Arguments against racism rely on the existence of souls

The semitic religion and race realism are quite compatible. HP Lovecraft wrote a poem about it.
That was actually Roman or Greek, not jewish or arab. Lets quote Lovecraft:

ON THE CREATION OF NIGGERS.

When, long ago, the Gods created Earth,
In Jove's fair image Man was shap'd at birth.
The beasts for lesser parts were next design'd;
Yet were they too remote from humankind.
To fill this gap, and join the rest to man,
Th'Olympian host conceiv'd a clever plan.
A beast they wrought, in semi-human figure,
Fill'd it with vice, and call'd the thing a NIGGER.

Lovecraft on Niggers. Now lets see what he has to say of the POO:

The Aryans in India were too late in establishing their colour-based caste system, so that today the culture of the Hindoo is probably the most thoroughly repulsive on our planet. The more one learns about India the more one wants to vomit. Aside from a few profound minds, the Indian people represent such an abyss of degeneracy that extirpation & fumigation would seem to be about the only way to make Hindoostan fit for decent people to inhabit.
  • H. P. Lovecraft to J. Vernon Shea, 25 Sep 1933, Letters to J. Vernon Shea. Carl F. Strauch, and Lee McBride White 158-159

He didn't like anime and foresaw CHYYYYNAA:

Of Japan I have not so far spoken, because I think it a certain enemy of the future, which no plan can permanently make a friend. It demands free access to Anglo-Saxon soil for its citizens, and this can never be given. Orientals must be kept in their native East till the fall of the white race. Sooner or later a great Japanese war will take place, during which I think the virtual destruction of Japan will have to be effected in the interests of European safety. The more numerous Chinese are a menace of the still more distant future. They will probably be the exterminators of Caucasian civilisation, for their numbers are amazing. But that is all too far ahead for consideration today.
  • H. P. Lovecraft to the Gallomo, 30 Sep 1919, Letters to Alfred Galpin 57
A boxer spaniel and a yorkie can reproduce, but that doesn't mean there is no clear genetic difference.

The extent to which you regard genetic differences as negligible is purely ideological. Why does is it have to rise to the level of speciation?

Also, assuming there is no genetic reality for race, that does not really establish why people shouldn't be racist.
Yeah, some people are just smashed and slammed. Its the upbringing, not the breed, yells the pitmommy as her shitbull chimps out when a door closes.



He also knew of the Irish Menace, and the tendency of coloured 'people' to swarm:
We walked—at my suggestion—in the middle of the street, for contact with the heterogenous sidewalk denizens, spilled out of their bulging brick kennels as if by a spawning beyond the capacity of the places, was not by any means to be sought. At times, though we struck peculiarly deserted areas—these swine have instinctive swarming movements, no doubt, which no ordinary biologist can fathom. Gawd knows what they are—Jew, Italian, separate or mixed, with possible touches of residual Irish and exotic hints of the Far East—a bastard mess of stewing mongrel flesh without intellect, repellent to eye, nose, and imagination—would to heaven a kindly gust of cyanogen could asphyxiate the whole gigantic abortion, end the misery, and clean out the place.
  • H. P. Lovecraft to Maurice W. Moe, 18 May 1922, Letters from New York 14

It is very easy to have natural selection for thousands of years. To think humans are immune to it is great folly and religious dogma, not grounded in science. The soyentists are just avoiding the topic, since Soviet times when GMO research wasn't allowed in the USSR, because equity.

If we look at dogs, most dogs live around 10% of a human lifespan. So to repeat the same reproductive cycle, you would just need to breed a type of human for a century or two to get results. I am looking at India and Israel. Lets make the ultimate scam merchant!
1727284465708.jpeg
 
Last edited:
The reason why is because the genetic differences are negligible and the amount of time the different ethnicities of humans have been separated for isn't enough to create a genuinely profound difference.

That's why you can't tell what continent someone's ancestors are from by DNA testing, or get any clues about their ancestry by looking at them. Genetic differences between groups of humans are so minimal that they get lost in statistical noise. There are no geographic trends in phenotypes or hereditary characteristics whatsoever, which is why a Bantu tribesman is just as likely to be blonde-haired, blue-eyed, and lactose-tolerant as a Swede.
 
There are good whites and there are bad whites.
There are good blacks and there are a little bit more bad blacks.
It would suck to be maligned at the center of the bell curve if you're an outlier.

I like to give people the benefit of the doubt if I can afford it. It has nothing to do with souls.
 
Last edited:
The Civil Rights movement relied on Christian morality of seeing all souls as equal in God’s eyes even if we weren’t all equally capable.

The weakening of Christianity’s place in Western culture has undermined that argument and anyone going surprisedpikachuface.jpg over the resulting resurgence of racism is a fucking moron.
There's a take that'll piss off the neo-puritans.
 
Mules are infertile and can't reproduce. Admixed humans can. Try again.
Mules are mostly infertile, some can and have reproduced successfuly.
Mischlings suffer from infertility and their parents usually don't have any success in making offspring, proving the non-compatibility.

Fertility is lower among interracial couples than among their endogamous counterparts. Fertility is lower among cohabiting than among married interracial couples. Fertility rates among interracial couples vary by race and gender of partners (i.e., by the extent of stigmatization or economic marginalization).
 
The "transgender" and "gender" "ideology" seems to be based on belief in the "soul" -- like a "transwoman" convinced of being a "female essence in a male body" or the like.

:thinking:

As for "racism", there are clearly different ethnic groups of Homo sapiens, whether or not there are supernatural essences in people.
Transgenderism is legit religious. They believe that your belief in a thing can alter the fundamental nature/reality of a thing. The closest thing I can think to compare it to is Catholics believing the right prayer over the bread turns it into LITERAL Jesus meat.
 
Yeah, some people are just smashed and slammed. Its the upbringing, not the breed, yells the pitmommy as her shitbull chimps out when a door closes.
All I'm saying is that I don't care about the reason Mr. Freeman can't pay the mortgage he owes me, Mr. Chen seems to pay on time. The only thing I need explaining for is where my fucking money is.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: HairyBadger
Then why the fuck do niggers act so wildly different to us?
They don't, they adopted what's called "cracker culture" from the Irish.
Slavery lol
Oh, so you're saying that retarded black people are not a product of nature but a product of white meddling?
In Marvin's retarded worldview, the sterile child of two white Germans is an entirely separate race from his parents
Yet another retarded straw man argument. You gave an example of two separate species procreating to create a mule, now you're backpedaling. It's ironic that the notion of an offspring being a distinct species from its sires is only a retarded one once you've divorced yourself from it.
but an Australian aboriginal huffing gasoline and sleeping in the road is indistinguishable from a Celtic native British person. And he will never deny this.
No, I have denied this because I never claimed different races were identical.
That's why you can't tell what continent someone's ancestors are from by DNA testing, or get any clues about their ancestry by looking at them. Genetic differences between groups of humans are so minimal that they get lost in statistical noise. There are no geographic trends in phenotypes or hereditary characteristics whatsoever, which is why a Bantu tribesman is just as likely to be blonde-haired, blue-eyed, and lactose-tolerant as a Swede.
Why is it that whenever race realists observe an argument that race is a negligible characteristic, they pretend what was said is "it's a nonexistent characteristic" to refute it? Is your position really so weak it requires a dumbing down of the statement before it becomes assailable?
Mischlings suffer from infertility and their parents usually don't have any success in making offspring, proving the non-compatibility.
Bullshit. If mixed race people are so unviable, then explain why and how so many American blacks have white people in their ancestry. Explain why so many South Americans have Spanish ancestry. Explain why all of Eastern Europe has Mongolian ancestry. Explain why nearly everyone has varying degrees of Neanderthal DNA. If what you claim is true, still births should be a common consequence of being mixed race and these mixed race people should've been filtered out a long time ago.
On average, Koreans. All the dumb ones died in the Finno-Korean hyperwar.

View attachment 6673175
Isn't it strange that South Koreans in particular have a five point IQ average advantage over all other Asian groups, including their neighbors to the North?
But you explicitly said that humans being able to mix proves that there is a negligible difference...? You must be mistaken. I'd like you to remember what you've said yourself.
If there is enough genetic differences between groups then their offspring is unviable, I didn't consider my position to be speciation one.
Either way, you still haven't argued why racism is bad.
No one has asked why racism is bad, the question posed in the OP is why Atheists are against racism, which is a question I answered. If you want an answer as to why racism is bad, would you really want to be treated as an untouchable under the law of your own home country because rapefugees flooded in from the ME and Africa? Joe Biden bragged about making white people a minority race in the United States for political brownie points by allowing open borders for illegal immigrants. Do you really want to live life as a Boer in Europe or America?
 
Bullshit. If mixed race people are so unviable, then explain why and how so many American blacks have white people in their ancestry. Explain why so many South Americans have Spanish ancestry. Explain why all of Eastern Europe has Mongolian ancestry. Explain why nearly everyone has varying degrees of Neanderthal DNA. If what you claim is true, still births should be a common consequence of being mixed race and these mixed race people should've been filtered out a long time ago.
I don't have to explain shit to you.
 
Why is it that whenever race realists observe an argument that race is a negligible characteristic, they pretend what was said is "it's a nonexistent characteristic" to refute it? Is your position really so weak it requires a dumbing down of the statement before it becomes assailable?

Because things like the ability to metabolize Omega-3 fatty acids, the ability to metabolize lactose, the ability to metabolize alcohol, susceptibility to various cancers, fast-twitch muscle formation, bone density, average age of menarche, average age of menopause, serotonin production, and on and on and on aren't any more "negligible" than frontal cortex neuron density or limbic system development. Nearly every single thing you care to measure has measurable differences across ethnic groups, so the argument that there are no significant differences between races, therefore there probably aren't any measurable cognitive differences, proceeds from a false premise.

The argument that genetic differences are fictional typically relies on observing that environmental differences are real, e.g.:

Isn't it strange that South Koreans in particular have a five point IQ average advantage over all other Asian groups, including their neighbors to the North?

Neural development, which is what IQ testing is a proxy for measuring, is well-known to have three major factors:
  1. Diet
  2. Childhood trauma
  3. Genetics
North Koreans have an extremely poor diet (and, I suspect, awful childhoods). They aren't just 5 points dumber than South Koreans; they're also shorter and thinner. This doesn't somehow prove that the maximum height a human can grow to given an adequate childhood diet has nothing to do with genetics, which it obviously does, and is very much due to genes whose distribution varies geographically.
 
Last edited:
This is such a dumb take. Why not just say you give up instead?
I don't have time to waste on already million times debated questions.
Mullatos in america are result of owners raping the negroid cotton workers to make more docile workers.
Vietmaricans are result of us armed man raping local peps, same as wapanese. Offspring is shunned in these societies yet it's only you here something revering in it.
Different races separate themselves even in nearby areas. Mexicans, africans, indians etc....
The take that mixing is natural is absolutely retarded and globalistic.
 
Because things like the ability to metabolize Omega-3 fatty acids, the ability to metabolize lactose, the ability to metabolize alcohol, susceptibility to various cancers, fast-twitch muscle formation, bone density, average age of menarche, average age of menopause, serotonin production, and on and on and on aren't any more "negligible" than frontal cortex neuron density or limbic system development. Nearly every single thing you care to measure has measurable differences across ethnic groups, so the argument that there are no significant differences between races, therefore there probably aren't any measurable cognitive differences, proceeds from a false premise.
Also nigger IQ is so low and they are overly aggressive without any reason you will notice this pattern with time once you learn how to deal with nigger ass
 
Back