UAP / UFO / Military, Pentagon, Harvard, NASA, Academia / Event analysis & ongoing news - Discussion of the Phenomena with a focus on Military, Government, & Academic sources only

What are the UAP?

  • PsyOp

    Votes: 578 52.1%
  • Glitches

    Votes: 115 10.4%
  • Illusion

    Votes: 132 11.9%
  • Ayylamos

    Votes: 360 32.5%
  • Extradimensional Entity

    Votes: 281 25.3%
  • Other

    Votes: 240 21.6%
  • Atlantis

    Votes: 152 13.7%

  • Total voters
    1,109
guys, I found the aliens
100% real no fake
glorp1.webpglorp2.webp
 

Mystery drones seen in Temecula California​



The drones aren’t coming from the Marine base​

The drones aren’t coming from the Marine base.jpg

Unidentified drones reported over US Military base in Germany​

Unidentified drones reported over US Military base in Germany.jpg

John Greenewald on if U.S. has recovered UAP debris​


Basically he says yes.
 
I took a look at the Audio of that interference signal:


I don't have a direct line to the audio but I was still able to determine the fundamental frequencies:
fag (2).png
fag (6).png
fagfag.png

Fundamental Frequencies were:
600hz
350hz
60hz

I believe everything else was audio from the vehicle that they were sitting in as they recorded the signal.

Frequencies were not simultaneously expressed. The most present were 600hz and 350hz. 60hz appeared to be almost a separate signal or something.

You can see it in the spectrum analysis at the top, they don't always line up.



(Sorry mods I know you don't like me double and triple posting. I'll try to control myself a little bit more here. )

"Newsnation Reporter Rich McHugh gets the best footage of the NJ "drones" yet. Says he was skeptical at first but this has completely rewired his brain on this topic. Says they don't look like planes or drones, they look "creepy" and "almost inverted", are U and V shaped and make no sound."​


Link: https://youtu.be/sXT4JBq6Rb4?si=VdRNR7yQtizFAC7D
"It did not look anything like a plane"

fag1.png
fag2.png
fag3.png
fag4.png
fag5.png
fag6.png
fag7.png
fag8.png
fag9.png
245642566425.png
g425g42g.png
3yh345g435.png
2g2gg.png

VERY crazy thought here. If you did actually have anti-gravitic technology, you could construct an airplane anyways to blend in, and it wouldn't need to technically "fly".
 
Last edited:
This is a really fucking bad idea. The only time someone that wants to do this, should ever consider doing this, is if an object was basically right above them.

Bullets arc when fired at airborne targets and, depending on trajectory, can absolutely come down and kill people. It happens regularly.

I distinctly remember a CSI (TV show) episode having it as the main plot point.

Good luck to any dumb bastard that ends up doing 25 years for killing a toddler 3 miles away.
ah, yes. csi. a show well known for its accuracy and fact-checking. the longest rifle shots in the world are like 2 miles with bullets so big they have to be classed as anti-vehicle weapons. you aren't hitting someone at 3 miles with a regular bullet. if you shoot a bullet into the air and it arcs back down then it's only going to be traveling at terminal velocity.

also theres an entire category of gun for shooting things out of they air they are called "shotguns"
 
I wish that some of these recorders had one of those ridiculously bright flash/spotlight to illuminate the object if they were near it and recording for a better visual ID. And also it's behavior when directly illuminated.
 

New Jersey drones: State lawmaker calls for ‘limited’ state of emergency | Morning in America​


fag1.png

Federal government's response to drones is 'baffling': NJ State Rep.​


fag3gt32tg2.png
 
Last edited:
Fuck yeah.

The weird thing though was the guy was saying it looked like the plane was moving in a corkscrew which would be impossible for a "seemingly" fixed wing craft like the news nation one (too dark to fucking say).

Edit: Never mind, he says it did not look like a plane.

Violation of aerodynamics is the money shot if I want to prove it's aliens, but everything is at night and there is zero reference in any of the frames.

I've been searching my ass off for a shot of aerodynamics being violated. I still can't find it.

I do feel like i'm quickly going insane though.

Edit: I think i'm going to take a break here my brains starting to slip now.



Okay i'm officially insane:




Few more I missed:



Here's one that appears to violate aerodynamics:




 
Last edited:
Fundamental Frequencies were:
600hz
350hz
60hz

I believe everything else was audio from the vehicle that they were sitting in as they recorded the signal
I swear I’ve heard those sounds in some Hollywood alien invasion film. The fact that it’s coming in crystal clear on their FM radio means the station broadcasted it as a joke.
 
I swear I’ve heard those sounds in some Hollywood alien invasion film. The fact that it’s coming in crystal clear on their FM radio means the station broadcasted it as a joke.
That's the most sensible answer.

There was nothing special about the audio from what I could gather, but like I said, I need a direct input of the signal to be able to properly analyze it.
 

Federal government's response to drones is 'baffling': NJ State Rep.​

Your browser is not able to display this video.
The response is baffling if you don't realize that those at the top know exactly what those things are and why they're there, they just aren't telling us.

Children don't get to know everything their parents are doing to run the household, citizens don't get to know everything the governments are doing to run the world. Might not be fair but it is how things are.
 
Back