"the intervention has been smooth but if they continue to resist..."
Or, listen to me here, have you considered that Russia's army is fake and gay, they haven't been able to beat a country they share a land border with after three years, and the only thing that will happen if they keep resisting is Russia has another 500% inflation event as their economy sinks further into the toilet.
"The intervention has been smooth." Look, I regard the US' invasion of Iraq as a mistake, and a failure on many levels, a strategic and political bungle that destabilized the region for no real gain for the US. A net negative. And it was (and is)
still more successful than "the intervention".
I know we keep playing this game but, like the original DOOM, it's a lot of fun, so lets do it again:
Imagine if after 3 years in Iraq, the US had lost 3000+ M1 tanks, 2500 M2 Bradleys, half of our operating Apache helicopter force, a dozen F22s, An
Arleigh Burke class missile frigate, a Los Angeles class submarine, four Ro-Ro vehicle transports, Kuwait was under constant IRBM bombardment from Iraq three years on, and the only way we'd been able to advance as far as Basra and take it was by rendering the city uninhabitable through indiscriminate cruise missile bombings.
But that didn't happen, the Iraqi army crumbled in a few weeks. Occupying the whole country had an entirely different set of problems. But the operational phase of the war was done in next to no time.
This "going smoothly" intervention? It ain't going smoothly. The Russians have suffered so many casualties it beggars belief.
Mister "I have a masters degree, do not respond" needs a head-check.