so fucking fat and stupidly unlucky that he made it look that way completely by accident

That's always a problem when trying to figure out what 1.2 GPA is thinking. Is he so retarded he thought this would be a good plan? Or is he just so retarded he tarded out and destroyed his phone out of pure retardation?

 

[Laburnum]

I wonder what a Fatrick swatting call would even sound like. Surely it would be something transparent like "Operator child, a real life tough guy and expert marksman with 5 guns in his house has bunkered down and killed several stalkers, send your most elite operatives immediately child."

 

[Markorian]

How is it possible a swatting never occured while guests were there? HOW? What are the odds of that?

I'd have to find it again, but I did some napkin math a few months back, and under the BEST POSSIBLE circumstances for pat, if you were just ordering SWATs by random chance without having knowledge of when the airbnb was booked, there's an estimated 1% chance that absolutely none of them would result in a police visit while booked.

Found it:

I actually did some napkin math based on that exact principle:
Even giving Pat the absolute BEST benefit of the doubt and skewing the variables in his favor in every way I possibly could, I still found about a 1% chance that these SWATs could be called in completely randomly and not line up with any guests. Repeating it with more middle of the road variables later, ones not overly favorable OR condemning of him, I got 0.004%. Is it possible that whoever was calling these in threaded the needle of a 99.996% chance purely on accident? Sure. It's also definitely MUCH more reasonable to assume that whoever was calling them in both had knowledge of pat's booking schedule, and had a motive to avoid days that were booked.

 

[Vinluv Handesbukia]

I would have said Fat Tuesday, but that's a once-a-year thing.

It's always fat Tuesday for Rick,the drinking,the freeballed titties out in the open,the pearl clutching