Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 101 25.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 72 17.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 162 40.2%

  • Total voters
    403
Police have a lot people making nonsense 'reports' and offering evidence that cannot be authenticated--or the manner of collection contaminates an active investigation. The actually helpful private citizen investigator is the very rare exception--not the rule.
Private investigators are usually former cops who know how to handle evidence. In this specific case, the police aren’t investigating something so small time, they don’t give a fuck that someone (Nick and his band of freaks) were watching a gmail account. Aaron needs to make it as easy as possible for them to care, a PI is a good step in that direction. In this context, it is not going to sour his relationship with the prosecution.

My point is, I just reallyyyyyy hope Nick gets fucked over, as unlikely as that is. Pulling for Monty mostly on that front.
 
This fat pedophile is so perfectly disgusting in his greasy appearance, mushmouth voice and chomo character - like baron Harkonnen or other characters specifically written to be disgusting.
The only clip of him I've ever watched through to the end was of Nick's drunken call-in. I simply find him too repulsive to listen to or look at.
 
Agreed, but could Nick handle being second chair to a guy who the show is named after? Me thinks his narcissism would only be able to handle about 3 shows of that.
99% of time I would agree with you, but this is Juju we're talking about here. Nick worships Juju (which in retrospect should have been a indication where this was always headed).

People forget, e-daddies can themselves have e-daddies.
 
99% of time I would agree with you, but this is Juju we're talking about here. Nick worships Juju (which in retrospect should have been a indication where this was always headed).

People forget, e-daddies can themselves have e-daddies.
Yes but as we learned from dick eventually when the honeymoon phase of being a bit below only or maybe even rising to an equal to their e daddy is over they eventually let their ego run wild and want to be the main draw again

Edit then again I don't think nick has enough grey matter left to gaslight the internet into thinking he's based for reporting dick for the nword
 
Last edited:
I still can't fucking believe he is still running with the "tests are a sham" narrative. Literally Ralph tier on denying the facts on his face. I wish someone would trap him in a stream with someone that works in forensic labs and be forced to talk to them or Disconnect like a rage quitting bitch.

He should make it a Locals goal that if he gets certain amount of revenue he will talk to someone from a lab. Of course he would never even if it means his family not having monetary issues because balldo is drug addict weak willed faggot.
 
If the cops didnt found anything, I would 100% supported Nick fighting the gov over this violence of the privacy of his home but retarded niggers like him that feed drug to their kids fuck the notion of a high trusting society and justify state overzealousness because they are unhinged niggers.
People like Nick are cancers to freedom.

I am going to quibble a bit, because if the police did not find anything it would mean A: Nick was a smarter drug addict or B: He was not a drug user at all.

I take exception to this counter-factual because the first does not change anything about Nick (except his plausible deniability) and the second is not worth considering because ehe would not be remotely in this situation.

We should support or lobby for change to the 'process' that led to a warrant execution independant of its results. Are Minnesota warrant requirements perhaps too broad? Yes. Were rules broken when applied to Nick? Clearly not!

EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW. WTF!?!

Why cannot people be normal? Is every entertainer personality a degenerate?

This is my only post I will have. Just to clarify 1 thing. It seems I've confused people about the "investigator" remark. My attorney has his own investigator who looks into new evidence and claims. We are waiting on their official report. Sorry for the confusion.

Assuming this is real, you reallY should shut up. I know that you talk for a living, but you really should stop going on about this.

We all know you like following Nick's demise, but do not let that interfere or bleeding into the real world. We are anonymous here for a reason.
 
We should support or lobby for change to the 'process' that led to a warrant execution independant of its results.
That depends on how many Nicks are out there. In essence, I think it´s a massive overreach for the police to invade someone´s home days after a stream were they look intoxicated but if there are more and more tweakers like Nick exposing their small children to drugs, that is justified. Laws adapt to the population; if there are more and more somalis like Nick, trust deteriorates and you have to exerce more authority to maintain order.
 
This is my only post I will have. Just to clarify 1 thing. It seems I've confused people about the "investigator" remark. My attorney has his own investigator who looks into new evidence and claims. We are waiting on their official report. Sorry for the confusion.
Follow through with this and do not post here again please until all legal issues are resolved.

If you fuck this up by being a big mouth you deserve it, and from what I know about you, you seem decent enough to not want to jeopardize your kids lives which is good enough for now all things considered.

Do not feel compelled to say anything or hint at anything, just hug the ground and follow your lawyers instruction. Also lurk moar faggot
 
Last edited:
This is my only post I will have. Just to clarify 1 thing. It seems I've confused people about the "investigator" remark. My attorney has his own investigator who looks into new evidence and claims. We are waiting on their official report. Sorry for the confusion.
If you're actually Aaron, consider getting verified. Elissa and Sean both have verified accounts. Also, welcome! It's a rough crowd but most of us (from what I can tell) hope you'll prevail with your legal issues. Tread carefully. (I now feel bad for calling you unlikable today. You did make me laugh when covering Ed and Michelle at the Fun Buffet in Cleveland. Make Sean watch it; he'd love it.)
 
That depends on how many Nicks are out there. In essence, I think it´s a massive overreach for the police to invade someone´s home days after a stream were they look intoxicated but if there are more and more tweakers like Nick exposing their small children to drugs, that is justified. Laws adapt to the population; if there are more and more somalis like Nick, trust deteriorates and you have to exerce more authority to maintain order.

Your point is taken, and perhaps my response seemed a bit hostile at the outset. It was not my intent to do so, but that was a result of misapprehension of your intent.

I was thinking and speaking narrowly in terms of the strict rules guiding the legal process that (IMO) clearly show Nick's arguments to be worth less than the paper they were printed on. Apply the rules fairly, and you get the current result. I initially took your post as an indication that the results of the search dictated your opinion on the rules (i.e. if he's innocent the rules are fine, but the rules are wrong if he is guilty).

On the more practical (and less autistic attention to detail) level, I agree that laws are shaped by society and general opinions to some degree. I also agree that they should be responsive to some degree, otherwise you get heaps of useless rules.

I think Nick got as fair as shake with the law as anyone in Minnesota would, and I do not have any reason to think that he or anyone is getting railroaded by the State using this rule. I share the general concern regarding the State getting benefit of a doubt in warrant applications.
 
You know I’ve always wondered, when people watch mainstream cuck shit (by bigger studios), are they imagining themselves as the bull or the corner cuck?

Funny enough, I think we have enough info about Nick to know he would certainly fall in the latter category.
Considering he always wins, looks like you're the cuck here, sweetie....
 
Considering he always wins, looks like you're the cuck here, sweetie....
PERHAP IT IS YOU WHO IS THE CUCK AYY LAWG

Lmao
This is my only post I will have. Just to clarify 1 thing. It seems I've confused people about the "investigator" remark. My attorney has his own investigator who looks into new evidence and claims. We are waiting on their official report. Sorry for the confusion.
The compulsion to correct the record in a thread is a good omen for future content.

I predict he will begin fighting in his thread within a year.
 
This is my only post I will have. Just to clarify 1 thing. It seems I've confused people about the "investigator" remark. My attorney has his own investigator who looks into new evidence and claims. We are waiting on their official report. Sorry for the confusion.
Please, for your own sake, stick to that and never post here again. Nothing good can come of you engaging with us.
 
>Account created on Nov. 2, 2024.
>First post on December 13, 2024 about something completely and utterly trivial to anything.

This isn't something that needed to be clarified on The Farms that couldn't have been done on STMS. Gayops.
I was wondering the same thing...

Why create an account just so say that, when he can address any confusion on his show, and he knows people here snip the parts relevant to Nick?

:thinking:

Verification is necessary.
 
I still can't fucking believe he is still running with the "tests are a sham" narrative. Literally Ralph tier on denying the facts on his face. I wish someone would trap him in a stream with someone that works in forensic labs and be forced to talk to them or Disconnect like a rage quitting bitch.
Above all else, the thing which convinces me that he knows it's bullshit is that he's not talking about hiring his own expert witnesses to testify to the frequency of false positives and what causes them. Instead, he's basing his assertion on a few papers he's read and has no credentials to interpret.

If you're going to attack the credibility of the tests, then do so via someone who is even more qualified than those who conducted them.

Nick won't, for the same reason he never had the original samples retested or new samples taken and independently tested.
 
Back