Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 5 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 98 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 69 17.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 159 40.5%

  • Total voters
    393
It is. But I want to see this weak faggot go down on his knees in a public ritual and admit guilt.

That's exactly what a plea deal is.

But he's routinely boasted about how much of a man he is and how you never grovel to the state and all that dumb bullshit.

It will be hilarious to see him actually grovel to the state.
Sometimes public humiliation rituals are justified
 
It is. But I want to see this weak faggot go down on his knees in a public ritual and admit guilt.

That's exactly what a plea deal is.

But he's routinely boasted about how much of a man he is and how you never grovel to the state and all that dumb bullshit.

It will be hilarious to see him actually grovel to the state.
"I didn't grovel you NERD! I actually calmly negotiated with the state and they cucked to me!" :really:
 
Comedians Nick Mullen and Dan Soder find out about Nick Rekieta.
Discussion starts at 1:00.40.

Edit - Late, I should have checked a few pages back.
So not only has Rackets unwittingly been the bridge between da sektur and the Dabbleverse he's now attracting old cum boys/legion of skanks fans. I guess it makes sense considering Mullen was a huge alcoholic back in the day.

Just imagine if Rackets' lolcow antics land him on Kill Tony or something, holy kek
 
Nick, you should have learned more of the lore. Vect was a slave when Slannesh was born. Vect put the work in to be Deldar Pimp Master. Once again, you thought you deserved things without putting in the work. Ponder that
Vect fucks, both literally and figuratively. Nick cannot fuck without the aid of a silicone torture device that even the dark eldar would find tacky and unamusing. He does know how to get proper fucked by the state though.
 
"I'll cradle the balls. Work the shaft. So long as you let me tell the internet I didn't neglect my children and let me keep my whore."
Meanwhile everyone knows he's totally guilty of all that shit.

He's such a legal retard he doesn't even grasp that everybody knows he's guilty of everything.

What a dumb, child-endangering piece of shit this tard is. Everyone knows what scum he is.
Nicholas Robert Rekieta as featured on FacialAbuse.com
Candy Yoshi County spurts all over his gay face.

Here's his face, waiting for all that Candy Yoshi cum.
fuckface.png
 
I want it to go to trial. I want that bodycam footage.
my relatives have been getting tattoos for over a quarter century now, and you really can tell "hey that guy got a tattoo in 1999" or "hey thats from 2005" or "hey i recognize that look from 2016" which also means that its rather easy to tell a mid life crisis Nick from someone that got tattoos at 19 and stopped.
Yeah but I'm not sure what era to pinpoint Nick's chinese tattoos aside from "I'm uncultured gwailo".
Poor Himedall. Even Nick figured out she's a she.
It's better that way, otherwise Himedall would be getting GAY♂90s invitations
Context and reading comprehension? What are they? The post I replied to was scant centimeters above mine in the same post.
That isn't how it works. You cannot be locked up for actions committed before your probation agreement. This has been explained in the legal thread by American barristers.
You cannot be locked up for crimes in the same instance/charge related to your charge. What is "related" is probably some test that judge has to balance the double jeporary clause by weighing the accused 's interest in closure of the process (hence "process as punishment" phrase) vs state's interest in accurate adjudications from what I understand.

So if I go throw crackhead parties and get arrested for that, you can charge me for the murder 10 years ago that someone snitched on me post plea, but you (likely) can't charge me for rape and torture charges with a weapon of testicular torsion at the same party after I plead guilty to cocaine possession, and you definitely can't charge me for trafficking cocaine at that party after I plead guilty to possession.
 
With some renewed "Dear John" talk recently, something has been nagging at me for a while. I'm pretty sure I remember him using some of the points he harped on in "Dear John" months earlier in a glib, hypothetical manner.
I've searched through the YouTube transcripts from Rittenhouse to "Dear John" and didn't come up with any leads. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a viable method to search through Rumble videos. I think I remember him talking to probably one other person, rather than a panel, but I'm not 100% on that. I think he was talking to a woman and if I had to make one guess, I was leaning toward Andrea Burkhart, but I wasn't able to find anything.

At this point, I don't think I'll be able to find it so I was just throwing it out there to see if anybody else recalls something like this.

Walking to the hospital
Being too poor to afford a gun
 
I've searched through the YouTube transcripts from Rittenhouse to "Dear John" and didn't come up with any leads. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a viable method to search through Rumble videos. I think I remember him talking to probably one other person, rather than a panel, but I'm not 100% on that. I think he was talking to a woman and if I had to make one guess, I was leaning toward Andrea Burkhart, but I wasn't able to find anything.
I think it might be a superchat tbh. I seem to remember him talking about it in an "I'm great you got over your other issues" way.
 
BUCK BROKEN AND CUCKED.
ON HIS KNEES BEFORE THE LAW.
THEIR BIG FAT COCK SUCKED
WITH A BIG WIDE OPEN JAW

Crackets the mighty no more!
Pleading and begging before everyone.
Crackets the pitiful begging whore!
Cases won? Exactly none!


Thanks for proving us right Rekieta. You're a big game talker but in the end you're full of shit.
You pussied out and took the deal because you knew you're guilty. And you were scared.
All your principles out the window finally. And every retarded balldowasher that still follows you can't claim anything anymore.
We all know, the public knows, the government will have it on RECORD that you are a guilty little shit and you admitted it. Instead of fighting to the bitter end.
We now know with absolute certainty, for the rest of history it shall be recorded that Nick Rekieta is a crackhead, alcoholic, sex hedonist, that exposed his children to drugs while living in squalor and being a hypocrite.

Thank you for this gift Nick

Honest question, what are his viewer counts anymore? I haven't watched him since the Brooks trial outside of clips here.
0
He doesn't stream so 0.
 
I´m not talking about this case specifically but it is so weird to have two conciliatory meetings and having to schedule another one just to declare your plea and if you go for "not guilty" you have to schedule yet another date for the trial. Is the system like that just so lawyers can rack up work hours? The parties should work up a deal on their own, present it to the judge so he can prepare and plea at the start of the trial, ready for sentencing or to go on with the procedures.
 
I think it might be a superchat tbh. I seem to remember him talking about it in an "I'm great you got over your other issues" way.
Hmm, maybe, but I was thinking that he had a strange "just jokes" demeanor, but like he was daring whoever he was talking to to have a problem with his scenario and say something (paired with the hindsight of now knowing that he was secretly referring to a real interaction for his own extra amusement.)

Edit: A superchat he got and responded to or a superchat he sent on a different channel? Because if it was a chat sent to him, I figured it would still show up in the transcript text. Also I did think it was possible, but less likely that it all took place on someone else's channel when he was a guest.
 
I´m not talking about this case specifically but it is so weird to have two conciliatory meetings and having to schedule another one just to declare your plea and if you go for "not guilty" you have to schedule yet another date for the trial. Is the system like that just so lawyers can rack up work hours? The parties should work up a deal on their own, present it to the judge so he can prepare and plea at the start of the trial, ready for sentencing or to go on with the procedures.
Its all about scheduling. Set a date so we can have a discussion of dates where we can have meetings to discuss dates to have future meetings.

In this case you have the meeting to decide what plea you enter, then a hearing on that date to declare that plea to the court so they can set a date for trial or sentencing or whatever.

90%+ of all court dates are talking about other dates and all the parties (and the judge) hope everyone will change their minds so they can make shit go away and do no work.
 
Back