Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Captain Manning]

Does beating Ralph count? That’s like beating a baby and calling it a win

If the Farms gave Warski a W for Tonka's no-show, Aaron gets two for Ralph's two no-shows.

I don't make the rules, I just work shitpost here.

And speaking of Tonkasaw...

They started a "fight club" and Kayla was the only female participant. She never lost against Nick and would go on to still give Nick occasional punches throughout their marriage. Nick would complain when struck.

Right. He's claimed he's gotten beat up by a girl. Meanwhile, Aaron is an amature boxer, but if we're to be believe Nick, Aaron is totally physically intimidated by cokehead skeletor.

And by "girl," I mean Kayla "body destroyed" Rekieta. Not Tara LaRosa.

It figures since Nick is a faggot in every other respect, he'd end up pulling the Internet Tough Guy™ shit too.

 

[AnOminous]

You dont dismiss a crime because the victim is immoral.

You dismiss a case because you can't possibly win it because the jury will hate your so-called "victim" and you like keeping your 99% win rate or whatever.

 

[Desktop User2]

You dismiss a case because you can't possibly win it because the jury will hate your so-called "victim" and you like keeping your 99% win rate or whatever.

I´d imagine the bar would be pretty high for a sex crime.

 

[AnOminous]

I´d imagine the bar would be pretty high for a sex crime.

It's the most trivial joke of a "sex crime" imaginable.

The ONLY thing a prosecutor cares about is whether they can win a case.

 

[Strix454]

There's also the issue where Geno and Keanu might not want to testify anymore, but I am pretty sure there's a mechanism for the state to compel them to if the state really wanted to go after Aaron.

They can compel testimony if they want to do the work. But they can't compel useful testimony from the witnesses. If Geno and Keanu are not cooperative, getting their testimony may not be helpful.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

They can compel testimony if they want to do the work. But they can't compel useful testimony from the witnesses. If Geno and Keanu are not cooperative, getting their testimony may not be helpful.

One wonders how much Geno and his "waste of skin" wife are willing to help Rekieta after he did a great job burning that bridge to "defend" his relationship with April. It's interesting that he's willing to lose a witness for his own wife's revenge porn case because of April, and also willing to put the same case at risk because of his need to take revenge on his ex-boyfriend Aaron.

It's almost like he didn't care about Kayla at all...


Archive

 

[Desktop User2]

It's the most trivial joke of a "sex crime" imaginable.

The ONLY thing a prosecutor cares about is whether they can win a case.

Sure it is, that´s why I said on that post you first quoted it should be downgraded at worst, dismissed at best but the prosecutor already took the case and pushed for a felony initially, probably trying to fish for a harsher deal. Nothing related to the hack would tarnish Kayla´s image anyway.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

Nothing related to the hack would tarnish Kayla´s image anyway.

Are you aware that Kayla is also charged with the same crimes as Rekieta, where Aaron may be a witness? And now her husband might be hacking into attorney communications of this witness against her own criminal case?

Do you think someone might interpret her allegation against Aaron as revenge/witness tampering, just like we think Nick might be doing?

 

[Desktop User2]

Are you aware that Kayla is also charged with the same crimes as Rekieta, where Aaron may be a witness? And now her husband might be hacking into attorney communications of this witness against her own criminal case?

Do you think someone might interpret her allegation against Aaron as revenge/witness tampering, just like we think Nick is doing?

The prosecutor obviously doesnt specially since there was a testimony to the crime of someone that received the material categorized as revenge pornography. The crime is bullshit but it is a crime and it is in the interest of the state to prosecute crime. Also there is no retroactive intimidation regarding the hacking, Nick only revealed the hacking in November and Aaron cannot be intimidated by something he doesn´t know.

 

[repentance]

Dont get it twisted, Aaron is still the major asshole in the RP case.

I can dismiss a lot of stuff Aaron has said and done in relation to the polycule because everyone else involved is either just as bad or worse, but the way he treats his co-host drives home just how much of an asshole he really is.

 

[Pedophobe]

where Aaron may be a witness?

Donuts to dollars he's not now nor has he ever been considered a potential witness in this case. "We used to fuck" doesn't mean they want your testimony in an open-shut possession case.

 

[Desktop User2]

Donuts to dollars he's not now nor has he ever been considered a potential witness in this case. "We used to fuck" doesn't mean they want your testimony in an open-shut possession case.

I´m pretty sure he was listed on the criminal cases as a witness, no?

 

[Captain Manning]

I´d imagine the bar would be pretty high for a sex crime.

He didn't rape her, FFS.

Look, I get that there's no such thing as a perfect sexual assault victim. Really, I do. Prosecute that shit to the fullest extent of the law, in all cases. It doesn't matter if the victim is a nun or a prostitute.

This is a not sexual assault case though.

There might actually be a fatally imperfect revenge porn victim. And Kayla might fit that bill. This is a relatively new type of law. You're talking about a mother of five who abdicated her responsibilities as a mother to engage in a coke fueled polycule, and voluntarily sent one or more nude photos to Aaron.

The voters of Sterns County, from which the jury will be drawn from, is 62.25% Republican as of 2024. They might not consider Kayla very sympathetic, or that Aaron's crime (sharing a single photo with Geno) is all that worthy of punishment.

I think that's the crux of what @AnOminous is trying to say here.

It's almost like he didn't care about Kayla at all...

Nick doesn't GAF if Kaya's nudes were plastered all over the Internet. He'd probably even find it funny. This is the same "man" that wants everybody to know April's vagina smells wonderful, and implied (nauseatingly) that he had such rough intercourse with her she bleed on the bedsheets.

This is entirely an attempt to get back at Aaron.

He has no shame. He has no honor. He is a sorry excuse for a husband, father, and man.

The crime is bullshit but it is a crime and it is in the interest of the state to prosecute crime.

Yes, but there is a thing called prosecutorial discretion. They are not obligated to prosecute every single crime.

 

[Desktop User2]

He didn't rape her, FFS.

Look, I get that there's no such thing as a perfect sexual assault victim. Really, I do. Prosecute that shit to the fullest extent of the law, in all cases. It doesn't matter if the victim is a nun or a prostitute.

This is a not sexual assault case though.

There might actually be a fatally imperfect revenge porn victim. And Kayla might fit that bill. This is a relatively new type of law. You're talking about a mother of five who abdicated her responsibilities as a mother to engage in a coke fueled polycule, and voluntarily sent one or more nude photos to Aaron.

The voters of Sterns County, from which the jury will be drawn from, is 62.25% Republican as of 2024. They might not consider Kayla very sympathetic, or that Aaron's crime (sharing a single photo with Geno) is all that worthy of punishment.

Mate, you even responded to a post where I specifically said it should be dismissed or downgraded. I´m not fucking arguing he should go to jail. I´m getting to the tenth post now saying the hacking have no practical effect on Aaron´s case.

Also, indecent exposure is not rape but I wouldn´t like someone flapping their cock on my kids or wife´s faces.

 

[Kipersonapiscesotter]

He didn't rape her, FFS.

Look, I get that there's no such thing as a perfect sexual assault victim. Really, I do. Prosecute that shit to the fullest extent of the law, in all cases. It doesn't matter if the victim is a nun or a prostitute.

This is a not sexual assault case though.

There might actually be a fatally imperfect revenge porn victim. And Kayla might fit that bill. This is a relatively new type of law. You're talking about a mother of five who abdicated her responsibilities as a mother to engage in a coke fueled polycule, and voluntarily sent one or more nude photos to Aaron.

The voters of Sterns County, from which the jury will be drawn from, is 62.25% Republican as of 2024. They might not consider Kayla very sympathetic, or that Aaron's crime (sharing a single photo with Geno) is all that worthy of punishment.

I think that's the crux of what @AnOminous is trying to say here.


Nick doesn't GAF if Kaya's nudes were plastered all over the Internet. He'd probably even find it funny. This is the same "man" that wants everybody to know April's vagina smells wonderful, and implied (nauseatingly) that he had such rough intercourse with her she bleed on the bedsheets.

This is entirely an attempt to get back at Aaron.

He has no shame. He has no honor. He is a sorry excuse for a husband, father, and man.


Yes, but there is a thing called prosecutorial discretion. They are not obligated to prosecute every single crime.

Perhaps Nick sent the photo. In the actual complaint it didn't say who sent it, just that it was in a group chat. It's super weird to send a nude in a group chat anyway.

 

[Captain Manning]

Also, indecent exposure is not rape but I wouldn´t like someone flapping their cock on my kids or wife´s faces.

I'd like to think everybody here would agree that's more serious than this particular revenge porn charge.

 

[RodgerDodger]

You dismiss a case because you can't possibly win it because the jury will hate your so-called "victim" and you like keeping your 99% win rate or whatever.

They also dismiss it because it comes down to messy breakup shit amongst a bunch of junkie perverts concerns one photo shown to one dude, and the "victims" husband is clearly fucking around with shit. The entire thing is a complete waste of taxpayer resources. That Karen'esque outrage "You don't dismiss an actual crime because..." Fuck yeah, you do.

 

[Desktop User2]

I'd like to think everybody here would agree that's more serious than this particular revenge porn charge.

Yeah, me included.

 

[Captain Manning]

Perhaps Nick sent the photo. In the actual complaint it didn't say who sent it, just that it was in a group chat. It's super weird to send a nude in a group chat anyway.

I already addressed this here, in case you missed it. I even highlighted the relevant portions in the warrant affadavit. Namely the sentence, "K.R. sent nude photographs via Signal."

 

[repentance]

This was after the alleged crime of revenge pornography and, if it was not the case, it would give motive for him to spread the nude picture with intent to harass them back. The only way I see the hack having any influence in Aaron´s case is the judge basically telling they all stop fucking around.

Aaron sent Kayla's nude to Geno the day after she sent him a message asking him not to talk about the polycule publicly and not to contact her family. We know the content of that message because Aaron shared it publicly.

It's also not clear exactly what information Aaron gave to police related to the arrests and when he provided that information but he can't speak to what was happening in the Rekieta household at the time of the search and arrests, and that's the time period which relates to the charges the polycule face. It's difficult to imagine that he would have any value as a potential witness in the drug related charges because he hadn't been there for some time.

I'm inclined to believe that Nick and Aaron have both acted out of spite at times, with Nick doing so to a far greater degree.