BreadTube - The Unofficial ContraPoints Dickriders Club and the culture / drama surrounding the community.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
No you can havefun playing with your toy soilders anymore, you gotta be beaten over the head with how evil you are for liking certain factions.
I wish I had that Ku Klux Klan video where it said I don't need a reason to hate him I hate him because they exist I hate him because they breathe there ain't no black man equal to be there ain't no black ***** already white person what's you go black you are not coming back.
Also reading warhammer 40K did not make me into a Nazi there is a bunch of other things technically I'm a reactionary but potato potato
 
I wish I had that Ku Klux Klan video where it said I don't need a reason to hate him I hate him because they exist I hate him because they breathe there ain't no black man equal to be there ain't no black ***** already white person what's you go black you are not coming back.
Also reading warhammer 40K did not make me into a Nazi there is a bunch of other things technically I'm a reactionary but potato potato
I once saw a yard sale where they were selling a Klan robe, I wonder what d if that robe was his or his granpdas.
 
Rick Priestley creator of warhammer 40K in almost every major contributor said repeatedly it's not satire it is a game setting for selling little toy soldiers
"To me the background to 40K was always intended to be ironic. The fact that the Space Marines were lauded as heroes within Games Workshop always amused me, because they're brutal, but they're also completely self-deceiving. The whole idea of the Emperor is that you don't know whether he's alive or dead. The whole Imperium might be running on superstition. There's no guarantee that the Emperor is anything other than a corpse with a residual mental ability to direct spacecraft. It's got some parallels with religious beliefs and principles, and I think a lot of that got missed and overwritten."

Rick Priestley, Warhammer 40K lore author and creator, in a December 2015 interview with Unplugged Games

death of the author is ******** and anyone who provides that talking point needs to have their head checked with the 45
Death of the author is older than you think. Again, I refer to the Watchmen example where Rorschach is applauded as a true hero by the fans even though the author, Alan Moore, thinks he's an unhinged loony.

Hell, you even had pagan hippie fans of JRR Tolkien's Lord of the Rings who thought that the Valar and Maiar were gods instead of angels of God, the latter interpretation being Tolkien's.

Then you had Imperial fans from the Star Wars fandom who would justify every crime the Empire commits, even though George Lucas sees the Empire as evil.

There's also the fans of the Starship Trooper movie that think the Federation is wholesome and good, as opposed to the intended message that they're indoctrinating people to fight a war they can't win.

It's funny that Breadtube hates people who cosplay as fascists when that's just "death of the author" talking.

5. How do this people expect these massive changes to happen, like they demand for such overarching changes that ignore factors like race, religion and territorial disputes that realistically would never happen.
Adam is a skeptic. He couldn't give less of a shit about such things.

6. Turning the eu into a “singe nation” will just cause a fucking civil war within the eu, could you imagine what would happen if the eu parliament came out an said” oh yeah we are becoming a single country” the untold amounts of violence and war would be larger than ww2
My point exactly. That was when I figured out that Adam was completely ignorant of the political realities of the situation, of how there's still bad blood between European nations.
 
Last edited:
The people behind the Frankfurt school would be some of the first victims of the new iteration of Communism if it ever arose in a developed, first-world nation.

Which is funny, because the Frankfurt School's goal was not to implement a communist regime right away, but to make the west "so corrupt that it stinks."

It's accelerationism, the fact that neo-marxism, woke marxism, only amplifies the worst excesses of capitalism is by design.
 
Which is funny, because the Frankfurt School's goal was not to implement a communist regime right away, but to make the west "so corrupt that it stinks."

It's accelerationism, the fact that neo-marxism, woke marxism, only amplifies the worst excesses of capitalism is by design.
Ironically, they don't stop to think whether or not the people can trace the stink back to them.

If a populist government overthrows the current capitalist regime, it's going to be more far-right than any Communist utopia would be, especially when the Marxists are in bed with the business class elite who are hated by the plebians.

Take Trump and add ten extra pounds of testosterone and ruthlessness. That is what will replace liberal capitalism if these Frankfurt school idiots keep on pushing.
 
Ironically, they don't stop to think whether or not the people can trace the stink back to them.

If a populist government overthrows the current capitalist regime, it's going to be more far-right than any Communist utopia would be, especially when the Marxists are in bed with the business class elite who are hated by the plebians.

Take Trump and add ten extra pounds of testosterone and ruthlessness. That is what will replace liberal capitalism if these Frankfurt school idiots keep on pushing.
Both communist and nazi propaganda posters had a very similar “man in a business” has the enemy in them, albeit after ww2 the soviests omitted 1 minor detail from their “man in a business suit”
 
There were anti-communist antifascists. In fact, it always cracks me up when I see self-avowed communists wearing the three arrows not realizing that only one of the arrows was meant for fighting fascists and another was meant for fighting communists (the third was against monarchists)
Unfortunately, self-avowed communists can easily shrug that off by suggesting that it only refers to authoritarian communism, or more specifically soviet communism. It's very likely that's exactly what the original creators of the three arrows symbol intended too.

I mean, the people behind neo-marxism, the authors of so-called "cultural marxism," the Frankfurt School, were motivated by what they perceived to be Russia's failure to implement their ideal version of communism, and figuring out why communist revolutions only happened in backwards shitholes, and not developed western countries.

Marx himself said that it was likely that he'd make an ass out of himself, or that his theories would fail to play out. All it takes is a little bit of dialectics or word games (not real communism) in order to dig themselves out of it, which is why communism as an ideology continues to survive even as it fails time and time again.
To be fair the same Antifa types who wear the three arrows also hate Tankies and basically call Tankies like Caleb Maupin "Fascists"
 
The fact that these people keep on pulling the "not true Communism" card just makes it even funnier, since you can make that case for any war crime or crime against humanity.

"The dystopian conditions of the Industrial Revolution was not true capitalism!"
"The Crusades and the Inquisition were not based on true Christianity!"
"Nazi Germany was not true fascism!"
Wait a minute, isn't "not true Communism" literally just a textbook example of the no true Scotsman fallacy?
 
Wait a minute, isn't "not true Communism" literally just a textbook example of the no true Scotsman fallacy?
It's more like finessing. It only really works unless you're ignorant, or naive, enough not know what it entails in historical practice. You have to sane-wash communism to sell it as an idea. Also, the usage of the word "tankie" is a part of that marketing tactic too. A lot of academic Marxism is just trying to do that too with new terms and names.
 
It's more like finessing. It only really works unless you're ignorant, or naive, enough not know what it entails in historical practice. You have to sane-wash communism to sell it as an idea. Also, the usage of the word "tankie" is a part of that marketing tactic too. A lot of academic Marxism is just trying to do that too with new terms and names.
Indeed. Anyone who sees the true extent of the evils of Communism would know that it makes Nazism look sane by comparison. At least Nazis killed foreigners and minorities to protect the majority populace; the Communists would kill millions of their own people just to achieve a utopia they don't even know can be attained.
 
Last edited:
Black and Latino culture is inherently macho and right-wing, especially among the men. That's why black men identified more with Trump than with Harris this past election. Same with Latinos who want a strong man to take charge of the country.
They want a strong man who mastered the Hawk Tuah and spits on their dick. Trump has proven that he is the right guy for that (blow)job.
trump.gif
 

She starts talking about the problem with Kick, which is apparently free speech, and then goes on a 2 minute long tangent about how these are the same people who "banned drag shows in Tennessee" and "don't want gay people to exist" :story:

Let’s talk about the whole free speech issue, because that’s one of the biggest reasons these sites exist. People feel censored by YouTube, Twitch, and other platforms.

But here’s the thing: the same people who say they want free speech and don’t want to be censored on these platforms are the ones who made drag shows illegal in Tennessee. They’re the same people who want gay people out of sight. They’re so scared of gay people that they think their child seeing a gay person will somehow “turn” them gay.

These people who talk about wanting free speech are the same ones trying to censor an entire demographic. They don’t just want these people to stay silent—they want them to not even exist.

Explain it to me, please, because I don’t understand. I don’t think I ever will.
 

She starts talking about the problem with Kick, which is apparently free speech, and then goes on a 2 minute long tangent about how these are the same people who "banned drag shows in Tennessee" and "don't want gay people to exist" :story:

Let’s talk about the whole free speech issue, because that’s one of the biggest reasons these sites exist. People feel censored by YouTube, Twitch, and other platforms.

But here’s the thing: the same people who say they want free speech and don’t want to be censored on these platforms are the ones who made drag shows illegal in Tennessee. They’re the same people who want gay people out of sight. They’re so scared of gay people that they think their child seeing a gay person will somehow “turn” them gay.

These people who talk about wanting free speech are the same ones trying to censor an entire demographic. They don’t just want these people to stay silent—they want them to not even exist.

Explain it to me, please, because I don’t understand. I don’t think I ever will.
People don't like the gays because they do their pride parades half naked, wearing fetish type of clothing and they suck each others dicks, fuck and fist each other's ass during said pride parades, they also have signs that say things such as "HIV+ PRIDE" and they talk about how much they want to convert children, when I was younger I thought that the only reason people don't like gays was because they are irrational religious bigots that hate them due to the their sacred books telling them to do so, once I started to get red pilled on how the majority of gays were abused as children or groomed, how they reproduce doing just that and how they are sexually degenerate I understood why they are disliked.

Comparing free speech to banning drag shows in the presence of minors is retarded, it is not a contradiction in terms because being a sexual degenerate around children is not expressing an idea and therefore you can support banning drag shows around children and be in favor of free speech, these people think that not showing pornographic books to children is "banning books" so it doesn't surprise me, also hating a demographic is not against free speech, I can hate muslims and wish they did not exist and that does not have any relation to their free speech unless I advocate for the restriction of their free speech, claiming that hating a demographic is against their free speech is as stupid as claiming that hating a demographic is being against property rights, there is no correlation between the two.
 
yeah the pride nonsense is so batshit even rational gays(I know that sounds weird but I mean, 8 billion people in the planet there is bound to be a number of gays who rather keep their hanky panky private) are going "oh fuck off" to the "pride ungabunga" crowd
 
It's more like finessing. It only really works unless you're ignorant, or naive, enough not know what it entails in historical practice. You have to sane-wash communism to sell it as an idea. Also, the usage of the word "tankie" is a part of that marketing tactic too. A lot of academic Marxism is just trying to do that too with new terms and names.

An argument I see underutilized in response to this argument:

If communism is so easy to subvert by capitalists, wokists, homosexuals/transsexuals, or scheming assholes in general, why should I take it seriously?
 
f communism is so easy to subvert by capitalists, wokists, homosexuals/transsexuals, or scheming assholes in general, why should I take it seriously?
It's not even subversion at this point. It's just the fact those are the only people communism appeals to, these days, because most people in developed countries are not illiterate peasants. You have to find people that are very impressionable to go along with it.

Communism, to these people, boils down to being willfully ignorant of the effects morality, and genetics, have on society to think that a sudden change in the ownership of political and economic institutions by low status people would solve everyone's problems. Its a rather naive obsession with bureaucracy and playing god. Turning everyone into a pauper, because you're envious of others, is not going to improve societal outcomes.
 
Last edited:
Back