Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%

  • Total voters
    463
What you need to ask yourself is whether or not the judge wants things to drag on a bit longer because that's who'll have to maneuver Greer towards that end regardless of where he actually wound up.

Unlike Null, the judge is getting paid to have his time wasted. It'll come down to whether the judge actually cares about abuse of the judicial process or if he's just collecting paychecks until he can retire.
 
Unlike Null, the judge is getting paid to have his time wasted. It'll come down to whether the judge actually cares about abuse of the judicial process or if he's just collecting paychecks until he can retire.
Judges tend to have a complicated cope about this that essentially boils down to "if you are sophisticated enough to hire a lawyer you have a social/moral duty to help me humor the retard so they feel like they got justice". It's the kind of thing you can only believe if your totally detached from the reality of what a hardship legal fees are for almost everyone who has to pay them.
 
Unlike Null, the judge is getting paid to have his time wasted. It'll come down to whether the judge actually cares about abuse of the judicial process or if he's just collecting paychecks until he can retire.
Paychecks and retirement or not, no judge likes to be reversed by a higher court and basically told "you dun goofed, do it again." We're seeing an awful lot of shit-lipped tolerance from this judge because--as others have mentioned--I think he wants to make sure if/when this pile of shit Russ calls a case is tossed again, there is no chance the appellate court can issue a do-over again.
 
Judges tend to have a complicated cope about this that essentially boils down to "if you are sophisticated enough to hire a lawyer you have a social/moral duty to help me humor the retard so they feel like they got justice". It's the kind of thing you can only believe if your totally detached from the reality of what a hardship legal fees are for almost everyone who has to pay them.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but since Russ is suing Josh's LLC, I believe that Null is prohibited from representing it himself in court and is forced to hire a lawyer. I'm sure that the judge would be aware of that requirement.

I love how neither his brother nor his dad seem particularly aware of the eight years of horrendous abuse he claims to have been through. One phone call and a promise of 40 bucks and they were like hell yeah.

I doubt his father would try to say anything that might hurt Russ's case and may even soften the truth or fib a bit to help his son, but I could see the brother giving zero fucks and volunteering information that would further embarrass Russ even if Hardin wasn't digging for it. I don't think Greer expected Hardin to actually contact either of his "witnesses" and that's why he freaked out the way he did and actually came to the table so quickly to make it go away even if it completely tanked his case.
 
I doubt his father would try to say anything that might hurt Russ's case and may even soften the truth or fib a bit to help his son
It all depends on how Harden would have asked his questions and the questions asked. If Elder Greer doesn't tell the truth about something like Russ being a stalking, vexatious freak, then he can be impeached by shitlip's own legal papertrail etc.
 
I have no idea if it’s the done thing in law, but like during the America’s Got Talent lawsuit*, I sure hope Hardin will include every single one of Russ’s lies in this case in his next document, as well as the lies Russ has told in other lawsuits he’s been in. Just so all the evidence as to what a vexatious litigant Russ is is in one place, and to really hammer home to the judge what a track record Russ has in bringing nonsense lawsuits pro se (costing everyone else money but himself).

* The AGT lawyer didn’t list Russ’s lies, but his past legal history of stalking and harassing women. Every. Single. One. It was glorious to have it all in one document, with references to rely on and all.
 
One of many issues that Russ has is that he knows the ingredients that go into a lawsuit, but he doesn’t have the recipe. So he uses accurate phrases (Motion to quash) but uses them inappropriately. There were no grounds to quash Hardin’s subpoenas, but Russ knew that was a thing, and figured all he had to do was file it.

It’s been like this over and over. He thinks he has the legal dagger that will end things, but then is completely mistaken on how to apply it. What‘s hilarious is how confidently wrong he is, especially when he makes impotent threats.
 
What‘s hilarious is how confidently wrong he is, especially when he makes impotent threats.
He’s yet to advance to doing anything of note even when he actually has honest-to-goodness chances to do something even if it isn’t the totality of what he wants. He squanders every single opportunity - some of which I won’t mention because he could still use them.

But this is to be expected from one track wonder here; he can’t deviate from any plan he ever comes up with because he’s a retard.

He could have BPD pussy for free for life by now if he hadn’t wasted so much time and money on whores.
 
Screenshot_20241223_170952_Firefox.jpg
Screenshot_20241223_171133_Firefox.jpg
 

Attachments

The appellate court already reversed the summary judgement due to Pro Se stupidity. At this point dismissing due to pro se misconduct, bad faith and lies is the cleaner end with less possibility of reversal.
There wasn't a summary judgment, it was a dismissal under 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim.
 
There wasn't a summary judgment, it was a dismissal under 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim.
Which means that all the appellate court actually said is “contributory copyright infringement is a claim” and nothing else.

Which means that even they, assuming everything Russ said is 💯 true and honest, only revived that.
 
Back