Dave Brian Muscato / Danielle Tatiana Muscato / Danielle Brian Muscato - Half-Assed Trans Activist, Fully Arrested, Rape Appropriator, Currently Trying to Extort His Parents

[S.C.U.D.]

I'm pretty doubtful our lovely lady Danielle will see any jail time.

It is only a non violent crime under 1,000 dollars I'd guess probation for 5 years and a order to stay away from him parents. don't get me wrong I'd kill to see Dave sent to jail for all the shit he pulled but I'm guessing his lawyer won't allow the state to being up all the harassment shit as it probably not relevant to the dine and dash.

I mean unless the state can somehow tie it to the dine and dash crime. say that it was part of his plan to ruin his parents reputation in the community etc etc

Here to hoping.

As much as I would love to see Dave enjoy prison, I think some probation + protective order barring him from his parents is the more likely outcome. Now, when he inevitably breaks that order...then the fun begins.

Speaking of prison, does MO put trannies in women's prison? Just something to consider, I don't want Dave inflicted on any female inmates, that's cruel and unusual.

 

[Particle Bored]

That's the extra audio/video evidence. The cat has been a deep cover agent for Joe Muscato (has the same kind of NPD as Trump) and the local PD

Seems that Dr. Joe has grabbed Dave by the pussy (the same way Trump grabs every woman he meets by the pussy).

 

[monstrous bubo]

Speaking of prison, does MO put trannies in women's prison?

It does, and that does include those who haven’t been castrated. One of the policy goals underlying this is to reduce rape in prison. Bad news for la principessa: this includes the rape of women by troons, so Dave would have to undergo this:



He shouldn’t get too complacent. He gets too grabby with the gals, and he won’t be in gen pop. The full policy is here.

As for titty skittles and clothing in prison, these are currently available, but surgery isn’t. A bill to remove access to hormones and fetish material women’s underwear is currently the subject of litigation.

 

[Plum Smuggler]

As much as I would love to see Dave enjoy prison, I think some probation + protective order barring him from his parents is the more likely outcome. Now, when he inevitably breaks that order...then the fun b

Can the court order him to seek mental health treatment but not from a shit therapist who acts like his friend?

 

[lindsayfan]

i'm not a pro-prison person generally but in all honesty, it would be good for dave. kind of a late-in-life "boot camp" experience. order, structure, routine, boundaries, intense accountability... really character building.

an environment where nobody humors his bullshit would be genuinely healthy for him. at this point it's probably the only chance he has left at ever maturing or improving as a human being.

 

[Spunt]

Women's prisons are also full of shit-hard bulldykes who will show Dave what a REAL woman is.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

there is no way dave will enjoy prison off of this. i could list all the factors why but i'm too lazy disabled right now. i think trial will be entertaining but let's be realistic.


EDIT: if i was facing a felony and this schmuck was my lawyer i'd do the race
View attachment 6675233

Lol, hopefully it would work out better for you than it did for Tay-k - he just got his capital murder trial date set this week.

So, I'm looking at the case records online (MO's setup is so nice with the tabs and easy expand/collapse of documents!), and I've never been in their system before, so question - do they not post orders, or am I looking in the wrong place? I'm in the docket entries, and it says motion for continuance denied yesterday, but I don't see the order - and don't see them for earlier orders, either.

 

[Plum Smuggler]

i'm not a pro-prison person generally but in all honesty, it would be good for dave. kind of a late-in-life "boot camp" experience. order, structure, routine, boundaries, intense accountability... really character building.

It's never but going to happen but Dave is such a little shit stained weasel I'd love to see him running to the Aryan Nation for protection.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

https://engandwoods.com/attorneys/adam-dowling/

Buddy, he's got all the awards you pay for to hang on the wall! He's gotta be 11/10.

Seriously though, I'm sure he is going to give Dave a legally sufficient defense at his trial (that he is desperately trying to postpone) and will do as good of a job as anyone can at arguing for probation when sentencing comes.

Dave is a first time offender and he's likely eligible for Jury sentencing. He should defiantly waive that. If he's sentenced by the judge I'm predicting 120 day "treatment program" in state prison, 5 years probation on a 7 year sentence, more special conditions than you can imagine and he walks away as a convicted felon (he could theoretically be sentenced to a different kind of probation that wouldn't result in a felony conviction if he completed it). If the jury does it he's going to prison.

I'm plopping this here for later (knock wood) - it's a short and simple explanation of options for sentencing in MO and their cryptic notation for it.

I've been trying to get the user guide for their sentencing analysis (was hoping it's similar to the sentencing guidelines in MN, which I basically memorized calculating possibilities in the Rekieta situation), but none of the links are going anywhere. So far I've got the calculator and plenty of info on that (pretty simple, but it's just for after you have an actual sentence, not what the sentence should be expected to be, so not that useful at this time). Also haven't found what, if any, impact multiple simultaneous felony convictions might have on a decision about the sentence(s). 99% will run concurrently, but in MN's calculation, multiple will bump up your criminal history for purposes of determining sentences for the lower-level convictions.

He potentially has sentences of 15 years total here, even if max time would be 7, doesn't he?

 

[Bookwork]

do they not post orders, or am I looking in the wrong place? I'm in the docket entries, and it says motion for continuance denied yesterday, but I don't see the order - and don't see them for earlier orders, either.

@A. G. Peak has pulled such rabbits out of a hat in the past. If you show us where the hat is, A.G., we'll pester you less.

 

[Kevin M. Crane]

He potentially has sentences of 15 years total here, even if max time would be 7, doesn't he?

Having sat through a few criminal dockets at the Courthouse, I don't believe he's going to see serious jail time.

I am not involved in the legal system here, nor do I understand their inner workings, but I have a guess as to what it prioritizes in it's operations. From what little wisdom I gleaned from observed a few court proceedings in Columbia, I think that their system is overworked, and therefore focuses on people that threaten Columbia's status as a safe town.

My belief stems from two factors:

1. There is higher criminal activity on the north side of town.

2. This is a college town.

My guess is that the judicial system here is primarily concerned with keeping the streets safe, so that upper middle class families from Chicago continue to ship their maladjusted, half-child half-adult offspring to the University of Missouri, and therefore keep the town alive.

The primary internal enemies to Columbia's status as a safe town are junkies and socio-economically conditioned people with low-impulse control and no ability to think long-term.

Those types of people are the ones that end up in the jails and prisons.

The judicial system has to ask itself this: what threat does Dave pose to Columbia at large? He is truly just a fucking weirdo. He doesn't rob stores, he doesn't carry a weapon, he doesn't wander the campus in the nude. He's just a nuisance, at best. Expending the resources necessary to bring punitive justice against him doesn't offset the benefit gleaned by doing so.

My estimate of Dave's punishment is a short stint in jail (sub-3 months) at most, if at all, and most certainly fines and community service.

 

[Surfin Terf]

I've got a better Tomlinson quote for Dave

your life is already over, stalker child. Enjoy prison.

 

[A. G. Peak]

@A. G. Peak has pulled such rabbits out of a hat in the past. If you show us where the hat is, A.G., we'll pester you less.

I've only ever downloaded documents via the Docket Entries section. I think the instance you're describing was just the court taking an extra day or two to upload the doc, and I happened to see it when I was checking the docket.

So, I'm looking at the case records online (MO's setup is so nice with the tabs and easy expand/collapse of documents!), and I've never been in their system before, so question - do they not post orders, or am I looking in the wrong place?

I don't think I've seen them upload any orders, just motions. Sometimes they won't even upload a motion, like that Motion in Limine. (Unless it's another case of the court being slow.)

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Having sat through a few criminal dockets at the Courthouse, I don't believe he's going to see serious jail time.

I am not involved in the legal system here, nor do I understand their inner workings, but I have a guess as to what it prioritizes in it's operations. From what little wisdom I gleaned from observed a few court proceedings in Columbia, I think that their system is overworked, and therefore focuses on people that threaten Columbia's status as a safe town.

My belief stems from two factors:

1. There is higher criminal activity on the north side of town.

2. This is a college town.

My guess is that the judicial system here is primarily concerned with keeping the streets safe, so that upper middle class families from Chicago continue to ship their maladjusted, half-child half-adult offspring to the University of Missouri, and therefore keep the town alive.

The primary internal enemies to Columbia's status as a safe town are junkies and socio-economically conditioned people with low-impulse control and no ability to think long-term.

Those types of people are the ones that end up in the jails and prisons.

The judicial system has to ask itself this: what threat does Dave pose to Columbia at large? He is truly just a fucking weirdo. He doesn't rob stores, he doesn't carry a weapon, he doesn't wander the campus in the nude. He's just a nuisance, at best. Expending the resources necessary to bring punitive justice against him doesn't offset the benefit gleaned by doing so.

My estimate of Dave's punishment is a short stint in jail (sub-3 months) at most, if at all, and most certainly fines and community service.

I would expect that. What I was looking to see was whether there are sentencing guidelines beyond the post-sentencing calculation (e.g., in MO if you're given a sentence of X time in jail/prison, that gets reduced in terms of actual time in to x%...but that requires there to be a known pronounced sentence).

In MN the guidelines give you presumptive sentences based on the offense, criminal history, and some other factors. Then there is a bunch of math laid out for calculating presumptive sentencing if there are multiple crimes, jail credit, supervised release (1/3 of incarceration time is flipped to supervised release in most cases). And then in reality there is also good time credit (iirc, 1 day per 2 served), plus (relatively rare) upward or downward departures.

I couldn't find those kinds of presumptive sentence calculations for MO, just the time ranges, and that Class D a d below are eligible for probation and/or that 120-day "shock incarceration" thing (along with the SES/SIS options), so I guess it's wholly discretionary on the front end, and I'd bet on a minimal outcome, too.

 

[waffle]

I've been trying to get the user guide for their sentencing analysis (was hoping it's similar to the sentencing guidelines in MN, which I basically memorized calculating possibilities in the Rekieta situation), but none of the links are going anywhere. So far I've got the calculator and plenty of info on that (pretty simple, but it's just for after you have an actual sentence, not what the sentence should be expected to be, so not that useful at this time). Also haven't found what, if any, impact multiple simultaneous felony convictions might have on a decision about the sentence(s). 99% will run concurrently, but in MN's calculation, multiple will bump up your criminal history for purposes of determining sentences for the lower-level convictions.

We don't have sentencing guidelines here, as a practical matter. You have a right to ask for a sentence assessment report from the Department of Corrections, but they are widely regarded as dog shit.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

We don't have sentencing guidelines here, as a practical matter. You have a right to ask for a sentence assessment report from the Department of Corrections, but they are widely regarded as dog shit.

Thanks for the confirm! I came to that conclusion finally, after far too much time mentally insisting that there must be more . Did not help that the MO Sentencing Commission website would not work for me at all today.

 

[Marc]

Flag me with rainbows of optimism, but I'm banking on Dave going full retard once it becomes clear that the state would rather prosecute his crimes instead of the histrionic, fantastical shit he accuses his long-suffering father of perpetrating in his capacity as public enemy #1 in Dave's world of fancy and endless entitlement. I want to see Bob "God has entered my body, like a body my same size" Hickman-like FB posts of Dave covered in ketchup as "proof" of vicious attacks from his dad in the night, copy-pasted from page one Google results of some female celebrity's rape story.

 

[Bookwork]

Flag me with rainbows of optimism, but I'm banking on Dave going full retard once it becomes clear that the state would rather prosecute his crimes instead of the histrionic, fantastical shit he accuses his long-suffering father of perpetrating in his capacity as public enemy #1 in Dave's world of fancy and endless entitlement. I want to see Bob "God has entered my body, like a body my same size" Hickman-like FB posts of Dave covered in ketchup as "proof" of vicious attacks from his dad in the night, copy-pasted from page one Google results of some female celebrity's rape story.

When the court system rolls its eyes at him, Dave will become a criminal justice reform activist - although he always was one, you know.

If people can get away with yelling at you when you're trying to sleep on their sofa no. one. is. safe.

 

[Morshu's Paradise]

Ok, so, one last time before the conference tomorrow:
1. Dave's main charge is for the country club billing
2. He's also charged with harassment related to him fighting with his dad
Is this correct? I know somebody mentioned expert testimony, but I'm not sure what it would be for. Forensic accounting, maybe?

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

Ok, so, one last time before the conference tomorrow:
1. Dave's main charge is for the country club billing
2. He's also charged with harassment related to him fighting with his dad
Is this correct? I know somebody mentioned expert testimony, but I'm not sure what it would be for. Forensic accounting, maybe?

I thought it was only the dine and dash? I don't see where the DA is going for a harassment charge? It looks to me like David is getting charged with fraud and theft. I don't see any harassment listing.

Did I miss something?