Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Nate Higgers]

Kinochet thinks he is Woodward and Bernstein.

He thinks he’s Jewish? Gross.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

The suggestion months ago was that CHIPS had a problem with April living with the Rekietas and that April being a visible part of Nick's life wasn't a good look in terms of the CHIPS case. Her presence or absence has only ever been relevant to the criminal proceedings in respect to her own charges and whether or not she would flip on Nick and Kayla.

I don't think this is true. Wanting to April "flip" on Nick and Kayla makes no sense. She offers nothing in terms of testimony regarding the charges they brought. They don't want or need her testimony to convict Nick/Kayla. The "look" they had a problem with was returning the children where a drug user lived. It was the same "look" that caused them to remove the children and they wanted to be able control who had contact with the children.

On the other hand, the state has two duties: 1) protect the Rekieta children that were in their care in July and 2) protect the public from criminals. If charging April with a felony was the most straightforward way to do that, so be it. Charging Nick and Kayla with drug felonies was the most straightforward way to protect the children from them.

 

[Captain Manning]

Based on their promo, their plan to distract is to literally make shit up about Nick Rekieta ("REKIETA PLEADS GUILTY!?!" spoiler alert, no, he didn't) to try to distract.

They might be doing it to distract this time around, but it's worth noting this isn't the first time they prematurely announced Rekieta has plead guilty. They pulled THE SAME EXACT SHIT three months ago.

Independent of whether they're feeling the heat or not, nobody should ever use the Kino Casino as a primary source for anything.

Also, click bait video titles should be punishable by public flogging.

He committed crimes for his master, and gets nothing in return, other than permanent exile to the Third World, where he gets to hide forever.

Yeah, but he got to dab on people by eating some mediocre Mexican food for Thanksgiving and recording himself doing so. Aren't you jelly?

I'm totally jelly! All I had was the traditional Turkey, stuffing, cranberry sauce, etc. Suffah non-ralphamales!

 

[Strix454]

So the contempt of court on ralph is for broadcasting the proceeding that he wasn't supposed to...what are the chances of him ending up squealing to the judge about nick paying him to witness intimidate and turning witness for it (regardless of true or not), in exchange for leniency on this contempt of court charge? Just a weird and funny thought.

If he gets returned to Minnesota on the contempt of court charge, the police can question him about Aaron's hacked information. The information from others seem to suggest Ralph was given hacked information. That puts him in a potentially complicated position.

If he received hacked information, they can perhaps threaten him with something that will make him think a little about what his best option is. And if Ralph is boots on the ground in Minnesota, he is the obvious person to get to squeal on the others.

 

[Cousin Eddie]

Anathema" quite literally means the worst kind of sin, it derives from the kind that gets you excommunicated.

There's no way he considers fighting charges "anathema" unless he actually doesn't know what the word means.

Considering "not taking the deal" anathema isn't the same thing as considering "fighting the charges" anathema.

Considering it nuts to pass up "free use of a BMW" for your road trip is not the same thing as considering it nuts to "take your own car" on a road trip.

Except you forget the other chat where he says that dragging this out further would drive him insane.

I don't know the context of those statements. I saw only screenshots of individual sentences from Nick.

To clarify: I'm not saying there is no deal Nick would take. I'm saying I've seen nothing indicating that he planned to accept a deal that had been offered to him. That is, nothing changed.

He went in with unrealistic expectations, hoping for the best, prepared to stand on principle. He was rebuffed, so he is now standing on principle as intended.

 

[thebigdream]

Since this thread has slowed to a crawl I want to throw my hat in for BBN being Kinochet but he's learned to be less gay (while still being a neghole pozzing faggot). Something about the way they both write and the attention seeking lines up for me, I don't have hard proof and don't care enough to find it, I just need to make my prediction before he's inevitably outed.

 

[Watching Rekieta]

More germane were the studies that showed children of addicts tested positive at very high rates.

The study I saw had the children with the same 2.4 ng cocaine/mg of hair concentration. The children had larger concentrations of metabolites. (children 0.74 ng benzoylecgonine/mg hair; parental users 0.39 ng BE/mg hair).

Nick's kid seems to be consistent with this study. I'd love to see what his other kids levels were. Below the cutoff doesn't mean zero. I'm betting they were substantial or Nick would have told us in a shower call how 4 zeros and 1 hot test made no sense.

 

[Kipersonapiscesotter]

Considering "not taking the deal" anathema isn't the same thing as considering "fighting the charges" anathema.

Considering it nuts to pass up "free use of a BMW" for your road trip is not the same thing as considering it nuts to "take your own car" on a road trip.

I don't know the context of those statements. I saw only screenshots of individual sentences from Nick.

To clarify: I'm not saying there is no deal Nick would take. I'm saying I've seen nothing indicating that he planned to accept a deal that had been offered to him. That is, nothing changed.

He went in with unrealistic expectations, hoping for the best, prepared to stand on principle. He was rebuffed, so he is now standing on principle as intended.

There would be no point in scheduling another settlement conference if he had no intention to take a deal.

My guess is the prosecutor wants Kayla and Nick to take a joint deal and they wait to see if Kayla's probable cause gets granted first. Otherwise there is no reason to wait, as Nick reached the end of the road.

 

[Cousin Eddie]

In other words, THEY MADE IT UP

Spoiler: Full text

Feed: -------- Breaking Balldo News --------
Title: Theoreticals that have been posed by our team have run a little wild recently, being taken as gospel, which was an unintended effect. We'd like to reiterate that it was based off information from 3rd-party sources that have asked to maintain their confidentiality, which we fully respect. Due to this, we cannot give concrete evidence of validity. Consider them as pointed, educated guesses. It was also see if it would rattle Nick's cage a little, as we suspected it was close to the mark. Kino Casino appear to be planning to run a segment on it tonight. Please consider such statements as semi-educated guesswork. I'm no Carl Bernstein or Bob Woodward
Author: @Crackieta
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:19:24 -0600
Link: https://x.com/Crackieta/status/1862275125942370709#m

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

In other words, THEY MADE IT UP

View attachment 6698985

Spoiler: Full text

Feed: -------- Breaking Balldo News --------
Title: Theoreticals that have been posed by our team have run a little wild recently, being taken as gospel, which was an unintended effect. We'd like to reiterate that it was based off information from 3rd-party sources that have asked to maintain their confidentiality, which we fully respect. Due to
this, we cannot give concrete evidence of validity. Consider them as pointed, educated guesses. It was also see if it would rattle Nick's cage a little, as we suspected it was close to the mark. Kino Casino appear to be planning to run a segment on it tonight. Please consider such statements as semi-educated guesswork. I'm no Carl Bernstein or Bob Woodward
Author: @Crackieta
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:19:24 -0600
Link: https://x.com/Crackieta/status/1862275125942370709#m

Thumbnail your shit, archive your shit, and lurk moar.

 

[Melty Butter]

I don't know the context of those statements. I saw only screenshots of individual sentences from Nick.

Would you like the context? It's here at 3:02:00. Keep watching for 15 min. It's very clear he planned to plead guilty. Nick sent at least 25 chats.

So, specifically, you're disagreeing that the State had a no-contact demand wrt April? It seems very likely considering Sean's input and this chronology.

>April was charged with drug possession weeks after the arrest
>Flagrent social media evidence of April and Nick flirting and attending events together
>Nick freaks the fuck out at April and Keanu for revealing that April is in the 2nd home
> Nick goes into the settlement hearing prepared to plead guilty. He doesn’t.
> Kayla’s a nervous wreck and is the vehicle driver, April is crying and “sniffing” in the bathroom.

No one is taking this as fact (that I've seen) but it's not like this is a huge stretch.

 

[Chazzed Up]

Why did anyone think they had some special inside source? Unless it comes from that MN public records account I don't think we've ever seen 'leaks' be true.

 

[Vibralldo]

Why did anyone think they had some special inside source? Unless it comes from that MN public records account I don't think we've ever seen 'leaks' be true.

Could be one of Nick's friends that he hasn't realized has flipped

 

[AnOminous]

They might be doing it to distract this time around, but it's worth noting this isn't the first time they prematurely announced Rekieta has plead guilty. They pulled THE SAME EXACT SHIT three months ago.

You can't take these retards seriously because they lie all the time. They just constantly make shit up.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Considering "not taking the deal" anathema isn't the same thing as considering "fighting the charges" anathema.

Considering it nuts to pass up "free use of a BMW" for your road trip is not the same thing as considering it nuts to "take your own car" on a road trip.

I don't know the context of those statements. I saw only screenshots of individual sentences from Nick.

To clarify: I'm not saying there is no deal Nick would take. I'm saying I've seen nothing indicating that he planned to accept a deal that had been offered to him. That is, nothing changed.

He went in with unrealistic expectations, hoping for the best, prepared to stand on principle. He was rebuffed, so he is now standing on principle as intended.

God, just take the L on this... This is embarrassing

The study I saw had the children with the same 2.4 ng cocaine/mg of hair concentration. The children had larger concentrations of metabolites. (children 0.74 ng benzoylecgonine/mg hair; parental users 0.39 ng BE/mg hair).

Nick's kid seems to be consistent with this study. I'd love to see what his other kids levels were. Below the cutoff doesn't mean zero. I'm betting they were substantial or Nick would have told us in a shower call how 4 zeros and 1 hot test made no sense.

Not being a chemist, how does that 2.4 nanogrammes/milligram correlate to the levels of the test as reported by KCHHS, or are they non-transmutable?

In other words, THEY MADE IT UP

View attachment 6698985

Spoiler: Full text

Feed: -------- Breaking Balldo News --------
Title: Theoreticals that have been posed by our team have run a little wild recently, being taken as gospel, which was an unintended effect. We'd like to reiterate that it was based off information from 3rd-party sources that have asked to maintain their confidentiality, which we fully respect. Due to this, we cannot give concrete evidence of validity. Consider them as pointed, educated guesses. It was also see if it would rattle Nick's cage a little, as we suspected it was close to the mark. Kino Casino appear to be planning to run a segment on it tonight. Please consider such statements as semi-educated guesswork. I'm no Carl Bernstein or Bob Woodward
Author: @Crackieta
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:19:24 -0600
Link: https://x.com/Crackieta/status/1862275125942370709#m

Thumbnail those images, phonefag. You insert, delete, then re-insert as a thumbnail and usually it sizes the image reasonably for PC users.

 

[Captain Manning]

I'm saying I've seen nothing indicating that he planned to accept a deal that had been offered to him.

That's because you don't want to. It's been pointed out to you by several people now, and nearly everybody in this thread saw the same thing on Tuesday and reached a similar conclusion that he was probably willing to take a deal.

Why did anyone think they had some special inside source? Unless it comes from that MN public records account I don't think we've ever seen 'leaks' be true.

Some people have talked to what they believe is a source that is very close to this case. I am not at liberty to say more than that (and there's certain things I don't even know myself). I also don't know if it's the same source BBN used/uses. Or how reliable the source or sources are.

There would be no point in scheduling another settlement conference if he had no intention to take a deal.

This is an underappreciated point. If he said "fuck you, give me my trial," what the hell is the 17th of December about?

They would have just set trial.

The man is Constitutionally entitled to a jury trial if he insists on it, but he'd be a complete fucking idiot if he decides to go that route. They've got him dead to rights.

He didn't like the deal offered him. He's fishing for a better one. Problem is, he's running out of time, and the state is likely running out of patience.

Tik tok, Nick. They're not gonna give you a deal where they tickle your balls and have you stand in the corner for 5 minutes. You had 26 grams of a Schedule II controlled substance in your home, with firearms and children, and your daughter tested positive. You're gonna have to suffer some discomfort here, retard. You don't get to be right on this one. You blew it. You should consider yourself lucky you're not looking at prison time.

For somebody who claims to be a alpha chad, Nick sure spends a lot of time being a crybaby bitch a lot.

"BUT I DON'T WANNA SUFFER CONSEQUENCES FOR MY ACTIONS"

 

[I Will Be Us]

I thought the BBN plea info smelled too much like hopium that I didn't want to believe it. It's just so soap opera'y. But it actually does make a lot of sense, legally and otherwise.

Spoiler: Prosecution hates Nick.

For starters, we know Nick's a drama queen. Aaron (who at this point I believe) said it was non-stop fights and gossip at the house with the three of them. That clearly didn't stop post-arrest. It's par for the course that he is opining what it means to lose April, will-he won't-he give her up, while she listens to emo playlists and thinks how they're star crossed lovers. It nauseates us, but "Chaos" over here thrives on it. A standard probation condition becomes this overwrought tragedy.

I think the social dynamics of small towns consistently get overlooked in this saga. I reiterate that they all know each other. CHIPS workers not only personally know but probably socialize with the prosecutors. I wondered if I was unfairly conflating Spicer's small population of over 1,000 with Willmar (where the courthouse is) but it's only a 15-minute drive. Willmar's population is only 40k. Nick is right that his town is full of Scandinavian prudes. We've gotten glimpses that they're aware of Nick's coke whore and disapprove. Even if it wasn't a standard component of probation, I have little doubt that prosecution's familiar with their drama, know it's best for the kids to not ever see her again, and use the law to ensure that happens.

And it's entirely Nick and April's own doing if the court is... extrajudicial in this matter, assuming it's not a standard probation condition. For ex: it's not illegal to sit kids down and talk about love and sex as it relates to swinging. But you think for one moment that a CHIPS worker--probably one that has been called a liar by a semi-public figure--isn't looking askance and that and figuring out a way to safeguard the kids from that whole twisted and toxic dynamic? Highly unlikely.

Nick just keeps poking the hornet's nest. The moment Nick's arraignment was flooded with viewers was the moment the court perked up. Some were already familiar with these guys, such as the detective having listened to Aaron's radio show. From the "pussy liquor" judge, to the liar Alicia Sweep, to the officer contaminating the child's hair, to the other judge whose proceedings were disrupted by the henchman Ralph... Nick has made a name for himself in a very small fish pond.

They're all sick of it. Exhibit #1,305: On the day before Thanksgiving, the judge rejected Ralph's plea about wanting to be home for the holidays.

 

[AnOminous]

God, just take the L on this... This is embarrassing

Wait? What? There are people who think Nick has principles?

What planet is this happening on?

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

Wait? What? There are people who think Nick has principles?

I think Rekieta has (at least) two principles:

1. Vanity
2. Haughtiness

 

[I Will Be Us]

@Captain Manning

The man is Constitutionally entitled to a jury trial if he insists on it, but he'd be a complete fucking idiot if he decides to go that route. They've got him dead to rights.

Playing devil's advocate, Nick may have zero intention of going to trial, but could be intentionally stretching this out as long as possible for the following reasons:

1) It appears he's free of testing from now until probation.
2) He can see how Kayla's plea resolves
3) He gets to see April
4) He gets time to decide who he wants to be with if the divorce arc is incoming
5) He might want to be checking if the Aaron investigation concludes, at which point any charges could be combined into one plea deal.

Not saying these are strong or good reasons; only that they may be factors. Sane and rational people would have wanted this done and behind them as soon as possible. I wouldn't say Nick is either of those things.