Inactive Shmorky / David Kelly / Daisy Kay / Sandypants / Peaches the Puppy & Ex-Fiance Amanda "Mandy" Mullen - Something Awful throwaway, pedophile sexual predator, abusive tranny schizo chaser; batshit crazy ex-fiancée

[OwO What's This?]

It's sort of funny because I wonder if furries cut all voyeuristic shit would people have that much of a problem with them? I feel like in general 'normal' diaper people don't get as much hate as diaper furs. Nor do people who like extreme fisting or piss really get singled out either. It's like almost every other fetish stays calmly in it's little group but furries can never do that. Or maybe I just have confirmation bias in that the crazy furries whom feel the need to engage in political arguments on twitter in fursuit are the ones I notice.

It's because furries think their kink is a sexuality, and so they should be able to be as open with it as LGBT people should be. None of those other groups (fisters etc) are under any illusion that their kink is anything other than a kink.

You're both wrong. The reason diaperfurs/babyfurs are more reviled by everyone is because of 'cubs'. They skirt the rules with their underage characters because they're not human and that just barely makes it legal. Thus their brand of awful kiddie porn is found all over the place and they feel like they don't have to hide.

And really, even other furries hate them. Null mentioned Rainfurrest 2015 earlier in the thread but I didn't really have time to go over it when he did. These fucked up hosers showed up en masse and left dirty diapers all over the hotel, literally shit in a hot tub. It was fucking revolting and it's why there will likely never be any more furcons in Seattle - both because of the hotel in question banning it, and because furries would be afraid to ever host another con there anyway because of the high babyfur population there.

 

[Charles A. Woodward]

http://archive.is/DbYMF

http://archive.is/eBjn0 - http://shmorky.com/thelittlefaggot.html

Spoiler: islamic content

 

[Big Nasty]

My closest encounter with Shmorky was over 12 years ago, on a long-since defunct forum known as CYD.

I don't remember why, but he came over for a short while to "set the record straight" about him abandoning the furry crowd, how they "falsely" accused him of being a diaperfur, and that he wasn't doing porn anymore.

He also posted two comics, which I haven't saved unfortunately, But it think they were called... eh... "I don't wanna do porn anymore" and "Tiger Jizz".

Also, this is my preferred soundtrack for this thread:

Edit: Holy fuck! the comic is in the post directly above! Synchronicity, man!

 

[Buddha]

You're both wrong. The reason diaperfurs/babyfurs are more reviled by everyone is because of 'cubs'. They skirt the rules with their underage characters because they're not human and that just barely makes it legal. Thus their brand of awful kiddie porn is found all over the place and they feel like they don't have to hide.

I'm wondering if that stuff is enough to protect you from PROTECT, honestly. Just glancing at wikipedia for it at least one guy got tapped for pictures of The Simpsons characters, so I really don't know if humanoid animals would be safe.

And really, everyone hates them. Null mentioned Rainfurrest 2015 earlier in the thread but I didn't really have time to go over it when he did. These fucked up hosers showed up en masse and left dirty diapers all over the hotel, literally shit in a hot tub. It was fucking revolting and it's why there will likely never be another Rainfurrest or any furcon in Seattle - both because of the hotel in question banning it, and because furries would be afraid to ever host another con there anyway because of the high babyfur population there.

Yeah I saw those images and that was pretty insane. That's more what I'm talking about the need to do things in public which are really better left for private.

 

[iron pilled gamera]

http://archive.is/DbYMF

http://archive.is/eBjn0 - http://shmorky.com/thelittlefaggot.html

Spoiler: islamic content

It's fucking hysterical how he tried to pull this I HATE FURRIES I WAS ONLY ONE OF YOU FOR MONEY FUCK YOU shit but couldn't resist and made a new furry fandom identity as early as 2006

He's like a being made entirely of insincerity that only exists to pander to others.

 

[Alolan Persian]

Just wanted to add 100% without a shadow of a doubt that no one who interacted with sandypants on furaffinity had any idea who she actually was. There's no evidence of her ever meeting anyone in person, no one had seen her attending any cons, no one skyped with her, etc. No one was that close to her either. She just cozied up with the popular artists and would constantly try and draw attention to herself.

Also RE: Cate Wurtz; considering the fact she has a history of lifting characters/ideas/art styles from people she's interacted with and taking them for herself, it's far more likely that was the case here as well. If you're trying to find a connection between them in that regard or seeing if she was in on the whole fake sandypants persona and made contributions, you're probably wasting your time.

 

[Rafael Quintero]

-snip-

so if this is truly shmork, we have proof hes able to change his style pretty dramatically, which adds to shmorky = sandy, for those still on the fence

edit: sorry abt long post quote, my phone makes it really hard for me to highlight/reedit stuff

 

[DZ 305]

I'm wondering if that stuff is enough to protect you from PROTECT, honestly. Just glancing at wikipedia for it at least one guy got tapped for pictures of The Simpsons characters, so I really don't know if humanoid animals would be safe.

It depends on how the defense argues. If they argue that this doesn't 'count' because the characters are not human, I think a half competent prosecutor can still highlight the fact that these characters are humanoid in more than just appearances, and thus an extension of the failed fictional characters defense

 

[Poor Choices]

there will likely never be any more furcons in Seattle - both because of the hotel in question banning it, and because furries would be afraid to ever host another con there anyway because of the high babyfur population there.

Is there a reason for that or is this just one of those unexplained mysteries?

 

[Soliloqueef]

Well, alright. I'm still not 100% sure what to make of all of this.

... Does anybody know if Shmorky was dating anyone around the time Sandypants was most popular?

If memory serves, and this is assuming what Dave told me was true, that he was living in Philly at the time with a live in girlfriend. They had a dog together, and later he told me "the girl" was a slob that played WoW a lot and didn't take care of the dog. He always referred to her as "the girl" so I don't know if she was just a roommate or if they were officially a couple.

 

[GentlemanFaggot]

Is there a reason for that or is this just one of those unexplained mysteries?

It's Seattle. It is a degenerate land.

Though I just realized that if there's no replacement there, they're going to come to Vancoufur instead and I live very close to the hotel they hosted it at last time. It was just mildly surreal seeing fursuiters last time, like it was a sudden alien invasion, but if they start leaving diapers around...FUCK!

Then again, Canada is good at keeping foreign furfags out:

 

[MirnaMinkoff]

It's still amazing to me that there are only two known images of a guy with such an extensive, active, long, well-known online existence.

 

[OwO What's This?]

It depends on how the defense argues. If they argue that this doesn't 'count' because the characters are not human, I think a half competent prosecutor can still highlight the fact that these characters are humanoid in more than just appearances, and thus an extension of the failed fictional characters defense

If they were ever tried for it, sure, but the fact of the matter is there's not currently any legal precedent and a whole lot of better targets to go after, so that's not very likely to happen.

 

[Null]

If they were ever tried for it, sure, but the fact of the matter is there's not currently any legal precedent and a whole lot of better targets to go after, so that's not very likely to happen.

There is conflicting and limited case law on Lolicon, but the only case I know where someone was convicted for it also had real child pornography. Because of the DOST standard (considering the material in context with how its held), the court found it to be child pornography.

But people hoping for an arrest here are going to be disappointed. Unless the person of carefully decides to press charges, there's no road for an arrest here.

 

[OwO What's This?]

@Soliloqueef Please email me the voicemail Shmorky left you at OwOwhatsthis@lolcow.email and I'll make sure it's posted up.

 

[Monokuma]

[A ton of autist shmork shit porn]

why is the wolf's dick coming out of his stomach

 

[The Great Citracett]

why is the wolf's dick coming out of his stomach

Same reason klurf vaginas are located an inch below the navel.

 

[Shrangus]

Are there any hot logs (do ho ho) of dave bullying himself on that davekaiki forum that people were talking about earlier? Even if it's not super funny stuff it'd contribute extra evidence to the 'dave is a sociopath who maintains multiple personas at once' pile.

 

[umbasa]

why is the wolf's dick coming out of his stomach

Shmorky never learned where dicks connect to the body despite having one.

Spoiler: nsfw big dicked baby yoshi

 

[Polexia Aphrodisia]

Unless a victim comes forward and says that they had pedo babyfur diaper RP with Peaches the Puppy or Sandypants, what's the point of going back and forth and back and forth and back and forth trying to analyze details in random drawings to see if Shmorky is Peaches or Sandy?

There's been some pretty solid evidence posted by multiple people but we're still going on about it. Not trying to sound harsh but it seems like we're beating a dead Klurf here.