State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

[TwinPeaksEnjoyer]

The filing is online.

pdf attached, here are the pages as png.

View attachment 6688698View attachment 6688700View attachment 6688701View attachment 6688702View attachment 6688704View attachment 6688705View attachment 6688706View attachment 6688707

Basically Kayla lawyer saying the coke on Rekieta nose that it was Kayfabe ? This argument is just as bad as Nick Lawyer.

 

[Vibralldo]

View attachment 6688723
Very bold accusation, I'm sure they have evidence of said Aaron Imholte swatting. Lets see how this one plays out.

Thank god the most prolific swatter online, the person who is likely behind these swattings, is in custody and cooperating

 

[Useful_Mistake]

This argument is just as bad as Nick Lawyer.

I'm generally not very impressed with this filing even if I ignore the things seized in the search for the benefit of entertaining the argument. The lawyer had almost a month to come up with something, but this seems like it took at most an hour to shit out.

 

[PyrrhicRustle]

This seems really dumb to me, he was streaming while all this happened, is the implication that he left home to go somewhere else and do someone else’s drugs then came back and kept streaming? Or did he more likely just go upstairs to his coke in his own house? I’d think that would be enough for a warrant at least.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Basically Kayla lawyer saying the coke on Rekieta nose that it was Kayfabe ? This argument is just as bad as Nick Lawyer.

I was really thinking hoping Kayla had a competent one there, but if this is anything to go by then her big caseload is accomplished by doing shoddy work.

Accusing Aaron of being behind the swatting of Nick's place is just hilariously stupid.
They are accusing a potential witness in the case of being behind swatting calls, without providing any evidence or even a timeline of these incidents to show they happened after the "falling out".

They also intentionally mixed the order of Aaron making the video about Nick, and Nick doing his coke stream in their narrative to make it appear Aaron spoke about those things before that stream happened.

While in reality it was Aaron reacting to Nick's coke stream, in which he said those things about drugs in the house and that April needs to get out there.
This entire document is very disingenuous and intentionally misleading.

[EDIT] I could be wrong, but I do not believe Aaron unpacked anything about the Crackets house before the coke stream went down.

 

[Dixieland Buckaroo]

Kayla's filing leads me to further believe Nick won't be taking a plea (today).

 

[Gunlance]

To answer late, I expect another Ethan Ralph moment of, I'm not guilty, I didn't plea guilty, I actually did a no contest and got the plea deal that way.

 

[LiquidKid]

The filing is online.

pdf attached, here are the pages as png.

View attachment 6688698View attachment 6688700View attachment 6688701View attachment 6688702View attachment 6688704View attachment 6688705View attachment 6688706View attachment 6688707

This might even be more retarded then Nick’s.

“People take weight loss pills, sudden massive weight loss is common.”
No you dumb bitch, everyone knows those weight loss pills do not work and definitely do not work the same way cocaine does.

“The deputy doesn’t have training to identify drug use in video.”
I feel like this doesn’t even need to be responded to.

 

[Focken Kiwi]

Lol. Lmao.



Also:


THE REKIETA
That's it folks. It's not up for debate. The Rekeitas are a household name like The Kardashians, Elvis or Madonna. Nick's absolutely a public figure and this case is a matter of public interest. DO NOT SEAL!

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

This might even be more retarded then Nick’s.

“People take weight loss pills, sudden massive weight loss is common.”
No you dumb bitch, everyone knows those weight loss pills do not work and definitely do not work the same way cocaine does.

“The deputy doesn’t have training to identify drug use in video.”
I feel like this doesn’t even need to be responded to.

Such a genius argument. Next they will require expert training for identifying a person on 1080p video footage because "on video" and "in person" are different things.

Everything here feels like wish(.)com Saul Goodman.

 

[Botchy Galoop]

Is it too late to change my vote on what The Rekieta will do today?

I now believe he will go to trial to prove his innocence, because *checks notes*...sheetrock dust.

 

[ye's Official KF Burner]

"Internet celebrity"

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Is it too late to change my vote on what The Rekieta will do today?

I could change the poll to be about Nick, and then all of you could "lock in" your votes

 

[Dumpster dived waifu]

Holy fuck, they think everyone is a fucking drooling retard. This is going to be fucking hilarious.

 

[East_Clintwood]

So much for pretending the coke was a compression artifact from the re-upload I guess.

 

[LiquidChrisRespecter]

It's actually impressive to claim the Professional Drug Addict Recogniser can't recognise telltale tics that would suggest drug abuse.

No, stalker child, you do not recognise signs of drug addiction when a person is gesticulating like a drug addict on a live webcam feed. These are just your delusions talking. He could've just returned from re-grouting the bathroom tiles. Enjoy professional embarrassment.

I enjoy that she called the entire basis of the warrant supposition and then peppered in that Aaron "probably SWATted" somebody.

Are you fucking serious?

 

[PyrrhicRustle]

It's actually impressive to claim the Professional Drug Addict Recogniser can't recognise telltale tics that would suggest drug abuse.

No, stalker child, you do not recognise signs of drug addiction when a person is gesticulating like a drug addict on a live webcam feed. These are just your delusions talking. He could've just returned from re-grouting the bathroom tiles. Enjoy professional embarrassment.

I enjoy that she called the entire basis of the warrant supposition and then peppered in that Aaron "probably SWATted" somebody.

Are you fucking serious?

Like sure, having that as your only evidence in an actual trial would be flimsy but for a “hey let’s maybe check this guy’s house” warrant, is that really that much of a stretch?

 

[Jimmy Dean Bowl]

How many legal filings reference Scarface?
This document is a masterpiece.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Like sure, having that as your only evidence in an actual trial would be flimsy but for a “hey let’s maybe check this guy’s house” warrant, is that really that much of a stretch?

No matter how much Kluver tries to pretend the warrant is only based on a single thing, it really isn't.
The warrant application very much reads like the presence of drugs was confirmed by people.

So they had
a) a video of the man of the house high as a kite and drunk livestreaming with sleet rock on his beaker
b) persons confirming the presence of drugs in the house
c) persons confirming children around those drugs
d) a previous report by a mandatory reporter with info from other concerned citizen about the dirty, hungry, stinky children and supposed drug consumption and immoral sex orgies with children in the house

There were plenty of reasons to raid that house and look for drugs and even calling upon Scarface won't make it go away.

 

[Lemon-Lime Turpentine]

Nick's lawyer's argument:


Kayla's lawyer's argument:


Tough to pick the superior argument. They're both very compelling.