Megathread Jesse Singal Derangement Syndrome - jsingal69 vs TroonWorld

Slight PL, I am a moderator over there at BS and we ARE protecting Singal because he drives engagement and normies like him.
It is just about ad dollars and the trannies drive ads away.

I know, or suspect, at least one other head admin over there is also a farmer but I don't know his username here.
Looks like Bluesky isn't the troon haven these faggots claim it to be.

What do you speculate will happen once these mentally unhinged morons cannot create another hugbox? will they run back to Twitter?
 
FALSE. You troons just keep trying to redefine what the term means to avoid any scrutiny of your fetish.

Screenshot 2024-12-15 150718.png
 
Per Singal, NBC is working on a story on this and according to the questions he got sent it seems like they're trying to skew it in favour of the loonies. I really wonder how long he can keep the cognitive dissonance this must've caused him about his "side" and now potentially what he views as "legitimate" media gearing up to defend them.
Even if NBC tries to cover for the loons, it's going to bring the whole shitshow to a much wider audience. Jess can retweet the NBC story with receipts, which will attract other media attention. It's actually a great story, all screenshotted for ease of reporting. People trying to claim that X has become some sort of cesspit (like Jesse and Katie regularly do) will be faced with actual genuine death threats and doxing, that haven't been moderated by Bluesky.
 
lol where’s the privacy in “here’s why your teenager should hate their body enough to mutilate it or they WILL die, no we don’t have kids but we know yours better than you do” “btw you should pay for my shit too, no I can’t work muh dysphoria.” “No you can’t pee without my boner in the bathroom!” “No you can’t refer to me or think of me as a man, and here’s how you’ll refer to me when I’m not around or else” etc etc they’re here because they invaded everyone else’s privacy. And now that they’re in the normies faces everyone is collectively going “what the fuck?” Sucks to suck.
You don't believe it's possible for a person to be attracted to children without actively having sex with said children immediately? Not even the fear of being shanked in prison is enough to dissuade them? That's a weirdly specific amount of skepticism there.
“Immediately” - they will seek out CSAM to view. They advocate for all current cp to be made legal because “it’s already out there and nobody is being harmed anymore” because fuck that child’s autonomy, Lilith needs her spank bank. Who cares about the dignity of the victims, things that make your dick hard when you have a paraphilia might as well not be human people with souls. And it always escalates. Nobody generally runs straight to sex with children, they groom, they get in positions of power over children, they get more and more brazen as the novelty wears off. They all need rope.
 
Per Singal, NBC is working on a story on this and according to the questions he got sent it seems like they're trying to skew it in favour of the loonies.

My money is on Jo Yurcaba authoring the piece. Kat Tenbarge would be my second guess. Both are always available to regurgitate the progressive left framing of an issue.
 
When these people are talking about creating Bluesky, they're actually just talking about posting on it back when it was new, right? They "made" it by popularizing it (in their opinion).
In regards to black people, I've no idea what they're on about. Funnily enough, look up 'Bluesky developent team' on Google and you get a completely different company based in Kenya. For trans people, yes they migrated there en masse so they could pretend to be oppressed in peace.

It just sounds like inane, Lefty pandering. Despite being founded by Jack Dorsey, ever since he threw himself out of the clown car they all seem to pretend he doesn't exist.

A couple years ago some troon group made cartoons/caricatures of different gender critical personalities and Jesse unironically looked like the Happy Merchant.
Funny how the people who cry about bigotry the loudest are so adept at it themselves.
 
Looks like Bluesky isn't the troon haven these faggots claim it to be.

What do you speculate will happen once these mentally unhinged morons cannot create another hugbox? will they run back to Twitter?
They will eventually migrate elsewhere. Who cares where.
As far as BS is concerned we don't care where they migrate as soon as they do it sooner rather than later.
We can obviously not openly push this to happen because we just want them to leave without a big fight, and we don't
want all the drama with crazy troons starting a full scale spergout against BS moderation, admin, owners and advertisers.

These people came over to BS, they brought in massive amount of CP with them and they are driving both
normal people as well as advertisers away with their behaviour.
The sooner they leave the better. That is pretty much the internal discussion on the matter.
 
They will eventually migrate elsewhere. Who cares where.
As far as BS is concerned we don't care where they migrate as soon as they do it sooner rather than later.
We can obviously not openly push this to happen because we just want them to leave without a big fight, and we don't
want all the drama with crazy troons starting a full scale spergout against BS moderation, admin, owners and advertisers.

These people came over to BS, they brought in massive amount of CP with them and they are driving both
normal people as well as advertisers away with their behaviour.
The sooner they leave the better. That is pretty much the internal discussion on the matter.
I always thought Troons will eventually be detrimental to advertisers.

Do these advertisers openly state to you that they won't give out any advertisements to bluesky over troons, or is it more of them just following their own principals of "not touching kids" and all of the people who are banned just happen to be troons?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: fagnarok
They will eventually migrate elsewhere. Who cares where.
As far as BS is concerned we don't care where they migrate as soon as they do it sooner rather than later.
We can obviously not openly push this to happen because we just want them to leave without a big fight, and we don't
want all the drama with crazy troons starting a full scale spergout against BS moderation, admin, owners and advertisers.

The sooner they leave the better. That is pretty much the internal discussion on the matter.
Thank you for the inside info, verified kiwileak.
 
Singals position is the logical conclusion for someone who swallowed the "born this way" arguments made by gay rights activists 20 years. Pedophlia getting protections was a common rebuttal and the counters were slippery slope fallacy style arguments. But in current year we see it wasnt slippery slope but a prophecy.

Homosexuality being a sexual orientation you are born with but not pedosexuality never made sense. We know now that grooming and sexual abuse at a young age play a huge role in all the rainbow affiliations. But if you were a good ally and didnt believe your lying eyes like Singal did then the position Singal has makes sense.
Sexual abuse "playing a role" in a person being gay as an adult is a long-debunked myth. There are lots of gay adults who were never molested, for one, and if there were a causal relationship between CSA and homosexuality, there would be a proportionally higher incidence of it in women (controlled for cultural background), because girls are way more likely to be molested than boys. Now, it is true that gay people of either sex are more likely to have experienced sexual abuse, but if any causal relationship exists, it's the other way around; gay people, especially lesbians, are more likely to be targeted with sexual abuse because they are gay.

Additionally, orientations and paraphilias are two different things. Though data is limited, existing research suggests that orientation is affected by variable exposure to certain hormones in utero. Paraphilias, on the other hand, tend to develop in late childhood or early adolescence (around the preteen years). In the case of many (but not all) homosexuals, they may literally have been born gay, but paraphiles are made. The common quality these traits share (and the crux of Singal's argument) is that they are immutable; once someone acquires a paraphilia, it is difficult if not impossible to de-program. Additionally, most people who were molested as kids (regardless of sexuality) are not pedophiles, and most pedophiles were not molested as children (though they may have been emotionally or physically abused). We truly do not know what exactly causes paraphilias, all we know is that it basically involves "wires" getting crossed the wrong way in peoples' brains at some point during childhood development, causing them to associate peculiar things (non-human objects, pain, children, etc.) with sexual arousal.

I also think it goes without saying that the rainbow brigade wouldn't be demanding Jesse's head on a pike if regarding pedophilia as immutable were a "logical conclusion for someone who swallowed the 'born this way' arguments made by gay rights activists." Clearly LGBT organizations have no issue discarding "born this way" as an argument, because their view of trans people is ostensibly the opposite; trans people are born in the "wrong body" and need surgery and drugs to resolve it. I want to clarify as well that I generally agree with your sentiment that "born this way" is a stupid argument that was only ever employed for utilitarian political reasons and not because it was the most logical approach to the issue. Why does it matter whether someone was "born that way"? The argument should be "consenting adults can have whatever relationships they want so long as no one or their property is being harmed." Like it's really retarded in retrospect that anyone thought it was ever appropriate for the government to stick its nose in that kind of shit.
 
Last edited:
Sorry for double posting, but this has fuckall to do with my other comment and it felt weird to put them in the same post.
That's a good point. The tranny users are determined to resurrect the Twitter of yesteryear, but the staff are behaving differently. Yes, Null's account was preemptively nuked, but can you imagine Twitter staff not immediately capitulating if 20,000 trannies demanded that one guy be banned?

One wonders if there are cool heads high up at the company who know that the circus freaks can't be given any power or they'll jeopardize future rounds of fundraising. Who is going to invest $5 million when deranged power users are trying to use the site to kill a journalist who's written for the New York Times and Atlantic?
This is what I don't understand. They demand an absurd level of ideological purity from the people who run the platforms they use and have been burned time and time again. It's not just Twitter and Bluesky; the same thing happened when Tumblr banned some traggot with the handle "predstrogen" (of course) and the CEO personally refused to reinstate him. To this day, if type "Photomatt" (the CEO's handle) in the Tumblr searchbar, you get gigantic wave of tranny seetheposts. You'd think after all of this, they'd just make their own goddamn website, especially when it seems like 90% of AGPS either work in IT or have a compsci degree. They genuinely could make their own shitty version of Kiwifarms, but they won't, and I can tell you why: they like imposing themselves on others. They don't want to be in a space with nothing but other troons, because asspats from non-troons are more validating. In the mind of a tranny, the ideal space to occupy is one where they are completely surrounded by non-troons who do nothing but coddle and "validate" them, ideally also somewhere they can find someone to fuck. Tumblr, Reddit, Twitter, and Bluesky all fit that description at some point, but not anymore.

They think the internet is being completely taken over by right-wing chuds or whatever, but the reality is that their puritanical approach to public discourse is incompatible with the business model of social media as it exists today.
 
What is Bluesky's "business model" anyway? At the moment there is no advertisement and no subcription, they've only focused on building the site and growing the user base.
They are going to harvest all of the morbidly obese MtFs and melt them down into a substance known as troil. It will then be used to cook McDonald's french fries by RKF Jr.'s decree.
 
What is Bluesky's "business model" anyway? At the moment there is no advertisement and no subcription, they've only focused on building the site and growing the user base.
Underpants gnomes style venture capitalist dollars to pay the bills. If they hit critical mass their investors gain influence over discourse just like they used to have over twitter. The goal is to not be profitable. Its to be investable.

At the moment they are just speaking to an echo chamber filled with an audience they had control over. But original twitter used celebrities to convince people that was the platform of choice. Bluesky is trying to do the same thing to limited success.
 
Jesse Singal tweeted a bunch about this whole Bluesky drama. He included screenshots of some of the threats he received. https://x.com/jessesingal/with_replies

Bluesky is presenting itself to the public and to investors as a kinder, safer platform
Here's a thread of how that's going so far. (Content warning if you don't like violent imagery)
I just took these screenshots. This is AFTER a handful of the worst offenders were suspended
0.png
https://ghostarchive.org/archive/c9Ldg
thread.png
lol.png


New tweets calling out Alejandra Caraballo for lying about him:
It is impossible that Caraballo, who is a *Harvard lawyer*, believes with confidence that this is true. The definition of PHI, per the HHS itself, includes the criterion of a reasonable basis for thinking the info could be used to identify a patient. Here's the spreadsheet again.
1-1.png
1a-.png 1b.jpeg 1c.jpeg 1d.jpeg
1-2.png

She just... keeps lying. PHI means a specific thing. It isn't PHI. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. This is a Harvard instructor! Then again, she's been pretty explicitly clear about what her goal is -- to ensure I never have a moment of peace again.
2.png
2a.png 2b.png
2-2.png


More thoughts on Bluesky:
3a.png 3b.png

When people tell you who they are, believe them
4.png
4a.png 4b.png
 
Back