2024 Syrian opposition offensives - The first Syrian rebel offensive against Government forces since March 2020

its worse than it looks. the syrian regime raped women in prison and would force them to give birth in the prison. The babies would then be raised in prison by their mothers. That toddler is likely a rape baby that never saw the outside of a prison cell before
This is more like an afternoon for the Syrian regime
I remember leading up to the revolution a bunch of teenagers sprayed a bunch of anti Assad slogans on their Highschool walls.
And in response Assad's local militias captured all the kids and proceeded to torture them in the worst ways possible.
During this a bunch of protests started demanding the kids be returned and in response the militias basically declared you should go fuck off and have more kids and if you don't or can't send your women and we'll give you more.
 
Thanks, I read the BBC highlight incorrectly. It still amazes me how Russia is still involved heavily with the UN Security council after the shit they’re doing lol
That's how being a member with veto power works the council cannot do anything without their approval how can they be removed?
 
Yesterday the US quietly removed his wanted poster and reward and now he's being interviewed on CNN about the power of diversity.
There are a number of different ethnicities and religious communities calling Syria their home.
"Diversity" in Syria means accepting every native Syrian. It has nothing in common with the Culture War meaning of diversity.
 
Russia is completely withdrawing from Syria while the Iranians lost their land bridge through Syria


1733662457867.png

the iranian carpetweavers have nothing on the patience of a retarded watermelon seller

I sure love Israel bombing sovereign countries again without any UN approval, they're so democratic and beautiful!
israel is literally at war with syria lol
 
Between this and Afghanistan I wonder how many other stable countries whose government seems secure but are actually susceptible to a blitz like this? More fun to think about, what first world country would be most likely to fall to something like this? Two common thread is majority support for the rebel faction outside of the main city, and the military buckling. A lot of the regime's troops either sympathize with the rebels, apathetic enough to not fight, or pragmatic enough to know they wouldn't win and the rebels aren't interested in killing the low rank grunts.

People think January 6th was close but that was never going to change Biden taking power; the process they interrupted was a formality. If those people truly were a threat security would've been ordered to start killing more and they already killed one.

The West lost Afghanistan which revealed it was a puppet government all along and the East lost Syria. I wouldn't be surprised if when the rebels fully take control the country becomes isolationist as it creates a new government. Maybe the new rebel-controlled Syria eventually starts helping Iran, Russia, and Hezbollah again but Hezbollah could be wiped out by then, Russia has to lick its wounds after they eventually win in Ukraine, the West could get involved and prevent it from forming again, or the rebels could simply decide not to.
It looks like the Syria state simply rotted out under the Caesar sanctions and the Kurds/US squatting on the oil and gas fields that made 25% of its exports. 12 years of economic depression resulted in an inability to pay soldiers or replenish arsenals after every Israeli strike.

Syria was also not a geopolitical backwater that could be safely contained and ignored the same way Cuba or North Korea could be, its position meant there was always intersecting interests, from the Sunnis to the Shia to Israel.

From what I read it also seems like a significant part of the rebel advances were really more social media psyops that spooked the already-impoverished army into laying down arms and abandoning cities, as evidenced by the lack of major battles. In the end, it looks like the decision on Syria’s fate was made for Assad, and there was little he could do.
 
Last edited:
Between this and Afghanistan I wonder how many other stable countries whose government seems secure but are actually susceptible to a blitz like this? More fun to think about, what first world country would be most likely to fall to something like this? Two common thread is majority support for the rebel faction outside of the main city, and the military buckling. A lot of the regime's troops either sympathize with the rebels, apathetic enough to not fight, or pragmatic enough to know they wouldn't win and the rebels aren't interested in killing the low rank grunts.

People think January 6th was close but that was never going to change Biden taking power; the process they interrupted was a formality. If those people truly were a threat security would've been ordered to start killing more and they already killed one.

The West lost Afghanistan which revealed it was a puppet government all along and the East lost Syria. I wouldn't be surprised if when the rebels fully take control the country becomes isolationist as it creates a new government. Maybe the new rebel-controlled Syria eventually starts helping Iran, Russia, and Hezbollah again but Hezbollah could be wiped out by then, Russia has to lick its wounds after they eventually win in Ukraine, the West could get involved and prevent it from forming again, or the rebels could simply decide not to.
The weirdass shit that went down in South Korea last week is rather educative of what would likely happen if a generic "rebel force" arose and made a beeline for the capital in a first world nation.

On the one hand you had a united front of lawmakers who spent 99% of their careers throwing shit at eachother coming together in the blink of an eye to take effective action, backed up en masse by civilians and gubmint workers, due to the fact that they all had an extremely clear and obvious interest in the current order not being overturned by military force. On the other hand you had a well trained and loyal military following the orders of the executive right up to the line where they would have to use deadly force against lawmakers and unarmed civilians.

In a rebellion hypothetical as you describe both of these groups would be united against the rebellion from the getgo. At worst you may see sympathetic elements of the military block them off with "please niggas just go the fuck home we REALLY dont want to start shooting but that aint gonna be our choice if this goes too far" messages being sent out, and even among sympathetic civilians there would be fuck all overt action taken to assist because of just how bad shit might hypothetically get if the rebels actually get anywhere, and how 1000% certain they will wind up getting fired and shitcanned and facing charges if the rebellion fails and they are known to have tried to help it.

Basically the risks of helping the rebellion would be too dang high, the risks of shit turning a hell of a lot worse if the rebellion wins are too dang high, the amount of stake people have in shit not being violently/forcibly overturned would be too dang high, meaning the rebellion would fizzle out bloodlessly in a couple days at best or at worst devolve into a semi violent insurgency for a while.

A good example of this general kind of thing playing out in a massively screwed up and insanely radicalised First World Country would be the Kapp Putsch in post WW1 Germany
 
Thanks, I read the BBC highlight incorrectly. It still amazes me how Russia is still involved heavily with the UN Security council after the shit they’re doing lol
Did you mean to say the US? They've meddled in every country on the planet and think that killing 30k infants is self defense but adopting retarded abandoned orphans is the most heinous crime in existence lol
 
Back