Disney General - The saddest fandom on Earth

[Screamer_2]

What's the bet they will have a few Dwarfs in the film but high lighted as amazing characters.

"May I introduce to you the smartest person in the kingdom, the worlds greatest philanthropist, scientists and the best horse rider we've got." In walks a black female bald dwarf.

 

[Doctor of Autism]

Man that new Snow White movie looks awful

The trailer looks like one of those fake AI slop trailers.

Gal Gadot still can not act to save her life, she even looks like she is just there for the paycheck in the poster.

The dwarves all look terrible, thanks to a man's very small and fragile ego making Disney avoid casting people of the appropriate height.

All live action film remakes deserve to die, I have yet to see a single film remake (for the Disney animated films) that justifies its existence.

 

[Sinner's Sandwich]

God, I heard a little bit about him bitching about that. “Oh, so you think it’s okay to portray dwarves living in a cave? Do you realize how fucked up that is?”
They live in a cottage and work in a mine, did we even watch the same cartoon?

The more I hear about this obnoxious little shitgremlin, the more I hate him. Dwarfs are magical fairy tale creatures but that ugly, walking subhuman makes it entirely about him. Fuck this nasty "person".

 

[Celebrate Nite]

This reminds me when Nostalgic Critic reviewed the Cat and the Hat live action and criticized it because it looked weird compared to the cartoon. I'll never understand live action remakes of cartoons.

I know I'm in the minority, but Jim Carey as the Grinch was pretty funny.

 

[starborn427614]

I know I'm in the minority, but Jim Carey as the Grinch was pretty funny.

It's definitely not for everyone, but I love that movie. Set design, casting, comedy, music. It's a great holiday film.

 

[graywolf88]

Trailer for Snow White is here, it looks awful. Bad CG (especially when compared to live action Snow White movies from years ago now), and she just does not bring to mind Snow White at all, with her constant grimace face and being uglier than the evil queen by miles.

Jesus Christ, that bitches eyes are in different ZIP codes.

 

[Starscream's Loyalty]

The more I hear about this obnoxious little shitgremlin, the more I hate him. Dwarfs are magical fairy tale creatures but that ugly, walking subhuman makes it entirely about him. Fuck this nasty "person".

Feel like Dinklage voiced Scorge from Transformers just to compensate for his little man syndrome/human chihuahua complex.

 

[Stratorroz]

We’re getting closer to that day…View attachment 6689603

No way, not a chance. 2020 BLM protests made Disney do away with the critters globally, except for Japan where they legally can't do shit.

 

[Cnut]

20+ years of CGI shit storms makes me appreciate all the hard work that went into Howard the Duck which actually has some cool sfx and also how if you pause it right you can see Lea Thompson's pussy

 

[Registration]

Will they turn off the diarrhea filter when the film comes out? It looks so fucking bad.

 

[Lobster Cult High Priest]

Man that new Snow White movie looks awful

The trailer looks like one of those fake AI slop trailers.

Gal Gadot still can not act to save her life, she even looks like she is just there for the paycheck in the poster.

The dwarves all look terrible, thanks to a man's very small and fragile ego making Disney avoid casting people of the appropriate height.

All live action film remakes deserve to die, I have yet to see a single film remake (for the Disney animated films) that justifies its existence.

Was listening to the radio today and the some host was going off that the trailer looked so good and that it would make $100 million dollars. Being in the top 10 movies of all time.

The cringe was at an all time high.

 

[Doctor of Autism]

This reminds me when Nostalgic Critic reviewed the Cat and the Hat live action and criticized it because it looked weird compared to the cartoon. I'll never understand live action remakes of cartoons.

The reason live action remakes exist is for a few reasons:

- Nostalgia: Gets older people to "relive" their childhood and introduce it to kids of their own. It also can be an attempt at instilling nostalgia into younger people to milk them off the IP

- IP Power: Kind of overlaps with the first point, but it already has a built-in audience and if its a household name, could get people to see since newer IPs are risky

- Anti-Animation Sentiment: This is a kind of specific point but it definitely appeals to normies who dismiss animation as a children's medium and gives the appearance of this being more "adult" than the original animation.

 

[Screamer_2]

There's also a thing where lots of younger people today don't watch and have an aversion to watching old films/television. They didn't grow up in a world where watching old stuff was a normal part of media consumption and whatever way the online stuff has shaped them, they always want something new.

I had someone telling me just last week how disappointed she was that she couldn't get her 15-year-old son to watch Die Hard.

 

[BootlegPopeye]

There's also a thing where lots of younger people today don't watch and have an aversion to watching old films/television. They didn't grow up in a world where watching old stuff was a normal part of media consumption and whatever way the online stuff has shaped them, they always want something new.

I had someone telling me just last week how disappointed she was that she couldn't get her 15-year-old son to watch Die Hard.

I've run into a few of these types. There was a girl at my work who had never seen a black and white movie.

 

[Candlelight Desolation]

All the blackwashing in new Disney stuff, makes me think about what might happen if they try to remake Darby O'Gill and the Little People. I can't imagine it'd go over well with people trying to take the idea of black leprechauns seriously.

 

[Coo Coo Bird]

All the blackwashing in new Disney stuff, makes me think about what might happen if they try to remake Darby O'Gill and the Little People. I can't imagine it'd go over well with people trying to take the idea of black leprechauns seriously.

What are the actual odds of Disney acknowledging that they used to have a robust original live action movie department?

The only ones I see them regularly acknowledge are Mary Poppins and Pirates of the Caribbean.

 

[Mr. Racewar1488]

What are the actual odds of Disney acknowledging that they used to have a robust original live action movie department?

When they run out of animated movies to remake into live action they'll remake them but with only niggers and trannies playing every part.

 

[Vyse Inglebard]

I had someone telling me just last week how disappointed she was that she couldn't get her 15-year-old son to watch Die Hard.

>an adolescent boy
>not watching Die Hard
They really are turning our boys gay, Die Hard used to be like, the teenage boy's Nirvana.

 

[Basic Blond Boy]

The reason live action remakes exist is for a few reasons:

- Nostalgia: Gets older people to "relive" their childhood and introduce it to kids of their own. It also can be an attempt at instilling nostalgia into younger people to milk them off the IP

- IP Power: Kind of overlaps with the first point, but it already has a built-in audience and if its a household name, could get people to see since newer IPs are risky

- Anti-Animation Sentiment: This is a kind of specific point but it definitely appeals to normies who dismiss animation as a children's medium and gives the appearance of this being more "adult" than the original animation.

It is also a technology thing. It is a chance for studios to flex their CGI typically. Not the case for all, but it is pretty obvious for films such as Transformers or any of the Disney remakes, more specifically Lion King. The idea that the cartoon is now real really is a selling point.

 

[Pedophobe]

Anti-Animation Sentiment

And ironically the new movies are still animated. Pretty much everything is animated these days.