Bluesky - "Decentralized" Twitter Alternative. Leftist Tranny Hugbox. "Answer" to Elon Musk's "Fascist" Takeover of 𝕏 (Formerly Twitter).

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Now that the initial flood has receded the site is dwindling down to death threats and panhandling troons. You love to see it.
I love how many people raved about the site like two weeks ago, and now just seeing their dead accounts, with them being back on Twitter, because they miss any negative posting or bemoaning about how 'targeted' they are on the platform.
 
I love how many people raved about the site like two weeks ago, and now just seeing their dead accounts, with them being back on Twitter, because they miss any negative posting or bemoaning about how 'targeted' they are on the platform.
Already saw a few attention whoring artists quietly posting their shit back on Xitter without so much a comment.

Looks like bad elon man wins again, suckers.
 
A small roundup of recent Bluesky normalcy. We should assassinate Democrat politicians because they are cooling on the idea of castrating kids!
They're all for gun control until someone they dislikes get shot.
Also, I'm not sure how these people are going to build a political party. Who the fuck wants to be led by trannies? Build something new? Nigga, you rage quit being a man.
How the fuck can you build anything when you couldn't even handle being a man?
 
Already saw a few attention whoring artists quietly posting their shit back on Xitter without so much a comment.

Looks like bad elon man wins again, suckers.
The ones i have seen have all activated the monetisation again on X. After having a melty tantrums about fascists and Nazis and how they wont support them. Not one of them will ever stand by their convictions. Because like all leftists. They are ruled by money and the pursuit of wealth and envy of the rich. They are as weak willed as they are spiteful. The leftist artists all like to think they are the auteurs and are creating high culture art with their inflation fetishes. But they are still panhandlers, asking for change.
 
One of the main reasons I never used Twitter and don't use Xitter is specifically the large and unavoidable amount of porn. That shit is so fucking annoying and degenerate I can't stand it. I shouldn't have to be concerned about doom scrolling a site and constantly running into porn because degenerates can't not goon in the middle of the day.

One of my favorite things about KF compared to shitholes like Reddit (outside of the obvious troon shit) is the lack of porn sick degenerates constantly posting fetish shit. I can at least get the slightest amount of enjoyment knowing that random autists I chat with aren't typing responses to me with one second, and then reposting/commenting on random pornstars the next second.
Yeah... I kind of thought about what you said here over the past few days and it's pretty true. Most online places have allowed sex shit to be commonplace (it doesn't help that "normal" music videos are basically softcore porn nowadays).
There used to be such a thing as adult/18+ websites specifically for porn/sex related shit and I wish that were still the case - I don't hate them and it's good that they exist so people can do adult stuff but people linking to their OFs and dropping lewds everywhere has become exhausting.

It's ironic that KF, an internet autism/drama website has more stringent rules about this shit than almost anywhere else.


The fetishization of blocking is so childish and fascinating. Anime fart dragon avatars acting like the ability to comment on their posts is one of the great battlegrounds for democracy... But what will they do when they have to leave the Internet and interact with people in real life? Just seethe quietly until one day they snap and start stabbing, probably.

I've also been added to a lot of block lists, not for anything I've posted, but for the crime of following Jesse Singal.

View attachment 6776375
View attachment 6776377
View attachment 6776378
Reminder: only people who have power nowhere in their lives spend this much time on blocklists. Or if they do get harassed by people or dislike some specific kind of content then they block and shut up about it. Sperging about it everywhere obviously just promotes more people doing it.

Reminder 2: DarksydePhil spends time banning people and acts like it's some amazing superpower, because it's the only power he actually has.
 
Bluesky posters are parody, not official ad campaign
AFP Fact Check (archive.ph)
By Daniel Galgano
2024-12-20 20:22:23GMT
fake01.jpg
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
 
So how are the bluesky user statistics doing? First, let's see how journos are presenting it: Extremely reddit-esque news site Futurism.com has this to say [Article, archive]

Twitter's Traffic Falling Relative to Bluesky​

Read it and weep, Elon.​

1734865717305.png
Over the past few months, traffic to the site formerly known as Twitter has taken a nosedive as competitors like Bluesky and Threads continue to bring in more and more users.

According to the traffic-estimating service Similarweb, visits to the Elon Musk-owned social network now known as X have plummeted over the past three months.

To evidence their headline of twitter's precipitous decline, they give this image from a site traffic rankings website, estimating the last 3 months of traffic:
1734865510310.png

See the problem?
They're showing the traffic to twitter.com, NOT x.com.

Since twitter.com is now obsolete, it is fully expected for the traffic to this domain to decrease. The traffic for x.com is almost 10 times higher than this. They updated the article later to acknowledge this stupid mistake and added the stats for X.com, but they still use this bogus stat to claim that "The numbers reflect repeated mass exoduses from X."

Meanwhile, let's see how bluesky is doing:
1734866263937.png

It's certainly a big increase. Once again the article favourably compares bsky numbers to twitter.com, not x.com:
In fact, the data shows that as of November, Bluesky was pulling in a full 21 percent of Twitter's monthly visits, which is an extraordinary accomplishment for a little-resourced upstart — or, depending on your perspective, a striking testament to Musk's toxic influence over the formerly beloved Twitter.
If you look at x.com, bluesky is getting more like 2% of its traffic, not 20%. Oops.



At least bluesky is on the up and up, growing exponentially, right? Hang on, the data in the article only goes to November. Furthermore, it's just a third-party web traffic estimator, we can look at the bluesky user data directly, let's do that:

https://bsky.jazco.dev/stats [archive]

2024-12-22-112207.png2024-12-22-112214.png2024-12-22-112221.png

Oh dear.

A consistent decline in engagement since the "big exodus" after the US election. Liking and posting users back down to numbers seen well before the election, and followers much lower than that still. A consistent downwards trend that shows no signs of slowing down. It's dead, Jim.

The entire globohomo media made a concerted effort to shill bluesky in order to bring the digital town square back under regime control, and it looks like they've definitively failed. You love to see it.
 
The entire globohomo media made a concerted effort to shill bluesky in order to bring the digital town square back under regime control, and it looks like they've definitively failed. You love to see it.
It's funny, because The Guardian tried to push a similar article earlier this month, comparing with the change of active users. It's obvious they're desperately trying to make BlueSky happen, but ultimately, it just doesn't offer anything new except for a fringe of the worst people Twitter had to offer (not unlike Gab in that regard).
 
It's funny, because The Guardian tried to push a similar article earlier this month, comparing with the change of active users. It's obvious they're desperately trying to make BlueSky happen, but ultimately, it just doesn't offer anything new except for a fringe of the worst people Twitter had to offer (not unlike Gab in that regard).
Stop trying to make FetchSky happen. It's not going to happen.

Like people really want a site that's just basically concentrated Twitter troonery filled with screaming murderous troons making death threats and rape threats from the moment they wake up until they crash from their meth binge.
 
The entire globohomo media made a concerted effort to shill bluesky in order to bring the digital town square back under regime control, and it looks like they've definitively failed. You love to see it.
Bluesky could still succeed, but IMO it'll depend on the fate of X. A lot of authorities are gunning for X right now, as they see free communication as a major threat to them. The EU and UK have issued stern warnings, and have powers to impose huge fines more or less at will. The present governments in Canada and Australia are strongly hostile too. The case in Brazil was proof of concept. If all of the above blocked X in their regions around the same time, could it survive?
 
Bluesky could still succeed, but IMO it'll depend on the fate of X. A lot of authorities are gunning for X right now, as they see free communication as a major threat to them. The EU and UK have issued stern warnings, and have powers to impose huge fines more or less at will. The present governments in Canada and Australia are strongly hostile too. The case in Brazil was proof of concept. If all of the above blocked X in their regions around the same time, could it survive?
I wish they banned X and forced everyone onto Reddit and BlueSky, imagine the shock of someone unaware of this shit stumbling upon the tranny subreddits or the Jesse Singal debacle.
 
Looks like Blue sky user norintha cracked the code of the Kiwifarm algorithm:

IMG_-1dhenx.jpg

When kiwifarmers aren't committing genocide, we turn on each others like sharks in a feeding frenzy.

And can anybody tell me who "The Nerdskull" is? I'm an avid reader of a lot of our hilarious troon threads but he never registered with me. Yet he acts as if he was Chris Chan's second coming and we all spend most of our days harassing him. Now, there nothing wrong with that if true but I wouldn't want to be left out while you guys all have fun!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back