UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson fatally shot outside Hilton hotel in Midtown in targeted attack: cops - Just Part and Parcel of visiting a Big City

Press X to doubt. And a powerlevel. I know everyone is different. But I've got similar, possibly more hardware in my lower back after a death fat rode me like a tobagan down 2 flights of snow covered concrete steps in a blizzard.

Sex and intimacy is not a problem. It's just your selection of positions is a little more constrained. Anything with the girl on top and lower back supported is fine. Whereas upright thrusting with a lot of unsupported back and pelvis motion gets painful fast. Unless this dude is secretly a pornstar I'm doubting he has that much of an issue.

To be honest putting on a pair of socks is more painful than sex. Especially if it's cold and raining.

So either Gigachad Agent 47 had an incredibly low pain tolerance, or the story from a" friend that knew them" is likely bullsit.
 

Sicilian, prominent real estate family, Baltimore??

But yes, calling bs on the supposed typed manifesto. They had cash for $40k/year PER KID for secondary school, and a lot more than that for an Ivy education.

He's an over-online, smart, sociable, unemployed/dropout data engineer from a rich family who may have some level of mental illness and has a bad back that still allows him to jog away from a murder, hop a bike, spend hours on a Greyhound, fly, and generally get around. Oh, and yes, he's good-looking.

What's the technical difference between 1st and 2nd degree murder? Luigi's was premeditated right, does it mean that it's 1st degree?
§ 125.27 Murder in the first degree.

A person is guilty of murder in the first degree when:

1. With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the
death of such person or of a third person; and

(a) Either:

(i) the intended victim was a police officer as defined in subdivision
34 of section 1.20 of the criminal procedure law who was at the time of
the killing engaged in the course of performing his official duties, and
the defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the intended
victim was a police officer; or

(ii) the intended victim was a peace officer as defined in paragraph a
of subdivision twenty-one, subdivision twenty-three, twenty-four or
sixty-two (employees of the division for youth) of section 2.10 of the
criminal procedure law who was at the time of the killing engaged in the
course of performing his official duties, and the defendant knew or
reasonably should have known that the intended victim was such a
uniformed court officer, parole officer, probation officer, or employee
of the division for youth; or

(ii-a) the intended victim was a firefighter, emergency medical
technician, ambulance driver, paramedic, physician or registered nurse
involved in a first response team, or any other individual who, in the
course of official duties, performs emergency response activities and
was engaged in such activities at the time of killing and the defendant
knew or reasonably should have known that the intended victim was such
firefighter, emergency medical technician, ambulance driver, paramedic,
physician or registered nurse; or

(iii) the intended victim was an employee of a state correctional
institution or was an employee of a local correctional facility as
defined in subdivision two of section forty of the correction law, who
was at the time of the killing engaged in the course of performing his
official duties, and the defendant knew or reasonably should have known
that the intended victim was an employee of a state correctional
institution or a local correctional facility; or

(iv) at the time of the commission of the killing, the defendant was
confined in a state correctional institution or was otherwise in custody
upon a sentence for the term of his natural life, or upon a sentence
commuted to one of natural life, or upon a sentence for an indeterminate
term the minimum of which was at least fifteen years and the maximum of
which was natural life, or at the time of the commission of the killing,
the defendant had escaped from such confinement or custody while serving
such a sentence and had not yet been returned to such confinement or
custody; or

(v) the intended victim was a witness to a crime committed on a prior
occasion and the death was caused for the purpose of preventing the
intended victim's testimony in any criminal action or proceeding whether
or not such action or proceeding had been commenced, or the intended
victim had previously testified in a criminal action or proceeding and
the killing was committed for the purpose of exacting retribution for
such prior testimony, or the intended victim was an immediate family
member of a witness to a crime committed on a prior occasion and the
killing was committed for the purpose of preventing or influencing the
testimony of such witness, or the intended victim was an immediate
family member of a witness who had previously testified in a criminal
action or proceeding and the killing was committed for the purpose of
exacting retribution upon such witness for such prior testimony. As used
in this subparagraph "immediate family member" means a husband, wife,
father, mother, daughter, son, brother, sister, stepparent, grandparent,
stepchild or grandchild; or

(vi) the defendant committed the killing or procured commission of the
killing pursuant to an agreement with a person other than the intended
victim to commit the same for the receipt, or in expectation of the
receipt, of anything of pecuniary value from a party to the agreement or
from a person other than the intended victim acting at the direction of
a party to such agreement; or

(vii) the victim was killed while the defendant was in the course of
committing or attempting to commit and in furtherance of robbery,
burglary in the first degree or second degree, kidnapping in the first
degree, arson in the first degree or second degree, rape in the first
degree, a crime formerly defined in section 130.50 of this title, sexual
abuse in the first degree, aggravated sexual abuse in the first degree
or escape in the first degree, or in the course of and furtherance of
immediate flight after committing or attempting to commit any such crime
or in the course of and furtherance of immediate flight after attempting
to commit the crime of murder in the second degree; provided however,
the victim is not a participant in one of the aforementioned crimes and,
provided further that, unless the defendant's criminal liability under
this subparagraph is based upon the defendant having commanded another
person to cause the death of the victim or intended victim pursuant to
section 20.00 of this chapter, this subparagraph shall not apply where
the defendant's criminal liability is based upon the conduct of another
pursuant to section 20.00 of this chapter; or

(viii) as part of the same criminal transaction, the defendant, with
intent to cause serious physical injury to or the death of an additional
person or persons, causes the death of an additional person or persons;
provided, however, the victim is not a participant in the criminal
transaction; or

(ix) prior to committing the killing, the defendant had been convicted
of murder as defined in this section or section 125.25 of this article,
or had been convicted in another jurisdiction of an offense which, if
committed in this state, would constitute a violation of either of such
sections; or

(x) the defendant acted in an especially cruel and wanton manner
pursuant to a course of conduct intended to inflict and inflicting
torture upon the victim prior to the victim's death. As used in this
subparagraph, "torture" means the intentional and depraved infliction of
extreme physical pain; "depraved" means the defendant relished the
infliction of extreme physical pain upon the victim evidencing
debasement or perversion or that the defendant evidenced a sense of
pleasure in the infliction of extreme physical pain; or

(xi) the defendant intentionally caused the death of two or more
additional persons within the state in separate criminal transactions
within a period of twenty-four months when committed in a similar
fashion or pursuant to a common scheme or plan; or

(xii) the intended victim was a judge as defined in subdivision
twenty-three of section 1.20 of the criminal procedure law and the
defendant killed such victim because such victim was, at the time of the
killing, a judge; or

(xiii) the victim was killed in furtherance of an act of terrorism, as
defined in paragraph (b) of subdivision one of section 490.05 of this
chapter; and

(b) The defendant was more than eighteen years old at the time of the
commission of the crime.

2. In any prosecution under subdivision one, it is an affirmative
defense that:

(a) (i) The defendant acted under the influence of extreme emotional
disturbance for which there was a reasonable explanation or excuse, the
reasonableness of which is to be determined from the viewpoint of a
person in the defendant's situation under the circumstances as the
defendant believed them to be. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall
constitute a defense to a prosecution for, or preclude a conviction of,
manslaughter in the first degree or any other crime except murder in the
second degree. (ii) It shall not be a "reasonable explanation or excuse"
pursuant to subparagraph (i) of this paragraph when the defendant's
conduct resulted from the discovery, knowledge or disclosure of the
victim's sexual orientation, sex, gender, gender identity, gender
expression or sex assigned at birth; or

(b) The defendant's conduct consisted of causing or aiding, without
the use of duress or deception, another person to commit suicide.
Nothing contained in this paragraph shall constitute a defense to a
prosecution for, or preclude a conviction of, manslaughter in the second
degree or any other crime except murder in the second degree.

Murder in the first degree is a class A-I felony.

§ 125.25 Murder in the second degree.

A person is guilty of murder in the second degree when:

1. With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the
death of such person or of a third person; except that in any
prosecution under this subdivision, it is an affirmative defense that:

(a) (i) The defendant acted under the influence of extreme emotional
disturbance for which there was a reasonable explanation or excuse, the
reasonableness of which is to be determined from the viewpoint of a
person in the defendant's situation under the circumstances as the
defendant believed them to be. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall
constitute a defense to a prosecution for, or preclude a conviction of,
manslaughter in the first degree or any other crime. (ii) It shall not
be a "reasonable explanation or excuse" pursuant to subparagraph (i) of
this paragraph when the defendant's conduct resulted from the discovery,
knowledge or disclosure of the victim's sexual orientation, sex, gender,
gender identity, gender expression or sex assigned at birth; or

(b) The defendant's conduct consisted of causing or aiding, without
the use of duress or deception, another person to commit suicide.
Nothing contained in this paragraph shall constitute a defense to a
prosecution for, or preclude a conviction of, manslaughter in the second
degree or any other crime; or

2. Under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life,
he recklessly engages in conduct which creates a grave risk of death to
another person, and thereby causes the death of another person; or

3. Acting either alone or with one or more other persons, he commits
or attempts to commit robbery, burglary, kidnapping, arson, rape in the
first degree, a crime formerly defined in section 130.50 of this title,
the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree, aggravated sexual abuse,
escape in the first degree, or escape in the second degree, and, in the
course of and in furtherance of such crime or of immediate flight
therefrom, he, or another participant, if there be any, causes the death
of a person other than one of the participants; except that in any
prosecution under this subdivision, in which the defendant was not the
only participant in the underlying crime, it is an affirmative defense
that the defendant:

(a) Did not commit the homicidal act or in any way solicit, request,
command, importune, cause or aid the commission thereof; and

(b) Was not armed with a deadly weapon, or any instrument, article or
substance readily capable of causing death or serious physical injury
and of a sort not ordinarily carried in public places by law-abiding
persons; and

(c) Had no reasonable ground to believe that any other participant was
armed with such a weapon, instrument, article or substance; and

(d) Had no reasonable ground to believe that any other participant
intended to engage in conduct likely to result in death or serious
physical injury; or

4. Under circumstances evincing a depraved indifference to human life,
and being eighteen years old or more the defendant recklessly engages in
conduct which creates a grave risk of serious physical injury or death
to another person less than eleven years old and thereby causes the
death of such person; or

5. Being eighteen years old or more, while in the course of committing
rape in the first, second or third degree, a crime formerly defined in
section 130.50, 130.45 or 130.40 of this title, the crime of sexual
abuse in the first degree, aggravated sexual abuse in the first, second,
third or fourth degree, or incest in the first, second or third degree,
against a person less than fourteen years old, he or she intentionally
causes the death of such person.

Murder in the second degree is a class A-I felony.
 
The people on Tumblr are saying Luigi was bisexual and that this was confirmed in a Penn State student newspaper. I knew Tumblrinas like to LGBTify literally everything, but is there any source to this?

His eye brows are confirmation enough.

1733785927680.png
 
The people on Tumblr are saying Luigi was bisexual and that this was confirmed in a Penn State student newspaper. I knew Tumblrinas like to LGBTify literally everything, but is there any source to this?
> takes shirtless pictures for social media
> hawaiian surfer
> lived in a coliving community
> went to find ice cream with some fugly girl at 1AM


his actions speak for themselves
 
"He's been charged in Manhattan with second-degree murder, three gun charges, and forgery."

no source, take that with a grain of salt
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: .iota.
Well Mz. establishment perl clutcher, there's actually a reason it would have been typed.
I think she knew the family or something she’s been mad this rando CEO got deleted since it happened claiming he was a great family man. I dunno how a great family man gets his family to separate from him though. His kids sure aren’t saying anything.
 
I think she knew the family or something she’s been mad this rando CEO got deleted since it happened claiming he was a great family man. I dunno how a great family man gets his family to separate from him though. His kids sure aren’t saying anything.
Does it salve your wounds if I say I think speculating on Mangione's sexuality is also stupid and in poor taste?
 
The people trying to claim ownership over the shooter are so gay. Reading through his twitter feed he was so far beyond American political red team blue team retardation that it's completely pointless to try and assign him a label. Also using Rittenhouse who was acquitted of all charges next to a guy who WILL spend the rest of his life in prison is pretty retarded.
View attachment 6737257
Weren't some leftoids trying to cancel the shooter over some Xeets he made? Like the one about him saying that porn should regulated like alcohol, drugs or tobacco? (based opinion)
 
How can that be 2nd degree ffs!
i mean, yay if he is. that means parole!!! after a lengthy sentence where someone could get close to him via letter, move to the USA, get a green card and work for Lolcow LLC.

i still think the trial will be fascinating, can you imagine the jury questions? "have you ever wanted to murder your insurance boss?" - who hasn't?
 
Back