Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

[JoseRaulChupacabra]

I really wish someone would do a research as to why women crave entering male dominated space so badly, ie. Boy Scout, Football, Gentlemen Club, etc — whether the research is through Biology, Psychology, Sociology, or History.

Well, it was a cisheteronormative capitalist patriarchy that landed on the moon, not some matriarchy shithole.

 

[Mr Bunny]

really wish someone would do a research as to why women crave entering male dominated space so badly,

It's simple, men as a group have more fun together and actually do things and achieve things.

 

[Dante Alighieri]

I really wish someone would do a research as to why women crave entering male dominated space so badly, ie. Boy Scout, Football, Gentlemen Club, etc — whether the research is through Biology, Psychology, Sociology, or History.

Because they see men having fun and want to ruin it.

 

[The Ugly One]

I really wish someone would do a research as to why women crave entering male dominated space so badly, ie. Boy Scout, Football, Gentlemen Club, etc — whether the research is through Biology, Psychology, Sociology, or History.

You mean male-created spaces. You're adopting feminist language, which positions spaces such as football teams, the army, and an engine design team as spaces with a priori existence that men invaded and took over, when in fact it was men who made them.

Women want to be in our spaces because the human female survival strategy is to attach herself to a protector-provider male. Instinctively, anywhere that we are is a place they want to be. It isn't just that they want sex. It's that they've evolved over millennia to see men and the things that we do as interesting, which draws them to where we are, resulting in resource-sharing and mating.

Luckily, most men in today’s timeline has caught on with this insanity that if we let women in, they’re bound to change the rule that would fit them. The effective solution is to gate keep male dominated space and eliminating any potential male simps or feminists from being apart of the community.

The basic problem here is that, thanks to the female vote and the overweening power of the administrative state, gatekeeping women out of male spaces is illegal.

 

[The Hardest R]

Most guys don't realize that equality is actually illegal. As much as some guys stroke themselves over pendulums and multidimensional chessmasters, the CRA is the core fundamental set of laws in modern America. Dunking on a foid online will not change the fact that women objectively have it better than men because that is mandated by law. Even most women who claim to reject feminism and DEI will still have a major blind spot over how the laws have favored them for 60 years.

 

[There Is Light At The End]

Well, it was a cisheteronormative capitalist patriarchy that landed on the moon, not some matriarchy shithole.

And it's cisheteronormative communist patriarchy who sent first human in space. And first artificial satellite. And it was cisheteronormative men who won wars, built factories, roads, sewers.

 

[The Ugly One]

And it's cisheteronormative communist patriarchy who sent first human in space.

And both the cisheteronormative communist patriarchs and the cisheteronormative capitalist patriarchs had a bunch of help from cisheteronormative Nazi patriarchs.

 

[bile demon]

Personally, I don't hate all women. I just hate Burger Women. I don't really know what it is but there's something about American culture that does something to women.

Hmmm, I wonder what that insidious something could possibly be...

 

[More AWS-8Q Than You]

Even just months ago, I had to explain to several female users as to why they’re not welcomed to the private Male community where a group of guys share real world talk and personal discussion to improve ourselves, to which of course they were upset and justify themselves that they were “allies”.

This is part of why women hated the original Red Pill spaces, most of which just started with men using the internet to trade notes about their experiences with women. The pick up artist stuff filtered in later, but a lot of the focus was on "Why do women do what they do," especially as it related to sex and relationships. It's why they hate grandpa Rollo more than they'll ever hate that faggot Tate or the dumbass browns on Fresh and Fit.

There are a comparative handful of women who can hang in male spaces, but most of them have good relationships with the men in their lives and let male spaces be male spaces. In the actual red pill "Rule Zero," space, I think there's two, maybe three off the top of my head, but they stay to the periphery and don't try and drive it or take it over. That's why @Otterly and @Feline Supremacist can hang out in our treefort, for example. In other words, they don't try and make it about them.

 

[Hermann von Salsa]

Saw this in another thread. It rings very true.
View attachment 6745645

To answer the OP in the image, the fairness in the situation is that Henry will forever have the stink of being a wife beater with several ex-wives (and probably baby mommas too). The women who chose to enter into a relationship with Henry now have to deal with the consequences of their ex and will more than likely learn from their mistake or double down. If you take anything from this story then it should be about being glad you're not Henry the wife beater.

 

[Pomniman]

To answer the OP in the image, the fairness in the situation is that Henry will forever have the stink of being a wife beater with several ex-wives (and probably baby mommas too). The women who chose to enter into a relationship with Henry now have to deal with the consequences of their ex and will more than likely learn from their mistake or double down. If you take anything from this story then it should be about being glad you're not Henry the wife beater.

Henry is a Ralphamalé. Henry pisses on your "consequences" and thumbs them up the ass just to taste their shit. What do you have to say about that, bish?

 

[Feline Supremacist]

The mother-in-law of your dreams, just make sure she gets in legally before you tie the knot.
Also not an exclusive Asian thing.

 

[Frederica Bernkastel]

If you don't divorce them immediately then you're going to be much worse off when they can whine to the courts that you've been supporting them for a year or more because they were too lazy to find a new one.

Got a friend who just incessantly bitches about his wife spending all his money, maxes out all his credit cards, while he works, and all I can do is feel sorry for him. He wants to divorce her, but worried the courts will side with her and take everything he has. He just hopes now she dies from her various sicknesses so he doesn't have to worry about that.

 

[California Newt]

I think it’s retarded to call someone gay for trying to hold women to male standards. They’re not gay, just naive.

It's one of these retards 10 IQ-level coping mechanism.

"We should stop giving preferential treatment to women just because they have different anatomy"

Them: "OHHHH MY GAWD.. Y R u An INCEL... YOURE sexist... I bet U jerk Off To Anime... LONER... LOSERRRRRRR..."

Seriously, it's like these dumbfucks are afraid of accountability or no longer have the same special treatments they once head.
I don't care if you're a woman. I'm not going to treat you special just because all the rest of the male idiots decided to treat you like one.

You're not special. You were never special. And No. Men aren't your ragdolls to toss around freely.

If you want to feel like a princess, talk to your boyfriend or husband, but everyone in the society isn't an NPCs or are you the main character of this universe. Or do they have any moral obligations to serve you. Welcome to being treated equal as everyone else.

I was specifically referring to the fact that it's gay to expect—as a prerequisite, rather than a bonus—masculine qualities of a woman in a relationship. It might be something that you need in your life, but you shouldn't assume that you're going to get that in your romantic relationships if you're a straight man. You'd probably want to look for that in your non-romantic relationships.

Imagine there's a cul-de-sac filled with ice cream trucks and hamburger trucks. If I went to the ice-cream trucks demanding that they give me a hamburger, wouldn't you tell me to go to the hamburger truck? Clearly, I must be confused if I go to the ice-cream truck looking for hamburgers. You might say, "buddy, how's about you go to the hamburger truck instead?"

Let's say I go to an ice-cream truck and they actually do also have hamburgers—lucky me, but that doesn't change the fact that that's a bonus and not the rule. It wouldn't be reasonable for me to say to myself, "hey, I want hamburgers; I think I'll go find some ice-cream trucks!"

Don't take my word for it (I doubt that you would anyhow); here's a certified not-gay individual touching on the same thing—a married bodybuilding Orthodox priest with kids:

I really wish someone would do a research as to why women crave entering male dominated space so badly, ie. Boy Scout, Football, Gentlemen Club, etc — whether the research is through Biology, Psychology, Sociology, or History.

Men are fire; women are kindling. You can't blame them.

 

[Otterly]

I had to explain to several female users as to why they’re not welcomed to the private Male community where a group of guys share real world talk and personal discussion to improve ourselves, to which of course they were upset and justify themselves that they were “allies”.

Two different space types here I think. There’s private or restricted spaces, which absolutely should be able to be single sex, like that community. Then there’s stuff like ‘enjoying gaming.’ Really if I’m playing a game nobody should care if if I’m a woman, it’s more of a public sphere. People need to distinguish between these space types more.

I really wish someone would do a research as to why women crave entering male dominated space so badly, ie. Boy Scout, Football, Gentlemen Club, etc

Curiosity maybe, everyone wants to peek where they’re not allowed. But access to power and sex as well. For women there’s the fact that this is where the power operates - the deals were done in gentlemen’s clubs. For men it’s more about access to women, and sex. You can see that by the different types of men and women who want in. The women who damaged your spaces are the queen bee boss girl types, they gain more power by having access to the men brokering power , and the men who want into ours are sex pests.
The only solution in modern society is distinguishing between those private and public type. Groups - we all need single sex spaces to be single sex if they’re smaller or private type groups, but we also need to meet in the public square and behave better there too. I don’t think we can have the better behaviour in the public square if we don’t have the private spaces too.

 

[The Hardest R]

Men’s spaces are more interesting, even if they are extremely dry and/or autistic. Women look at these spaces with envy the way kids do at a clubhouse they’re not invited to. Rarely does “hey, I’ll make my own that’s better!” get into the mix because women really aren’t that creative or innovative, they just prefer to destroy spaces instead. Women’s spaces end up being government mandated or funded by various organizations that are led by men.

 

[Chunky Salsa]

Really if I’m playing a game nobody should care if if I’m a woman, it’s more of a public sphere. People need to distinguish between these space types more.

Otterly confirmed for fake gamer girl, tragic.

 

[Otterly]

Otterly confirmed for fake gamer girl, tragic.

It’s just an example, people were mentioning women in gaming, so that’s the example I used. but things like football were mentioned earlier and that’s another one. If a woman likes football, she should be able to and go to matches. We aren’t Iran, thank goodness. Plenty of women like football. It’s a public sphere. If she’s trying to get into an all men team, or a club then that’s a problem.
My point is that i think theres a difference between pastimes in general and specific spaces, which should be kept single sex. If a man wants to do knitting, good on him, crack on. I have no right to say he can’t, it’s his pastime and he’s allowed to. BUT if he wants to crash the ladies knit night, we should be able to say no.
Anyway, I was tagged and summoned so I replied, but I shall wish you all a peaceful third advent tomorrow and butt out.

 

[Party Hat Wurmple]

I didn't want to post 'couples' shit, since - and I did tell her this - it would only compound the humiliation when (not if) she inevitably dumps me. She posted quite a lot of that stuff, though, and then promptly DFE'd the lot, after we split up. Like I never existed. That didn't twist the knife...

Okay, I have to ask, I'm sure there's a reason - but why did you say this? I don't think there's any circumstance where I'd ever say that to a chick where I was dating. I mean, I've said 'when I dump you' but never 'when you dump me'. Did you do something? Did she do something? Were you just young n dumb?

I'm more inclined to think that it's the other way around. The propensity for violence is what makes men attractive, not that attractive men will have their violence excused.

Also, I've said it before and I'll say it again, the most emotion women are most attracted to is anger. Anger equals aggression which equals masculinity for some reason.

If a girl tells you to add her to instagram you already lost.
You pass her your cellphone and make her write down her own number.

See, that's what I told my friends. They asked what do I do and I told them, just open the new contacts page and toss them your phone. Even girls I thought didn't like me put their number in. We either just texted or we didn't, but I got the damn number. I think only once was a girl like "no I'm good".

I have the good fortune to know an intelligent, self-aware woman, and she explained it, a man who can protect a woman from danger is sexy, but there's only a hair of difference between a man who protects from danger and a man who is the danger, and it can be really hard to tell at first.

I've actually said this in the other thread a very long time ago. The problem is, you're combating a natural instinct and it's hard to filter obvious red flags when you're battling against your own head. That's why women waste so much time on men that don't like them or guys who want to use them. They're attracted to them, and it doesn't matter what their heads say, they're fighting against their instincts and it's always a losing battle.

Women did not always act like this. I'm old enough to remember. Society certainly understood that women who were not properly socialized could act like this. Society knew they could be like this.

I agree, I'm on the older end too. I don't think it has anything to do with expectations, but rather just social media reinforcing bad behaviors and bad personalities. Your bad personal traits only get reinforced on social media.

Saw this in another thread. It rings very true.

I think this is something every guy has to eventually learn and just cope with. Nice guys finish last and they always do and always will. It's not that kindness is weakness, but attitude and dickish behavior is misconstrued for true confidence. Confidence is attractive, and therefore dickish behavior = attraction. I've dated plenty of girls who tell me "Actually I thought you were kind of an ass hole, but you weren't an ass hole to me."

Media doesn't help. Media always makes the nice guy the winner at the end. Media always makes the die hard romantic look good. But if I showed up to a woman's house with a stereo playing "our song" and saying "I love you", I'm pretty sure she'd say "It's 2AM, fuck off".

Foid response: "he's not a nice guy at all, since he thinks he deserves anything. He's actually an even bigger creep than Henry."

I fucking hate this more than anything. Nothing pisses me off more than the denial of this reality. I have more respect for the women who flat out say they prefer douchebags than the women who say this garbage. I've heard plenty of women ask why the red pill/Manosphere is even a thing, but the reality is-THEY CREATED IT.

 

[Pedophobe]

I think a lot of the women who invade "male spaces" do it for attention and validation from the men there. Boys will immediately stop what they're doing and compete for her favor. It makes the invader feel beautiful, valuable, desirable and powerful.

This isn't to say no woman genuinely enjoys "typically male" pastimes. I'm talking about that need to insert yourself in a place full of men doing something you don't really care about one way or the other, just because it's there

Troons do the same thing,. Nothing stokes their egos more than a room full of handmaidens cooing and kowtowing over how beautiful and valid and welcome they are.

Most men don't do this because they don't get the same results. If women are flocking to you it probably just means you're rich, and you don't need other people to tell you that, you can just check your account balance.