I'm not going to watch that. Because fuck these three people honestly. But all the guy said was gamergate should be more than "goon = good". He didn't even say there shouldn't be attractive women in games. Just that we should be pushing more than games = porn as the end all be all of quality. And he's not wrong. Some of these games they've shilled because GOON are exceedingly mediocre. Without the eye candy nobody would play those games.
And speak of the devil
A game ultimately has to survive on gameplay. It can look good, but if it plays like shit, it's a bad game. Tiddies in games are nice, but if that's all you got, I'm not wasting my money or time on it. It's why I don't play gacha despite liking Fate: it's gambling but with JPEGS.
I'll repeat: I will NEVER understand how did these "people" managed to ally themselves with counterculture (I wouldn't say right wingers, just people tired of others forcing things down their throats, most deconstructionists and cultural marxists are annoying hall monitors and these people are libertines who have the mantra of "LET ME ENJOY MY LIFE THE WAY I WANT, BITCH!!!").
Yes, it's always the fucking T-COA(A)L. "Incest game le funny, don't say nigger tho. Or if you do, I don't care, be edgy XDDDD".
Korean Games BTFO'd. But honestly, I agree with you.
First, it's wild that's how you define "counterculture" as it stands these days when, 20 years ago, the deconstructionists and cultural Marxists were what was considered to be "counter culture" and a lot of them are still probably convinced that they're part of the "counter culture" to this day. I'm not saying you're entirely wrong, mind you. It's just an insane consideration in light of the last 20 years.
Right, I know what you mean, don't worry. The """punks""" of today stand for nothing of the original punk once stood, basically. As well as believing themselves to be the counter-culture, and so on.
It's not so confusing when you consider that a lot of people hide their intent until something makes them sperg out, and because they tend to attract a following that refuses to think for themselves, sometimes when they go "mask off", they spin it in such a way that it becomes nebulously palatable to the unassuming and encourage ostracization of the people who express doubt or disagreement. Of course, they also attract a lot of people who do get the underlying message (i.e., pedophilia) and either agree with it openly or tacitly.
Its sinister in that way honestly. They bait people in with one thing, then start forcing them to defend other shit. In this case, pedophilia. Because you are ANTI CENSORSHIP, right buddy? And a mix of peer pressure and sunk cost fallacy makes them inevitably defend it even if they don't want to; they don't want to be a WOKE CENSORSHIP HYPER FEMANAZI.
If someone gets enjoying video games with hot women in it and fucking kids mixed up, there was no hope for them from the start.
Just based on observation of behaviors alone, I have some reason to believe that anybody who doesn't have any intention of defending something isn't going to defend it, even when their cause is used as a vessel to try and legitimize the thing by going wildly off-base with the original cause.
I think its fair. Rally the people that fall for the sunk cost fallacy are either going to be young, stupid, or just care about winning- so extremists. Unfortunately there are a lot of those online. IRL not so much. IRL you actually have to talk to people that aren't behind a screen.
Basically me. Look, I just don't want "progressive" propaganda in my games. I want my government to stop replacing me. I didn't ask to defend pedo shit. Nor will I.
Because of two (well, three) reasons
They use number 3 alot to get idiots to sympathize but since the Internet is starting to finally catch up they don't buy that shit. Although it's beginning again with people forgiving Kelogish as Koofy.
I'll add #4: children are weak prey. A grown woman can fight back. A five year old can't.
Eh, I don't know. I believe the statistics. It's actually a documented thing that most children who sexually abuse other children learned it from somewhere, and it's not surprising that this would carry into adulthood.
They do deserve sympathy, to a point, when talking about that specific third option. That sympathy is gone when they harm another. That is when they go from victim to villain. I think that's a important distinction to make. And yes, looking at lolicon and CSAM counts as harm.
