- Joined
- Dec 3, 2020
Well if you watch the video he was sending porn to minors so that's a possibility...
Sonic The Hedgehog Games
- Thread starter StoneKnightMan
- Start date
Mossy Trash Panda
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2023
This isn't your normal schizophrenia...
This is...
*Advanced Schizophrenia.*
This is...
*Advanced Schizophrenia.*
majaswan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2024
You're mistaken. Ol' Sqrly actually prides himself on the fact that he has a penis and didn't choose to do sexual reassignment surgery. Way before the all Sonic and Bubsy autism (I am talking like 2011) he was really big into furry futa art, so porn literally played a part in shaping his identity today.
This fascination with such an identity is also shown in his obsession with Bunnie Rabbot (one of the Sonic characters he roleplays as and has a hyperfixation on), and is known to have an autistic meltdown if he sees porn of Bunnie Rabbot with a vagina, or even when someone just casually implies that she is a cisgendered character.
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2015
From the image I'm seeing of the mario there that's an old YTP meme where they had mario from Mario is missing "malleo" be like a stalin-esque dictator who was called a mahzi (mario nazi) or some shit like that lmao. There used to be a whole like pantheon of shitty mario sprite shitpost demons. The only that'slasted into the modern age is GRAND DAD due to vinesauce and siIva for better or worse. I'm betting the "nazi mario" is just that old meme and is somewhat removed from the rest of the degeneracy.
Two Dollars
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2022
They also removed a Rush track for Smash Ultimate. Are there legal issues now?
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2015
Not enough of one to stop automated copyright claims on youtube!
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2016
No copyright law in the universe is going to stop that.
Nguyen Van Phuoc
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2018
This isn’t 100 percent true, they at least tried to replace the song with Westopolis (although if they were to pick another song I’d rather them use Blue Coast Act 3 from Sonic Rivals 2, it’s quite an underrated track).
I believe so, I think Hideki Naganuma has been pretty bitter with Sega and has been fighting over the rights to his music.
Kind of ironic, especially since in
BetterFuckChuck
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2022
Gonna guess BBHD was close enough to his leaving they still had the rights. btw was the new monkey ball any good? i heard banana mania fucked up the physics and added a jump button as a band aid
Nguyen Van Phuoc
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2018
There’s actually a game that released after that called Banana Rumble. From what I heard it’s the best release in the series since that one PSVITA exclusive title but the art style and the redesigns turned me off.
But to answer your question, yeah Banana Mania sucks dicks, just emulate 2 on Dolphin w/ a nod to add the Deluxe levels.
Mossy Trash Panda
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2023
Necro-ing this thread to talk about some rumors regarding some behind-the-scenes talks. Apparently, Flynn tried to say that Shadow was genderfluid, and that got the usual suspects worshipping him. However, fearing the 3rd Sonic movie suddenly getting a similar fate to Avowed, Sega made him put a disclaimer on his podcast going forward, meaning, they will now keep an eye on him so he doesn't say stupid shit anymore.
As for "unathorized redistribution," that might be Flynn trying to curtail anyone using his words against him. Good luck with that, pal. Lol.
Simply put, Flynn almost put the 3rd Movie's financial gains at risk, and Sega had to make him say that everything he says is merely an opinion, implying that his bs is non-canon to those who pay attention.
As for "unathorized redistribution," that might be Flynn trying to curtail anyone using his words against him. Good luck with that, pal. Lol.
Simply put, Flynn almost put the 3rd Movie's financial gains at risk, and Sega had to make him say that everything he says is merely an opinion, implying that his bs is non-canon to those who pay attention.
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2023
AlmightyMagichan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2014
Take all my money so you can talk about Shadow being a huge faggot. Not like I can find that for free all over this fandom.
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2016
Where did you get this from? Just a rumour, or is it somewhere in one of the Bumblekast episodes.
View attachment 6702840
Another Sonic and Hololive collaboration, this time with their english branch... at a Japanese cafe. Biboo would've been a better fit as Knuckles instead of Amy.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2024
I was watching "Garfield and Friends" recently (it's from my childhood, shutup), and I remembered this character from the show.
Flynn put a garfield reference in his furry comic
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2020
Roy Rooster was more memorable to be honest
Mossy Trash Panda
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2023
Ken Penders, of all people, dropping a Hiroshima-level nuke on Flynn regarding the whole thing.
The thing is, despite him being a lolcow himself, he's right. Ken has a wife and family who he can spend time with, and find happiness in, that he can move on from Sonic. Flynn just has a "wife" that he lets Jen Hernandez sleep with while he watches in the corner cuz he simps hard for his lesbians.
The thing is, despite him being a lolcow himself, he's right. Ken has a wife and family who he can spend time with, and find happiness in, that he can move on from Sonic. Flynn just has a "wife" that he lets Jen Hernandez sleep with while he watches in the corner cuz he simps hard for his lesbians.
Mossy Trash Panda
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2023
One of the Bumblekast episodes. Though I should've clarified, he was talking about the Biolizard being female due to the pink orbs from the boss fight being inert eggs. A certain group took that as meaning Shadow is genderfluid, and didn't even hesitate to try and claim him as their own.
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2016
I don't even want to try to understand the mental gymnastics behind this. Reptiles' sex is determined by egg temperature, mammals are completely different.
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2020
Nintendo is rooted in play. Most of their games are held together by their design and the requirements to achieve a certain experience. A prime example is Mario himself, in his original design.
He only became Mario, really, because of a hat and a mustache, a decision which is rooted in the technical limitations of 8 bit sprites. Having both of these removed the need to have a mouth and hair - things that would've been harder to communicate. All together, it looked sort of like an Italian plumber. All of this began with the game. Sonic, on the other hand, is never rooted in the experience of playing the game. Sonic's goal was always appeal. He was designed in a literal contest for SEGA's next mascot. There wasn't a stringent gameplay reason that he was fast - it was something to sell the Genesis/Mega Drive (Blast Processing, anyone?). Sonic/SEGA was flashy with an attitude to stand up provocatively to Nintendo.
Having this strategy against PG, safe, predictable Nintendo proved to be effective (for a time). That doesn't mean play can't have appeal, or vice versa. It's just that usually in game development, you have a main goal, and all of the aspects of the game are laser-focused towards that goal. Nintendo has been consistent in having goals for their games, and if that also happened to have marketing appeal, hey, all the better! Whereas Sonic's base begins in his appeal, and the experience is modeled around that appeal. SEGA wasn't trying to make a game when they made the first Sonic, they were trying to make an icon. That's why his games include a sense of speed to this very day. Sonic = fast.
If it's not fast, it isn't Sonic.
From these two core values/principles of both of these characters/companies, you can extrapolate other values. Nintendo could be said to be more conservative with their properties, whereas SEGA is more liberal. Because Nintendo cares about retaining their brand's value (most of the time), they don't ever wish to devalue their properties and what they stand for - for better and worse.
"Tee-hee, we're so light-hearted, goofy, and weird!.....
BUT NEVER TOUCH ANY OF OUR GODDAMN PROPERTIES, YOU ABSOLUTE PEASANTS!"
Nintendo can be over-protective of their brands, to a massive fault, but that is infinitely preferable to how bad Sonic/SEGA can get. Similarly to a fault, they take the spotlight for
and against
themselves at any moment it serves them. If there is one thing Sonic is good at, it is at always leaving you with an
impression - nothing he typically does is just "forgettable", and so gimmicks sort of feel synonymous with the character now - an ever-changing name and property that serves whatever purpose it needs to at a moment's notice. If Mario/Nintendo are about towing the line, following the rules, and being disciplined, then Sonic/SEGA would be about breaking the rules and achieving whatever they want by any means necessary. On a general level you can really notice the difference between the two simply on how
^careful Nintendo is with Mario,
^and how careless SEGA is with Sonic.
He only became Mario, really, because of a hat and a mustache, a decision which is rooted in the technical limitations of 8 bit sprites. Having both of these removed the need to have a mouth and hair - things that would've been harder to communicate. All together, it looked sort of like an Italian plumber. All of this began with the game. Sonic, on the other hand, is never rooted in the experience of playing the game. Sonic's goal was always appeal. He was designed in a literal contest for SEGA's next mascot. There wasn't a stringent gameplay reason that he was fast - it was something to sell the Genesis/Mega Drive (Blast Processing, anyone?). Sonic/SEGA was flashy with an attitude to stand up provocatively to Nintendo.
Having this strategy against PG, safe, predictable Nintendo proved to be effective (for a time). That doesn't mean play can't have appeal, or vice versa. It's just that usually in game development, you have a main goal, and all of the aspects of the game are laser-focused towards that goal. Nintendo has been consistent in having goals for their games, and if that also happened to have marketing appeal, hey, all the better! Whereas Sonic's base begins in his appeal, and the experience is modeled around that appeal. SEGA wasn't trying to make a game when they made the first Sonic, they were trying to make an icon. That's why his games include a sense of speed to this very day. Sonic = fast.
If it's not fast, it isn't Sonic.
From these two core values/principles of both of these characters/companies, you can extrapolate other values. Nintendo could be said to be more conservative with their properties, whereas SEGA is more liberal. Because Nintendo cares about retaining their brand's value (most of the time), they don't ever wish to devalue their properties and what they stand for - for better and worse.
"Tee-hee, we're so light-hearted, goofy, and weird!.....
BUT NEVER TOUCH ANY OF OUR GODDAMN PROPERTIES, YOU ABSOLUTE PEASANTS!"
Nintendo can be over-protective of their brands, to a massive fault, but that is infinitely preferable to how bad Sonic/SEGA can get. Similarly to a fault, they take the spotlight for
and against
themselves at any moment it serves them. If there is one thing Sonic is good at, it is at always leaving you with an
impression - nothing he typically does is just "forgettable", and so gimmicks sort of feel synonymous with the character now - an ever-changing name and property that serves whatever purpose it needs to at a moment's notice. If Mario/Nintendo are about towing the line, following the rules, and being disciplined, then Sonic/SEGA would be about breaking the rules and achieving whatever they want by any means necessary. On a general level you can really notice the difference between the two simply on how
^careful Nintendo is with Mario,
^and how careless SEGA is with Sonic.