Ok Dafuk am I supposed to do with this mid-2010 white polycarbonate MacBook with a Core 2 Duo processor?
The same thing you'd do with any other laptop from that year with a C2D: Install Linux on it.
Honestly, Intel Macs are not interesting at all. The reason why actual tech people (instead of posers) became interested in Macs again is because of Apple Silicon and the generally poor state of Windows in the 2020s.
Haha I love how this thread has become a pro-Apple kumbaya love in. For all their faults, I’d rather stick with a manufacturer who tells the FBI to fuck off when they demand they unlock a terrorists phone.
As a guy who likes laptops, they won me over by being the only company to produce a new laptop worth a damn. The pricing is steep, especially since you can't really upgrade it so you need to overspec if you want to use it for a long time, but it feels like a completely different tier of quality compared to the 2023 Thinkpad my work just issued me.
I'm more just sad at the state of laptops than I am particularly enthused with Apple.
What is it that causes some people to say that apple products(macbook and imac mainly) are better for creative endeavors? I mean like video editing, recording and writing songs, writing books and screenplays, etc. I know a couple of creative types that swear by them. Is there anything to their assertions? I know very little about Apple computers and have always just used windows, but I'm not asking the question in bad faith.
A lot of creative software that runs on both MacOS and Windows is made primarily on MacOS first and then ported to Windows. A good example is Scrivener (a creative-writing/notetaking application) which has a Windows version but it's several years behind in features compared to the Mac/iOS version. This is more a side-effect of so much of the 'creative class' owning and using Macs so MacOS is top of the totem pole when it comes to focus from these software companies. Also if there's one thing Apple gets right, it's heavy autism on desktop rendering and color accuracy - if you buy a super whizbang high-end monitor with calibrated colors, MacOS more than likely already has the color profile preloaded and will switch to it when you connect it. It'll also respect it throughout the entire desktop rather than the weird piecemeal Windows experience where some parts respect color settings and others don't etc.
There's also the fact that M-series hardware is very good. It's very energy efficient and the wide memory bus makes it extremely good at utilizing the unified memory setup they've got. Getting away from x86 has allowed Apple to make some architectural decisions that are going to be painful (if not impossible) for x86 to match.
Earlier in this thread I talked about how Apple got this current audience but it mostly comes down to sweet deals Apple offers educational institutions as well as an extremely robust collection of built-in applications. You can do okay video editing and better-than-okay music production on a Mac more-or-less out of the box. You also get Apple equivalents to word, powerpoint, excel etc. (nowhere as good for professional use but sufficient for casual use) and pretty soon Apple is going to own a photoshop competitor that will likely become either extremely cheap on MacOS or possibly outright free. There's really nothing like it anywhere else.
And if you're a burger, there's a 50/50 chance you're probably already used to Macs because they're common in US public school systems. I went to a school in bumfuck nowhere in one of the poorest counties in the US and everything was Apple. Why? Because Apple was basically donating shit at the prices they charge for public schools especially when you factor in the long-term support contract.