- Joined
- Nov 12, 2024
Good Lord, I stopped reading a bit after this part. But sure, when I'm reading words on a page of fiction describing what characters are doing and thinking, I'm somehow psychically connecting to the author and gauging the quality of their work based on their personhood or whatever.Oogieboogie's Hot Takes said:It’s not any “thing” that makes a story, any of those techniques or devices, but people. It’s people that make a story good.
Of course, when your writing skills are lacking, selling a cultivated image of yourself is a natural road to travel.
Is it neat if an author has real-world experience that they translate to their stories? Sure. Can author can write great military fiction without having served, or write great fantasy without being a wizard? Absolutely. Can someone with real-world experience with a profession or location be a shit writer? It's more likely than you think. I don't care to have a parasocial relationship with authors I read, personally. I actually kind of hate learning about them, because it turns out a lot of people, including writers, are annoying or awful once you get to know them. So I'd rather not. I'm fine consooming product from a faceless word-slave whose name is merely a brand, and I'll judge those products accordingly.
More deranged yapping said:People of each place and time coming together to collectively decide if a piece of writing is good invariably makes it so.
"iT's gOoD iF wE aLL sAy iT iS." Consensus does not quality make. I have had some absolute slop paraded out to me as "quality" and it physically pains me to see how bad it actually is on even just a technical level.
I should at least try to finish reading the article just to get the full context of what he's yammering on about but goddamn, there are better uses of my time.
Edit: had to fix failcode